| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
theatrelily

Joined: 03 Jun 2004 Location: Haeundae-gu, Busan
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
happeningthang

Joined: 26 Apr 2003
|
Posted: Wed Nov 21, 2007 5:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
| That's hilarious, but disturbing. They obviously think this will work? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ontheway
Joined: 24 Aug 2005 Location: Somewhere under the rainbow...
|
Posted: Wed Nov 21, 2007 7:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
On November 20th, the dumb Hucks at the Huckabee campaign tried to copy the Ron Paul money bomb. It didn't work. Of course, the dumb Hucks tried to organize the campaign themselves. They have few real followers and little real support.
Huckabee raised $220,000 on his money bomb. Nov 20, 2007.
Ron Paul raised $4,380,000 on his money bomb. Nov 5, 2007.
Ron Paul's money bomb was organized "spontaneously" by supporters in the free market.
Ron Paul has more active, real supporters than any other Republican candidate.
And in a nationwide Zogby poll, released Nov. 20th, when the voters were asked to choose which Republican candidate they preferred based on the candidate's positions on the issues and experience, Ron Paul finished first with 33%. Giuliani was a distant second. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mithridates

Joined: 03 Mar 2003 Location: President's office, Korean Space Agency
|
Posted: Wed Nov 21, 2007 7:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
| ontheway wrote: |
On November 20th, the dumb Hucks at the Huckabee campaign tried to copy the Ron Paul money bomb. It didn't work. Of course, the dumb Hucks tried to organize the campaign themselves. They have few real followers and little real support.
Huckabee raised $220,000 on his money bomb. Nov 20, 2007.
Ron Paul raised $4,380,000 on his money bomb. Nov 5, 2007.
Ron Paul's money bomb was organized "spontaneously" by supporters in the free market.
Ron Paul has more active, real supporters than any other Republican candidate.
And in a nationwide Zogby poll, released Nov. 20th, when the voters were asked to choose which Republican candidate they preferred based on the candidate's positions on the issues and experience, Ron Paul finished first with 33%. Giuliani was a distant second. |
You forgot to mention that RP's supporters decided in the middle of the day yesterday to compete with Huckabee's money bomb, and ended up winning on the spur of the moment.
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
thepeel
Joined: 08 Aug 2004
|
Posted: Wed Nov 21, 2007 7:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
| That's awesome! The Ron Paul crew are a very motivated bunch. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee

Joined: 25 May 2003
|
Posted: Wed Nov 21, 2007 7:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
The majority of Republicans are probably saving their money for the general election.
Ron Paul is the only one with his views
Gulliani , McCain , Romney Thompson compete for the same voters.
Ron Paul has zero chance. I would be willing to bet on it. He is stronger than Buccanan but he is weaker than Ross Perot. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ontheway
Joined: 24 Aug 2005 Location: Somewhere under the rainbow...
|
Posted: Wed Nov 21, 2007 8:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
Ron Paul is getting the support of the old Perot supporters, along with the young people, libertarians, and Goldwater Republicans.
So, he'll have Perot's people, plus Bucchanon's people, plus Goldwater Reps plus libertarians, plus the anti war voters, plus the youth vote, plus ... as the economy worsens, he will be the only candidate who has been warning about what is coming.
Reform party of Ohio chair endorses Ron Paul.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dyFa08obIIg&feature=RecentlyWatched&page=1&t=t&f=b
Rally at UNLV, Ron can win in Nevada primary: thousands turn out in a small state:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xumImZvNMEs&feature=RecentlyWatched&page=1&t=t&f=b |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee

Joined: 25 May 2003
|
Posted: Wed Nov 21, 2007 8:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
At any rate I would be willing to be against Ron Paul with my own money.
I am willing to bet . How about you?
Just cause Goldwater's son likes Paul does not mean that Goldwater Republicans will support Paul.
As I said he is weaker than Perot. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
thepeel
Joined: 08 Aug 2004
|
Posted: Wed Nov 21, 2007 8:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee wrote: |
The majority of Republicans are probably saving their money for the general election.
|
The majority of Republicans are breathing through their mouths while watching price is right in dirty camouflage t-shirts and mesh trucker hats from a NASCAR race they didn't attend and looking for the face of jesus in one of the 8 cheese sandwiches they will have for lunch today. Whoever their overlords (pastors, Faux) tell them to vote for, they will vote for.
Some of the older ones might be playing with a model train set while wearing stripped overalls and no shirt. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Pluto
Joined: 19 Dec 2006
|
Posted: Wed Nov 21, 2007 8:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
I still remain skeptical about Ron Paul's chances. For one, his campaign reminds me of the Deaniacs of 2003. Though Howard Dean had the support of many disenfranchised groups from the net, he was also the darling of the media. Yet, his whole campaign flopped and the nominee polling 3rd, John Kerry, won the nomination.
Another problem of Ron Paul is that he doesn't take national security seriously. That alone is reason enough to be skeptical. Republican primary voters take security very seriously and Ron Paul doesn't. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee

Joined: 25 May 2003
|
Posted: Wed Nov 21, 2007 8:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
| thepeel wrote: |
| Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee wrote: |
The majority of Republicans are probably saving their money for the general election.
|
The majority of Republicans are breathing through their mouths while watching price is right in dirty ca | | |