| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
twg
Joined: 02 Nov 2006
Location: Getting some fresh air...
|
 Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2008 9:38 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
Huh, why would I be crying?
Well, it's possible that you can tears from me.
Maybe tears of laughter at the idea that trolling this board is the only goal you seem to have in your life.
Or maybe tears over the thought of the amount of shame you family probably feels about you. That's a horrible thing to contemplate.
Then again, there's also the tears that come when I remember the ending of Old Yeller.
I hope none of the kids take you out back to shoot you. That would be sad.
Oh wait... those would be tears of joy again.
Oh, these conflicting emotions,
Last edited by twg on Sat Jan 12, 2008 9:39 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
cunning_stunt
Joined: 16 Dec 2007
|
| Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2008 9:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| "Ban me again!" does it? |
I was banned ? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
cunning_stunt
Joined: 16 Dec 2007
|
| Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2008 9:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
Maybe tears of laughter at the idea that trolling this board is the only goal you seem to have in your life.
|
Funny...I haven't been active on this board much at all...to the extent that some people thought I'm brand new here . But it was an interesting theory that showed creative (if a little flighty) thought on your behalf .Well done .
| Quote: |
Or maybe tears over the thought of the amount of shame you family probably feels about you. That's a horrible thing to contemplate.
|
Your compassion and empathy for my family is very touching . My mother says you're very affectionate . (wink wink).
| Quote: |
Then again, there's also the tears that come when I remember the ending of Old Yeller.
I hope none of the kids take you out back to shoot you. That would be sad.
|
That was a sad movie . That you'd think of me when thinkiing of that faithful dog is both an honour ...and a little bit creepy to be honest . My remaining hope is that the words "red rocket" did not come into your mind whilst pondering this idea .
Now if you're done with the attemps at personal insults , and would like to try and discuss the subject matter that would be swell.....because I'm not going to get provoked into getting myself banned at your expense... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
twg
Joined: 02 Nov 2006
Location: Getting some fresh air...
|
| Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2008 11:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I thought you being a crackpot idiot WAS the topic at hand. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
cunning_stunt
Joined: 16 Dec 2007
|
| Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2008 11:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| I thought you being a crackpot idiot WAS the topic at hand. |
It should be self evident to anyone with rudimentary cognitive functioning , that I'm certainly not insecure regarding my intellect . In fairness you don't domonstrate rudimentary cognitive functioning so that need not apply . Keep prodding sunshinse...you've got to hit a nerve eventually . It's like the monkeys typewriters and shakespeare . When you're dull and lacking in wit you have to make persistance the name of your game . |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Ya-ta Boy
Joined: 16 Jan 2003
Location: Established in 1994
|
| Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2008 12:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| you have to make persistance the name of your game . |
That pretty well describes a conspiracy theorist, doesn't it? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
cunning_stunt
Joined: 16 Dec 2007
|
| Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2008 1:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| That pretty well describes a conspiracy theorist, doesn't it? |
The spelling mistake doesn't help either ....oops .
I'd seriously like to distance myself from conspiracy theorists of the loose change variety . I'm talking about the scientific method not being used by an agency posturing as a scientific one . I'm not talking about the illuminait and bilderberg group sactrificing peopls childen .... I'm not even proposing the U.s government brought down the towers.....I'm just suggesting people don't write off every theory that is cast under the name net of conspiracy because that's poor scientific and logical practice . If you are the side of sciene it's your perrogative to seriously consider all evidence and data available before dismissing it .
Why this would spark such an outcry is beyond me . The subject is obviously very emtotive to people ....and that's really the problem and hampers objective analysis . |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
endofthewor1d
Joined: 01 Apr 2003
Location: the end of the wor1d.
|
| Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2008 1:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
| cunning_stunt wrote: |
occams razor states in science we should always consider the simplest hypothesis....id you knew anything at all about physics you'd know that controlled demolition by a country mile represents the easiest explanation .....steel and concrete buildings do not just fall into themselves at near free fall speed contradicting the laws of physics ......
|
airplanes hit buildings. buildings fall down. apply occam's razor. i don't think occam would have had a problem seeing a causal relationship between those two statements. bringing in government conspiracies and aliens and whatever you want to have happened flies in the face of occam's razor.
sure, you want george bush to have been the mastermind behind the attacks. so do i. it would make for a nice bit of reading, and make a lot of really stupid people have to face the fact that they are, in fact, really stupid. but us wanting that to be true doesn't make it so.
i'm also curious about what the 'controlled demolition' was supposed to accomplish. whoever was behind the attacks, i don't think anyone argues agains their objective being to piss off the american people. i would have thought that planes slamming into the world trade center would have gotten that job done. why demolish the rest of the building? yeah, it's more damage, but i don't think that the american public was more pissed off because the buildings were completely destroyed than they would have been had planes hit the buildings without completely destroying them.
calling smart people stupid doesn't make you look smarter than them. have a look at mindmetoo's posting history. you'll see that he has a pretty solid record of chewing up stupid people and spitting them out, all the while being far more diplomatic than you or me. don't be a statistic. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
cunning_stunt
Joined: 16 Dec 2007
|
| Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2008 1:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| bringing in government conspiracies and aliens and whatever you want to |
Please read my previous post .
| Quote: |
| airplanes hit buildings. buildings fall down. |
It's not a question of could the airoplanes make the buildings start falling...sure they could. It's the question of total collapse against the path of maximum resistance and near free fall speed . To propose this should just happen as some natural course for 3 towers in one day is absurb and requires huge leaps of faith . In you actually understand the implications you're actually asking the laws of physics to break ...which i think is quite a bit less likely than the alternative...there were explosives/thermate used .
Seeing as the official bizant version requires the top of the building to piston down destroying the rest of the building (itself somehow not getting damaged despite newtons third law , and moving against the path of maximum resistance with almost no resistance )....seeing as the plausibility of this model are extremely low for one towers....not to mention 3.... with that in mind there can be no harm is testing for controlled demolition ...in fact any rational person would immedietly recognise the need for this . That's just the towers....world trade 7 was almost definately controlled demolition ....there is simply no reasonable doubt about that .
Again...I really know how this debate can get ugly and I totally understand why people would question the truth movement with idiots like Alex Jones and crappy documentaries like loose change around.....I read Nist resport to debunk these whacky theories myself and there is little doubt...it's not using the scientific method ....it's trying to fit data to it's pre decided conclusion ...and the data doesn't fit . |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
mindmetoo
Joined: 02 Feb 2004
|
| Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2008 2:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
| cunning_stunt wrote: |
| To propose this should just happen as some natural course for 3 towers in one day is absurb and requires huge leaps of faith . |
I await your peer reviewed literature that indicates this is absurd. Sorry "absurb". |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
cunning_stunt
Joined: 16 Dec 2007
|
| Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2008 2:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| I await your peer reviewed literature that indicates this is absurd. Sorry "absurb". |
You do that sunshine . You're a big boy . You do whatever it is you want . |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
mindmetoo
Joined: 02 Feb 2004
|
| Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2008 2:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
| cunning_stunt wrote: |
| Quote: |
| I await your peer reviewed literature that indicates this is absurd. Sorry "absurb". |
You do that sunshine . You're a big boy . You do whatever it is you want . |
It would be the scientific position. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
cunning_stunt
Joined: 16 Dec 2007
|
| Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2008 2:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| It would be the scientific position. |
Which is all I'm asking for . |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
