|
Korean Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee

Joined: 25 May 2003
|
Posted: Sun Nov 04, 2007 6:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
TML1976"]
| Quote: |
| This is sad, anyone who disagrees with the war or the views held by people such as you or media outlets such as CNN and FOX is a leftist. |
well you are using left wing arguements . Also what is wrong with CNN or Fox if you are using comom dreams?
| Quote: |
| What does that mean anyways? |
It means that if you are going to use commondreams don't complain about someone using FoX
| Quote: |
| What an absolutely ridiculous way of arguing your point. It's like saying, oh you don't understand, or get what we are saying so you must be a woman, or homosexual, or... a leftist. Get out of this black and white box which you live in and try to gain some wisdom instead amassing factual knowledge. metaphorically speaking, you are no different than a donkey with the weight of books on it. The donkey doesn't understand what the books are saying, its just carrying them, so it still is a donkey. You are the same, you carry all these fact around and parade them on this forum so proudly, but it doesn't change the fact that you are still a donkey, cause you don't get them. |
And you are the expert. the fact is that Iran has been after the US for years.
and I don't know why you bring up sexual orientation ? but for the record Iran hangs homosexual teenagers
But for the record I have facts which is more than you have.
| Quote: |
| And for your infomation my views are based on 6 years of undergraduate and graduate work on Iran, specially Iran after the 1908 constitutional revolution. So trust me I'm not a leftist, neo-con, or homosexual. What I am is an educated person who has the ability to receive information from a variety of sources and digest them independent of any emotional or personal biase that I may have about the subject being discussed. I don't believe in something just because my fore fathers, leaders or countrymen believe in it. |
You still haven't said anything worthwhile.
If it is ok to use commondreams then it is ok to use Fox.
That is why there are certain things I agree with about Iran, US or whatever else we are talking about and certain things that I don't.
| Quote: |
| anyway, Octavius Hite I'm sorry for high jacking this topic, I promise I'll leave it alone now. But its obvious from his posts that Joo has not watched the video, otherwise he would stop trying to argue the point that the Iranians have not made offers of appeasement to the Americans. |
offers of appeasement to the US.
The fact is that Iran turned down the US several times. That is true. Is it not?
The fact is that Iran promised to lift the death sentance on Rushdie. They never have. Why ought the US believe Iran?
As I said U are a left winger. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
thiophene
Joined: 15 Sep 2007
|
Posted: Sun Nov 04, 2007 9:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee wrote: |
and I don't know why you bring up sexual orientation ? but for the record Iran hangs homosexual teenagers
|
And Iran supports sex changes. How advanced for such an oppresive country eh? The US tortures teenagers, throws away their rights, for being at the wrong place at the wrong time. brava. Many are laughin at ya...good ol USa. I stand and applaud your nobleness. I hope one day I can be as kind and virtuous as a yankee.
http://web.amnesty.org/library/index/engamr511842005 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
thiophene
Joined: 15 Sep 2007
|
Posted: Sun Nov 04, 2007 9:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee wrote: |
The fact is that Iran promised to lift the death sentance on Rushdie. They never have. Why ought the US believe Iran? |
Oh noes, the holy Rushdie is in danger, every iranian must pay. Silly persians, good people don't lie, unless you were lucky enough to be born on the good ol usa.
The fact is the US is pissed at Iran for having a backbone and will not stop untill they get a little puppy into power to control the oil markets. They make excuses about women wearing chadors, gasp, and BS about iranians wanting to take away human freedom, it's a sin don't ya know, and sadly too many people with power are busy scratchign their asses or stuffing their faces or scratching their asses while stuffing their faces. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
TML1976

Joined: 10 Jul 2005 Location: South Korea
|
Posted: Sun Nov 04, 2007 1:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Sexual orientation???? Dude you are off the charts. It was an example to highlight the stupidity of your arguments. You're like a parrot, you keep on repeating the same information over and over again and then go around claiming that you know what you're talking about.
and about Rushdie, i mean seriously who cares about the guy. I certainly don't. The entire fatwa was to scare him anyway. Do you seriously think the if the Islamic government of Iran really wanted this guy dead, they would have waited this long?
Moreover, if being leftist means that I am not part of the group of people that you come from, you know the ignorant, arrogant and galactically stupid, then yes I am a leftist.
I'm curious, since you believe in your views so much, why aren't you in Iraq fighting the evil terrorist and preparing yourself for the eventual "liberation" of Iran? Or are you just like this when you are sitting behind the computer? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee

Joined: 25 May 2003
|
Posted: Sun Nov 04, 2007 4:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
[TML1976"]
| Quote: |
| Sexual orientation???? Dude you are off the charts. It was an example to highlight the stupidity of your arguments. You're like a parrot, you keep on repeating the same information over and over again and then go around claiming that you know what you're talking about. |
Fact is you have no answer. You have no facts.
| Quote: |
| and about Rushdie, i mean seriously who cares about the guy. I certainly don't. The entire fatwa was to scare him anyway. Do you seriously think the if the Islamic government of Iran really wanted this guy dead, they would have waited this long? |
who knows the fact is the did not keep their agreement. No reason to trust Iran.
| Quote: |
| Moreover, if being leftist means that I am not part of the group of people that you come from, you know the ignorant, arrogant and galactically stupid, then yes I am a leftist. |
You are ignorant and stupid . and you are a leftist. You just don't like someone putting up facts that you don't have an answer for.
and you are a moonbat and an apologist for the Iran's regime.
]
Last edited by Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee on Sun Nov 04, 2007 4:45 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee

Joined: 25 May 2003
|
Posted: Sun Nov 04, 2007 4:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
="thiophene"]
| Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee wrote: |
| Quote: |
| The fact is that Iran promised to lift the death sentance on Rushdie. They never have. Why ought the US believe Iran? |
Oh noes, the holy Rushdie is in danger, every iranian must pay. Silly persians, good people don't lie, unless you were lucky enough to be born on the good ol usa. |
No but it shows that there is not much reason to trust. Iran.
You luv strawman arguments
| Quote: |
| The fact is the US is pissed at Iran for having a backbone |
Moonbat.
The US is pissed about Iran cause Iran has been after the US for 25 years.
and you are an apologist for the Iranian regime.
| Quote: |
| and will not stop untill they get a little puppy into power to control the oil markets |
.
Moonbat.
| Quote: |
| They make excuses about women wearing chadors, gasp, and BS about iranians wanting to take away human freedom, it's a sin don't ya know, and sadly too many people with power are busy scratchign their asses or stuffing their faces or scratching their asses while stuffing their faces. |
No Iran ought to just give up their war.
and you are an apologists for Iran but then you will side w/ anyone is against the US you fake peace activist. Your are only against war by the US. War against the US is ok in your book. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee

Joined: 25 May 2003
|
Posted: Sun Nov 04, 2007 4:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| thiophene wrote: |
| Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee wrote: |
and I don't know why you bring up sexual orientation ? but for the record Iran hangs homosexual teenagers
|
And Iran supports sex changes. How advanced for such an oppresive country eh? The US tortures teenagers, throws away their rights, for being at the wrong place at the wrong time. brava. Many are laughin at ya...good ol USa. I stand and applaud your nobleness. I hope one day I can be as kind and virtuous as a yankee.
http://web.amnesty.org/library/index/engamr511842005 |
Wrong place at wrong time. What is a guy from the mideast doing in Afghanistan fighting for the Taliban. You are an apologist for anyone who is against the US.
futhermore Gitmo is probably better than most mideast prisons.
The US justice system can not handle Al Qaeda.
and you are an apologist for the Iranian regime. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Pluto
Joined: 19 Dec 2006
|
Posted: Sun Nov 04, 2007 8:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
Sexual orientation???? Dude you are off the charts. It was an example to highlight the stupidity of your arguments. You're like a parrot, you keep on repeating the same information over and over again and then go around claiming that you know what you're talking about.
|
You brought sexual orientation up first man.
| Quote: |
What an absolutely ridiculous way of arguing your point. It's like saying, oh you don't understand, or get what we are saying so you must be a woman, or homosexual, or... a leftist.
So trust me I'm not a leftist, neo-con, or homosexual. |
| Quote: |
and about Rushdie, i mean seriously who cares about the guy. I certainly don't. The entire fatwa was to scare him anyway. Do you seriously think the if the Islamic government of Iran really wanted this guy dead, they would have waited this long?
|
This was the guy who was knighted, right? He wrote some things that were considered anti-Islamic. So why did Iran want to scare him with pain of death? To keep him from writing? As for Iran waiting this long to kill Rushdie, it begs the question; Can Iran's influence reach the United Kingdom? - Doubtfully.
Also, do you agree with Iran using pain of death to promote its Islamic political goals?
| Quote: |
Moreover, if being leftist means that I am not part of the group of people that you come from, you know the ignorant, arrogant and galactically stupid, then yes I am a leftist.
|
Ignorant?
I read the paper everyday; two of them actually. The New York Times and the Chicago Tribune. I also watch CNN and MSNBC. Never have really watched Fox that much though. I also like to read the Wall Street Journal and watch CNBC. Anyways, I'd like to think of myself as well-informed though I certainly don't know everthing.
Arrogant? You mean like this:
| Quote: |
And for your infomation my views are based on 6 years of undergraduate and graduate work on Iran, specially Iran after the 1908 constitutional revolution. So trust me I'm not a leftist, neo-con, or homosexual. What I am is an educated person who has the ability to receive information from a variety of sources and digest them independent of any emotional or personal biase that I may have about the subject being discussed. I don't believe in something just because my fore fathers, leaders or countrymen believe in it.
|
Oh right, sorry I must bow to the 'enlightened' Iran expert. Sorry, I won't challenge your arrogance, err... I mean 'enlightened' thought again.
galactically stupid?
Hmmm.. It's been a while since I've taken my astronomy class in university. I believe though that the Earth, third planet from the sun, as apart of the Soalr System is in the Orion Arm of the Milky Way. I might be wrong about that so correct me if I'm wrong.
| Quote: |
I'm curious, since you believe in your views so much, why aren't you in Iraq fighting the evil terrorist and preparing yourself for the eventual "liberation" of Iran? Or are you just like this when you are sitting behind the computer?
|
Iraq? Been there, done that. Also my dad's neighbor died over there and I've known another to give the ultimate sacrifice. I do wish some of you would be more respectful but there are people here that have got no respect for the US. So yeah, flame away man.
As for myself, I support the troops and I support their mission.
Then again, what do I know? You're the 'enlightned' one. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mcgeezer

Joined: 17 Apr 2007
|
Posted: Sun Nov 04, 2007 9:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I want to address a few points made by others...
You first Joo
-You and i have argued about Iran for some time now....You often come back to your statement about "Iran ought to give up their war"....
For the past 3 years I've heard nothing from the U.S. government (which i consider distinctly different from U.S. general population) but threats of war, imposed sanctions, and belittlement towards Iran.
At the same time, the Iranaian leadership has called for more roundtable negotiations and a gerneral thaw in relations...Having said that, waking up every morning to news headlines reading "target Iran" or "Will Iran be next?" is nothing more than a U.S. propoganda war to sway the public behind a justified attack on Iran....That's what this administration is doing is pointing all ten of its fingers at Iran (nuclear program, WMD'S in iraq, human rights violations etcc..) to convince the public that a war against iran is justified and necessary...The U.S. should try to give up their war!
Next, about Rushdie...Joo have you ever read the Satanic Verses? Do you know what it's about? For those of you who don't know, Rushdie wrote a book which portrayed the prophet Mohammed (depending on who you ask) as a womanizer, a theif, and even a homosexual....
Do you have any idea how degrating that is for muslims? Say if this type of literture had have been wirtten about jesus christ or moses or someone else, don't you think MAYBE someone would be a little ticked off? What Khomeini tried to do was take the lead for the muslim population in denouncing such a dispicable book....AND, if you knew anything about Islamic Sharia tradition and fatwa's you would understand that a fatwa is cancelled when the issuer dies...hence, it's done with!
I don't want to insult you Joo because i respect the fact that you do try to make a point and have 'evidence' to back it up....
however i have some suggested sources which are really interesting and i think you should look at to maybe 'rationalize' your arguments a tad:
Ray McGovern-30 year CIA operative who is outspoken about the U.S. adminstrations new policies of telling the intelligence community what to find them, instead of the proper visa-vera approach eg. (find out WMD's in Iraq)
Scott Ritter-former head u.n. inspector in Iraq and author of the book "Target Iran"...he draws many similarities between the false eveidence in Iraq and the parallel rhetoric and false info about iran....
Robert Fisk-30 year middle-east correspondent and 7 time journalist of the year winner.....he's lived in beirut now for the past 30 years and wirtes about "ACTUAL" events which have been covered up or ignored by the American media complex since the 1967 war....very interesting and often disturbing stuff...
These aren't crazy people who have dog crap evidence to display a desired argument...these guys ahve been in the field, seen what's gone on, and are fed up with the crap that is being fed to the public and being taken seriously by people like yourself! Just read some of their stuff, and i guarantee you will at least moderate your thinking a tad.... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee

Joined: 25 May 2003
|
Posted: Sun Nov 04, 2007 11:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
mcgeezer"]I want to address a few points made by others...
You first Joo
| Quote: |
-You and i have argued about Iran for some time now....You often come back to your statement about "Iran ought to give up their war"....
For the past 3 years I've heard nothing from the U.S. government (which i consider distinctly different from U.S. general population) but threats of war, imposed sanctions, and belittlement towards Iran. |
Ok. Bush is stupid for talking so much , Then again Iran has been doing stuff for a while.
| Quote: |
| At the same time, the Iranaian leadership has called for more roundtable negotiations and a gerneral thaw in relations...Having said that, waking up every morning to news headlines reading "target Iran" or "Will Iran be next?" is nothing more than a U.S. propoganda war to sway the public behind a justified attack on Iran....That's what this administration is doing is pointing all ten of its fingers at Iran (nuclear program, WMD'S in iraq, human rights violations etcc..) to convince the public that a war against iran is justified and necessary...The U.S. should try to give up their war! |
I am all in favor of talks.
Iran has turned down the US for while.
Also Iran has been targeting the US and with more than words they have been targeting US forces in other nations for a while.
The US has not engaged in a war against Iran , Iran has engaged in a war against the US. I don't see the US killing Iranian soldiers.
| Quote: |
Next, about Rushdie...Joo have you ever read the Satanic Verses? Do you know what it's about? For those of you who don't know, Rushdie wrote a book which portrayed the prophet Mohammed (depending on who you ask) as a womanizer, a theif, and even a homosexual....
Do you have any idea how degrating that is for muslims? Say if this type of literture had have been wirtten about jesus christ or moses or someone else, don't you think MAYBE someone would be a little ticked off? What Khomeini tried to do was take the lead for the muslim population in denouncing such a dispicable book....AND, if you knew anything about Islamic Sharia tradition and fatwa's you would understand that a fatwa is cancelled when the issuer dies...hence, it's done with! |
Rushdie has aplogized and Iran has not only targeted Rushdes but also the translators.
| Quote: |
I don't want to insult you Joo because i respect the fact that you do try to make a point and have 'evidence' to back it up....
however i have some suggested sources which are really interesting and i think you should look at to maybe 'rationalize' your arguments a tad: |
I am all in favor of talking to Iran . I think you understand my point too.
| Quote: |
| Ray McGovern-30 year CIA operative who is outspoken about the U.S. adminstrations new policies of telling the intelligence community what to find them, instead of the proper visa-vera approach eg. (find out WMD's in Iraq) |
| Quote: |
| Scott Ritter-former head u.n. inspector in Iraq and author of the book "Target Iran"...he draws many similarities between the false eveidence in Iraq and the parallel rhetoric and false info about iran.... |
| Quote: |
| Robert Fisk-30 year middle-east correspondent and 7 time journalist of the year winner.....he's lived in beirut now for the past 30 years and wirtes about "ACTUAL" events which have been covered up or ignored by the American media complex since the 1967 war....very interesting and often disturbing stuff... |
Two of them are off the left. I think the US ought to listen to alot of opinions but that means not only on the left.
| Quote: |
| These aren't crazy people who have dog crap evidence to display a desired argument...these guys ahve been in the field, seen what's gone on, and are fed up with the crap that is being fed to the public and being taken seriously by people like yourself! Just read some of their stuff, and i guarantee you will at least moderate your thinking a tad.... |
Two of the them are left wingers. I think everyone ought to be heard that being said their opinions aren't special
I am all in favor of talking , other the other hand the US ought to prepare for the worst with Iran.
Iran has been at the US for a long time and it is a serious problem. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Gopher

Joined: 04 Jun 2005
|
Posted: Mon Nov 05, 2007 12:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
| thiophene wrote: |
| The US tortures teenagers... |
You offer your link as an Amnesty International link. But it does not talk like an Amnesty International link.
Just one example that leaps off the page...
| Quote: |
| Lieutenant Corporal Johnson, a spokesperson for the US military... |
Never heard of "Lieutenant Corporals" -- not in any armed forces; not in any nation-state, past or present.
Further, Amnesty International does not tend to cite "spokespeople for the US military." AI typically makes very specific cites -- by Pentagon office or specific service, etc.
Be careful with the information you toss around, then. As it is, you only confirm my impression that leftists are simply careless with their information. As long as it supports the antiAmerican allegations they wish to make, they take it at face-value.
Either you -- or worse: Amnesty International, and I truly hope the report you cite comes from a bogus source -- are way off your game here. But even hands are the first casualty in extremist politics. So I imagine we ought not be too surprised by such sloppiness. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
thiophene
Joined: 15 Sep 2007
|
Posted: Mon Nov 05, 2007 7:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Gopher wrote: |
Either you -- or worse: Amnesty International, and I truly hope the report you cite comes from a bogus source -- are way off your game here. But even hands are the first casualty in extremist politics. So I imagine we ought not be too surprised by such sloppiness. |
I didn't read your whole report but I may agree with the sloppiness. My main point was that Khadr, a teenager when arrested, is not treated as a human being, and the US tortures, this I am certain about, and is documented everywhere. Whether the cite I posted (a site which I didn't read fully) is 100% accurate isn't/wasn't of any relevance to my point (I too would hope it's not 100% accurate but doesn't mean Gitmo is Club Med either). Just the first cite I saw with his name and the fact that he was being held at Guantanamo and was 15 when detained. But I'm "debating" with Joo here, integrity isn't my main focus. Other logical people, I hope I'm not being taken too seriously. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee

Joined: 25 May 2003
|
Posted: Mon Nov 05, 2007 5:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The Guantanamo Thirteen
Packing on the pounds at America's toughest prison.
By Manny Howard
Posted Thursday, May 29, 2003, at 2:52 PM ET
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Is America the only country in the world that could run a prison camp where prisoners gain weight? Between April 2002 and March 2003, the Joint Task Force returned to Afghanistan 19 of the approximately 664 men (from 42 countries) who have been held in the detention camps at the U.S. Naval Base in Guantanamo Bay. Upon leaving, it has been reported, each man received two parting gifts: a brand new copy of the Koran as well as a new pair of jeans. Not the act of generosity that it might first appear, the jeans, at least, turned out to be a necessity. During their stay (14-months on average), the detainees (nearly all of them) had gained an average of 13 pounds.
In America, where 13 pounds is what many of our citizens' chins weigh, the prisoners' slightly enlarged girth might seem negligible. But given the low-bit-resolution video footage we have seen of stooped and shackled men in orange jumpsuits, and the collective protests from international human rights groups, the revelation that the men detained from last year's war would leave the Guantanamo prison camps sporting a larger pair of trousers than the ones they showed up with comes as something of a surprise. So I called one of the prison camps at Guantanamo (also known at GTMO, pronounced GIT-mo) to inquire, and was put in touch with Chief Warrant Officer (CW4) James Kluck. (The official voice of GTMO was clearly quite happy to tell the story of weight gain among the detainees�it's evidence, perhaps, that the prisoners' treatment can't have been so bad if they managed to put on a few pounds.) CW4 Kluck, 55, a reservist, is in charge of feeding the detainees as well as the 1,780 soldiers at GTMO, and he arrived there perversely well-prepared for his work. In civilian life he ran the food and beverage program at the University of Michigan.
Though Kluck calls his crew of 46 "cooks," none of the meals are actually cooked on the base, just reheated. The food is delivered on a barge by a subcontractor, Atlantic Coast Contracting, Inc., which doesn't cook it either. Atlantic ferries the food from Jacksonville, Fla., where it is bought from SYSCO, a heavy-hitting supplier to institutions like prisons and universities (including the University of Michigan). SYSCO does cook the food, and the meals are certified halal�adhering to Islamic law�at SYSCO's plant; that paperwork is later double-checked by GTMO's Muslim chaplain.
Kluck's cooks only have what he calls "visual contact" with the medium-security detainees, who live communally in four barracks and are served in groups of as many as 10. They merely plate the food and the Military Police serve it. The cooks don't have any contact at all with the high-security-risk detainees. These men are fed alone in their cells and the food�two hot meals a day, at breakfast and dinner, rather than the three given to the other prisoners�is delivered by a pair of MPs. Lunch on the high-security wing is a soldier's combat ration, otherwise known as MRE (Meals-Ready-to-Eat). Kluck's crew unwraps the rations, removing the plastic wrap from the multigrain fruit bars, as well as from the plastic sporks. "Apparently the prisoners can cause all kinds of damage, stuffing the wrappers into locks and that sort of mischief," says Kluck.
So what exactly does the reheated food consist of? The detainees eat a relatively spartan menu that revolves around Asian-accented stews of beef, chicken, and fish. And, Kluck insists, "The detainees eat the same food as the troops, except that the troops' menu is on a 5-week rotation, and the detainees' menu rotates every two weeks. The JTF [Joint Task Force] gets more variety." When Kluck says everybody eats the same food he means�not to put too fine a point on it�that everything the detainees eat is available at the buffet at the soldiers' canteen. The reverse is not true. Though the diets devised for both the JTF and the detainees were approved by GTMO's resident nutritionist, the JTF 5-week menu also includes institutional dining terrors like Chicken Cordon Bleu and Turkey a la King, never mind fried chicken. (It hardly seems surprising that the troops are also struggling with their weight.)
In addition to the stews and multigrain fruit bars, Kluck also serves both groups of detainees a host of legumes: black beans, lentils, kidney beans, and chickpeas. None of this food sounds overly fattening. The cooks do serve carbohydrates�mainly rice�at lunch and dinner, and the New York Times reported that detainees had developed "a fondness for bagels." (I ran the veracity of this reporting by Kluck, who replied: "Not that I can see. They don't seem to like bagels more than the pita bread, baguettes or sliced wheat bread we also serve.") Kluck says that medium-security detainees are provided "additional servings," if they request them, and he adds that an incentive program that encourages good behavior revolves around the dispensing of cakes and dates and other treats. But it's unlikely that carbohydrates by themselves (even the occasional heapin' helpin') can account for all the weight.
Human rights critics insist there's another explanation. "Life as a Talib conscript was probably hell," explains John Sifton, an attorney who works in Afghanistan for Human Rights Watch, an international human rights organization. "Those guys showed up [at GTMO] half-starved, some of them probably hadn't had a proper hot meal since the war began. It wouldn't be hard to put on weight."
Lisa Dorfman, a nutritionist who has counseled inmates in federal prisons in and around Dade County, Fla., says that in prison, food isn't just about calories; it takes on a special significance. "When you are incarcerated, food becomes one of the few sources of social pleasure available to you. Meals are an opportunity to communicate with other people. Not insignificantly, it also becomes an outlet, like sex," she says.
Dorfman explains that overeating, hoarding, and what she calls Night Eating Syndrome are a real problem and a significant cause of dramatic weight gain among prisoners she has counseled. "We found that most inmates gain an enormous amount of weight when they first arrive in an institution. They tend to be depressed, lonely, and stressed out and alienated from loved ones," says Dorfman. "It's kind of like being in college your first semester."
I ask CW4 Kluck if, based on his professional experience in civilian life at the University of Michigan, he had expected the detainees to gain weight immediately after their arrival at GTMO. He laughs at first, "Oh, yes: the Freshman Fifteen," but then resumes his strictly business manner. "I'm not sure whether there were any expectations with these guys."
Manny Howard is a writer living in Brooklyn, N.Y.
Article URL: http://www.slate.com/id/2083612/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Gopher

Joined: 04 Jun 2005
|
Posted: Mon Nov 05, 2007 5:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| thiophene wrote: |
| ...but [that] doesn't mean Gitmo is Club Med either. |
You do recognize more positions than either I agree with you or I must be suggesting that the place is like Club Med, right? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bacasper

Joined: 26 Mar 2007
|
Posted: Mon Nov 05, 2007 5:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Pluto wrote: |
| I read the paper everyday; two of them actually. The New York Times and the Chicago Tribune. I also watch CNN and MSNBC. Never have really watched Fox that much though. I also like to read the Wall Street Journal and watch CNBC. Anyways, I'd like to think of myself as well-informed though I certainly don't know everthing... |
You call that well-informed? US intelligence has actually bragged about having plants in all the major news outlets for propaganda stories as needed. All the media you mention are owned by the same corporations in whose interest is the maintenance of the status quo. How can you hope they would be objective?
Want real news, or at least to get a perspective? Listen to or watch www.democracynow.org or www.wbai.org or any of its other four sister Pacifica stations. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|