View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
bucheon bum
Joined: 16 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Fri Dec 21, 2007 9:25 am Post subject: Rice rejects Huckabee's criticism |
|
|
Yahoo news article
Quote: |
WASHINGTON - In a brief foray into politics, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice on Friday denounced comments by a leading Republican presidential candidate that the Bush administration's foreign policy is arrogant and unilateral.
"The idea that somehow this is a go-it-alone policy is just simply ludicrous," she said at a State Department news conference. "One would only have to be not observing the facts, let me say that, to say that this is now a go-it-alone foreign policy." |
Why the heck does the Bush Administration care what some presidential candidate is claiming? Not like Bush is up for re-election. Talk about being distracted by meaningless stuff.
Quote: |
Rice did not mention Huckabee by name in her response and at first declined to respond, saying dismissively: "Look, I don't comment on other people's comments. I don't have time, all right. I really don't have time to worry about this."
But she then launched into a vigorous defense of the administration's multilateral diplomatic efforts on Afghanistan, North Korea and Iran, and pointed to improving ties with traditional allies in Europe, some of which were strained by the Iraq war. |
Yeah Rice, you might want to stick to following that first remark of yours: don't comment on other people's comments. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
stillnotking

Joined: 18 Dec 2007 Location: Oregon, USA
|
Posted: Fri Dec 21, 2007 9:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
She pointed to "improving ties with traditional allies in Europe, some of which were strained by the Iraq war"?
Uhh... whose Iraq war was that, again?
"It's OK, really, we're working on cleaning up this mess that we made. Hand me a Kleenex, I need to get started sopping up the first giant pool of sewage." |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Tiger Beer

Joined: 07 Feb 2003
|
Posted: Fri Dec 21, 2007 12:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Funny.
It's interesting in general how NONE of the Republicans want to mention Bush's name, but all of them want to put his failed 6-years of failed policies in overdrive (speaking of the highly criticized failed foreign policy in general). |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
dogshed

Joined: 28 Apr 2006
|
Posted: Fri Dec 21, 2007 2:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It's not a go it alone policy. The US is now begging everyone for help. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
VanIslander

Joined: 18 Aug 2003 Location: Geoje, Hadong, Tongyeong,... now in a small coastal island town outside Gyeongsangnamdo!
|
Posted: Fri Dec 21, 2007 3:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Rice is just pissed that nobody is noticing her efforts to foster multilateralism or at least international cooperation. One day she'll realize what an irrelevant puppet she's been for the Bush Administration. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Czarjorge

Joined: 01 May 2007 Location: I now have the same moustache, and it is glorious.
|
Posted: Fri Dec 21, 2007 9:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Didn't you hear? "George Bush hates black people." The degree to which he makes Condees job difficult would certainly support that statement. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Rteacher

Joined: 23 May 2005 Location: Western MA, USA
|
Posted: Sat Dec 22, 2007 6:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
Wasn't she at one point (before the current administration's big slide in popularity) reported to be Bush's prefered choice for the Republican nomination?
Maybe she's contemplating last-minute entry into the race to break a deadlock - and emerge as an historical participant in either the first "woman v. woman" or "black v. black" Presidential election... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Ya-ta Boy
Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Location: Established in 1994
|
Posted: Sat Dec 22, 2007 12:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I feel rather sorry for Condi and all the other members of the administration who do have to get jobs after this administration ends. How would you like to have to include service in one of the most unpopular administrations in history on your resume? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Gopher

Joined: 04 Jun 2005
|
Posted: Sat Dec 22, 2007 12:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Are you kidding? Cabinet-level experience on your c.v.? Kissinger and other Nixon-Administration veterans seem to have done very, very well post-Nixon. If that is any indication.
Regards the OP: it is an election year; outgoing administrations make nice whipping boys, so to speak. People wanting to replace them will talk. Sometimes those in the outgoing administration will talk back. It does not mean much. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Kuros
Joined: 27 Apr 2004
|
Posted: Sat Dec 22, 2007 1:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Gopher wrote: |
Are you kidding? Cabinet-level experience on your c.v.? Kissinger and other Nixon-Administration veterans seem to have done very, very well post-Nixon. If that is any indication. |
I'm not sure. Rumsfeld lost a speaking engagement because of an insurgency.
Condi I have little sympathy for. Remember the cabinet position she held on 9-11? Hint: It weren't SecState! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Gopher

Joined: 04 Jun 2005
|
Posted: Sat Dec 22, 2007 1:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Special cases exist. Nixon himself, Rumsfeld, and a few others. Pretty much down for the count -- although I believe even Nixon practised law again.
Others, even those unpopular with the far left, McNamara, Kissinger, Kirkpatric, and more, even Oliver North, a convicted felon, if memory serves, have all done well in their postadministration careers. Before Gates, another Iran-Contra veteran, and former DCI as well, returned to a cabinet-level position recently, the W. Bush Administration found him presiding over a Texas university's affairs...
I do not see any problems in Rice's future. For one thing, politics aside, she is a brillilant woman with excellent connections in bureaucratic Washington. Who would not want her on their board? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Ya-ta Boy
Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Location: Established in 1994
|
Posted: Sat Dec 22, 2007 2:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Putting sarcasm aside for the moment, I see some people are from the Hollywood-'there-is-no-such-thing-as-bad-publicity' school of thought on this. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Gopher

Joined: 04 Jun 2005
|
Posted: Sat Dec 22, 2007 2:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Perhaps I am describing "what is" while others are imagining "what should be?"
Last edited by Gopher on Sat Dec 22, 2007 2:05 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
contrarian
Joined: 20 Jan 2007 Location: Nearly in NK
|
Posted: Sat Dec 22, 2007 2:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It is looking more and more like a Republican president coming up. With the Democrats main challegers be a black and a woman, both of whom start with 20 - 25% of the vote who won't vote for them for that very reason, things will be interesting. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
bucheon bum
Joined: 16 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Sat Dec 22, 2007 2:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Well I agree with Gopher, I really doubt Condi Rice will have much of a problem finding a respectable position in 2009. Even the aforementioned Rumsfeld was able to become a part of the Hoover Institute at Stanford. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|