| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee
Joined: 25 May 2003
|
 Posted: Sun Nov 04, 2007 7:26 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
| Big_Bird wrote: |
This thread is cool.  |
U would know |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Big_Bird
Joined: 31 Jan 2003
Location: Sometimes here sometimes there...
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 04, 2007 7:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee wrote: |
| Big_Bird wrote: |
| This thread is cool. |
U would know |
Ah Joo. My days in the asylum are long behind me. I'm on the proper medication now.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
loose_ends
Joined: 23 Jul 2007
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 04, 2007 7:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
[quote="Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee"]
| loose_ends wrote: |
| Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee wrote: |
| loose_ends wrote: |
| Quote: |
| what is with the rods from god video? have you not fully woken up from one of your homoerotic dreams? |
from another post. but it deploying it is the correct response for Iran's nuclear program.
| Quote: |
| you certainly are taken one for the boss. you know you don't fit into their equation right? still working on good faith right? |
Look at the video it is not 40 stories below. |
http://au.youtube.com/watch?v=eUTWqCotsTo (54 second march)
http://au.youtube.com/watch?v=y8g_FECab9o (near the end)
the above are pre-collapse flashes. joo that means the building ISN"T falling yet. |
But the pressure is increasing cause of the weakening steel due to the fire. |
your circular logic is going to make me puke.
again....potential energy-->kinetic energy when collapse initiated. not before. not affecting a bolt 40 floors down. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee
Joined: 25 May 2003
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 04, 2007 7:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It wasn't 40 floors down.
The plane hit.
The fires weakened the steel
There was less support
The pressure increased.
Bolts snapped.
If you are going to puke please swallow it this time because you have been getting all over the boards |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
loose_ends
Joined: 23 Jul 2007
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 04, 2007 8:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee wrote: |
It wasn't 40 floors down.
The plane hit.
The fires weakened the steel
There was less support
The pressure increased.
Bolts snapped.
If you are going to puke please swallow it this time because you have been getting all over the boards |
bush science at its best
you don't deserve my puke on you. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee
Joined: 25 May 2003
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 04, 2007 11:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Well the fire men talk of bolts breaking.
I tell you what just keep the puke to yourself. we will call it even. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
blaseblasphemener
Joined: 01 Jun 2006
Location: There's a voice, keeps on calling me, down the road, that's where I'll always be
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 05, 2007 12:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee wrote: |
It wasn't 40 floors down.
The plane hit.
The fires weakened the steel
There was less support
The pressure increased.
Bolts snapped.
If you are going to puke please swallow it this time because you have been getting all over the boards |
You make it sound so simple.
Here's something maybe you could explain to me Joo.
If bolts were failing, why didn't the building slowly give way? Why didn't we see partial collapses? Why was the whole thing so darn uniform and perfect? Your theory is built on a premise that the building fell uniformly and with top to bottom consistency. How can this be? A plane hit the building in anything but a uniform way. The resulting fire did not burn uniformly, nor did it displace uniformly. Nothing was uniform, except for the collapse. How can this be? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee
Joined: 25 May 2003
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 05, 2007 3:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
| blaseblasphemener wrote: |
| Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee wrote: |
It wasn't 40 floors down.
The plane hit.
The fires weakened the steel
There was less support
The pressure increased.
Bolts snapped.
If you are going to puke please swallow it this time because you have been getting all over the boards |
You make it sound so simple.
Here's something maybe you could explain to me Joo.
If bolts were failing, why didn't the building slowly give way? Why didn't we see partial collapses? Why was the whole thing so darn uniform and perfect? Your theory is built on a premise that the building fell uniformly and with top to bottom consistency. How can this be? A plane hit the building in anything but a uniform way. The resulting fire did not burn uniformly, nor did it displace uniformly. Nothing was uniform, except for the collapse. How can this be? |
| Quote: |
| The massive weight easily caused a "Pancaking" effect |
| Quote: |
Below we see the top of the south tower fall behind the perimeter columns at an angle. The top falls behind the perimeter columns and on the floors. (This happened at both buildings as this evidenced by these video screen shots of the north tower.) The angle at which it falls pushes the perimeter columns in front of the falling top section outward, giving them distance.
This also proves the building was falling apart and could never topple over as conspiracy theorists imply should have happened. |
http://www.debunking911.com/collapse.htm
Last edited by Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee on Mon Nov 05, 2007 3:12 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
blaseblasphemener
Joined: 01 Jun 2006
Location: There's a voice, keeps on calling me, down the road, that's where I'll always be
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 05, 2007 3:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee wrote: |
| blaseblasphemener wrote: |
| Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee wrote: |
It wasn't 40 floors down.
The plane hit.
The fires weakened the steel
There was less support
The pressure increased.
Bolts snapped.
If you are going to puke please swallow it this time because you have been getting all over the boards |
You make it sound so simple.
Here's something maybe you could explain to me Joo.
If bolts were failing, why didn't the building slowly give way? Why didn't we see partial collapses? Why was the whole thing so darn uniform and perfect? Your theory is built on a premise that the building fell uniformly and with top to bottom consistency. How can this be? A plane hit the building in anything but a uniform way. The resulting fire did not burn uniformly, nor did it displace uniformly. Nothing was uniform, except for the collapse. How can this be? |
http://www.debunking911.com/collapse.htm |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee
Joined: 25 May 2003
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 05, 2007 3:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| The massive weight easily caused a "Pancaking" effect |
| Quote: |
| Below we see the top of the south tower fall behind the perimeter columns at an angle. The top falls behind the perimeter columns and on the floors. (This happened at both buildings as this evidenced by these video screen shots of the north tower.) The angle at which it falls pushes the perimeter columns in front of the falling top section outward, giving them distance. |
| Quote: |
| This also proves the building was falling apart and could never topple over as conspiracy theorists imply should have happened. |
http://www.debunking911.com/collapse.htm |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee
Joined: 25 May 2003
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 05, 2007 3:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| The last piece of evidence is the standing perimeter columns. You can see what's left of the steel plates which hold the floors up. The tremendous weight stripped them off as the floors were on their way down |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
loose_ends
Joined: 23 Jul 2007
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 05, 2007 3:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee wrote: |
| Quote: |
| The last piece of evidence is the standing perimeter columns. You can see what's left of the steel plates which hold the floors up. The tremendous weight stripped them off as the floors were on their way down |
|
pancake theory. nice joo.
what the authors of debunking 9/11 fail to discuss, is that the remaining perimeter columns were blown to pieces and up to 500 feet outside of the footprint. Lateral high speed ejections with a sudden onset. it can all be seen in photos and video.
what the authors of debunking 9/11 fail to discuss, is that there were no pancakes. all concrete was pulverized as can be seen in the huge dust clouds. this can be seen in the video. no macroscopic concrete remained.
what the authors of debunking 9/11 fail to discuss is the core column. you know, the other thing the floors were attached to. 47 thick steel columns served as the center support. Totally destroyed into the basement. That destruction does not agree with the 'pancake theory'. that is why NIST did a second report. NIST labeled anything after collapse, 'global collapse' and did not explain further. read the NIST report. that is the 'official' story for collapse. not pancaking as suggested by FEMA. it has been rejected.
pancaking did not occur joo. do you even know who writes debunking 9/11?
turds like you buddy boy. do some research. atleast post things from scientific journals. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
TheUrbanMyth
Joined: 28 Jan 2003
Location: Retired
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 05, 2007 4:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee wrote: |
It
If you are going to puke please swallow it this time because you have been getting all over the boards |
Ahhaaaa!!!!
And Mr Rhhee slips in an excellent burn there...well done sir and never more truly put. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Julius
Joined: 27 Jul 2006
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 05, 2007 4:02 am Post subject: Re: Demolition Flashes |
|
|
| loose_ends wrote: |
| open your eyes |
and get blinded by the flashes? no thanks 
seriously, those flashes are easily explainable by electrical faults/ short circuits etc. The building was under immense stress at the time. You get the same flash when a lightbulb blows. maybe thats what it was. The voltage blew all the electrics out.
Last edited by Julius on Mon Nov 05, 2007 6:16 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
blaseblasphemener
Joined: 01 Jun 2006
Location: There's a voice, keeps on calling me, down the road, that's where I'll always be
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
