|
Korean Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
bobinseoul
Joined: 24 Oct 2007 Location: Seoul
|
Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2007 12:35 am Post subject: new laws in korea , READ |
|
|
Workers in English education are worried that a new set of rules for work visas to be introduced in December will lead to a teacher shortage.
All new working visa applicants will have to supply criminal record checks and health checks, including drugs tests, in addition to existing requirements. E-2 candidates will also have to be interviewed at their nearest consulate. People on F-series visas are expected to be unaffected.
Kim Soo-nam, deputy director of Seoul`s immigration office, told The Korea Herald he expected an announcement would be made within the week. "We expect the regulations to come into effect one month later, namely in mid-December," he said, stressing that exact details were not yet finalized.
Kim said he expected the new system to be inexpensive. "All the new documents they will have to present will be issued by their own governments. We don`t expect that the expense will be that high."
On the face of it, the policy is reasonable. After all, fake degrees are a major concern in Korea, and criminal checks on those working with children are a common practice in the West.
The worry is that implementation is coming too soon after the announcement. The process is sure to take more time, causing a temporary teacher crunch while extra documentation is collected.
Kim said there had been no earlier announcement because they "needed time to consider possible pitfalls and problems that could arise.
"We usually try to have a one-month period for careful examination of the guidelines," he said.
The ministry seems to be somewhat sensitive to initial concerns. The one-month notice period is more than the initial press release had implied.
But it may not be enough. According to the U.S.`s FBI website, a countrywide criminal record check for that country takes about four months. And that`s before you apply for the visa.
"In my opinion, basically I agree with the new laws," says Kevin Choi, the director of English Harvard, a hagwon in Seoul. But there are a few problems.
"Right now it`s very difficult to hire teachers. It takes too long," he says. "It will take even longer in the future."
"I think after December it will take four to five months to hire teachers."
That`s a long time in an industry with a high turnover of staff. It is not always hagwon`s fault that teachers embark on "midnight runs," in which instructors flee the country without warning. But it is directors and co-teachers who cover the lessons, and have to bear the brunt of irresponsible employees.
There are concerns such pressures will push hagwon into hiring teachers illegally - on tourist visas, for example.
To counter this, the Ministry of Justice has said they will introduce tougher penalties on anyone breaking immigration rules.
They have to catch them first, which might be easier said than done. It is common knowledge that illegal teaching in various forms is rife in Korea.
But Kim says they will work hard to make sure the law is not broken. "We will cooperate with all relevant organizations to crack down on those offenders," he asserted.
They have also suggested it will be easier for teachers already working here to get new visas. These teachers will require checks in due course, when they need to renew their visas.
There might be beneficial side-effects: Good teachers would be better able to find good schools - and leave bad ones. Currently teachers have little power to change schools before their contract is up, and require permission from their employer.
Kim said that F-series visa holders would not be required to produce extra documents: "Those who are spouses of Korean nationals or those who have permanent resident status here in Korea will be treated as Koreans. They will not be affected."
The new laws will likely less affect public schools, which already require criminal checks and health records.
Andrew Wright, who works at a Gyeonggi Province high school, thought the requirement was reasonable. "I would expect that if a Korean wanted to work in a school in the U.K., a similar system should apply," he explained.
Public schools also usually hire teachers further in advance than private institutes.
"Working for a public school meant that I had a longer timescale to get all the forms and relevant information sorted," says Wright. But he points out that hagwon often work at a much faster turnover.
"A quick check on recruiting websites shows that there are plenty of jobs in hagwon where the job will begin in 6 weeks," he says. "Hagwon may find themselves having to readjust how they hire native speakers."
English camps, which often use C4 visas, may also find it hard to fill places. People may not want to go through the hassle of a police check for such short term work.
Wright also faced problems because of not living in his home country. "I discovered that you cannot apply for the criminal check by post due to database protection," he says referring to British privacy laws. "I was working in Poland. In this respect my experience will be similar to many if not the majority of EFL teachers."
Since professional EFL teachers do not usually work - and therefore live - in their native country, the new requirements could discourage professional teachers.
However, Kim said that he expected that "those who want to get a visa, but live in other nations will not have to go back to their own nations to get visas to work in Korea.
"We will include some measures for them so that they can get their visa in a third nation when they are away from their native countries," he explained.
Indeed, many question the need to go to a Korean consulate at all.
"The consulate interviews would create unnecessary, difficult, and costly situations for some foreign teachers," says Gregor Burgess, a teacher at a Seoul University, whose hometown is 1,000 km from his nearest consulate.
There is a certain amount of opacity surrounding the purpose of the interview. Kim says it will cover "basic things, the submission of required documents."
One theory is that it will draw on local knowledge to check the validity of credentials. This is something of a capitulation in terms of the effectiveness of the current checking system, and it`s unclear why the documents would need to be checked in the presence of the applicant.
"I`m definitely very much in favor of checks being improved," says Burgess. "But I would hate to see the government deter or make it difficult for good teachers to teach in Korea while improving checks."
By Paul Kerry
([email protected])
2007.11.15 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
indytrucks

Joined: 09 Apr 2003 Location: The Shelf
|
Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2007 12:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
It would appear this time, the emphasis in the article is on new E2 candidates, and those working in hagwons, NOT those who are already here and looking to renew. I'll take this with a grain of salt, but this bodes well for the time being. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
lawyertood

Joined: 17 Jan 2003 Location: Seoul, Incheon and the World--working undercover for the MOJ
|
Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2007 1:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
They have also suggested it will be easier for teachers already working here to get new visas. These teachers will require checks in due course, when they need to renew their visas. |
Quote: |
But it may not be enough. According to the U.S.`s FBI website, a countrywide criminal record check for that country takes about four months. And that`s before you apply for the visa. |
These two statements are of concern to me if these measures go through.
If, as the article states, the measures will be finalized and announced in mid-December, I don't see how it will be easier for those of us teaching at universities. Most of us will need to renew our visas around the end of February to be able to start the new school year. If background checks are needed prior to renewal, and the check takes about four months (in the US), many will not be available to teach at the beginning of the term.
I still think I will wait and see what finally comes of the proposals but it is troubling. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
CentralCali
Joined: 17 May 2007
|
Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2007 1:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
The dude from Immigration is an idiot. Not everywhere in the world has an easy and quick background check policy. Some places in the US the wait is incredibly long. A month's delay in puttingl new rules in place would be fine and dandy if everywhere in the world were just like Korea or if our embassies could do background checks.
This is yet another instance of Korea not realizing that it's not the whole world. It's both expensive and time-consuming to fly to our native lands. A bit more than a month's notice of what will be required is the least the Korean government could do. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
indytrucks

Joined: 09 Apr 2003 Location: The Shelf
|
Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2007 1:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
lawyertood wrote: |
Quote: |
They have also suggested it will be easier for teachers already working here to get new visas. These teachers will require checks in due course, when they need to renew their visas. |
|
Geeearrrgh! I seem to have missed that part.
Bollox. I take back what I said. This is indeed troubling. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Optimus Prime

Joined: 05 Jul 2007
|
Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2007 2:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
FBI check is at 4 months NOW...just wait until they have 5,000 simultaneous requests from Americans working in Korea. I bet it goes to 7 months/1 year. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Beej
Joined: 05 Mar 2005 Location: Eungam Loop
|
Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2007 2:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
Under the current system, I wonder how many E2 visas are gotten at Korean consulates in native countries and how many are gotten on the Japan Visa run. This is important.
Schools will be unable to pay for Visa runs to our native countries. They will not allow immigration to pass this law. The article even says that tecahers not currently in their home country wont have to go all the way home.
So I guess this will only affect those coming directly from their native countries and not those finding and signing a new contract in Korea. So will we continue to make Japan Visa runs?
If they do pass all these laws, they definitely need to give control of the visa to the teacher and not the employer. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Julius

Joined: 27 Jul 2006
|
Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2007 2:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
To fly home, pay accomodation and living costs while I wait weeks for pieces of paper to be stamped is too high a cost. At a quick calculation, it would run into millions of won.
London is not cheap. Notary's charge extortionate prices for their ink stamps. You have to make an appointment and wait days to see them. Then the criminal check takes at least 6 weeks. If you've got all the details right. For someone who has lived only briefly in-country, and that over ten years ago at multiple adresses? Yopu get bounced from one clueless police dept to the next. Then you have the apostille. I may have to travel to the country of my university for that. Its not the same as that of my passport. Then you have the visa application wait.
I would be working the first 6 months here just to recoup my losses.
And then I would be expected to do it all again as soon as I changed jobs or got a new contract?? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
fruitcake

Joined: 18 Apr 2004 Location: shinchon
|
Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2007 2:53 am Post subject: Re: new laws in korea , READ |
|
|
bobinseoul wrote: |
However, Kim said that he expected that "those who want to get a visa, but live in other nations will not have to go back to their own nations to get visas to work in Korea.
"We will include some measures for them so that they can get their visa in a third nation when they are away from their native countries," he explained.
Indeed, many question the need to go to a Korean consulate at all. |
i don't think it's going to be necessary to go back to your native country. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
twg

Joined: 02 Nov 2006 Location: Getting some fresh air...
|
Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2007 3:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
Julius wrote: |
I would be working the first 6 months here just to recoup my losses.
And then I would be expected to do it all again as soon as I changed jobs or got a new contract?? |
See you in Taiwan? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mindmetoo
Joined: 02 Feb 2004
|
Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2007 4:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
"I think after December it will take four to five months to hire teachers."
You ever see a Korean job ad that hires a teacher 4 months in advance? I'm amazed if they're planning 2 months ahead. Buncha idiots.
But wouldn't this give current teachers considerable leverage? "If I walk, you're not getting jack all to take my place for another four months. No white dancing bear = no parents signing checks." |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
bassexpander
Joined: 13 Sep 2007 Location: Someplace you'd rather be.
|
Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2007 4:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
Wow, the author seem to go after F2s in that, or is it just me? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
SuperFly

Joined: 09 Jul 2003 Location: In the doghouse
|
Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2007 5:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
Bassxpander,
I'm a little bit toasted after a night of drinking, but I read this:
Quote: |
Kim said that F-series visa holders would not be required to produce extra documents: "Those who are spouses of Korean nationals or those who have permanent resident status here in Korea will be treated as Koreans. They will not be affected." |
How do you see that as 'going after' F2s? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
lucas_p
Joined: 17 Sep 2007
|
Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2007 5:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
SuperFly wrote: |
Bassxpander,
I'm a little bit toasted after a night of drinking, but I read this:
Quote: |
Kim said that F-series visa holders would not be required to produce extra documents: "Those who are spouses of Korean nationals or those who have permanent resident status here in Korea will be treated as Koreans. They will not be affected." |
How do you see that as 'going after' F2s? |
Sounds like a free pass (whether justified or not) for F folks. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
caniff
Joined: 03 Feb 2004 Location: All over the map
|
Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2007 5:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
lucas_p wrote: |
SuperFly wrote: |
Bassxpander,
I'm a little bit toasted after a night of drinking, but I read this:
Quote: |
Kim said that F-series visa holders would not be required to produce extra documents: "Those who are spouses of Korean nationals or those who have permanent resident status here in Korea will be treated as Koreans. They will not be affected." |
How do you see that as 'going after' F2s? |
Sounds like a free pass (whether justified or not) for F folks. |
Yes, definitely justified. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|