Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Kennedy Assassination Anniversary News blackout
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 9, 10, 11, 12  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  

Did the CIA kill Kennedy?
Oswald was framed.
45%
 45%  [ 5 ]
Secret Service was in on it.
54%
 54%  [ 6 ]
Total Votes : 11

Author Message
Manner of Speaking



Joined: 09 Jan 2003

PostPosted: Thu Nov 22, 2007 5:10 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

regicide wrote:
Manner of Speaking wrote:
By your own admission, you draw your sources from Crime Magazine, a rag that makes its living by throwing together the most outrageous nonsense in order to sell paper. The majority of people who read it, read it for its entertainment value, not because they take it seriously. You might as well base your Ph.D. thesis in Early European History by assuming The Life of Brian is a serious scholarly work. It's stupid, pointless, a waste of your time, a waste of everybody else's time, and SERIOUSLY not worthy of consideration.

I used this source once and that information can be verifed elsewhere.

You use garbage as your ORIGINAL source, and then you go to other sites that are less disreputable once people call you on your garbage. It's the same thing with the photos; if you're not professionally trained and qualified to interpret forensic photographs, then any conclusions you draw from them are going to be muddled nonsense. With both your photos and your sources, you do the same thing: you start from the basis of nonsense, so inevitably you're going to end up with nonsense no matter how hard you "analyze" the material.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Manner of Speaking



Joined: 09 Jan 2003

PostPosted: Thu Nov 22, 2007 5:22 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

You know that this is true, but instead of acknowledging it, you hide behind the ridiculous claim that people who don't believe you are "defending the government's lies" and "supporting the assassination of JFK by the government". Once again, just like the IMF thread, you've decided to dictate to the forum and the world how things are to be defined and interpreted. YOUR way.

You know what is the most noteworthy feature of all of your JFK and Watergate posts? You don't exhibit the SLIGHTEST bit of uncertainty in any of your conclusions. Despite the fact that any person knows that there are always ambiguities in photos, records, interviews, etc. - data of any kind - you are always absolutely certain you know the "correct" way to interpret the data, that your way of interpreting it is the only acceptable way of interpreting it. You think anybody who might look at this data and come to any other conclusion is a government conspirator. You can't even admit the possibility that more than one conclusion is possible.

That in itself, completely discredits you.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
regicide



Joined: 01 Sep 2006
Location: United States

PostPosted: Thu Nov 22, 2007 5:29 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Manner of Speaking wrote:
regicide wrote:
Manner of Speaking wrote:
By your own admission, you draw your sources from Crime Magazine, a rag that makes its living by throwing together the most outrageous nonsense in order to sell paper. The majority of people who read it, read it for its entertainment value, not because they take it seriously. You might as well base your Ph.D. thesis in Early European History by assuming The Life of Brian is a serious scholarly work. It's stupid, pointless, a waste of your time, a waste of everybody else's time, and SERIOUSLY not worthy of consideration.

I used this source once and that information can be verifed elsewhere.

You use garbage as your ORIGINAL source, and then you go to other sites that are less disreputable once people call you on your garbage. It's the same thing with the photos; if you're not professionally trained and qualified to interpret forensic photographs, then any conclusions you draw from them are going to be muddled nonsense. With both your photos and your sources, you do the same thing: you start from the basis of nonsense, so inevitably you're going to end up with nonsense no matter how hard you "analyze" the material.


Concerning an article about E Howard Hunt; I used a source I didn't check out about something that is secondary to this issue, and the main purpose of the post was too simply to piss you off. And that worked.

But you can not continue to say that everything I say has no basis in fact. Much of it is drawn from historical fact, only the interpretation is subjective.

I have also sited a false CBS News report and you continue to skirt around that.

You need to move on MOS and quit hiding behind this cloak of denial. Do you think that there is anything forthcoming on the conspiratorial side from the National Archives? It just doesn�t work that way and your official position has been exposed as a bunch of lies , so how can you continue to belittle our sources.

ANSWER MY QUESTIONS.

And did I spell analyze wrong?

United States Secret Service Agent Roy Kellerman in the front passenger seat of the Presidential limo sitting , where he will remain while the shots rang out.

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
regicide



Joined: 01 Sep 2006
Location: United States

PostPosted: Thu Nov 22, 2007 5:56 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Manner of Speaking wrote:


That in itself, completely discredits you.


And now who is 100% right? You remind me of one my younger brothers who I never got along with when we were younger and who I was always fighting with. Its funny because now that we are older and we see how nice it is to have family, we can see and admit that we were similiar in our personalities and it was always A case of the pot calling the kettle black.


I say this because what you keep saying to me is exactly how I feel about you. You keep using the excuse that my data is flawed, therefore , you do not comment on it.

How convienient!

And I say that there was no chain of evidence in the government investigation AND ALL ITS DATA IS FLAWED.

SO , WHO ARE YOU TO SAY MY DATA IS FLAWED.

In fact, most of my data is undisputed and as I have said before only open to interpretation.

For example: FACT:

The AGENTS did not move during shooting. THIS IS NOT IN DISPUTE.

IT IS A FACT.

YOUR ARGUMENT IS THEREFORE FLAWED.

Agent Hill jogging a few feet behind the limousine. He could have been there in time to stop the execution had he not been ordered not to move.


The public was lead to believe that is was such a chore for Hill to get to the "fast moving" limousine and he "herocially" got there when he could.

Nothing could be further from the truth, folks, as you can see in this photograph which , like many photographs of the event, was kept from the public until recently.

The photo per se, is not in dispute.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ya-ta Boy



Joined: 16 Jan 2003
Location: Established in 1994

PostPosted: Thu Nov 22, 2007 6:15 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
I would like a response to my accusation that Clint Hill


I would have no idea if he is green or purple. I didn't watch the clip. I just posted it because I knew you would wet your pants over it.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
regicide



Joined: 01 Sep 2006
Location: United States

PostPosted: Thu Nov 22, 2007 6:22 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ya-ta Boy wrote:
Quote:
I would like a response to my accusation that Clint Hill


I would have no idea if he is green or purple. I didn't watch the clip. I just posted it because I knew you would wet your pants over it.


Well , aren�t you so clever!

It shows United States Secret Service Agent Clint Hill smoking a cigarette on CBS Television in 1975 nearly crying whining about how he feels so bad about not saving the president.

Morley Safer gave him a leading question �you moved forward in two seconds, but you couldn�t save him"

It is a historical, undisputed fact that he moved forward after that fatal shot as recorded by the Warren Commission and the Zapruder film of around six seconds.

Hill and Safer lied on CBS and national television and no one blinked an eye.

So I guess wetting my pants is nothing.


Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Manner of Speaking



Joined: 09 Jan 2003

PostPosted: Thu Nov 22, 2007 7:00 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

regicide wrote:
Concerning an article about E Howard Hunt; I used a source I didn't check out...

No surprise there.

regicide wrote:
...about something that is secondary to this issue, and the main purpose of the post was too simply to piss you off. And that worked.

You quoted that article in response to my description of Watergate. You said that I had no idea what really happened with Watergate, and you went on to describe how Watergate - in your mind - is connected to the JFK assassination.

You didn't quote that article to piss me off. You quoted it to perpetuate your compulsive delusion that everything in the universe can be explained in reference to the JFK assassination.

You even believe - as you said in another thread - that Lee Harvey Oswald, who was shot and killed in Texas in 1963, had something to do with the IMF crisis in Korea in 1997.

regicide wrote:
But you can not continue to say that everything I say has no basis in fact. Much of it is drawn from historical fact, only the interpretation is subjective.

No, the interpretation is delusional. By your own admission, you yourself are not in any way professionally qualified to interpret forensic photography. I suspect that you have absolutely no training in photographic principles, analysis, production, or the physics of photography whatsoever.

I myself, also don't have any background in the physics of photography either. So I KNOW that I don't have the professional basis to look at a photograph of the JFK assassination and draw scientifically rigorous conclusions. I'm not so presumptious to do so, and neither is the average person.

regicide wrote:

ANSWER MY QUESTIONS.

And did I spell analyze wrong?

United States Secret Service Agent Roy Kellerman in the front pass...

YOU DON'T HAVE THE QUALIFICATIONS to interpret the photograph with any degree of academic or scientific rigor. Neither do I. So the exercise is pointless.

QUESTION ANSWERED
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Manner of Speaking



Joined: 09 Jan 2003

PostPosted: Thu Nov 22, 2007 7:15 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ya-ta Boy described the word "delusional" when he wrote:
I think you are confusing obsession with compulsion. One is a thought, one is an action. Delusions are thoughts and it is, I hesitate to say, 'natural' to be obsessed with delusions.

You are right about delusions not being restricted to paranoid schizophrenics. I wouldn't, and I'm fairly certain MoS wouldn't, insist on his use of the word schizophrenic. I would be comfortable if you just accepted my position that many conspiracy theorists were delusional and leave the clinical diagnosis to the experts.


Regicide, I know you know I believe that you are delusional. DEEPLY delusional. But I've discussed this with other members of the forum, and I want you to know that we on this forum are trying to treat you like a normal person. The average person on the street, reading the nonsense you are throwing up here, would conclude immediately that you've got psychological problems and would dismiss you. We're not doing that. If any normal person would say and post stuff like this, the forum members would immediately call them out on it as well.

We're only trying to treat you here the same way we would treat anybody else.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Funkdafied



Joined: 04 Nov 2007
Location: In Da House

PostPosted: Thu Nov 22, 2007 7:44 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

One thing is for sure, if Oswald even fired a shot he most certainly was not the only one. This is not even really up for debate any more.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
regicide



Joined: 01 Sep 2006
Location: United States

PostPosted: Fri Nov 23, 2007 5:45 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Manner of Speaking wrote:

You even believe - as you said in another thread - that Lee Harvey Oswald, who was shot and killed in Texas in 1963, had something to do with the IMF crisis in Korea in 1997.




Funkdafied wrote:
One thing is for sure, if Oswald even fired a shot he most certainly was not the only one. This is not even really up for debate any more.

Clearly, so we need to begin the discussion with that premise. People like MOS who continue to cling to the Warren Report and it's magic bullets, while at the same time calling us insane because we take a little of our time to write about this matter , are the ones who have issues.

MOS has a superiority complex that is obvious here. You can see his anger in his posts which is not disguised by his pompous attitude.

He also makes up stuff that is nearly unbelievable: I believe I posted a photo that I called "ghost man" as a joke in the thread that I got harangued for days by MOS because he didn�t like me being accurate in my description of the Asian Crisis of 1997. It really pissed him off and he when on for days about it. So to further belittle me he writes the following:


"You even believe - as you said in another thread - that Lee Harvey Oswald, who was shot and killed in Texas in 1963, had something to do with the IMF crisis in Korea in 1997"

This is how the discredit people who write about the truth: It is bad enough that our sources are always flawed (as if theirs are not), but in the end we are all mentally ill.

Good lord.


"No, the interpretation is delusional" This from a man who believes in the magic bullet theory?

The Magic Bullet:

It doesn't add up. The weight of the whole bullet prior to firing was approximately 160-161 grains and that of the recovered bullet was 158. grains. That means that only three grains were lost after causing all that damage to Connelly. They believe this and that the bullet itself zigzagged in midair during the process.

Now who is crazy?


This is the nonsense that Lone Nutters expect us to believe!



Last edited by regicide on Fri Nov 23, 2007 6:16 am; edited 4 times in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
regicide



Joined: 01 Sep 2006
Location: United States

PostPosted: Fri Nov 23, 2007 6:01 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

regicide wrote:
Manner of Speaking wrote:
Question is answered.

You don't have ANY qualifications or professional training to interpret these photographs, so you're just shovelling smoke.

There's no basis for taking anything that you say about these photographs seriously.

There's no reason why any citizen should limit the scope of their skepticism.

And the question of whether or not I should put any credence in these photographs, or what you say about them, has been answered.



Michael T. Griffith has this professional training.





The governmental body doing a follow up investigation the House Select Committee on Assassinations explores this possibility in detail. Let's take a look at that:

THE HSCA AND FRAUD IN THE BACKYARD RIFLE PHOTOS:

A Brief Critique of the Testimony of Two Members of the

House Select Committee on Assassinations' Photographic Evidence Panel

by

Michael T. Griffith



In studying the HSCA testimony of photographic experts Cecil W. Kirk and Calvin S. McCamy on the backyard photos, I have found a number of problems with their defense of the disputed pictures. What follows is my analysis of some of their arguments and claims. Kirk and McCamy's testimony appears in the government publication HEARINGS BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON ASSASSINATIONS OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, volume 2, pp. 349-371 (commonly cited as 2 HSCA 349-371).

There are three backyard snapshots in evidence. Each picture shows the Oswald figure in a different pose. The photos are labeled 133-A, B, and C. In the spring of 1977, HSCA investigators discovered another backyard print, labeled 133-A, DeMohrenschildt (DeM). This photo is significant because it is markedly clearer than 133-A and was printed full negative (i.e., it was not cropped). Another superior-quality print of 133-A is known as 133-A, Stovall.

http://ourworld.cs.com/mikegriffith1/id149.htm


Governor Connally's Wrist Wound and CE-399


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This is a test. Please take your time.

This article offers high-resolution government photographs of the bullet that that Warren Commission says caused all of Governor Connally's wounds.

You are then shown bullet fragments that the Warren Commission says came from that bullet. And you are also given sworn testimony from attending emergency room personnel telling you that there are even more fragments left in the Governor's body.

Your mission: To pinpoint exactly where on this bullet all these fragments came from. The Warren Commission concluded that all these fragments came from CE-399. Their whole case is based on the "single bullet theory."

If you can see where the fragments came from, then you prove the Warren Commission's case.

But if you cannot see defects in CE-399 to account for the fragments shown and testified to, then you have just destroyed the Warren Commission's findings in their Report.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Introduction
I haven't seen a comparison of...

photographs of the "pristine bullet" (WC Exhibit CE-399)
the fragments remaining in Governor Connally's wrist
Warren Commission expert testimony
...side-by-side anywhere. This article offers seven high-resolution photographs of CE-399, as well as portions of testimony given by Warren Commission expert witnesses.

Although I, as a lay person and not acquainted with the medical profession, cannot see enough imperfections in CE-399 to account for all the fragments described by experts, I see that I am not alone in my belief that CE-399 could not have caused all of the Governor's wounds.

My personal thanks to JFK Lancer's Debra Conway for publishing this dry, lengthy article in the current issue of Assassination Chronicles magazine.

Please take your time to read the testimony offered ... and make sure you 'click' on each of the seven pictures of CE-399 to see the high-resolution copies.


Go to the site and take the test here:
http://www.jfk-info.com/fragment.htm
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
regicide



Joined: 01 Sep 2006
Location: United States

PostPosted: Fri Nov 23, 2007 6:20 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Manner of Speaking wrote:


You even believe - as you said in another thread - that Lee Harvey Oswald, who was shot and killed in Texas in 1963, had something to do with the IMF crisis in Korea in 1997.




YOU DON'T HAVE THE QUALIFICATIONS to interpret the photograph with any degree of academic or scientific rigor. Neither do I. So the exercise is pointless.



Manner of Speaking wrote:
regicide wrote:
Manner of Speaking wrote:
Regardless, you're a big one for telling people that they shouldn't follow the "official line" and take what "the government" says as the way things ought to be, yet here you are trying to shove your line - that your way is the only permissible way to describe the IMF crisis - down everybody's throats. This is the description of the event that the average person and the general public has come to, not the government's, and yet here you are. "Don't do as I do, do as I say." Who gave you the right to decide how people refer to the IMF crisis?

And now you're telling us there's only one permissible term to use in Korea to refer to cell phones: yours. You look down your nose on anybody who decides, IN KOREA, to use the KOREAN LANGUAGE expression "handphone". More "do as I say"; "do as **I** say. You really are full of yourself, you know that?

The general consensus regarding why others on this thread use the term IMF is expediency but the problem I have is that it condones and promotes Korean nationalism.

WHO CARES


Look at the anger is MOS above post~~over me writing a polite post about using the correct term for the Asian Crisis of 1997. MOS went on and on about what I did and then suggests "You even believe - as you said in another thread - that Lee Harvey Oswald, who was shot and killed in Texas in 1963, had something to do with the IMF crisis in Korea in 1997. "

This guy has got issues folks.



This guy: GHOST MAN
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Manner of Speaking



Joined: 09 Jan 2003

PostPosted: Fri Nov 23, 2007 7:16 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Well, folks, what can I say that I haven't already said. ** shrug **

Manner of Speaking wrote:
I know you know I believe that you are delusional. DEEPLY delusional. But I've discussed this with other members of the forum, and I want you to know that we on this forum are trying to treat you like a normal person. The average person on the street, reading the nonsense you are throwing up here, would conclude immediately that you've got psychological problems and would dismiss you. We're not doing that. If any normal person would say and post stuff like this, the forum members would immediately call them out on it as well.

We're only trying to treat you here the same way we would treat anybody else.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
sundubuman



Joined: 04 Feb 2003
Location: seoul

PostPosted: Fri Nov 23, 2007 7:36 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

you conspiracy kids might want to read Lee Harvey Oswald's bio...and see if you feel any sense of empathy...he was pretty fuc-ked in the head as well

Early life and Marine Corps service

Lee Harvey Oswald was born in New Orleans, Louisiana.[2] His father, Robert Edward Lee Oswald Sr., died shortly before he was born. His mother, Marguerite Claverie (1907�1981), largely raised Lee on her own along with two older siblings: his brother Robert and his half-brother, John Pic, Marguerite's son from a previous marriage. Oswald did have a step-father for several years, and his mother sent him to an orphanage for several years when she was too poor to take care of him and his brothers. The family was Lutheran. His mother is said to have doted on him to excess. She has also been characterized as domineering and emotionally volatile, however. Lee's youth was plagued by extreme mobility; before the age of 18 Oswald had lived in 22 different residences. Because of the short-lived stay in each location, he had attended 12 different schools, mostly around New Orleans and Dallas, but also in New York City.

As a child Oswald was withdrawn and temperamental.[3] After moving in with his half-brother (who had joined the US Coast Guard and was stationed in New York City), Oswald and Pic were asked to leave after an incident where Oswald allegedly threatened John Pic's wife with a knife, and struck his mother.[4] [5] Following charges of truancy, he was put under a three week court-ordered stay for psychiatric observation in a facility called 'Youth House'. Dr. Renatus Hartogs described Oswald as having a 'Vivid fantasy life, turning around the topics of omnipotence and power, through which he tries to compensate for his present shortcomings and frustrations,' and diagnosed the fourteen-year-old Oswald as having a 'personality pattern disturbance with schizoid features and passive-aggressive tendencies' and recommended continued psychiatric intervention.[6] Oswald's behavior at school appeared to improve in his last months in New York.[7][8] In January 1954, his mother Marguerite decided to return to New Orleans with Lee, which prevented Lee from receiving the care the psychiatrist had recommended.[9] There was still an open question pending before a New York judge whether or not he should be taken from the care of his mother to finish his schooling.[10]

Oswald left school after the ninth grade and never received a high school diploma. Throughout his life, he had trouble with spelling and writing coherently.[11] His letters, diary and other writings have led some to suggest he was dyslexic. Nonetheless he read voraciously and, as a result, occasionally asserted that he was better educated than those around him. Around the age of fifteen, he became an ardent Marxist solely from his private reading on the topic. He wrote in his diary, "I was looking for a key to my environment, and then I discovered socialist literature. I had to dig for my books in the back dusty shelves of libraries."[12] At 16 he wrote to the Socialist Party of America, stating that he was a Marxist who had been studying socialist principles for "well over fifteen months," and asked for information about their youth league.[13]

Even as a Marxist, Oswald wished to join the US Marine Corps. He idolized his older brother Robert and wore Robert's US Marine ring. This relationship seems to have transcended any ideological conflict for Oswald, and enlisting in the Marines may have also been a way to escape from his overbearing mother.[14] He enlisted in the US Marine Corps in October 1956, a week after his 17th birthday.[15]

While in the Marines, Oswald was trained in the use of the M-1 rifle. Following that training, he was tested in December of 1956, and obtained a score of 212, which was 2 points above the minimum for qualifications as a sharpshooter. In May 1959, on another range, Oswald scored 191, which was 1 point over the minimum for ranking as a marksman.[16]

Oswald however was trained primarily as a radar operator and assigned first to Marine Corps Air Station El Toro in Irvine, California,[17] then to Naval Air Facility Atsugi in Japan. Though Atsugi was a base for the U-2 spy planes that flew over the Soviet Union, there is no evidence Oswald was involved in that operation. Oswald's experience after joining with the Marine Corps was by all accounts unpleasant. Small and frail compared to the other Marines, he was nicknamed Ozzie Rabbit after a cartoon character. His shyness and Soviet sympathies alienated him from his fellow Marines. Ostracism only seemed to provoke him into being a stauncher, more outspoken communist. For his steadfast beliefs, his nickname ultimately became Oswaldskovich. The Marine had subscribed to The Worker and taught himself rudimentary Russian. Oswald was court-martialled twice: initially because of accidentally shooting himself in the elbow with an unauthorized handgun, and then later for starting a fight with a sergeant he thought responsible for the punishment he received from his first court-martial. He was demoted from private first class to private, and briefly served time in the brig. Later he was punished for yet another incident; while on sentry duty one night in the Philippines, he inexplicably fired his rifle into the jungle. By the end of his Marine career, Oswald was doing menial labor.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
sundubuman



Joined: 04 Feb 2003
Location: seoul

PostPosted: Fri Nov 23, 2007 7:37 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Oh...and then there was his exiting adventures in the Soviet Union...I am sure some of you can imagine yourselves fighting the evil American Empire in a similar way...

n October 1959, Oswald emigrated to the Soviet Union. He was nineteen, and the trip was planned well in advance. Along with having taught himself rudimentary Russian, he had saved $1,500 of his Marine Corps salary,[18] got an early "hardship" discharge by (falsely) claiming he needed to care for his injured mother,[19] got a passport, and submitted several fictional applications to foreign universities in order to obtain a student visa (and possibly help avoid Marine Corps reserve duty).

After spending only three days with his mother in Fort Worth, he departed by ship from New Orleans on September 20, 1959, for the Soviet Union, first arriving in France, then England and eventually Finland as part of a package tour.[20] When he arrived in the Soviet Union and showed up unexpectedly at the US Embassy in Moscow, he said he wanted to renounce his U.S. citizenship.[21][22] When the Navy Department learned of this, it changed Oswald's Marine Corps discharge from 'hardship/honorable' to 'undesirable.'[23]

Oswald told a reporter in Moscow, "For two years I've had it in my mind, don't form any attachments, because I knew I was going away. I was planning to divest myself of everything to do with the United States."[24] To another reporter he said, "I would not consider returning to the United States," and referred to the Soviet government as 'my government.'[25] His wish to remain in the Soviet Union was initially applauded by the Soviets, but although he had some technical knowledge acquired in the Marines they soon discovered he had little of real value to offer the Soviet Union and his application for Soviet residency was rejected.[26] In response, Oswald made a bloody but minor cut to his left wrist in his hotel room bathtub. After bandaging his superficial injury, the cautious Soviets kept him under psychiatric observation at the Botkin Hospital.[27][28] Although this attempt may have been no more than an attention-getting ruse, the Soviet government feared an international incident if he were to attempt something similar again.
Marina Prusakova, Minsk 1959
Marina Prusakova, Minsk 1959

Against the advice of the KGB, Oswald was allowed to remain in the Soviet Union. Although he had wanted to remain in Moscow and attend Moscow University, he was sent to Minsk, located in modern-day Belarus. He was given a job as a metal lathe operator at the Gorizont (Horizon) Electronics Factory in Minsk, a huge facility that produced radios and televisions along with military and space electronic components. He was given a rent-subsidized, fully furnished studio apartment in a prestigious building under Gorizont's administration and in addition to his factory pay received monetary subsidies from the Russian Red Cross Society (a Soviet organisation entirely separate from the international medical aid organization). This represented an idyllic existence by Soviet-era working-class standards.[29] Oswald was under constant surveillance by the KGB during his thirty-month stay in Minsk.[30] Oswald gradually grew bored with the limited recreation available in Minsk.[31] He wrote in his diary in January 1961: 'I am starting to reconsider my desire about staying. The work is drab, the money I get has nowhere to be spent. No nightclubs or bowling alleys, no places of recreation except the trade union dances. I have had enough.' Shortly afterwards, Oswald opened negotiations with the U.S. Embassy in Moscow over his proposed return to the United States.

At a dance in early 1961 Oswald met Marina Prusakova, a troubled 19-year-old pharmacology student from a broken family in Leningrad now living with her aunt and uncle in Minsk. While later reports described her uncle as a colonel in the KGB or MVD, he was actually a lumber industry expert in the MVD with a bureaucratic rank equivalent to colonel. Lee and Marina married on April 30, 1961, less than six weeks after they met. Their first child, June, was born in February 1962.

After nearly a year of paperwork and waiting, on June 1, 1962 the young family left the Soviet Union for the United States. Even before November 22, 1963, Oswald enjoyed a small measure of national notoriety in the U.S. press as an American who had defected to the U.S.S.R. and returned.[32]
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 9, 10, 11, 12  Next
Page 10 of 12

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International