| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Milwaukiedave
Joined: 02 Oct 2004 Location: Goseong
|
Posted: Thu Jan 03, 2008 6:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I was thinking the same thing CP, but I wouldn't underestimate Clinton. She will come back fighting. Hopefully Obama gets the bounce and wins NH, but he needs to place at least 1st or 2nd. If Clinton comes in 3rd in Iowa, then she'll be hurting and NH will be pretty important. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Tiger Beer

Joined: 07 Feb 2003
|
Posted: Thu Jan 03, 2008 7:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Amazing. I mean amazing that it's still out there that even Edwards might get ahead of Clinton for a 2nd place after Obama. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Czarjorge

Joined: 01 May 2007 Location: I now have the same moustache, and it is glorious.
|
Posted: Thu Jan 03, 2008 7:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Edwards is pulling second with 97% of precincts reporting. The question is really can Clinton explain away third, since it's really more of a tie for second. Edwards is only ahead by 11 delegates which is a minute majority.
Obama's up to 38%. It will be interesting to see if some of Edwards' and Clinton's delegates jump over to Obama's side if he's the clear leader in March.
And thank god for Huckabee. I thought about changing his nickname from Huckster to Schmuckabee, but I think it's more apropos to call his supporters schmuckabees, as he has zero chance for winning if the US isn't so far gone it's not worth saving. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Gopher

Joined: 04 Jun 2005
|
Posted: Thu Jan 03, 2008 7:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
People are calling Obama "the winner." But I see Obama carrying 16 delegates, Hillary carrying 15, and Edwards 14.
Is there truly a clear-cut winner here...? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Czarjorge

Joined: 01 May 2007 Location: I now have the same moustache, and it is glorious.
|
Posted: Thu Jan 03, 2008 7:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Actually at the county and state caucus the delegates can change which candidate they support. I could leave Obama and caucus with Hillary and vice versa. The final convention delegate number won't be decided until this summer. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Tiger Beer

Joined: 07 Feb 2003
|
Posted: Thu Jan 03, 2008 7:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| Projections showed a turnout of 220,588 for Democrats, compared to 124,000 who showed up for Democratic caucuses in 2004. The turnout was nearly twice as large as the Republican turnout, which was also up from four years ago. |
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080104/ap_on_el_pr/clinton |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Milwaukiedave
Joined: 02 Oct 2004 Location: Goseong
|
Posted: Thu Jan 03, 2008 7:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Czarjorge wrote: |
Edwards is pulling second with 97% of precincts reporting. The question is really can Clinton explain away third, since it's really more of a tie for second. Edwards is only ahead by 11 delegates which is a minute majority.
Obama's up to 38%. It will be interesting to see if some of Edwards' and Clinton's delegates jump over to Obama's side if he's the clear leader in March.
And thank god for Huckabee. I thought about changing his nickname from Huckster to Schmuckabee, but I think it's more apropos to call his supporters schmuckabees, as he has zero chance for winning if the US isn't so far gone it's not worth saving. |
I have to say that I'm shocked, but happy that Clinton made such a horrid showing. Even a second place finish for Edwards puts him on the ropes. If he doesn't place first or second in NH or NC he's toast. I would guess Clinton will stay in it until Feb 5th. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
cbclark4

Joined: 20 Aug 2006 Location: Masan
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Milwaukiedave
Joined: 02 Oct 2004 Location: Goseong
|
Posted: Thu Jan 03, 2008 7:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| CB..FYI the link didn't work. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
cbclark4

Joined: 20 Aug 2006 Location: Masan
|
Posted: Thu Jan 03, 2008 8:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| fixed |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
chronicpride

Joined: 16 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Thu Jan 03, 2008 8:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Clinton will spin that Bill was also never strong in Iowa and still went on to win it all. And also that they are confident in the national numbers and that the Iowa thing won't matter much on the whole. Or basically say the same thing that Mitt said after losing Iowa.
But lord knows that they were not expecting 3rd and to be that far behind Obama. She has to hope that McCain sucks in more independents (who can vote for either primary in NH) than Obama in NH and she sqweaks out a win there.
The big variable for Hil right now is how Bill is going to play this. He's obviously ripping into Mark Penn and is likely trying to run the show to preserve his legacy. Bubba can sink this or possibly still seal this.
PS, here's the link for the real time results:
http://www.iowacaucusresults.com/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Milwaukiedave
Joined: 02 Oct 2004 Location: Goseong
|
Posted: Thu Jan 03, 2008 8:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It's official Hillary came in 3rd. WHOOO!
1st Obama
2nd Edwards
3rd Clinton
Gravel, Biden and Dodd are out.
That leaves Obama, Edwards, Clinton and Richardson on the D side. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
cbclark4

Joined: 20 Aug 2006 Location: Masan
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Tiger Beer

Joined: 07 Feb 2003
|
Posted: Thu Jan 03, 2008 8:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Milwaukiedave wrote: |
It's official Hillary came in 3rd. WHOOO!
1st Obama
2nd Edwards
3rd Clinton
Gravel, Biden and Dodd are out.
That leaves Obama, Edwards, Clinton and Richardson on the D side. |
Wow, Gravel too! Well, makes sense, those three really don't have much of a chance.
This is all the better for Richardson however, as he might get a lot more notice without the others around.
What about Kucinich? I doubt he had much expectation for Iowa to begin with, so I'd imagine he'll still be around a bit more. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Milwaukiedave
Joined: 02 Oct 2004 Location: Goseong
|
Posted: Thu Jan 03, 2008 8:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I think Kucinch will drop out soon as well. He might stick around until NH though. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|