|
Korean Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Juregen
Joined: 30 May 2006
|
Posted: Sat Dec 22, 2007 8:00 pm Post subject: Koreans are no Gentleman |
|
|
This title has been brewing in my head for a long time. At first most of you will either think it's another beat down on Koreans customs, and some of you will call me an apologist when I further explain my ideas.
It is all too obvious for most of us that Korean society lacks a certain etiquette. I am often angered by the lack of decency and politeness.
But.
Etiquette, Decency, Gentleman, .... these are all concepts developed in Europe (No, not in America ), mostly during the Renaissance.
So although I do agree that Koreans lack these things (in general ...), especially in public places, can we uphold the Koreans (or Asians in general) to follow the same set of principals that were developed a long time a go in a far away place?
On a side note, I notice that these traits are often missed in other Non-European countries, although in a lesser degree.
Koreans have their own set of etiquette actually, although I still have great trouble understanding it, mainly due to respect being in a single direction from the bottom up, which is very hard to swallow for me.
On an individual level, Koreans can be very entertaining, amusing and adhering to the principals of good behavior, but when we meet them on a more distant level, say on the street, and not on a name to name basis, a lot of them seem rather course in their behavior.
I often see Korea as still being a peasant society, don't take this in a negative sense, take it objectively, even though they are now a developed country, a lot of older generations still portray the rudimentary behavior of a farmer. I often forgive such people for they don't have a clue to what they are doing wrong.
I do often encounter younger generations acting completely different from their older counterparts. Often excusing themselves when intruded into private space (also a Western Concept), paying more attention to the people around them, instead of paying attention only to the people they know.
So change is in the air, and rules of proper behavior (as understood in the West) are becoming slowly more prelavent in Korean society.
Therefore my advise to you:
Even though Koreans are no Gentleman, give them some respite, they have been changing in such rapid fashion from peasant culture to developing culture to developed culture. Especially older generations, who have difficulties in changing their way, should be excused. If it is not in you nature to be forgiven, then try to avoid older generations, and do not uphold them to your own standards. Show them the proper example and hope it rubs of.
And maybe, this counts for anyone including me, try to understand their side of the story. Koreans often think we are rude as well. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
thiophene
Joined: 15 Sep 2007
|
Posted: Sat Dec 22, 2007 8:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Easy on the ethnocentrism. Why should they change to a more west friendly etiquette and not the other way around? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mercury

Joined: 05 Dec 2004 Location: Pusan
|
Posted: Sat Dec 22, 2007 10:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
thiophene wrote: |
Easy on the ethnocentrism. Why should they change to a more west friendly etiquette and not the other way around? |
Because they are the ones trying to copy the west. From shopping carts, to television ads, to highway structures, to red lights, to suits and leather dress shoes, cops in uniforms with little guns, bus tickets, sinks and toilets, napkins and plates and computers and ipods and telephones and cars and trains and planes. Light switches, light bulbs, motobikes and apartment buildings. These people are copying the West. Go outside and count how many things they have copied. Make a list. Now ask yourself this question: Why are they using OUR things? How many of THEIR things do we use? I wonder why? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Juregen
Joined: 30 May 2006
|
Posted: Sat Dec 22, 2007 10:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
thiophene wrote: |
Easy on the ethnocentrism. Why should they change to a more west friendly etiquette and not the other way around? |
Actually that is the point I am trying to make.
An entire discussion could consist of just trying to find reasons why they should adapt to the West an why we should adapt to their ways.
I am trying to see and understand both ways. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Julius

Joined: 27 Jul 2006
|
Posted: Sat Dec 22, 2007 10:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
thiophene wrote: |
Easy on the ethnocentrism. Why should they change to a more west friendly etiquette and not the other way around? |
Because its more advanced to treat everyone with equal respect than only the oldest- who treat everyone else with contempt.
It would also help Korea get into line with the rest of the world and forge better relations with everyone else. Its for their own good to be viewed and view others in a positive light. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
markhan
Joined: 02 Aug 2006
|
Posted: Sat Dec 22, 2007 11:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It some respects, you may already be influenced by ethnocentrism without even knowing about it.
One of the leading historian (I forgot his name, but he was a professor in Harvard) noted that over 50% of all modern inventions has roots in invention created long time ago in China. For instance, many argue (even though I disagree) that first computer was created in China. ie. Abacus. There are many similar arguments. Also IPod is popular for ability to use MP3 file. Mind you MP3 player was first created by Korean company, MPMan. Sony could also argue that Korean MPman was modifed version of Walkman, and so on.
Of course our ability to propagate the knoweldge could not have been possible without the paper and printing machine, which are also Chinese invention. I hardly think Chinese would ask foreigners to abide to their "cultural etiquette" based on fact that we are using THEIR THINGS.
Let's not be childish here.
mercury wrote: |
thiophene wrote: |
Easy on the ethnocentrism. Why should they change to a more west friendly etiquette and not the other way around? |
Because they are the ones trying to copy the west. From shopping carts, to television ads, to highway structures, to red lights, to suits and leather dress shoes, cops in uniforms with little guns, bus tickets, sinks and toilets, napkins and plates and computers and ipods and telephones and cars and trains and planes. Light switches, light bulbs, motobikes and apartment buildings. These people are copying the West. Go outside and count how many things they have copied. Make a list. Now ask yourself this question: Why are they using OUR things? How many of THEIR things do we use? I wonder why? |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Ya-ta Boy
Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Location: Established in 1994
|
Posted: Sat Dec 22, 2007 11:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
Why should they change to a more west friendly etiquette and not the other way around? |
I don't know that they should, but Koreans have shown they are far more adaptable than the vast majority of Westerners who come here and whine endlessly about how Koreans don't act like 'we' do back home. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mercury

Joined: 05 Dec 2004 Location: Pusan
|
Posted: Sat Dec 22, 2007 11:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
markhan wrote: |
It some respects, you may already be influenced by ethnocentrism without even knowing about it.
One of the leading historian (I forgot his name, but he was a professor in Harvard) noted that over 50% of all modern inventions has roots in invention created long time ago in China. For instance, many argue (even though I disagree) that first computer was created in China. ie. Abacus. There are many similar arguments. Also IPod is popular for ability to use MP3 file. Mind you MP3 player was first created by Korean company, MPMan. Sony could also argue that Korean MPman was modifed version of Walkman, and so on.
Of course our ability to propagate the knoweldge could not have been possible without the paper and printing machine, which are also Chinese invention. I hardly think Chinese would ask foreigners to abide to their "cultural etiquette" based on fact that we are using THEIR THINGS.
Let's not be childish here.
mercury wrote: |
thiophene wrote: |
Easy on the ethnocentrism. Why should they change to a more west friendly etiquette and not the other way around? |
Because they are the ones trying to copy the west. From shopping carts, to television ads, to highway structures, to red lights, to suits and leather dress shoes, cops in uniforms with little guns, bus tickets, sinks and toilets, napkins and plates and computers and ipods and telephones and cars and trains and planes. Light switches, light bulbs, motobikes and apartment buildings. These people are copying the West. Go outside and count how many things they have copied. Make a list. Now ask yourself this question: Why are they using OUR things? How many of THEIR things do we use? I wonder why? |
|
So who is this guy, you forgot his name??? Then why did you post this message, worthless. Uhhhhh, I heard this one prof say that.........duh
Post links, then I will listen to what you have to say. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
komerican

Joined: 17 Dec 2006
|
Posted: Sun Dec 23, 2007 12:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
mercury wrote: |
markhan wrote: |
It some respects, you may already be influenced by ethnocentrism without even knowing about it.
One of the leading historian (I forgot his name, but he was a professor in Harvard) noted that over 50% of all modern inventions has roots in invention created long time ago in China. For instance, many argue (even though I disagree) that first computer was created in China. ie. Abacus. There are many similar arguments. Also IPod is popular for ability to use MP3 file. Mind you MP3 player was first created by Korean company, MPMan. Sony could also argue that Korean MPman was modifed version of Walkman, and so on.
Of course our ability to propagate the knoweldge could not have been possible without the paper and printing machine, which are also Chinese invention. I hardly think Chinese would ask foreigners to abide to their "cultural etiquette" based on fact that we are using THEIR THINGS.
Let's not be childish here.
mercury wrote: |
thiophene wrote: |
Easy on the ethnocentrism. Why should they change to a more west friendly etiquette and not the other way around? |
Because they are the ones trying to copy the west. From shopping carts, to television ads, to highway structures, to red lights, to suits and leather dress shoes, cops in uniforms with little guns, bus tickets, sinks and toilets, napkins and plates and computers and ipods and telephones and cars and trains and planes. Light switches, light bulbs, motobikes and apartment buildings. These people are copying the West. Go outside and count how many things they have copied. Make a list. Now ask yourself this question: Why are they using OUR things? How many of THEIR things do we use? I wonder why? |
|
So who is this guy, you forgot his name??? Then why did you post this message, worthless. Uhhhhh, I heard this one prof say that.........duh
Post links, then I will listen to what you have to say. |
well I've had this discussion before and cited sources. The response was "books aren't original sources"
I think what's more interesting is how westerners graduate with liberal arts degrees but don't know how their own history. For example, steel, which I think we can all agree was essential for the industrial revolution was actually invented in asia. This is why a western undergraduate education is not that great. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
thiophene
Joined: 15 Sep 2007
|
Posted: Sun Dec 23, 2007 12:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
mercury wrote: |
thiophene wrote: |
Easy on the ethnocentrism. Why should they change to a more west friendly etiquette and not the other way around? |
Because they are the ones trying to copy the west. From shopping carts, to television ads, to highway structures, to red lights, to suits and leather dress shoes, cops in uniforms with little guns, bus tickets, sinks and toilets, napkins and plates and computers and ipods and telephones and cars and trains and planes. Light switches, light bulbs, motobikes and apartment buildings. These people are copying the West. Go outside and count how many things they have copied. Make a list. Now ask yourself this question: Why are they using OUR things? How many of THEIR things do we use? I wonder why? |
Social norms and inanimate objects are 2 different things, why on earth would a light bulb more gentleman-like? Would a westerner adopting a Korean invention be mutinous? (i'm exaggerating of course) Science is for everyone.
Juregen, I see what you're saying.
Julius, it is better to treat everyone equal, but no one does it, if we did, there would be no culture. A simple act like a gentleman holding a door for a lady could be a norm in many parts of the west, but for equality-nazi's like myself, I don't care for it. Societies just developed different norms, why should they be judged for it? In the west, we all (most) act differently when we are around children, employers, funerals, friends, and strangers. Dancing around the world has many forms, from touching gyrating hips to line dancing to painfully organized ballroom. You gyrate hip to hip at a muslim wedding, that's a major faux pas, you sacrifice a sheep for a new born in Canada, that's a faux pas (and I think illegal if it's a do-it-yourself), or hey, you want some placenta with that sheep?. Every culture does 'weird' things, that's what makes them special. It's not hurting anyone so what's the big deal?
Personally, I don't hold their pushing, spitting, etc. ways against them, I wasn't brought up here so I just accept it as another way of life.
And no I'm not a social anthropologist, these are just my views. And I know I'm using the term culture very loosely. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
crusher_of_heads
Joined: 23 Feb 2007 Location: kimbop and kimchi for kimberly!!!!
|
Posted: Sun Dec 23, 2007 2:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
thiophene wrote: |
Easy on the ethnocentrism. Why should they change to a more west friendly etiquette and not the other way around? |
When I am in, *ahem ahem* Rome, I won't beat my girlfriend like the Romans do.
When I am in Rome, I won't be sure to hear everyone hearing me clear my throat.
When I am in Rome and married in the future, I won't be getting a Happy Ending when I go for a haircut.
When I am Rome, I won't be asking if visitors ever ate , *ahem* spaghetti in their home country.
When I am in Rome, I won't be drinking, *ahem*, copious amounts of Roman whisky most nights. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
winterwawa
Joined: 06 May 2007
|
Posted: Sun Dec 23, 2007 2:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
Ya-ta Boy wrote: |
Quote: |
Why should they change to a more west friendly etiquette and not the other way around? |
I don't know that they should, but Koreans have shown they are far more adaptable than the vast majority of Westerners who come here and whine endlessly about how Koreans don't act like 'we' do back home. |
Actually, Koreans are not as adaptable as you think. Even when they go abroad they still want everything done according to their culture. When I taught ESL in America, I had many Korean students, and they always complained that American just don't understand them. Their mantra was always and under any circumstance
"I'm Korean. Please understand me."
I agree with the OP. Korea is one massive copy machine. They haven't had an original idea since Hangul was invented. And there is even evidence that Hangul was copied from an old Mongolian script that has since died away. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Pyongshin Sangja

Joined: 20 Apr 2003 Location: I love baby!
|
Posted: Sun Dec 23, 2007 3:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
Sure, China invented steel. But it was only mass-produced in the 19th century by an Englishman, Bessemer. Just like the printing press, it was invented but not made available to the people. While the West was driving the Industrial Revolution the only time a Chinese person saw steel was while he was laying railroad tracks. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
nateium

Joined: 21 Aug 2006 Location: Seoul
|
Posted: Sun Dec 23, 2007 3:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
Pyongshin Sangja wrote: |
Sure, China invented steel. But it was only mass-produced in the 19th century by an Englishman, Bessemer. Just like the printing press, it was invented but not made available to the people. While the West was driving the Industrial Revolution the only time a Chinese person saw steel was while he was laying railroad tracks. |
Can you really claim the Chinese invented it? The steel production process seems to have a long history of development and improvement, only part of which happened in China.
Quote: |
Ancient steel
Steel was known in antiquity, and may have been produced by managing the bloomery so that the bloom contained carbon.[9] Some of the first steel comes from East Africa, dating back to 1400 BCE.[10] In the 4th century BCE steel weapons like the Falcata were produced in the Iberian peninsula. The Chinese of the Han Dynasty (202 BCE � 220 CE) created steel by melting together wrought iron with cast iron, gaining an ultimate product of a carbon-intermediate�steel by the 1st century CE.[11][12] Along with their original methods of forging steel, the Chinese had also adopted the production methods of creating Wootz steel, an idea imported from India to China by the 5th century CE.[13] Wootz steel was produced in India and Sri Lanka from around 300 BCE. This early steel-making method employed the use of a wind furnace, blown by the monsoon winds.[14] Also known as Damascus steel, wootz is famous for its durability and ability to hold an edge. It was originally created from a number of different materials including various trace elements. It was essentially a complicated alloy with iron as its main component. Recent studies have suggested that carbon nanotubes were included in its structure, which might explain some of its legendary qualities, though given the technology available at that time, they were probably produced more by chance than by design.[15] Crucible steel was produced in Merv by 9th to 10th century CE.
In the 11th century, there is evidence of the production of steel in Song China using two techniques: a "berganesque" method that produced inferior, inhomogeneous steel and a precursor to the modern Bessemer process that utilized partial decarbonization via repeated forging under a cold blast.[16]
[edit] Early modern steel
A Bessemer converter in Sheffield, England.
A Bessemer converter in Sheffield, England.
[edit] Blister steel
Main article: Cementation process
Blister steel, produced by the cementation process was first made in Italy in the early 17th century CE and soon after introduced to England. It was probably produced by Sir Basil Brooke at Coalbrookdale during the 1610s. The raw material for this was bars of wrought iron. During the 17th century it was realised that the best steel came from oregrounds iron from a region of Sweden, north of Stockholm. This was still the usual raw material in the 19th century, almost as long as the process was used.[17][18]
[edit] Crucible steel
Main article: Crucible steel
Crucible steel is steel that has been melted in a crucible rather than being forged, with the result that it is more homogeneous. Most previous furnaces could not reach high enough temperatures to melt the steel. The early modern crucible steel industry resulted from the invention of Benjamin Huntsman in the 1740s. Blister steel (made as above) was melted in a crucible in a furnace, and cast (usually) into ingots.[18]
[edit] Modern steelmaking
A Siemens-Martin steel oven from the Brandenburg Museum of Industry.
A Siemens-Martin steel oven from the Brandenburg Museum of Industry.
See also History of the modern steel industry.
The modern era in steelmaking began with the introduction of Henry Bessemer's Bessemer process in the late 1850s. This enabled steel to be produced in large quantities cheaply, so that mild steel is now used for most purposes for which wrought iron was formerly used.[19] This was only the first of a number of methods of steel production. The Gilchrist-Thomas process (or basic Bessemer process) was an improvement to the Bessemer process, lining the converter with a basic material to remove phosphorus. Another was the Siemens-Martin process of open hearth steelmaking, which like the Gilchrist-Thomas process complemented, rather than replaced, the original Bessemer process.[18]
These were rendered obsolete by the Linz-Donawitz process of basic oxygen steelmaking, developed in the 1950s, and other oxygen steelmaking processes.[20]
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steel |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
komerican

Joined: 17 Dec 2006
|
Posted: Sun Dec 23, 2007 3:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
Steel manufacture. (history of Chinese science)
actually what happened was that bessemer merely beat Kelly to the patent office. He may have gotten his ideas independently or perhaps from Kelly who got his ideas from the chinese.
http://www.legis.state.pa.us/WU01/VC/visitor_info/pa_history/whole_pa_history.htm
William Kelly, a native of Pittsburgh, is regarded as the inventor of the Bessemer process of making steel.
http://www.accessmylibrary.com/coms2/summary_0286-9200760_ITM
Henry Bessemer's work had been anticipated in 1852 by William Kelly, from a small town near Eddyville, Kentucky. Kelly had brought four Chinese steel experts to Kentucky in 1845, from whom he had learned the principles of steel production used in China for over 2,000 years
http://gates.itcstore.com/default.aspx?p=92690
Iron working can be traced as far back as 3,500 B.C. in Armenia. The Bessamer process, created independently by Henry Bessemer in England and William Kelly in the United States during the 1850s |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|