Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

English Teachers Another Migrant Issue
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> General Discussion Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
agentX



Joined: 12 Oct 2007
Location: Jeolla province

PostPosted: Tue Dec 18, 2007 3:05 am    Post subject: English Teachers Another Migrant Issue Reply with quote

Fresh off the presses, the Korean Times has an editorial written by Alex Lee about how the English teacher issue is treated differently than the migrant worker issue.
And the fuse is lit...
http://koreatimes.co.kr/www/news/special/2007/12/177_15767.html
Quote:
English Teachers Another Migrant Issue
By Alex Lee

``Western English teachers who come to Korea should be considered migrants, too,'' Bono, an Indian friend told me recently.

For him, Koreans frame the migrant issue too narrowly. They highlight the plight of migrants who work the dirty, dangerous, difficult jobs but never talk about the other foreigner issue in this country: Western English teachers (and specifically, white native English speakers).

Discussing both groups together would have two implications. First, it would enrich and complicate the debate. Instead of only focusing on why Koreans treat foreigners from the global South so badly, a new paradigm would ask why Koreans treat foreigners from the West so much better. After all, to paraphrase Rinku Sen, the desirable Western English teacher cannot exist without its foil: the undesirable migrant.

Second, it would challenge historical factors (i.e. colonialism and knowledge production) as to why native English teachers like me aren't stigmatized as migrants in the first place _ even though we're also just foreign workers in Korea selling our labor and skills. The Oxford English dictionary itself defines a migrant simply as ``a worker who moves from one place to another to find work.''

According to Bono, what's important is not what class a particular foreigner was before they came to Korea, but what class they became after. In this regard, Western English teachers are, in fact, elite, privileged migrants while Southeast Asian and South Asian workers are working class migrants. Most of us Western English teachers would scoff at such a notion, though.

Consciously or not, we believe that we are better than migrants. What we teach ― English ― is invaluable to Koreans. In fact, we do Koreans a favor by staying here. Migrants, on the other hand, provide skills that are hardly marketable. Anybody can work in a factory and clean toilets! Therefore, they're completely different to us. This is what we tell ourselves.

But in reality, we have more in common with migrants than we'd like to admit. Most of us are young men in our 20s or 30s. Most of us complain about being exploited by our Korean bosses. And most of us expect to earn big money in Korea and leave as soon as we're finished.

Most of them (Southeast Asians) are no different. Koreans just treat them worse.

They earn in the region of 850 000 won per month. To get this most of them work 12 hours a day doing jobs that are considerably harder than teaching English. What's more, they usually spend one to two years after arriving in Korea having to pay off debts like airfare, housing, and recruitment agency costs.

In comparison, we Western English teachers earn anywhere from two to three million won per month ― and that's only if we work at an institute. Besides that, most of us work only 30 hours a week. Teaching privately with an E-2 (teaching) visa ― what every English teaching foreigner in Korea, save Korean Americans, possesses ― is illegal. Airfare and housing are usually free to boot.

And yet, most Western English teachers, particularly the white ones, say they're victims, endlessly scapegoated by a scare mongering Korean public.

Earlier this month, a white American English teacher wrote an article criticizing Korea's Ministry of Justice for displaying ``a staggering lack of cultural sensitivity.'' He's the perfect example of the pot calling the kettle black in Korea.

Recently, the Korean government, largely in response to Christopher Paul Neil, a white Canadian English teacher who was arrested last October on suspicion of pedophilia, decided to tighten its policies on issuing and renewing E-2 visas.

Now, applicants have to do the following: Get a criminal background check; a medical check up; and an interview at their home country's nearest Korean consulate. (Before these changes, applicants required little more than their college diploma.)

The writer characterized all of these changes as unconscionable inconveniences. ``It is apparent to any native English teacher that no attempt is being made by the ministry to understand our situation or that of our home country," he wrote.

That's funny. I am a native English speaker and an American, and this still isn't apparent. But then, he probably wasn't referring to native English teachers who looked like me.

Maybe I'm aloof because none of these new policies affect me as a privileged F-4 visa-carrying American gyopo. Or worse, maybe I'm still bitter because non-white English teachers remain underpaid and under-respected in the English language business. But everyone's tired of this cliche, so I'll shut up.

Instead, I'll try to empathize with him. If you're reading this, I'm sorry you feel marginalized as a racial minority. This must be new for you. One question, though. After such a profound new experience, will you ― along with many other irritable white English teachers like yourself ― finally condemn all the racist, anti-immigrant scapegoating against Blacks, Latinos, Asians, Arabs, and Indigenous peoples going on in your own home country (often committed by your own kin)?

The answer, probably not. Self-absorption like yours is a serious narcotic. So please wake up! Perspective can help.

Hey Cognorati! He's working your side of the street!
Quote:
In order to receive a working visa in Korea most migrants must do the following: Undergo government-sponsored work training; a medical check-up (including tests for AIDS and other STDs), and training in the Korean language and culture. (A Korean language requirement alone would send most of us Western English teachers packing.)

Additionally, most migrants also have to go back to their home countries to renew their visas. (It's an unconscionable inconvenience for them, as well.) Needless to say, obtaining any one of these visas is difficult. Most migrants' home countries have large unemployment and even larger competition.

Ultimately, white English teachers who complain are not the problem. Their sense of superiority and entitlement are.

My friend, Bono, says their arrogance rests upon their self-denial, historically, of racism and the inequitable global division of labor. I agree.

Be that as it may, other Western English teachers like me certainly aren't off the hook, either. We whine almost as much, at the same time we ignore our poorer, darker counterparts in Korea. This is a shame because all of us Western English teachers aren't that different than migrants in Korea. We just get treated better, and they get treated worse. And this is the only difference that really matters.

Boom goes the dynamite (Jim Rome Reference)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
CentralCali



Joined: 17 May 2007

PostPosted: Tue Dec 18, 2007 3:48 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Alex Lee, you are an ass.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
hogwonguy1979



Joined: 22 Dec 2003
Location: the racoon den

PostPosted: Tue Dec 18, 2007 3:55 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

what an idiot. i wanted to throw something after reading it
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
juicyhumdinger



Joined: 03 Jan 2005

PostPosted: Tue Dec 18, 2007 4:13 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
After such a profound new experience, will you ― along with many other irritable white English teachers like yourself ― finally condemn all the racist, anti-immigrant scapegoating against Blacks, Latinos, Asians, Arabs, and Indigenous peoples going on in your own home country (often committed by your own kin)?

The answer, probably not. Self-absorption like yours is a serious narcotic. So please wake up! Perspective can help.


Yes, perspective can help. Back in Canada, I used to fight against racism whenever I saw it, both verbally and physically. I believed that my country's strength was because of its multicultural makeup. Now I have a hard time thinking this way after being treated like the gum stuck to some guy's Seoul.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
CentralCali



Joined: 17 May 2007

PostPosted: Tue Dec 18, 2007 4:15 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

All my life, I've fought against racism both in my country and in whatever country I've found myself resident.

I guess we just found out komerican's real name, though!

BTW, humdinger, good (intentional) typo! "Stuck to some guy's Seoul," indeed!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
twg



Joined: 02 Nov 2006
Location: Getting some fresh air...

PostPosted: Tue Dec 18, 2007 5:06 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Well, it started out promising. 3D workers do get treated like shit here.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
PGF



Joined: 27 Nov 2006

PostPosted: Tue Dec 18, 2007 5:15 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

twg wrote:
Well, it started out promising. 3D workers do get treated like *beep* here.


Migrant workers entering Canada or the US with an education do not face the same discrimination as migrant workers who are poor and uneducated.

This guy is just flaming the FTs in Korea on a national level. He has some misdirected anger or something. I've read about a dozen of his articles and I think there was one were he mentioned that his father never spoke to him except one time when his daddy told him to work for the US Government because the US gave him so much opportunity.

The guy's a head case, at least.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
lastat06513



Joined: 18 Mar 2003
Location: Sensus amo Caesar , etiamnunc victus amo uni plebian

PostPosted: Tue Dec 18, 2007 6:20 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

In some ways, he makes a point but in others he flaunts it and yet still in others he tries to break it down into Korean logic

Yes~ FTs CAN be considered migrant workers because they go to Korea for financial reasons and then move on (That is Korean rationale about this issue).

But~ is that to say that ALL foreigners are that way?
There are some foreigners (FTs and regular migrant workers alike) who want to stay in Korea, either because they developed a familial connection during their stay in Korea or because they simply like the country.

Is mostly the foreigners fault they can't integrate into Korean society?
That is also a two-prong answer- if the person doesn't like Korea, yes. But there is also a mentality in Korea that ALL foreigners are transient, that they have to leave eventually, so the average Korean sees no reason to deal with foreigners (There is no historical context other than the excuses they give).

I had seen this (and I'm not joking!), as WE might not be expected to know Korean, I had seen others get screamed at because they didn't address Koreans in Korean (By "others" I mean Filippinos, Sri Lankans, and even Russians). I once talked to an Uzbek factory worker in Dongdaemun and he said that when he arrived in Korea, he would be thrown out of places because he didn't speak Hanguel. Can we, also foreigners, say the same? (except those occasions where the restuarant proprietor politely refuses service to foreigners of certain nationalities [by that, I mean Americans during the high point of the anti-American sentiment in Korea])

But what if the foreigner CAN speak the language fluently (and I had met countless people who could) and yet, they still get chastized? Is it their fault or is it the fault of Korean logic and rationale.

And many people who write these articles forget to mention and what is the root of this problem- the new visa regulations. The immigration department has a nasty habit of not filing paperwork permanently (at USCIS, almost all applications are archived, you can find applications dating back to the 1940's, 50's and 60's but Korean immigrations can't file paperwork longer than a year) making the person file the same documents (which are the Degree diploma, sealed transcripts, criminal checks, medical checks, etc.) over and over again- if you don't believe me, wait until you have to renew or switch jobs after the one-year mark in March, 2009- it will become a bureaucratic nightmare for the applicant.

And why do foreigners have to leave after they finish every job?
Why can't Korea streamline the process so the person CAN stay in Korea yet renew their visa without the formalities of having to go home, get all the paperwork that they submitted before (just foreshadowing now...) and only then could they return to Korea.....I know they "promise" that a prior applicant could easily get their visa without going through all these formalities, yet remember that when dealing with immigrations, it is a case-by-case issue and also depends on the thoughts and feelings of the officer doing the application on that particular day. So one officer would say "You can do it here.." while I am going to speculate alot of officers would use the going home clause as an excuse to shoo foreigners away.....

All this goes against their aims of trying to become a "world hub" (which you don't hear about anymore..).
And if this was all just an election ploy, it is VERY scummy on the politicians part to play on the majority's fear of a minority.
Is this truly the 21st Century?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Wisconsinite



Joined: 05 Jan 2007

PostPosted: Tue Dec 18, 2007 7:35 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

It is obvious to any educated person who read that article that the person has an ax to grind and an agenda to push.

Basically, he puts the blame on how migrant workers are treated as a problem of the white westerner. Yep, they are treated horribly but yet this is a problem deeply rooted in KOREAN immigration policys and in the mindsets of the KOREAN people. How many white westerners do you see treating badly and refusing service to migrant workers?

I particularly enjoyed how he stated that white westerners should shut up and take their medicine since western countries have treated immigrants to their country very badly in the past and even now. That may be true but I have never treated anyone with anything less than respect and kindness, so why lump me with the baddies? I think about my boyfriend, who came to study in America do anything he wanted without any trouble. He walked into a bank, got an account and a credit and debit card. He volunteered as he pleased and not ONE single organization rejected him for being a Korean. He used public transportation and public offices with no trouble (other than a language barrier). He even got his own library card based solely on an address and a passport. He was never refused entry into a nightclub, bar, or restaurant. My landloard gladly added him to the lease. There is no place for comparison. Opportunity and hope exists in America, not really sure it exists in Korea!

I really hate it when they publish this crap in the newspapers in Korea. To be fair, I also hate it when they publish this crap in American newspapers too.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
lastat06513



Joined: 18 Mar 2003
Location: Sensus amo Caesar , etiamnunc victus amo uni plebian

PostPosted: Tue Dec 18, 2007 8:06 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

When reading the final part of the article, the only term that comes to mind when referring to the author is that he's nothing more than a simple "Uncle Tom".
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Vicissitude



Joined: 27 Feb 2007
Location: Chef School

PostPosted: Tue Dec 18, 2007 8:47 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
Consciously or not, we believe that we are better than migrants. What we teach ― English ― is invaluable to Koreans. In fact, we do Koreans a favor by staying here. Migrants, on the other hand, provide skills that are hardly marketable. Anybody can work in a factory and clean toilets! Therefore, they're completely different to us. This is what we tell ourselves.
Maybe this is what the author tells himself, but it's not what I tell myself. That's not how I was raised. I was raised to believe that all people are equal and that being humble is one of the most important virtues a person can posses. My mother worked as a maid for a rich Jewish (migrant) family to put food on our table. She cleaned their toilets. She also worked in 3D jobs. Heck, so did I to help put myself through college. All of my Great Grandparents were immigrants who worked hard in America. I resent this guy�s attitude that all Americans have had easy privileged lives. Every summer my mother works with migrants from Mexico who make more money than she does.

________________________

Most of my college students in Korea resented the fact that they had to learn English. They were terrible students to have to teach! Therefore, how could I have possibly walked around thinking that, "English ― is invaluable to Koreans. In fact, we do Koreans a favor by staying here?" The notion is absurd. I'd say the vast majority of Koreans resent the fact that they have to learn English, especially from foreigners. They consider it a necessary evil and that it disrupts their Korean ethnocentricity.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Bagpipes11



Joined: 10 Nov 2006

PostPosted: Tue Dec 18, 2007 9:13 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think the fundamental difference is that our country was built on immigrants. My family included. Back in the 1910's and 20's, Canada was still very segregated. Different ethnic groups did not mix as well as they do today.

Korea was not built on immigrants. Contrarily, foreigners were often invaders. Are Koreans extremely paranoid of E-2 Visa holders with no justifiable reason? DEFINITELY. Can I relate to their paranoia? NO. Was I raised in a homogeneous society? NO. (So basically, I try and understand their reservations they have and why they have them)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Vicissitude



Joined: 27 Feb 2007
Location: Chef School

PostPosted: Tue Dec 18, 2007 9:32 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Bagpipes11 wrote:
I think the fundamental difference is that our country was built on immigrants. My family included. Back in the 1910's and 20's, Canada was still very segregated. Different ethnic groups did not mix as well as they do today.

Korea was not built on immigrants. Contrarily, foreigners were often invaders. Are Koreans extremely paranoid of E-2 Visa holders with no justifiable reason? DEFINITELY. Can I relate to their paranoia? NO. Was I raised in a homogeneous society? NO. (So basically, I try and understand their reservations they have and why they have them)

Do you also try to understand the white supremicist in the deep south of America who joints the KKK and dreams of going on a cross burning protest on the front lawns of non-white immigrants? Because the way I see it, what you are doing is no different.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Bagpipes11



Joined: 10 Nov 2006

PostPosted: Tue Dec 18, 2007 11:47 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Valid point, but you are comparing Apples to Oranges. If you re-read my post you will see that in no way do I agree with racist actions towards foreigners in Korea.

And no, KKK members in the deep south of America is not the same. The KKK has not been an entity for thousands of years without outside influence.

On that note, I have never heard of Koreans hanging a foreigner or burning little Buddha statues outside of my Villa.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Mr. Pink



Joined: 21 Oct 2003
Location: China

PostPosted: Tue Dec 18, 2007 12:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I sort of get the point Alex is trying to make. Whites have been privileged for hundreds of years. To keep our privilege we have also been racist. However, in the last 50 years we have come forward by leaps and bounds.

Canada still has racists and racism. However, it is ILLEGAL for immigration to use racist policies in who they allow into the country. It has been like that since the 1970s.

Now as to the question of migrant workers in Korea, I think Alex needs to dig deeper. It isn't about race, but rather about CLASS. English teachers consider them somewhat professionals and based on their salary and living conditions, it puts them in a higher CLASS than the 3D workers. Thus, we don't have much in common besides how immigration treats us. And to be fair, until recently we were treated A LOT better. Even with these new regulations, E-2 workers are treated better than those on 3D visas.

As "professionals" we argue that it is insulting that we should have to submit documents repeatedly and undergo rigorous screening that leaves no room for logical compromise. Such as, if one is in Korea already, having to leave to have an interview OUTSIDE Korea, is pretty stupid. Consular staff already have a ton of things they must do, why not add a few jobs for Koreans in Korea to do such things? Again it shows just how new Korea is to the whole process of immigration.

3D workers do jobs that even Korean people won't do. I am not going to defend how Korea treats them, as Korea should learn from how other countries treated their poor working class migrants. Within Canada's history, we treated the Irish pretty bad in the 1840s and 50s, and later the Italians throughout the 1900s (until roughly 1970).

Alex should bring up the argument that in todays day and age, we have the benefit of learning from history. As well, we have the development of a human rights code in all industrialized countries and in many developing countries. As Korea is still considered a developing nation, they should jump on board to adopt a through human rights code that applied to EVERYONE. I know they have one, but it is not enforced to the full extent as industrialized countries.

Finally, Alex might have left his bias and bitterness at being a Korean America at the door, this would have given his argument more strength and perhaps opened him up to objectivity.

Alex, while I feel for you that you don't make as much money as a "whitey", you have many doors that are opened that most "whiteys" don't. Stop complaining about imbalance. If you are making less than the average E2 visa holder, you are doing something wrong.

Also, Alex, do you have to submit a criminal background check? I think you should, because you know a while back there was this Korean-American kid who went and shot a bunch of people at a university...so you know, there is a tendency for you Kyopos to be violent.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> General Discussion Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Page 1 of 6

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International