Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

China blogger beaten to death

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
bassexpander



Joined: 13 Sep 2007
Location: Someplace you'd rather be.

PostPosted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 3:57 pm    Post subject: China blogger beaten to death Reply with quote

http://edition.cnn.com/2008/WORLD/asiapcf/01/11/china.blogger/index.html
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Ya-ta Boy



Joined: 16 Jan 2003
Location: Established in 1994

PostPosted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 4:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Sooner or later, the CCP's monopoly on power is going to be seriously challenged, like at Tianamen Square. Every time I read about a rural protest against corruption or whatever, I wonder if it's the first step in the challenge. We can only hope.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Milwaukiedave



Joined: 02 Oct 2004
Location: Goseong

PostPosted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 6:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I have to wonder with the Olympics coming up this year, how much real pressure is going to be put on China to stop the beating and killing of people. I read somewhere that China let some North Koreans out of China (I think they were evetually headed to SK) rather then sending them back to NK (where they either would be killed or sent to a gulag). That was somewhat encouraging.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mistermasan



Joined: 20 Sep 2007
Location: 10+ yrs on Dave's ESL cafe

PostPosted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 6:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

and how is the CCP's power to be challenged? what china is tasting now is what we have to look forward to as well.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
pesawattahi



Joined: 30 Sep 2007
Location: it rubs the lotion on it's skin or else it gets the hose again

PostPosted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 8:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

We could make it a new event in the Olympics to honor the traditional way of life in communist China. SK has Tae Kwon Do, Canada has Curling, and now we can have "Beating Independant Journalist to Death by Angry Low Level Government Officials" for China.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Milwaukiedave



Joined: 02 Oct 2004
Location: Goseong

PostPosted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 9:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Has anyone seen the Lonely Planet guidebook for China. The author states something like (and I'm paraphrasing), " It's not legal to ride bicycles in Tiananmen Square (apparently tanks are ok though)."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Milwaukiedave



Joined: 02 Oct 2004
Location: Goseong

PostPosted: Sat Jan 12, 2008 5:26 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Interesting article from Yahoo. I don't think the legislation will go anywhere though.

Congress uses Olympics to focus on China By FOSTER KLUG, Associated Press Writer
1 hour, 43 minutes ago



WASHINGTON - The world will be watching China closely as it gears up to host the Olympics this year. So will U.S. lawmakers, who hope to use the attention generated by the summer games to highlight their complaints about China's government.

ADVERTISEMENT

Lawmakers, in hearings and in legislation, will scrutinize what some see as unfair Chinese economic policies, its secretive military buildup and its human rights abuses. China already has been targeted by presidential candidates.

"The Chinese want this `Show' � with a capital `S' � to showcase their government to the world," Rep. Chris Smith, R-N.J., said in an interview. Congress, he said, should use that as leverage to "bring maximum scrutiny and light to their egregious human rights abuses."

Smith champions legislation that would stop U.S. technology companies from aiding countries that restrict Internet access. American Internet companies have been denounced for turning a blind eye to abuse in China so they can crack that lucrative market.

The Bush administration's criticism of China is usually muted. Lawmakers, however, are more vocal in asserting that China has failed to live up to its responsibilities as an emerging superpower.

With the presidential campaign heating up, "2008 promises to be a trying year" for U.S.-China ties, wrote Brad Glosserman and Bonnie Glaser, analysts with the Center for Strategic and International Studies think tank. "There will be a temptation to make China a foreign policy issue or a scapegoat for problems in economic and security policy."

U.S. manufacturers say Beijing's low valuation of the yuan, its currency, makes Chinese goods cheaper in the United States and American products more expensive in China. Lawmakers are considering bills that would punish China for what they contend are predatory trade practices.

Lawmakers also worry about China's rapid military spending and the country's apparent secretiveness about its military aims. The House Armed Services Committee will hold hearings this year with top U.S. commanders in the Pacific, where China will be a major topic.

Last year, Washington criticized China's test of an anti-satellite weapon as a provocative militarization of space. The two countries also sparred after China barred the USS Kitty Hawk from entering Hong Kong for a port call.

But it is Taiwan that could cause the most friction. Taiwan split from China in 1949, although Beijing continues to see the island as part of its territory. China has pledged to keep the island from independence by force if necessary.

Reps. Scott Garrett, R-N.J., and Tom Tancredo, R-Col., are among sponsors of a resolution that would voice Congress' support for Taiwan's membership in the United Nations, which both China and the Bush administration oppose as a provocation. A referendum, scheduled to be held with Taiwan's presidential election in March, asks voters if they would support the island's application to join the United Nations under the name Taiwan, rather than under its long-standing official title, Republic of China.

The Olympics, said Mac Zimmerman, Tancredo's chief of staff, provide "a good opportunity for Taiwan and its friends in Congress to raise the profile of the Taiwan issue."

Ralph Cossa, president of the Pacific Forum CSIS think tank, noted worry that congressional support for Taiwan's U.N. membership could encourage Taiwan President Chen Shui-bian to do something that China would see as a push for independence. Chen is trying to carve out a non-Chinese identity for the island.

"Hopefully, they won't do too much," Cossa said of Congress, "because nothing makes things worse than congressional efforts to make them better."

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080112/ap_on_go_co/us_china_congress
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mistermasan



Joined: 20 Sep 2007
Location: 10+ yrs on Dave's ESL cafe

PostPosted: Sat Jan 12, 2008 11:53 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

taiwan did not split from china in 49. that the media continues to get this wrong is not a small part of the friction.

china ceded taiwan "in perpetuity" to japan circa 1898. in 1945 japan renounced control of taiwan in a treaty at the end of WW2. china was not a signatory of the treaty. the US was. any time the US state department is pressed on the issue they opine "the status of taiwan is unresolved". intentional ambiguity rules the day on this topic.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
vertical loser



Joined: 08 Jan 2006

PostPosted: Sat Jan 12, 2008 7:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

mistermasan wrote:
taiwan did not split from china in 49. that the media continues to get this wrong is not a small part of the friction.

china ceded taiwan "in perpetuity" to japan circa 1898. in 1945 japan renounced control of taiwan in a treaty at the end of WW2. china was not a signatory of the treaty. the US was. any time the US state department is pressed on the issue they opine "the status of taiwan is unresolved". intentional ambiguity rules the day on this topic.


People argue over the validity of various agreements. But the bottom line is that almost nobody in TW wants to be part of China. Almost all Taiwanese see China as a different country. According to brainwashed mainland Chinese, TW is being held hostage by the Americans and President Chen Shui Bian. The reality is that TWese trust the US far more than China. In fact many TWese are angry that the US is not supporting them more in their fight to stave off Chinese hegemony. China has 800 missiles pointed at TW, not exactly consistent with its "We love our TWese compatriots and welcome them to the warm embrace of the motherland" propaganda. I attended a conference in Taipei where academics discussed scenarios for the future of Taiwan. There were utopian and nightmare scenarios put forward. Guess under which category annexation by China came to be listed. You guessed it: a nightmare.

TW will not be becoming part of the PRC willingly. It will have to be done violently, at least if it happens anytime this generation. There is simply massive widespread resistance to the idea in Taiwan. Even the KMT (opposition party) has dropped "unification" as part of its political platform, as it is a political albatross.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mistermasan



Joined: 20 Sep 2007
Location: 10+ yrs on Dave's ESL cafe

PostPosted: Sun Jan 13, 2008 12:27 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

see the fresh election results in taiwan? voting for the KMT is a vote for incremental unification. the KMT won in a landslide. something like 86%.

business ties are going to achieve what bilions in US military hardware couldn't. the blues are gonna sellout taiwan and home as heroes to the homeland.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
nicholas_chiasson



Joined: 14 Jun 2007
Location: Samcheok

PostPosted: Sun Jan 13, 2008 1:50 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Was it stevemcgarret?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
vertical loser



Joined: 08 Jan 2006

PostPosted: Sun Jan 13, 2008 4:41 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

mistermasan wrote:
see the fresh election results in taiwan? voting for the KMT is a vote for incremental unification. the KMT won in a landslide. something like 86%.

business ties are going to achieve what bilions in US military hardware couldn't. the blues are gonna sellout taiwan and home as heroes to the homeland.


Taiwanese want normal relations and business with China, not colonisation. Those are two very different things. The very fact that the TWese are free to make that choice is the same reason why they don't trust Beijing - no choice by the people.

I doubt getting rid of Chen will change things one bit as far as that issue is concerned. He's a lame duck prez anyway. And the KMT got about 55% to 37% for the DDP% - it just won a large majority
of the seats for that reason.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
stevemcgarrett



Joined: 24 Mar 2006

PostPosted: Sun Jan 13, 2008 7:06 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

YaTa Boy wished:

Quote:
Sooner or later, the CCP's monopoly on power is going to be seriously challenged, like at Tianamen Square. Every time I read about a rural protest against corruption or whatever, I wonder if it's the first step in the challenge. We can only hope.


My sentiments precisely, only I'm afraid we'll all being hope for quite a long time to come. The CCP has always found a way to morph its message in bad times; as it did after the Great Famine and after the Cultural Revolution and after the democracy protests. It appeals to the practical side of Chinese just enough to surmount any widespread unrest. It's latest appeal is more materialistic than patriotic, of course.

As for the discussion about Taiwan vis-a-vis China, it's pretty lame.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Mosley



Joined: 15 Jan 2003

PostPosted: Mon Jan 14, 2008 4:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm with Steve on this one: a hell of a lot of us will be worm food before the CCP loses its grip on power.

I would argue, though, that as well as fostering materialism amongst the bulk of the Chinese, the party is doing a pretty good job of encouraging a nationalism that has precious little to do with socialist ideology.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International