| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Dome Vans
Guest
|
 Posted: Wed Nov 21, 2007 9:16 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
| itaewonguy wrote: |
| The_Eyeball_Kid wrote: |
Cheers, mate. |
this movie will be awesome not only the script and acting but the cinematography will be beautiful so this film is on my wait list for the first DVD screener!
dont spoiler the experience with a CAM! wait for the screener,. |
I have to agree with this totally. If you've been waiting for something then a pirate copy, filmed on a camcorder or on someones phone just isn't worth it. It's like screwing some dirty cow to lose your virginity as quickly as possible. Whereas if you wait you'll get the beauty and it'll be great. (I'm hoping that's the case usually)  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
The_Eyeball_Kid
Joined: 20 Jun 2007
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 21, 2007 10:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Well in that case, I'm currently halfway through giving a dirty scrot-bag a good seeing to, but I've had to stop to go to work.
The cam version isn't TOO bad. The dubious quality adds period detail (the film's set in 1980). But I'll also be looking forward to seeing it in the cinema. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
blurgalurgalurga
Joined: 18 Oct 2007
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 21, 2007 10:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'm really appalled that you guys have taken a very pleasant conversation about a very pleasant movie adapted from a very pleasant book written by an author who is nothing if not pleasant and reduced it to this horrible gutter level. How unpleasant.
Harumph; 'a good seeing-to,' indeed. 'Dirty scrot-bag,' indeed.
And I, who happily gave my virginity to a bovine, must protest that while she was a quadriped she was very loving and kind and exceptionally clean. Cows are very nice animals, and their mouths are cleaner than our own, and they should not be disparaged in this way. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
yingwenlaoshi
Joined: 12 Feb 2007
Location: ... location, location!
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 22, 2007 1:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
| The_Eyeball_Kid wrote: |
Well in that case, I'm currently halfway through giving a dirty scrot-bag a good seeing to, but I've had to stop to go to work.
The cam version isn't TOO bad. The dubious quality adds period detail (the film's set in 1980). But I'll also be looking forward to seeing it in the cinema. |
That's what I thought. It was like watching it as if it were filmed 30 years ago. Gave it that 70's/early 80's feel. Made it more real.
As far as the movie goes? Meh. It was alright. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
The_Eyeball_Kid
Joined: 20 Jun 2007
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 22, 2007 7:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
| yingwenlaoshi wrote: |
| The_Eyeball_Kid wrote: |
Well in that case, I'm currently halfway through giving a dirty scrot-bag a good seeing to, but I've had to stop to go to work.
The cam version isn't TOO bad. The dubious quality adds period detail (the film's set in 1980). But I'll also be looking forward to seeing it in the cinema. |
That's what I thought. It was like watching it as if it were filmed 30 years ago. Gave it that 70's/early 80's feel. Made it more real.
As far as the movie goes? Meh. It was alright. |
I liked it quite a lot, but I wish I'd waited for a proper quality version. But that's the impetuousness of Librans for you. It has to be instant gratification... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
