View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee

Joined: 25 May 2003
|
Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2007 5:00 pm Post subject: U.S. stages 1st dual-missile intercept test in space |
|
|
U.S. stages 1st dual-missile intercept test in space
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. military destroyed a simulated salvo of two short-range ballistic missiles more than 100 miles over the Pacific Tuesday night in the first such simultaneous test in space.
The event marked the 10th and 11th successful ballistic missile intercepts for Lockheed Martin Corp's sea-based Aegis system in 13 attempts, the Pentagon's Missile Defense Agency, or MDA, said.
"We consider it a simultaneous engagement," said Richard Lehner, an agency spokesman, on Wednesday. "That means both targets were in flight at the same time even though they were not intercepted at precisely the same moment."
The Aegis system tested is part of a fledgling, multibillion-dollar U.S. shield designed to thwart missiles tipped with deadly warheads that could be fired by potential foes like North Korea and Iran.
MDA said the test marked the 32nd and 33rd successful "hit to kill" intercepts since 2001, but it did not specify out of how many attempts. Hit to kill means the targets are destroyed by collision.
Lehner described the drill as "very operationally realistic," partly because a foe probably would attack with more than one missile, he said.
In addition, the crew of the Aegis-equipped guided missile cruiser Lake Erie did not know when the targets were going to be launched, though they were on alert as they would have been amid heightened tensions, Lehner said.
Two Standard Missile-3 interceptors built by Raytheon Co were fired from the Lake Erie, which was off the coast of Kauai, Hawaii. The single-stage target missiles -- with warheads that did not separate from their booster rockets -- were fired within moments of each other from a missile range on Kauai.
"With two targets engaged simultaneously, both the system and the crew are under additional stress and today they performed flawlessly," Orlando Carvalho, general manager of Lockheed Martin's related business line, said in a company release.
Earlier Tuesday, U.S. House and Senate negotiators approved $8.7 billion for missile defense programs, shaving $185 million from President Bush's request for fiscal 2008, which began October 1. Lawmakers added $75 million for the Aegis program.
Many experts remain skeptical about U.S. prospects in more complex scenarios, for instance involving long-range missiles, separating warheads and decoys.
The anti-missile shield's backbone, managed by Boeing Co and known as the ground-based mid-course defense, has made intercepts in about half of its 13 or so tries, "all under highly scripted circumstances," said Victoria Samson, an expert at the private Center for Defense Information.
The Japanese guided missile destroyer Kongo, newly equipped with the Aegis ballistic missile defense system, used the test as a training exercise in preparation for the first ballistic missile intercept test by a Japanese ship, due by the end of next month, MDA said.
(Reporting by Jim Wolf, Editing by Gerald E. McCormick)
� Reuters2007All rights reserved
http://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idUSN0750720320071107?sp=true |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mcgeezer

Joined: 17 Apr 2007
|
Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2007 6:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
the U.S. wastes too much money on fancy weopns to kill people, istead they should be rebuilding impoverished neighbourhoods and setting up social welfare programs inside it's own borders...  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Ya-ta Boy
Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Location: Established in 1994
|
Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2007 7:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
You'll be singing a different tune when those sexually perverted Venusians and those warlike Martians come calling in their spaceships. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Dome Vans Guest
|
Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2007 7:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It's all a business. They need to invent a war every so often because they've got rockets and missiles that'll go out of date. Then they get to buy some more and give more money to companies owned by somebody in the higher echelons of government. Then once they've been used and blown everything up then Dick Cheney get's the contract for re-building everything.
Wait a while then repeat process. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee

Joined: 25 May 2003
|
Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2007 7:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
mcgeezer wrote: |
the U.S. wastes too much money on fancy weopns to kill people, istead they should be rebuilding impoverished neighbourhoods and setting up social welfare programs inside it's own borders...  |
As soon as the US doesn't have enemies trying to get it. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee

Joined: 25 May 2003
|
Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2007 7:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Dome Vans wrote: |
It's all a business. They need to invent a war every so often because they've got rockets and missiles that'll go out of date. Then they get to buy some more and give more money to companies owned by somebody in the higher echelons of government. Then once they've been used and blown everything up then Dick Cheney get's the contract for re-building everything.
Wait a while then repeat process. |
Someone who is not from the US is upset about the US having a defensive weapon.
Anyway being anti US is your hobby no one in the US ought to listen to you. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Mix1
Joined: 08 May 2007
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Dome Vans Guest
|
Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2007 9:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Would this have averted 9/11? Nope
Has anyone tried to launch missiles at America?
Does anyone have the capability to launch a missile that far?
Quote: |
that could be fired by potential foes like North Korea and Iran. |
Mmmm Yes! I think that you're more likely to be attacked by Godzilla than these two. Still he'd get blown to pieces so bonus. But probably a lot of upset japanese kids as a result.
Quote: |
partly because a foe probably would attack with more than one missile, he said. |
Unless it was ethiopia or somebody like that who can only afford the one missile. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee

Joined: 25 May 2003
|
Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2007 10:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
="Dome Vans"]
Quote: |
Would this have averted 9/11? Nope |
So what. Each security threat is different.
Quote: |
Has anyone tried to launch missiles at America?
Does anyone have the capability to launch a missile that far? |
Not yet. But waiting until they can would be too late.
Quote: |
that could be fired by potential foes like North Korea and Iran. |
Quote: |
Mmmm Yes! I think that you're more likely to be attacked by Godzilla than these two. Still he'd get blown to pieces so bonus. But probably a lot of upset japanese kids as a result. |
Who knows what Iran might do. Besides just allowing Iran or North Korea to be capable of destroying a US city is too much.
If just being able to hit the enemy back is enough then why are North Korea and Iran interested in long range missiles?
The fact is that a nation could hold the US hostage with a few nuclear missiles. Being able to destroy the enemy back would make up for the loss of a US city. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Dome Vans Guest
|
Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2007 10:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
The fact is that a nation could hold the US hostage with a few nuclear missiles. Being able to destroy the enemy back would make up for the loss of a US city. |
Joo, my point being that the US isn't being held hostage by a few missiles. It's being held hostage by it's governments paranoia of a terrorist threat. BUt it's the enemy within, if you will.
It likes to have these public displays of power and look what'll happen if you try and touch us but deep down it's not the main problem. Terrorists are a lot smarter than you think. Do you think we'll ever see another 9/11? No! Identify a new weakness and then strike. Wouldn't be surprised if we see a computer attack soon, that'd screw a lot up. Markets etc. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee

Joined: 25 May 2003
|
Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2007 11:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
[quote="Dome Vans"]
Quote: |
The fact is that a nation could hold the US hostage with a few nuclear missiles. Being able to destroy the enemy back would make up for the loss of a US city. |
Quote: |
Joo, my point being that the US isn't being held hostage by a few missiles. It's being held hostage by it's governments paranoia of a terrorist threat. BUt it's the enemy within, if you will. |
One 9-11 was enough. It not paranoia.
Quote: |
It likes to have these public displays of power and look what'll happen if you try and touch us but deep down it's not the main problem. Terrorists are a lot smarter than you think. Do you think we'll ever see another 9/11? No! Identify a new weakness and then strike. Wouldn't be surprised if we see a computer attack soon, that'd screw a lot up. Markets etc. |
Sure but terrorists can't do much if states they live in. go after them and there will be less of them if govts don't encourage them.
Mideast govts are all powerful within their own nations. They can get rid of the terrorists if they choose to. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
JMO

Joined: 18 Jul 2006 Location: Daegu
|
Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2007 11:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
What homo erotic name is attached to this particular project? Is this another Rods from the Gods or a different program? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
contrarian
Joined: 20 Jan 2007 Location: Nearly in NK
|
Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2007 1:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
Good for the US. This is specifically aimed at the CHinese and the Iranians. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Dome Vans Guest
|
Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2007 2:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
contrarian wrote: |
Good for the US. This is specifically aimed at the CHinese and the Iranians. |
China. What did they do? Forget to send you a christmas card. AH, I forgot regime change, no WMD's, no wait a sec, erm, Al Qaeda, ah no hold on, "terruwrists," Dang it. Do we need a reason, FIRE!
China against the US if it gets to that stage:
And yes, the US is the black cat. No missile defence is gonna stop that. And yes this is someone's avatar as well, I know. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
contrarian
Joined: 20 Jan 2007 Location: Nearly in NK
|
Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2007 2:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
Anything that threatens western hegemony is the enemy. Perhaps for the first time through technology an "empire" can maintain dominance beyond the old "decline and fall" idea. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|