Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Do you hate lawyers?
Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  

Do you hate lawyers?
Yes, I do
24%
 24%  [ 7 ]
I dislike many/most of them, but I don't *hate* lawyers
27%
 27%  [ 8 ]
I only dislike some/a few of them, but it is a large profession
6%
 6%  [ 2 ]
No, I do not
41%
 41%  [ 12 ]
Total Votes : 29

Author Message
Kuros



Joined: 27 Apr 2004

PostPosted: Fri Feb 08, 2008 10:57 am    Post subject: Do you hate lawyers? Reply with quote

I am curious as to how widespread this phenomenon is.

I am also interested to know whether this is a particularly American phenomenon.

I am interested in hearing people's opinions as to when and why they began to hate lawyers.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
On the other hand



Joined: 19 Apr 2003
Location: I walk along the avenue

PostPosted: Fri Feb 08, 2008 11:14 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

No. For the most part, if you don't like what a lawyer is doing, the problem is not the lawyer himself, but the law that the lawyer is appealing to to in order to make his case. Or, the judge or jury who agrees to the lawyers interpretation of that law.

Quote:
I am also interested to know whether this is a particularly American phenomenon.


Not exlusively, but probably moreso, because traditionally American courts had greater powers of judicial review than in most of the other democracies. So people were more likely to criticize the American legal system for "legislating from the bench". You hear similar complaints in Canada now that we have the Charter Of Rights. (Oddly enough, these complaints tend to come from conservatives who otherwise are full of praise for what they perceive to be the American way-of-life. And Canada's courts are actually less powerful than the US's, since we have a "notwithstanding clause" that allows parliament to overrule court decisions.)

Also, in the states, you seem to have more lawsuits, with bigger settlements, which probably ticks a lot of people off.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Gopher



Joined: 04 Jun 2005

PostPosted: Fri Feb 08, 2008 12:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Every culture produces unique variants on such themes. In the American context, it began with Nixon and Watergate and not with tort-related actions.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ya-ta Boy



Joined: 16 Jan 2003
Location: Established in 1994

PostPosted: Fri Feb 08, 2008 1:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

"The first thing we do, let's kill all the lawyers"--although this is said by someone plotting to overthrow the government, it does reflect a common attitude.

I don't hate lawyers. Many of the minds I most admire are lawyers, Oliver Wendell Holmes being one example. I do think some lawyers would benefit from more ethics classes in law school, but then I think that would be a good idea for everyone else, too.

Where I part company with lawyers is when things get overly legalistic--when a missing comma invalidates a document. There should be some room for common sense in the common law. This is where the 'let's kill all the lawyers' attitude seems to come into play. I think most people get frustrated with lawyers at this point.

Another common complaint about the law profession I share with many is that they have created a monopoly for themselves and then charge money for access to justice. Legal protection should not be expensive. It should be a human right.

The other day I made a joke post about suing Kellogg's. There is too much truth to the idea that if I had a real case, Kellogg's could hire enough lawyers to stall the case until I'm dead. This should not be possible.

In short, there are failings in the legal profession that justifiably irritate people, including me, but no, I don't hate lawyers.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Gopher



Joined: 04 Jun 2005

PostPosted: Fri Feb 08, 2008 4:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Incidentally, apparently I am the only one who voted "no" on this poll. Hating people through the prism of a class -- professional trade; socioeconomic class; race, ethnicity, nationality, etc. -- is for simpletons. Reducing "lawyers" to a monolithic bloc and talking about "what lawyers think," etc. makes about as much sense to me as the moron who tried to tell me that he knew what "the rest of the world" thought about the current American elections...

In any case, here is more on how and why this emerged in the American context:

Wikipedia wrote:
Since Nixon and many senior officials involved in Watergate were lawyers, the scandal severely tarnished the public image of the legal profession. In order to defuse public demand for direct federal regulation of lawyers (as opposed to leaving it in the hands of state bar associations or courts), the American Bar Association (ABA) launched two major reforms. First, the ABA decided that its existing Model Code of Professional Responsibility (promulgated 1969) was a failure and replaced it with the Model Rules of Professional Conduct in 1983. The MRPC has been adopted in part or in whole by 44 states. Its preamble contains an emphatic reminder to young lawyers that the legal profession can remain self-governing only if lawyers behave properly. Second, the ABA promulgated a requirement that law students at ABA-approved law schools take a course in professional responsibility (which means they must study the MRPC). The requirement remains in effect.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Kuros



Joined: 27 Apr 2004

PostPosted: Fri Feb 08, 2008 9:15 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ya-ta Boy wrote:


Where I part company with lawyers is when things get overly legalistic--when a missing comma invalidates a document. There should be some room for common sense in the common law.


You must be talking about a will. Yes, wills are highly contested and seriously scrutinized, but for good reason: A piece of paper is being asked to provide the voice for a dead person.

Ya-ta Boy wrote:
In short, there are failings in the legal profession that justifiably irritate people, including me, but no, I don't hate lawyers.


There are huge failings in the legal profession, and they seem annoy the hell out of not just me, but my fellow classmates and my professors as well.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Kuros



Joined: 27 Apr 2004

PostPosted: Fri Feb 08, 2008 9:18 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Gopher wrote:

In any case, here is more on how and why this emerged in the American context:

Wikipedia wrote:
Since Nixon and many senior officials involved in Watergate were lawyers, the scandal severely tarnished the public image of the legal profession. In order to defuse public demand for direct federal regulation of lawyers (as opposed to leaving it in the hands of state bar associations or courts), the American Bar Association (ABA) launched two major reforms. First, the ABA decided that its existing Model Code of Professional Responsibility (promulgated 1969) was a failure and replaced it with the Model Rules of Professional Conduct in 1983. The MRPC has been adopted in part or in whole by 44 states. Its preamble contains an emphatic reminder to young lawyers that the legal profession can remain self-governing only if lawyers behave properly. Second, the ABA promulgated a requirement that law students at ABA-approved law schools take a course in professional responsibility (which means they must study the MRPC). The requirement remains in effect.


I had no idea about the lawyer-Watergate connection, but that makes an incredible amount of sense. Its also a concrete moment when lawyers' collective reputation were (somewhat) justifiably tarnished.

Yeah, the ABA is pretty strict. The KY Bar alone averages 12 disbarments/year.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Gopher



Joined: 04 Jun 2005

PostPosted: Fri Feb 08, 2008 9:34 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Kuros wrote:
I had no idea about the lawyer-Watergate connection...


They did not go easy on President William J. Clinton, remember? Also, a lot changed in America following Vietnam and Watergate. I understood that most law schools required students to tackle the ethics classes the first year. Do the instructors not contextualize this class?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
moosehead



Joined: 05 May 2007

PostPosted: Fri Feb 08, 2008 10:40 pm    Post subject: Re: Do you hate lawyers? Reply with quote

Kuros wrote:
I am curious as to how widespread this phenomenon is.

I am also interested to know whether this is a particularly American phenomenon.

I am interested in hearing people's opinions as to when and why they began to hate lawyers.



why?

and why on this board?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Kuros



Joined: 27 Apr 2004

PostPosted: Sat Feb 09, 2008 6:48 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Gopher wrote:
Kuros wrote:
I had no idea about the lawyer-Watergate connection...


They did not go easy on President William J. Clinton, remember? Also, a lot changed in America following Vietnam and Watergate. I understood that most law schools required students to tackle the ethics classes the first year. Do the instructors not contextualize this class?


In answer to Moosehead's question, I'm a first year law student, so I am curious.

Professional responsibility is a wierd course here at UofL, and it meets unevenly and not as a regular class. But the importance of ethics is constantly discussed in the context of class, particularly in CrimLaw and Civil Procedure. Also, when lawyers do come into to brown-bag lunch with us, the #1 topic seems to be ethics & money, the two of which are apparently hard to separate.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Gopher



Joined: 04 Jun 2005

PostPosted: Sat Feb 09, 2008 8:40 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Kuros wrote:
I had no idea about the lawyer-Watergate connection...


By the way, the ABA's move to self-police has generally not countered this trend (declining faith in attys' integrity). Iran-Contra. OJ Simpson. Clinton's perjury.

Last I heard, lawyers ranked near the bottom of every profession as far as public trust goes. Professors/academics Shocked ranked near the top.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Czarjorge



Joined: 01 May 2007
Location: I now have the same moustache, and it is glorious.

PostPosted: Sat Feb 09, 2008 9:50 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

This board is full of wannabe lawyers, just read one of the threads. How could an overwhelming consensus hate lawyers?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
thepeel



Joined: 08 Aug 2004

PostPosted: Sat Feb 09, 2008 10:42 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I do not hate lawyers. We all do the jobs we picked.

My uncle (a lawyer) says one of the best reasons to become a lawyer is so that you never have to deal with one.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee



Joined: 25 May 2003

PostPosted: Sat Feb 09, 2008 3:21 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

If you want justice go to a w h o r e house.

If you want to get F**ked go to court.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
wannago



Joined: 16 Apr 2004

PostPosted: Sat Feb 09, 2008 9:22 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I know I've railed about lawyers several times, but I will say this: I really have no problem with criminal lawyers at all. I see them as a necessary part of the system. If you are charged with a crime and have no money, there are public defenders available.

I do, however, despise civil lawyers. If a normal person is slapped with some civil lawsuit and has no money to pay a lawyer, they are screwed. Your only option apart from paying someone exorbitant amounts of money to walk you through the proceedings, is to represent yourself. Few people have the time or expertise to do that. Basically, you pay or you will get railroaded. I have a real problem with someone who makes their living from someone else's misery charging upwards of $250+/hour. Lawyers have set up their own club in civil matters and the price to play the game in their club is very steep.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
Page 1 of 3

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International