Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

The Final Ron Paul Thread...
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 7, 8, 9 ... 12, 13, 14  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Ya-ta Boy



Joined: 16 Jan 2003
Location: Established in 1994

PostPosted: Wed Feb 06, 2008 6:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
so that leaves him the disenfranchised folks


Very Happy Very Happy You do of course realize that what you have said is only criminals will vote for him. We no longer have disenfranchised people except for criminals who have not regained their right to vote.

No doubt the criminal element would be backers of RP--the less government the better, in their view.

Bumper Sticker:

RP: Candidate of the Grifters Exclamation
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mithridates



Joined: 03 Mar 2003
Location: President's office, Korean Space Agency

PostPosted: Thu Feb 07, 2008 3:15 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ya-ta Boy wrote:
Quote:
The reason he doesn't have a lot is because people...


have seen him in several big debates and dislike what they hear. His appeal is to the uneducated because his ideas are simplistic. Very Happy


I don't use the rolly eyes much but here's one for your post: Rolling Eyes

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yDfPaUux1Kc

Go about a minute into the video: Ron Paul leads among employees from Google, Microsoft, Verizon, Cisco, high-tech army personnel, navy personnel, air force personnel, etc. Even Fox admits that.

The hardware and software you are using right now and use every day but don't understand the mechanics of was created by companies whose employees give the most money to Ron Paul. How's that feel?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee



Joined: 25 May 2003

PostPosted: Thu Feb 07, 2008 4:52 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

poll them and the results will be different.

just like the US armed forces.

http://lonestartimes.com/2008/02/05/do-the-troops-support-ron-paul/


Quote:


Do the Troops Support Ron Paul?


Supporters of Ron Paul are proudly trumpeting the news that the Presidential candidate has the overwhelming support of the military. This belief is based on information contained in a press release by the Paul campaign that shows donations from those people self -identified as being associated with the military outpaced donations to all other candidates combined. Indeed, that does seem to be the case. What is not stated in the press release is that those donations include civilian employees of the military, a substantial percentage of military employees.

Ron Paul campaign chairman Kent Snyder even said this: �The latest numbers make it clear: the troops support Ron Paul.� The numbers in no way make that statement clear. In fact, just the opposite is clear. It is against Federal Law (Titles 10, 2, and 18, United States Code), Department of Defense (DOD) Directives, plus specific military regulations for active duty military personnel to participate in partisan political activities. �The troops� do not support Ron Paul because to do so would be illegal.

It was suggested what was really meant by the Paul campaign was that Veterans support Ron Paul. There are a substantial number of veterans in that list (side note: there are a few supporters listed as �active duty�; they should reconsider allowing their names to be published on that list as it is illegal to do so). Since we have had several primaries and caucuses, support among vets has actually been measured. The results show Dr. Paul has very little support among veterans:
Giuliani Huckabee McCain Paul Romney Thompson
Michigan 4% 14% 41% 7% 32% 1%
South Carolina 1 29 36 3 17 14
Florida 12 7 42 4 35 -
Nevada 4 4 15 14 48 13

It is clear that neither Veterans nor active duty military personnel support Ron Paul in substantial numbers. What about the large amount of money? The numbers appear to be generated by the Ron Paul campaign themselves so I would expect them to be biased. Strangely enough, the Paul campaign used the excuse that it would set a dangerous precedent to track donations when asked to do so last year, but I digress. Open Secrets is a non-partisan organization that tracks money in politics. Here�s a comparison of military donations identified by them compared to the Ron Paul campaign numbers:
Candidate Open Secrets Ron Paul Campaign
Ron Paul $111,261 $249,000
John McCain 31,077 83,000
Mike Huckabee 24,535 37,000
Mitt Romney 8995 24,000

I arrived at these numbers from Open Secrets by searching for donors who identified their employer as Army, Navy, Air Force, or Coast Guard. The numbers are quite a bit lower than those from the Ron Paul campaign but the ratios between the candidates are basically the same � Ron Paul leads in donations from those identified as military personnel. While I was searching I decided to compare the numbers to Bush in the 2004 election. To my surprise, Bush�s total from military personnel was $48,312, less than half that of Ron Paul�s total this year.

Do veterans and/or troops support Ron Paul? Looking at the numbers for veterans the answer is yes - in about the same numbers as in the general population, between three and five percent. But the bottom line is this: it is fallacious of the Ron Paul campaign to take these numbers and pronounce �the troops support Ron Paul�.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
agentX



Joined: 12 Oct 2007
Location: Jeolla province

PostPosted: Thu Feb 07, 2008 5:48 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Those numbers are striking and it shows what the mindset of the troops/veterans are to some degree.

Nevertheless, the voting results show that he didn't have any sustainable support.

His supporters are too scattered around the country to even carry a state. Being "close" only counts in a Democratic race; most of the Feb 5th states are winner-take-all, and I think some more of those afterwards are as well.

He's had sufficient exposure. He's been on a multitude of talk shows, both TV and radio. He's been on MTV, twice. He even went to the AA debates, with Huck and Tancredo. He was on right-wing and left-wing shows (Ed Schultz) multiple times.
At the debates, he got the most audience 'pop'.

He had his chance to win it and he didn't, plain and simple. If he's saying he did better than expected, then that's his opinion. But you play the game to win. This was his chance; the GOP was fractured all over the place between the various idiotic ideologies of their borderline coalition which was unified on the basis of propaganda, cronyism, and greed. Paul and McCain didn't break the party; Bush did. With all the fracticious infighting going on, Paul could have won it, if he played his cards right. But he didn't.

The only way for him to win now would be if Huck and Ronmey dropped out and gave him their delegates; dunno if that's against the rules or not, but that has only a snowball's chance in hell of happening.
IF it does happen, that might be the GOP's last best chance of not collapsing due to McCain's nomination.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mithridates



Joined: 03 Mar 2003
Location: President's office, Korean Space Agency

PostPosted: Thu Feb 07, 2008 6:08 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks for the thoughtful post. Yes, it's pretty much impossible now and I always wonder if he isn't really doing the whole thing for an independent run, especially with his new book coming out right around the end of the primaries when it doesn't help him at all.

Either that or his goal all the time has just been to reignite the standard conservative movement and bring in more like-minded people into congress and the senate this time. Who knows. There are definitely a lot more people this time around that are going to be running for congress on his platform, so at the very least it's had that effect.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
mithridates



Joined: 03 Mar 2003
Location: President's office, Korean Space Agency

PostPosted: Fri Feb 08, 2008 8:37 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Strange, Ron Paul doesn't look like he's going to concede:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SGaZsAeMKFo
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Gopher



Joined: 04 Jun 2005

PostPosted: Fri Feb 08, 2008 8:39 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Two reasons for that: he has money from his internet supporters to last a while longer; and he has no grasp of reality.

Do he and his supporters realize that he will not even likely be invited to speak or even opine in writing at the convention?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee



Joined: 25 May 2003

PostPosted: Fri Feb 08, 2008 8:59 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Well I just hope Ron Paul's non American supporters keep sending him money. What could be the harm in that?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ontheway



Joined: 24 Aug 2005
Location: Somewhere under the rainbow...

PostPosted: Fri Feb 08, 2008 9:44 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

As the neocon clones drop out, for lack of money and support, and line up behind McCain, it is still possible that McCain will not have a majority of delegates lined up for a first ballot victory in Minneapolis in September. Then the convention would be wide open. Fewer than half of the delegates have been selected, so we'll see. It's a three way race now: McClone, Huckabee and Paul.

You can be sure the party insiders pushed hard on Giulinani and Romney to get out and defer to McCain. Of course Giulinani lost to Ron Paul in nearly every vote and Romney's wife got tired of buying votes with their own cash ... Romney must have spent more than $15 of his own money per vote.

Gopher's dream of excluding Ron Paul will only happen if he walks out first to take a third party or independent run. Possible of course, but the Rs are likely to give him a speaking slot to keep him in the party. It would be nearly impossible for Ron Paul to run 3/I at such a late date, although it would be a great show if he did.

Gopher's belief that the party insiders would exclude Ron Paul confirms that he too recognizes the conspiracy against Ron Paul. It is part of the 50 to 1 bias in media coverage, the slanderous coverage when granted, excluding Ron Paul's name from ballots and voting machines and preventing registered voters who might support Ron Paul from voting, all documented.

Here is a truth filled look at the inside of the land of neocons:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-cDQVEqhwds
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Gopher



Joined: 04 Jun 2005

PostPosted: Fri Feb 08, 2008 1:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

You speak of "Gopher's dream" and "Gopher's belief" while living in the most absurd dream-world I can imagine.

You have got to have delegates and major leverage in the form of Republican voters backing you to carry any weight at the convention. Ron Paul just has some money and an internet-based backing.

Post all the internet polls and youtube.com vids you like. It changes the calculus underlying the convention's likely result not one iota.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bacasper



Joined: 26 Mar 2007

PostPosted: Fri Feb 08, 2008 5:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee wrote:
poll them and the results will be different.

just like the US armed forces.

http://lonestartimes.com/2008/02/05/do-the-troops-support-ron-paul/


Quote:


Do the Troops Support Ron Paul?


Supporters of Ron Paul are proudly trumpeting the news that the Presidential candidate has the overwhelming support of the military. This belief is based on information contained in a press release by the Paul campaign that shows donations from those people self -identified as being associated with the military outpaced donations to all other candidates combined. Indeed, that does seem to be the case. What is not stated in the press release is that those donations include civilian employees of the military, a substantial percentage of military employees.

Ron Paul campaign chairman Kent Snyder even said this: �The latest numbers make it clear: the troops support Ron Paul.� The numbers in no way make that statement clear. In fact, just the opposite is clear. It is against Federal Law (Titles 10, 2, and 18, United States Code), Department of Defense (DOD) Directives, plus specific military regulations for active duty military personnel to participate in partisan political activities. �The troops� do not support Ron Paul because to do so would be illegal.

It was suggested what was really meant by the Paul campaign was that Veterans support Ron Paul. There are a substantial number of veterans in that list (side note: there are a few supporters listed as �active duty�; they should reconsider allowing their names to be published on that list as it is illegal to do so). Since we have had several primaries and caucuses, support among vets has actually been measured. The results show Dr. Paul has very little support among veterans:
Giuliani Huckabee McCain Paul Romney Thompson
Michigan 4% 14% 41% 7% 32% 1%
South Carolina 1 29 36 3 17 14
Florida 12 7 42 4 35 -
Nevada 4 4 15 14 48 13

It is clear that neither Veterans nor active duty military personnel support Ron Paul in substantial numbers. What about the large amount of money? The numbers appear to be generated by the Ron Paul campaign themselves so I would expect them to be biased. Strangely enough, the Paul campaign used the excuse that it would set a dangerous precedent to track donations when asked to do so last year, but I digress. Open Secrets is a non-partisan organization that tracks money in politics. Here�s a comparison of military donations identified by them compared to the Ron Paul campaign numbers:
Candidate Open Secrets Ron Paul Campaign
Ron Paul $111,261 $249,000
John McCain 31,077 83,000
Mike Huckabee 24,535 37,000
Mitt Romney 8995 24,000

I arrived at these numbers from Open Secrets by searching for donors who identified their employer as Army, Navy, Air Force, or Coast Guard. The numbers are quite a bit lower than those from the Ron Paul campaign but the ratios between the candidates are basically the same � Ron Paul leads in donations from those identified as military personnel. While I was searching I decided to compare the numbers to Bush in the 2004 election. To my surprise, Bush�s total from military personnel was $48,312, less than half that of Ron Paul�s total this year.

Do veterans and/or troops support Ron Paul? Looking at the numbers for veterans the answer is yes - in about the same numbers as in the general population, between three and five percent. But the bottom line is this: it is fallacious of the Ron Paul campaign to take these numbers and pronounce �the troops support Ron Paul�.

Wow, that's amazing! He's getting the most support from DoD employees as well, and active service members are risking their commissions just to support him because they feel so strongly about his message!

Thanks for that info, Joo.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
The_Conservative



Joined: 15 Mar 2007

PostPosted: Fri Feb 08, 2008 5:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

bacasper wrote:
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee wrote:
poll them and the results will be different.

just like the US armed forces.

http://lonestartimes.com/2008/02/05/do-the-troops-support-ron-paul/


Quote:


Do the Troops Support Ron Paul?


Supporters of Ron Paul are proudly trumpeting the news that the Presidential candidate has the overwhelming support of the military. This belief is based on information contained in a press release by the Paul campaign that shows donations from those people self -identified as being associated with the military outpaced donations to all other candidates combined. Indeed, that does seem to be the case. What is not stated in the press release is that those donations include civilian employees of the military, a substantial percentage of military employees.

Ron Paul campaign chairman Kent Snyder even said this: �The latest numbers make it clear: the troops support Ron Paul.� The numbers in no way make that statement clear. In fact, just the opposite is clear. It is against Federal Law (Titles 10, 2, and 18, United States Code), Department of Defense (DOD) Directives, plus specific military regulations for active duty military personnel to participate in partisan political activities. �The troops� do not support Ron Paul because to do so would be illegal.

It was suggested what was really meant by the Paul campaign was that Veterans support Ron Paul. There are a substantial number of veterans in that list (side note: there are a few supporters listed as �active duty�; they should reconsider allowing their names to be published on that list as it is illegal to do so). Since we have had several primaries and caucuses, support among vets has actually been measured. The results show Dr. Paul has very little support among veterans:
Giuliani Huckabee McCain Paul Romney Thompson
Michigan 4% 14% 41% 7% 32% 1%
South Carolina 1 29 36 3 17 14
Florida 12 7 42 4 35 -
Nevada 4 4 15 14 48 13

It is clear that neither Veterans nor active duty military personnel support Ron Paul in substantial numbers. What about the large amount of money? The numbers appear to be generated by the Ron Paul campaign themselves so I would expect them to be biased. Strangely enough, the Paul campaign used the excuse that it would set a dangerous precedent to track donations when asked to do so last year, but I digress. Open Secrets is a non-partisan organization that tracks money in politics. Here�s a comparison of military donations identified by them compared to the Ron Paul campaign numbers:
Candidate Open Secrets Ron Paul Campaign
Ron Paul $111,261 $249,000
John McCain 31,077 83,000
Mike Huckabee 24,535 37,000
Mitt Romney 8995 24,000

I arrived at these numbers from Open Secrets by searching for donors who identified their employer as Army, Navy, Air Force, or Coast Guard. The numbers are quite a bit lower than those from the Ron Paul campaign but the ratios between the candidates are basically the same � Ron Paul leads in donations from those identified as military personnel. While I was searching I decided to compare the numbers to Bush in the 2004 election. To my surprise, Bush�s total from military personnel was $48,312, less than half that of Ron Paul�s total this year.

Do veterans and/or troops support Ron Paul? Looking at the numbers for veterans the answer is yes - in about the same numbers as in the general population, between three and five percent. But the bottom line is this: it is fallacious of the Ron Paul campaign to take these numbers and pronounce �the troops support Ron Paul�.

Wow, that's amazing! He's getting the most support from DoD employees as well, and active service members are risking their commissions just to support him because they feel so strongly about his message!

Thanks for that info, Joo.


Where do you get that "active service members are risking their commissions just to support him". The article above states that some veterans and civilian employees are voting for him...but do you really think active service members are going to violate federal law? And if they are, yeah that's just the type of guy we want with a gun in his hands. Rolling Eyes
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Gopher



Joined: 04 Jun 2005

PostPosted: Fri Feb 08, 2008 5:30 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

For Ron Paul's campaign and his supporters to threaten to destabilize American civil-military relations like this is simply the height of irresponsibility -- and another reason we should never grant this man any political power whatsoever.

Politicizing the military, or "the troops," if you will, like this is a reckless idea.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ya-ta Boy



Joined: 16 Jan 2003
Location: Established in 1994

PostPosted: Fri Feb 08, 2008 6:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
and active service members are risking their commissions just to support him because they feel so strongly about his message!


You skipped down to the bottom and didn't read the whole thing, did you ba? A small percentage, in about the same small percentage as the overall population. AND it is illegal for them to openly take part in politics.

The principal of a non-political military has been a major concept for the last 2 1/4 centuries. It is too basic for people to be messing with for short-term political gain.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bacasper



Joined: 26 Mar 2007

PostPosted: Fri Feb 08, 2008 6:08 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The_Conservative wrote:
bacasper wrote:

Wow, that's amazing! He's getting the most support from DoD employees as well, and active service members are risking their commissions just to support him because they feel so strongly about his message!

Thanks for that info, Joo.


Where do you get that "active service members are risking their commissions just to support him". The article above states that some veterans and civilian employees are voting for him...but do you really think active service members are going to violate federal law? And if they are, yeah that's just the type of guy we want with a gun in his hands. Rolling Eyes

Well, besides more servicemen financially supporting RP, there are at least two willing to put their faces on camera in full uniform to voice their support:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jiFsxp5qOpM

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5oOJjefhV3Q

Since they are doing this in violation of federal law, I guess that means you, Conservative, must now report them or else you are a lawbreaker also, no? Razz Razz

And to address Gopher's Alice-in-Wonderland logic, we couldn't possibly have anyone in power who has popular support, including active duty military now, could we?

Semper fi
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 7, 8, 9 ... 12, 13, 14  Next
Page 8 of 14

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International