Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

World Oil Companies Post Record Profits
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
igotthisguitar



Joined: 08 Apr 2003
Location: South Korea (Permanent Vacation)

PostPosted: Sat Feb 02, 2008 6:17 pm    Post subject: World Oil Companies Post Record Profits Reply with quote

Exxon, Chevron Post Record Profits
By JOHN PORRETTO
AP Business Writer

HOUSTON � Suppose Exxon Mobil decided to return the favor and buy you a tank of gas. Then again, why stop there? The oil giant turned a profit last year fat enough to buy a fill-up for every car, truck and SUV in America � four times.

Beating its own record to rack up the largest annual corporate profit in American history, Exxon Mobil Corp. said Friday it earned $40.6 billion for the year, reaping the benefits of crude-oil prices around $100 a barrel.

MORE ...

http://www.statesman.com/money/content/shared-gen/ap/Finance_General/Earns_Oil.html

Shell's Sales Balloon To $107 From $75.5 Billion
Despite A Fall In Production

AMSTERDAM, Netherlands (AP) -- Royal Dutch Shell, Europe's largest oil company, reported a $31.3 billion yearly net profit on Thursday, due to divestments and higher oil prices.

Shell chief executive Jeroen van der Veer was "satisfied" with the oil company's latest results.

It represented a 23 percent rise from last year's figure of $24.4 billion, while sales rose 12 percent to $356 billion.

The results came on the back of a 60 percent rise in fourth-quarter net profit of $8.47 billion, up from $5.28 billion. Sales for the final quarter rose to $107 billion from $75.5 billion despite a fall in production.

At its production operations, Shell's profit rose 38 percent to $4.87 billion.

The Anglo-Dutch company's production was 3.4 million barrels of oil and equivalents per day, down 5.5 percent from 3.6 million in the same quarter a year ago.



Chief executive Jeroen van der Veer described the results as "satisfactory" overall, noting that the company had weak refining margins but "launched new (production) projects ... and achieved exploration successes."

http://edition.cnn.com/2008/BUSINESS/01/31/shell.profits.ap/index.html
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger
mindmetoo



Joined: 02 Feb 2004

PostPosted: Sun Feb 03, 2008 3:23 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Given the number of states that have nationalized their oil companies and piss away the profits, I don't see a problem here.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee



Joined: 25 May 2003

PostPosted: Sun Feb 03, 2008 3:24 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

mideast states got record profits too. Much more than the oil companies.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bacasper



Joined: 26 Mar 2007

PostPosted: Sun Feb 03, 2008 5:19 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee wrote:
mideast states got record profits too. Much more than the oil companies.

So both the oil companies AND the mideast states profited from the war causing the price to go to $100, but that's just a coincidence, right?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee



Joined: 25 May 2003

PostPosted: Sun Feb 03, 2008 5:31 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

It is not the oil companies. And the main reason for oil at 100 dollars is supply and demand.

What is Ron Paul's position on alternative energy?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bacasper



Joined: 26 Mar 2007

PostPosted: Sun Feb 03, 2008 5:34 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee wrote:
It is not the oil companies. And the main reason for oil at 100 dollars is supply and demand.

What is Ron Paul's position on alternative energy?

He's against government subsidies.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ya-ta Boy



Joined: 16 Jan 2003
Location: Established in 1994

PostPosted: Sun Feb 03, 2008 5:38 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
He's against government subsidies.


He's also against gov't interference with business...so in favor of giant companies like oil companies.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee



Joined: 25 May 2003

PostPosted: Sun Feb 03, 2008 5:39 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

He is against all alternative energy spending by the US govt.

Besides if you get rid of subsidies for the US oil companies you know what they will do?

They won't look for oil in the US any more instead they will look for it in the mideast where getting it is very cheap.

It costs next to nothing to get oil from the mideast. But it costs about 40- 50.00 a barrel to get it from the oil sands in Canada.

Yep that'll make the US more energy independent. Ron Paul and his supporters they don't have a clue.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee



Joined: 25 May 2003

PostPosted: Sun Feb 03, 2008 5:45 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

How about this ? get rid of subsidies for oil companies.

But if you do that better put a tax on imported oil especially that which comes from the mideast or Venezuela.

Only with a a tax on imported oil does eliminating subsidies for oil companies make sense.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bacasper



Joined: 26 Mar 2007

PostPosted: Sun Feb 03, 2008 5:48 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ya-ta Boy wrote:
Quote:
He's against government subsidies.


He's also against gov't interference with business...so in favor of giant companies like oil companies.

Sorry, yata, I didn't realize you needed it spelled out: Dr. Paul opposes all government subsidies, INCLUDING those for oil companies.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee



Joined: 25 May 2003

PostPosted: Sun Feb 03, 2008 5:49 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

bacasper wrote:
Ya-ta Boy wrote:
Quote:
He's against government subsidies.


He's also against gov't interference with business...so in favor of giant companies like oil companies.

Sorry, yata, I didn't realize you needed it spelled out: Dr. Paul opposes all government subsidies, INCLUDING those for oil companies.



If Chavez and Amadinajad could vote they would vote for Ron Paul.

If you want the US to be even more dependent depend on Chavez and the mideast for oil then vote for Ron Paul.

Of course 9-11 conspiracy theorists want to see the US govt overthrown so this is probably what they in fact want. Idea


Last edited by Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee on Sun Feb 03, 2008 5:50 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bacasper



Joined: 26 Mar 2007

PostPosted: Sun Feb 03, 2008 5:50 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee wrote:
bacasper wrote:
Ya-ta Boy wrote:
Quote:
He's against government subsidies.


He's also against gov't interference with business...so in favor of giant companies like oil companies.

Sorry, yata, I didn't realize you needed it spelled out: Dr. Paul opposes all government subsidies, INCLUDING those for oil companies.



If Chavez and Amadinajad could vote they would vote for Ron Paul

Anyone ballsy enough to insult George Bush on a world stage can't be all that bad.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee



Joined: 25 May 2003

PostPosted: Sun Feb 03, 2008 5:51 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yep siding with the enemies of the US against the US.

Stormfront hates George Bush. But they aren't that bad Rolling Eyes
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bacasper



Joined: 26 Mar 2007

PostPosted: Sun Feb 03, 2008 5:55 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee wrote:
Yep siding with the enemies of the US against the US.

Stormfront hates George Bush. But they aren't that bad Rolling Eyes

George Bush is an enemy of the US which is why he is guilty of treason and articles of impeachment are being brought against him.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee



Joined: 25 May 2003

PostPosted: Sun Feb 03, 2008 5:57 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

bacasper wrote:
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee wrote:
Yep siding with the enemies of the US against the US.

Stormfront hates George Bush. But they aren't that bad Rolling Eyes

George Bush is an enemy of the US which is why he is guilty of treason and articles of impeachment are being brought against him.


You and your kind are an enemy of the US that is why you support Amadinajad, Chavez, support a candidate who is against alternative energy spending , and who promotes 9-11 conspiracy theories on the internet.

You also support that neo Nazi Igothisguitar.

case closed
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International