Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Clinton's Lies Continue
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
thepeel



Joined: 08 Aug 2004

PostPosted: Thu Jan 24, 2008 9:19 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I went on a whiskey tour in Kentucky. Nice state.

I got the joke. Don't really understand what you all are arguing about.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Milwaukiedave



Joined: 02 Oct 2004
Location: Goseong

PostPosted: Thu Jan 24, 2008 12:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

stevemcgarrett wrote:
MilwaukieDave:

Thanks for sharing that ad. I wasn't aware that it was running. As you know, I predicted this would happen the longer the campaign drags on.

And the Clinton insinuation that Obama somehow secretly concurred with Reagan's policies is disingenuous. Anyone with two nerve synapses firing in his brain knows that Obama was describing a historical phenomenon, namely, Reagan's transformative brand of politics, which Obama also aspires to.

And you can bet the Columbia River that if Obama were not a minority, these dirty pool tactics would be even more frequent.

It will be interesting to see if Black voters--especially the younger generations who were not part of the civil rights movement and did not campaign for Bill Clinton--become turned off to these attacks enough to switch their allegiance to Obama. Sure hope so.

And if Bill points one more finger at a reporter asking a legitimate question, someone should twist it. BTW: have you noticed he gets more Secret Service protection than all of the candidates except the front runners?

Watch for the parsing of words by the legal team of Hill-Bill, which might also turn off less educated voters tired of lawyer-speak.

I just hope Obama can hold up but as his wife said, he's been tested in Chicago politics which are mud-slinging contests exceeded only by Louisiana and Texas.

One more thing is really starting to get under my skin: this tag team wrestling tactic of Bill taunting and Hill denying. Obama was right on the mark when he quipped during the last debate that he sometimes doesn't know who he's running against. This is, of course, an unprecedented move on their part and at some point it will be legitimate for Obama to pick holes in Bill's record as President.

But all of this only makes the Dems look bad. Would be real curious to know two things at this juncture: who is Dean backing behind the scenes and how much will Edwards cozy up to Clinton for a VP spot if he sees his chances waning? Don't forget: doing so would bring pay back time to Kerry, who came out in favor of Obama.


Steve,

I am deeply concerned, unlike the Clinton supporters, that the GE will be similar to 2000 and 2004. That is it will be a very nasty fight and it will be very close (ok granted 2004 wasn't that close, but one state would have changed the outcome). If these two things become true, it's anyone's race. The Clinton's believe they will cruise to an easy win, which will preserve Bill's legacy, but it's going to be a bruising fight. One they will lose.

My feeling is that Clinton will not be competitive in many smaller states despite the fact she is a woman and if she was elected it would make history. As I have said previously, she may well win some of the big states, but if she can't compete in the small states, then it's game over.

The whole flap about what he said about Reagan is being twisted by the Clinton twins. Reagan did indeed transform politics by enticing Democrats to vote for him, thus giving him two landslide victories. That is the difference between divisive politics (which is what the Clinton's like to use) and inclusive politics.

I don't know what to think about Edwards. Some of it depends on the timing of his theoretically dropping out (what I'm saying here is I'm not going to assume he will). Many believe there is no way he'll endorse Hillary Clinton, but I think it's still very possible. If he dropped out after this weekend and endorsed Clinton, the primary would be over after Feb 5th. I'm not so sure how much he would help Obama.

I'm also hoping if Clinton wins the nomination and Obama is offered the VP slot, he turns it down. Since there is no love lose between the two, I hope he will. As long as this is still a race, I'm behind Obama.


Last edited by Milwaukiedave on Thu Jan 24, 2008 4:41 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ya-ta Boy



Joined: 16 Jan 2003
Location: Established in 1994

PostPosted: Thu Jan 24, 2008 2:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
Reagan did indeed transform politics by enticing Democrats to vote for him, thus giving him two landslide victories. That is the difference between divisive politics (which is what the Clinton's like to use) and inclusive politics.


How soon people forget...

Suppose you were planning your announcement of your decision to seek the nomination of the Republican Party for president. You grew up in Illinois, went west to California and spent most of your adult life there and have even served as governor of California. Where would you go to announce your candidacy? To your birthplace? That might have some nostalgic value. Your home in California or some spot in California that has symbolic value to you...Hollywood or Sacramento?

No, you go to Selma, Alabama and throw around words like States Rights.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Kuros



Joined: 27 Apr 2004

PostPosted: Thu Jan 24, 2008 2:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

thepeel wrote:
I went on a whiskey tour in Kentucky. Nice state.


Thanks.

I'm not *from* Kentucky, but I like my adopted state. I especially like Louisville, which is where I live.

I live on a side-street right off the coolest road in Louisville (and by extension, the coolest road in the state). It's called Bardstown Road.

Its the most gay-friendly neighborhood in KY, IN, and I'd even wager OH.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Czarjorge



Joined: 01 May 2007
Location: I now have the same moustache, and it is glorious.

PostPosted: Thu Jan 24, 2008 4:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The most gay friendly street I've ever seen is really more of a neighborhood or district in Chicago, Boy's Town. There are these great lit up rainbow statuaries and all the hookers are trannies. There was even a bar called "The Man Hole" a few years back.

I was surprised when I moved to Omaha and saw another Boy's Town.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I was a little kid for most of the 80's, so I can't speak of personal experience with Reagan. In reading about him in college I don't remember him being a very positive figure. It's surprising how much nostalgia is attached to a figure that was so wildly divisive.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Milwaukiedave



Joined: 02 Oct 2004
Location: Goseong

PostPosted: Thu Jan 24, 2008 4:40 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ya-ta Boy wrote:
Quote:
Reagan did indeed transform politics by enticing Democrats to vote for him, thus giving him two landslide victories. That is the difference between divisive politics (which is what the Clinton's like to use) and inclusive politics.


How soon people forget...

Suppose you were planning your announcement of your decision to seek the nomination of the Republican Party for president. You grew up in Illinois, went west to California and spent most of your adult life there and have even served as governor of California. Where would you go to announce your candidacy? To your birthplace? That might have some nostalgic value. Your home in California or some spot in California that has symbolic value to you...Hollywood or Sacramento?

No, you go to Selma, Alabama and throw around words like States Rights.


Ya-ta,

That may be, but he still won elections in two of the biggest landslides in American history. He certainly didn't do it with just Republicans backing him. Reagan literally blew out the tires of the two D nominees in 1980 and 1984. In the GE you pretty much have to appeal to a broad base of support or your not going to win.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Kuros



Joined: 27 Apr 2004

PostPosted: Thu Jan 24, 2008 4:45 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Milwaukiedave wrote:
In the GE you pretty much have to appeal to a broad base of support or your not going to win.


Except in 2004.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
stevemcgarrett



Joined: 24 Mar 2006

PostPosted: Thu Jan 24, 2008 7:20 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Jorge conjectured yet again:

Quote:
It's surprising how much nostalgia is attached to a figure that was so wildly divisive.


Just to reinforce MD's response to you, I think you've got it twisted around. Reagan united people on the theme of "It's morning in America, again." Lee Atwater and Co. helped him convince most Americans that wallowing in the mire of post-Vietnam malaise wasn't in our character or interests. Reagan really believe it and so did the landslide majorities voting for him. Although an actor, he was political to the core with one notable advantage: he knew how to convey his feelings which were genuine.

The fundamental problem with Hill-Bill is that most Americans sense that their ambition drives their convictions and not the other way around.

It's another reason that Obama appeals to so many across party lines. He may be a little wet behind the ears, but he doesn't hide them under a hood, so to speak.

MD:

I agree: a Hillary nomination will be the kiss of death for the Dems. Her negatives are simply too high and too entrenched to ignore.

My hunch is that Bill will come knocking on Edwards' door sooner rather than later if it is obvious the latter can't win the nomination and Obama's star is still rising. Bank on it.

Tonight, Carl Bernstein, who as you may know has written an influential bio of Hillary, declared to Anderson Cooper of CNN that the Clintons will stop at almost nothing to get back to the White House.

And Bill himself implied as much, albeit unwittingly, when he smugly retorted that he "didn't give a flip what people are saying about him." Yeah, I guess when you've been exposed as much as he has, that's probably true.

How convenient for Hillary: he gets to do her dirty work in the kitchen.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
thepeel



Joined: 08 Aug 2004

PostPosted: Thu Jan 24, 2008 7:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Kuros wrote:
thepeel wrote:
I went on a whiskey tour in Kentucky. Nice state.


Thanks.

I'm not *from* Kentucky, but I like my adopted state. I especially like Louisville, which is where I live.

I live on a side-street right off the coolest road in Louisville (and by extension, the coolest road in the state). It's called Bardstown Road.

Its the most gay-friendly neighborhood in KY, IN, and I'd even wager OH.


I stayed in Louisville for a couple days. Saw John Prine there. I like the 'feel' of the South.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Czarjorge



Joined: 01 May 2007
Location: I now have the same moustache, and it is glorious.

PostPosted: Thu Jan 24, 2008 7:39 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Like I said, I'm a youngin by some of your standards and I was more concerned with riding my bike and big league chew (I loved gum that simulated tobacco as a youth.) than politics in the 80's, but I'm not sure I agree with your analysis based on my reading.

The number of registered voters as compared to the number of eligible voters has never been good in the US. It's only slightly worse now than it was in the 1980s, percentage wise, and yes Reagan won by a huge margin in two election where the turnout of registered voters was amazingly high. But in terms of society at large, most historians view Reagan as a divisive character.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
stevemcgarrett



Joined: 24 Mar 2006

PostPosted: Thu Jan 24, 2008 7:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

thepeel wrote aimlessly:

Quote:
I stayed in Louisville for a couple days. Saw John Prine there. I like the 'feel' of the South.


Would you kindly take your fat azz-kicking butt over to the Off-Topic Forum with this drivel about Kentucky. It's not relevant and it's not making the rest of us slap our knees in guffaw.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
stillnotking



Joined: 18 Dec 2007
Location: Oregon, USA

PostPosted: Fri Jan 25, 2008 2:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

If the Dems nominate Hillary, they lose the general. Period. At least forty percent of America would crawl through barbed wire, uphill, in a blizzard, to pull the lever marked "Anyone But Hillary". And the oppo research file on her is so thick it has its own file cabinet.

That having been said, I like the fact that Hillary has finally decided to go negative on Obama. It's a useful preview of what the general election will look like should he be the nominee, although, of course, the opposition party will pull out all the stops. I eagerly await the 527 ads screaming that Obama shot a man in Reno just to watch him die.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
stillnotking



Joined: 18 Dec 2007
Location: Oregon, USA

PostPosted: Fri Jan 25, 2008 2:29 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Milwaukiedave wrote:
That may be, but Reagan still won elections in two of the biggest landslides in American history. He certainly didn't do it with just Republicans backing him. Reagan literally blew out the tires of the two D nominees in 1980 and 1984. In the GE you pretty much have to appeal to a broad base of support or your not going to win.


Well, yeah, but you also have to look at his opponents. Carter in 1980 was widely seen as a failed President, and Mondale was a grizzled old hack of a ward-heeler that no one had ever heard of.

If all you look at is the winner and the margin of victory, you'd conclude that (for example) Nixon was wildly popular in 1972 and George W. Bush was wildly popular in 1988 and Clinton was wildly popular in 1996. They weren't; they were just running against singularly ineffective opposition.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Milwaukiedave



Joined: 02 Oct 2004
Location: Goseong

PostPosted: Fri Jan 25, 2008 5:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

stillnotking wrote:
And the oppo research file on her is so thick it has its own file cabinet.


More like its own office building.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Milwaukiedave



Joined: 02 Oct 2004
Location: Goseong

PostPosted: Fri Jan 25, 2008 6:43 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hillary and Bill continue to lie:

Undecided voters watch Obama-Clinton fracas
Clinton revives Rezko charge as South Carolinians keep mum about voting
By Tom Curry
National affairs writer
MSNBC
updated 3:09 p.m. ET Jan. 25, 2008
CHARLESTON, S.C. - It has now become fully a four-person race as the clock ticks down toward Saturday�s South Carolina Democratic primary.

Two married couples, the Obamas and the Clintons are battling it out over who should be the nominee.

Making the point that South Carolina has become a referendum on Bill Clinton was the e-mail from Michelle Obama that popped into inboxes exactly at the moment the former president started speaking Thursday in Walterboro, S.C. (population 5,545).

�In the past week or two, another candidate's spouse has been getting an awful lot of attention,� said Michelle Obama as she asked for a $50 donation to her husband�s campaign.

�We knew getting into this race that Barack would be competing with Senator Clinton and President Clinton at the same time.� What we didn't expect, at least not from our fellow Democrats, are the win-at-all-costs tactics we've seen recently.�

'We don't play the fear card'
The Obama camp has adopted the tone of the victim who remains high-minded despite the injuries they feel they�ve suffered.

�We don�t play the fear card, or the race card or the anger card,� said Kevin Puleo, Obama�s regional field director as he tried to warm up the crowd waiting to hear Barack Obama speak Thursday night in North Charleston.

�I was convinced the American people were hungry for something new, they don�t want a politics that�s all about tearing people down,� Obama himself told the crowd later.

Obama told the crowd, �Some of my opponents say, �Oh, he talks pretty, he�s always talking about hope, he�s so na�ve, he�s idealistic, he�s a hope-monger, it�s a fairy tale.�

One woman bellowed out from the crowd, �That was Bill!�

It was a reference to Bill Clinton�s calling Obama�s explanation of his stance on the Iraq war �a fairy tale.�

Eight hours later, Hillary Clinton in her interview on NBC's TODAY Show Friday morning, played two different hands simultaneously.

One hand: �Our campaign has to stay focused on the legitimate differences between us.�

The other: the Rezko card.

Who knew Rezko and for how long?
Clinton brushed off a photo that surfaced from the 1990s of her and her husband standing next to long-time Obama campaign fundraiser Tony Rezko, who is set to go on trial next month in Chicago on corruption charges.

Hillary Clinton attacked Obama�s relationship with Rezko to whom she referred as �a slum landlord� in the Democrats� debate Monday night.

�I don�t know the man (Rezko); I wouldn�t know him if he walked in the door; I don�t have a 17-year relationship with him,� Clinton told Matt Lauer. �There�s a big difference between standing somewhere, taking a picture with someone you don�t know and haven�t seen since, and having a relationship that the newspapers in Chicago have been exploring.�

Thus Clinton tried to keep Obama�s link with Rezko alive as an issue.

Earlier Friday morning in an interview with CBS, she seemed to apologize for Bill Clinton�s uncurbed enthusiasm in attacking Obama.

�He gets excited; he gets really passionate about making the case for me. He said several times yesterday that maybe he got a little bit carried away.�


'Just a hired hand'
To a voter in Walterboro Thursday who asked about Hillary Clinton�s position on states� workers� compensation funds, Clinton said he didn�t know the answer. �I�m very scrupulous; I won�t say what her position is� if he doesn�t know for sure. Then he added, �I�m just a hired hand here� � which drew a laugh from the crowd.

Later he told another questioner, �I�m out of politics now.�

Here in South Carolina voters have been paying attention to the four battling spouses. Janet Sawyer, an �migr� from New Hampshire to South Carolina, who came to hear Clinton speak in Walterboro, said, �I�ve met Hillary. I really like her; she�s so darn smart it�s scary, but so is Barack; he�s as brilliant as she is. He has my heart and she has my head. The trouble is Hillary comes with too bloody much baggage.�

As for Bill Clinton, �He�s really messing things up here. I got ticked off at him at one point. He was not making Hillary look good. He should not engage in arguments with people.�


In his Thursday campaign stops Clinton was avoiding mention of Obama and sticking to his traditional approach: intense, data-heavy seminars in public policy. No politician loves statistics more or deploys them as often and as effortlessly as Bill Clinton.

�Hispanic Americans, given the same exact diet and the same exercise, are 1.7 times as likely to become diabetic as Americans of European heritage, African-Americans 1.8 times, Native Americans and Pacific Islanders two times as likely,� Clinton told students Thursday morning at Claflin University, South Carolina�s oldest historically black college..

His pitch for votes was at times subtle.

Hillary Clinton�s supporters among African-Americans in South Carolina mostly seem to be keeping their loyalties quiet.

OK to vote for Hillary
Clinton sought to reassure the students at Claflin that it was OK it vote for Hillary Clinton � despite any peer pressure to vote for Obama. �You can have arguments with your friends; you don�t have to agree with them, maybe you don�t even vote for the same people at election time,� he told them.

Was Clinton convincing South Carolinians to vote for Hillary Clinton, or was he a one-man extravaganza, worth seeing for himself, even if the voter in the end might decide to not vote for Hillary Clinton?

Nostalgia drove some of those who turned out to see Bill Clinton.

Eugene Allen, an Air Force veteran and former corporate executive, said he came because he wanted to catch up with him after 20 years.

Back in 1987 he heard Clinton speak at Claflin University and was so impressed that he urged him to run for president.

�He remembered that very well,� Allen said Wednesday after chatting with Clinton at Claflin.

Guarded about revealing their choices
South Carolina voters, far more than those in New Hampshire and Iowa, are very guarded when asked who they�ll vote for.

�I�m not really 100 percent, I guess I�ll make that decision when I go behind the curtain Saturday,� Allen said. Clinton�s speech �has not affected what I�ll do behind the curtain.�

Father Don Abbott, a transplanted Bostonian and a Catholic priest who is pastor of two churches, one in Walterboro, with a mixed, white, black and Latino congregation, the other in an area of Colleton County called Catholic Hill, which is all black, came to hear Bill Clinton speak Thursday in Walterboro.

Was he convinced by Bill to vote for Hillary? �Well, he convinced me that he�s a smart son of a gun. He�s always been the smartest president we�ve ever had besides John F. Kennedy.�


Between voting for Obama or for Clinton, �at this point I�m undecided. And when I get decided I don�t dare to tell anyone � I�ve listened to my parishioners in Catholic Hill, I�ve listened very carefully and not one of them has told me who they are going to vote for. People will surprise you. Especially here in the South you have to be careful who you tell what to.�

URL: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22838678/page/2/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Page 2 of 3

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International