| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
mrsquirrel
Joined: 13 Dec 2006
|
Posted: Sun Mar 02, 2008 6:15 am Post subject: Any GEPIKr's own their own house? |
|
|
Notice in the GEPIK contract that it says that even if you own your own house you have to pay the 900k security deposit.
Anybody done that? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
xCustomx

Joined: 06 Jan 2006
|
Posted: Sun Mar 02, 2008 7:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Yep. I think there is a new clause in this year's contract that requires married couples to both pay the 900k, even though they live in the same house. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
butlerian

Joined: 04 Sep 2006 Location: Korea
|
Posted: Sun Mar 02, 2008 8:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
| xCustomx wrote: |
| Yep. I think there is a new clause in this year's contract that requires married couples to both pay the 900k, even though they live in the same house. |
And people actually accept that kind of crap? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
PGF
Joined: 27 Nov 2006
|
Posted: Sun Mar 02, 2008 10:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
| I thought security deposits were a hagwon scam.... I guess scams in korea spread to gov't operations pretty fast.... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mrsquirrel
Joined: 13 Dec 2006
|
Posted: Sun Mar 02, 2008 3:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I remember it for married couples being that they both had to pay. I never noticed it in the 07/08 that if you owned your own house you had to pay. Clearly in the 08/09 though. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
spliff

Joined: 19 Jan 2004 Location: Khon Kaen, Thailand
|
Posted: Sun Mar 02, 2008 3:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Why Squirrel, are you thinking about buying your very own little Waygook studio? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mrsquirrel
Joined: 13 Dec 2006
|
Posted: Sun Mar 02, 2008 4:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Nope, just found it interesting that they are forcing people to pay.
Sounds more like a hostage deposit now than it did before. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
spliff

Joined: 19 Jan 2004 Location: Khon Kaen, Thailand
|
Posted: Sun Mar 02, 2008 4:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Think it's just easier (and fairer in their minds) to implement it across board, if you will, for each GIPIK employee. Regardless, you get it back in the end. Anyway, it's not really just a a housing deposit, it's a.......
| Quote: |
Article 17 (Indemnity)
1.Employee shall be responsible for and protect Employer from any liability or damages arising from or in relation to any negligent, faulty, or illegal activity during the Term of Employment under this contract. For safety deposit, 300,000 Korean won per month will be deducted from Employee�s salary for the first 3 months of employment until it amounts to a total of 900,000 Korean won, even in case Employee finds their own housing. Married couples who are both employed by GPOE, sharing living accommodations, shall also be required to pay the cost respectively.
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bassexpander
Joined: 13 Sep 2007 Location: Someplace you'd rather be.
|
Posted: Sun Mar 02, 2008 5:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I'm surprised more GEPIK'ers don't do a runner with a laptop tucked under their arm. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
LostinKSpace
Joined: 17 Feb 2008
|
Posted: Sun Mar 02, 2008 7:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I own my home, and have great piece of mind because of it. I was told the 900K was a security against me stealing the laptop, as this had happened at some school before. I believe it is really there to discourage people running out on their contract. Funnily enough my co-workers don't have to pay it and they all have school laptops too, but I guess being foreign means I'm not to be trusted, I mean I don't eat Kimchi with every meal and I have an annoying habit of doing what I say I will do.
The clause sucks, I just look at it as a saving, and so far my school is treating me really well and I guess as I am their first foreign teacher they are just following the contract as it was given to them. I've even had sick days and nothing has been said, other people haven't been as fortunate. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
TheChickenLover
Joined: 17 Dec 2007 Location: The Chicken Coop
|
Posted: Sun Mar 02, 2008 7:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
They're lying to you. The 900k deposit is to discourage you from leaving. Forced savings or 'deposits' are illegal in this country.
Refuse to pay it. It is illegal & get the labour board involved if needed. I guarantee you'll see them back off if they try to push this through.
Chicken |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mrsquirrel
Joined: 13 Dec 2006
|
Posted: Sun Mar 02, 2008 8:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quiet interesting.
I'm sure last year it wasn't there on the 2007/8 contract. Maybe it was. I think maybe it was if you rented but the 2008/9 specifically mentions if you own property. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
icicle
Joined: 09 Feb 2007 Location: Gyeonggi do Korea
|
Posted: Sun Mar 02, 2008 9:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| TheChickenLover wrote: |
They're lying to you. The 900k deposit is to discourage you from leaving. Forced savings or 'deposits' are illegal in this country.
Chicken |
I paid the "security deposit" last year and got all of it back on my final day. It was in no way held over my head to discourage me from leaving early ... which I did do for family reasons with around 6 weeks notice. As long as you do the right thing you have nothing to be afraid of.
But it is still something that you do need to consider in working out if a public school job will be the best job for you. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
that guy

Joined: 29 Feb 2004 Location: long gone
|
Posted: Mon Mar 03, 2008 2:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
I have my own place and never paid the "deposit" although I did start at this school in 2006 and the contracts have changed since then (not sure of the deposit).
I do have the feeling though that the schools have more control over the contracts than they let on. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|