Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Poll: What American city will be nuked by rogue Americans?
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... , 9, 10, 11  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  

What American city will get nuked by rogue American government to faciliate martial law?
Baltimore
8%
 8%  [ 2 ]
Denver
4%
 4%  [ 1 ]
Detroit
26%
 26%  [ 6 ]
Seattle
8%
 8%  [ 2 ]
San Francisco
39%
 39%  [ 9 ]
Cleveland
13%
 13%  [ 3 ]
Total Votes : 23

Author Message
TheUrbanMyth



Joined: 28 Jan 2003
Location: Retired

PostPosted: Thu Feb 21, 2008 6:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

loose_ends wrote:
Gopher wrote:
Thanks for offering us a look into the mind of a conspiracy theorist.


Anytime Gopher. Thanks for playing nicely. More importantly, thanks for giving us a look into the mind of a conspiracy theorist of a different kind;

You previously wrote:
Quote:
"All the good people," huh? Still claiming altruism, I see. In any case, my answer to your question is an unqualified "yes." I say this without the slightest doubt. They fabricate and they lie. Start with Oliver Stone and Michael Moore and work your way out, through the New Left of the 1960s, to today's 9/11 people and the OP's baseless allegation.


So you'd better keep your eye on the "evil left", and expose their alleged conspired lies when you have a chance.

I'll keep my eyes on the "rogue" elements of the MIC/Whitehouse/intelligence agencies and be sure to expose their alleged conspired lies whenever I have a chance.

We'll keep each others backs, mmmkay?


I see you're rather keen to fasten on George Bush/his Adminstration as the mastermind(s) behind such plots.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
loose_ends



Joined: 23 Jul 2007

PostPosted: Thu Feb 21, 2008 7:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

TheUrbanMyth wrote:
loose_ends wrote:
Gopher wrote:
Thanks for offering us a look into the mind of a conspiracy theorist.


Anytime Gopher. Thanks for playing nicely. More importantly, thanks for giving us a look into the mind of a conspiracy theorist of a different kind;

You previously wrote:
Quote:
"All the good people," huh? Still claiming altruism, I see. In any case, my answer to your question is an unqualified "yes." I say this without the slightest doubt. They fabricate and they lie. Start with Oliver Stone and Michael Moore and work your way out, through the New Left of the 1960s, to today's 9/11 people and the OP's baseless allegation.


So you'd better keep your eye on the "evil left", and expose their alleged conspired lies when you have a chance.

I'll keep my eyes on the "rogue" elements of the MIC/Whitehouse/intelligence agencies and be sure to expose their alleged conspired lies whenever I have a chance.

We'll keep each others backs, mmmkay?


I see you're rather keen to fasten on George Bush/his Adminstration as the mastermind(s) behind such plots.


Insert D. Cheney into your comment and remove George Bush....that would be more accurate.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee



Joined: 25 May 2003

PostPosted: Tue Mar 04, 2008 8:07 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

This thread was so funny.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee



Joined: 25 May 2003

PostPosted: Wed Mar 05, 2008 4:14 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
little mixed girl



Joined: 11 Jun 2003
Location: shin hyesung's bed~

PostPosted: Wed Mar 05, 2008 8:15 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

uhmm....i don't see LA on that list.
your list is flawed.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bacasper



Joined: 26 Mar 2007

PostPosted: Wed Mar 05, 2008 5:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
Thanks for offering us a look into the mind of a conspiracy theorist.

Anyone care to explain how one person did it by himself?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee



Joined: 25 May 2003

PostPosted: Wed Mar 05, 2008 11:08 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee



Joined: 25 May 2003

PostPosted: Sun Mar 09, 2008 11:29 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Question

Does it have to be a real city?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jkelly80



Joined: 13 Jun 2007
Location: you boys like mexico?

PostPosted: Mon Mar 10, 2008 2:57 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Sleeeep, Mr. Murdoch.

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
endo



Joined: 14 Mar 2004
Location: Seoul...my home

PostPosted: Mon Mar 10, 2008 3:13 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

loose_ends wrote:
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee wrote:
You know for the record Bin Laden's own son says his father was behind 9-11.


Bin Laden "said" he was behind 9-11, what is your point Joo?


Only after he denied it how many times?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee



Joined: 25 May 2003

PostPosted: Mon Mar 10, 2008 4:10 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

He didn't come out and say it cause he was hoping the US would not hit him after 9-11.

Bin Ladens' own kid thinks he did it and then there is the Bin Laden tape where he talks about how the attack was more successful than he expected. That was not a tape for the west.

At any rate I didn't want this thread to die. So thank you for keeping it going.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mindmetoo



Joined: 02 Feb 2004

PostPosted: Mon Mar 10, 2008 4:18 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

endo wrote:
loose_ends wrote:
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee wrote:
You know for the record Bin Laden's own son says his father was behind 9-11.


Bin Laden "said" he was behind 9-11, what is your point Joo?


Only after he denied it how many times?


What is the world coming to when you can't trust the word of a terrorist!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
endo



Joined: 14 Mar 2004
Location: Seoul...my home

PostPosted: Mon Mar 10, 2008 4:44 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

mindmetoo wrote:
endo wrote:
loose_ends wrote:
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee wrote:
You know for the record Bin Laden's own son says his father was behind 9-11.


Bin Laden "said" he was behind 9-11, what is your point Joo?


Only after he denied it how many times?


What is the world coming to when you can't trust the word of a terrorist!




This is still one question I don't understand. OBL publically denied being inviolved in the 9/11 attack 2 times before finally admitting his involvement.

Why the change?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee



Joined: 25 May 2003

PostPosted: Mon Mar 10, 2008 7:18 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

endo wrote:
mindmetoo wrote:
endo wrote:
loose_ends wrote:
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee wrote:
You know for the record Bin Laden's own son says his father was behind 9-11.


Bin Laden "said" he was behind 9-11, what is your point Joo?


Only after he denied it how many times?


What is the world coming to when you can't trust the word of a terrorist!




This is still one question I don't understand. OBL publically denied being inviolved in the 9/11 attack 2 times before finally admitting his involvement.

Why the change?


Cause it was before the US bombed Afghanistan.

He hoped he could get away with it.


Anyway . Look at this


Quote:
The story...

bin Ladin has always clearly admitted responsibility for previous attacks, why not 9/11?


Our take...

bin Ladin has made many statements that clearly show responsibility for the 9/11 attacks, as far as we can see. Further, al Qaeda members have explained in an audio-taped interview how the attacks came about, and were planned (see). Some people want still more, but the past record shows this is how bin Ladin works. He rarely directly claims responsibility, probably 9/11 is as close as he's ever come to it. By way of an illustration, here are some comments from an interview in May 1998:



http://www.911myths.com/html/previous_claims.html



http://www.911myths.com/html/do_al_qaeda_exist.html
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
arjuna



Joined: 31 Mar 2007

PostPosted: Tue Mar 25, 2008 10:08 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

False Flag Prospects, 2008 -- Top Three US Target Cities

by Captain Eric H. May
Global Research, February 23, 2008

http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=8165

The easiest way to carry out a false flag attack is by setting up a military exercise that simulates the very attack you want to carry out. As I'll detail below, this is exactly how government perpetrators in the US and UK handled the 9/11 and 7/7 "terror" attacks, which were in reality government attacks blamed on "terrorists."

Although ill health keeps me from working as hard in the area of false flag analysis as I used to, the urging of independent editors and brother intelligence officers has prompted me to write this essay. I'll keep it short for readers with limited time, but I will include invaluable links for those who want to delve deeper and understand better.

My aim, as a former military intelligence officer who spent five years with the U.S. Army 75th Division conducting military war games, is to convince the American people that the "next 9/11" -- constantly promised by officials and the media -- is likely to be carried out under the guise of future military exercises. If the American people are aware of pending exercises and the danger they represent, then the exercises cannot "go live" and effect the very terror events that they are supposed to be rehearsing against.

Military Exercises

The 9/11, 2001 attacks in the United States and the 7/7, 2005 attacks in the United Kingdom both have smoking guns proving that the mass murderers were not foreign terrorists but domestic tyrants. Each country's government was conducting military exercises that simulated the exact events that were to occur. [...]
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bDfdOwt2v3Y

In the case of the 7/7 London railway bombings, there is same-day evidence in a BBC interview with former Scotland Yard anti-terrorism agent, Peter Power, who was a contract employee working in government exercises: [...]
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JKvkhe3rqtc

[...]

Here is a brief target analysis of the top three cities:

Primary Target: Houston. Over the past four years military and police veterans like me have been alerting the public to government exercises aiming at the nuclear destruction of Houston petro-suburbs. Five times in those four years we were able to predict to within a day major petrochemical explosions in those petro-suburbs. The odds against this kind of accuracy are astronomical. As the center of Big Oil and the Bush Family, Houston remains the most endangered city in America. Any patriotic group, like mine, trying to alert its home city to the dangers of a false flag attack should read my recent article, "The 1/31 Nuke: Proof for Ron Paul" about the successful interdiction of a 2006 attempt against Texas City:
http://www.thepriceofliberty.org/08/01/28/may.htm

Secondary Target: Chicago. While Houston is the most endangered city, the most endangered building -- the best candidate to be the next World Trade Center -- is the Sears Tower. Official sources have pronounced it just that ever since the original 9/11 attack, when they said it was on the Al Qaeda hit list. Larry Silverstein, who bought the Twin Towers two months before 9/11, led a group that purchased the Sears Tower on 3/11, 2004, the day of the Madrid bombings. Federal officials have been pointing to Chicago and its Sears Tower as Al Qaeda targets since the original 9/11 attacks, and have repeated the threat ever since. In May 2006,, the government scheduled secret 9/11-type exercises in Chicago, while Chicago Mayor Daley was docked conveniently away in Israel for his first visit there. I sent a widely read communiqu� to Illinois Governor Blagojevich as part of a successful Internet attempt to shut down the pending false flag attack:
http://tekgnosis.typepad.com/tekgnosis/2006/05/ghost_troop_com.html

Tertiary Target: Portland. Portland, called "Little Beirut" by Bush cronies because of its enmity to Bush 41 and Bush 43, only made my top three list last summer, when it was designated as a target for a nuclear attack by successive exercises Noble Resolve and TOPOFF. The language in an official press release stated the case plainly enough: "Noble Resolve will coordinate with officials in Oregon to model a nuclear attack on Portland." In the course of researching Portland for a series of articles I wrote about the city and its exercises. I discovered that Stanford and Harvard had prepared a detailed nuclear fallout map for it, that national military commanders and state National Guard commanders were telling different stories about what the exercises were trying to accomplish, and that Portland's The Oregonian newspaper was doing everything it could to avoid investigating the frightening anomalies. I wasn't at all surprised that the last day of the exercises found the Homeland Security director Michael Chertoff in downtown Portland, which was largely closed down by an "unexpected" bomb threat. For another professional perspective on how great the danger was -- and may be again -- I refer the reader to the analysis of my colleague, Major William B. Fox (USMC):
http://www.lonestaricon.com/absolutenm/anmviewer.asp?a=2006&z=186

[...]

Still, for every one person who republishes or constructively comments on this essay, there will be another who employs division, abuse and ridicule against me or anyone else who asserts the common sense point that false flaggers will continue to false flag, just as murderers will continue to murder and robbers will continue to rob. It's Newtonian in its simplicity: things continue to drift the way they are drifting until they are stopped.

We can only stop the deadly drift of America by understanding 9/11 and anticipating the next 9/11. Many of the vociferous voices impeding our understanding and anticipation are performing a vital service for treason. The federal government once used counterintelligence programs (COINTELPRO) against the Vietnam era antiwar and civil rights movement, and common sense would suggest that they are using it again in the post-9/11 era, this time against the antiwar and 911 truth movement. The most dangerous voices of all our those from false friends who have infiltrated us to confuse us until the traitors who carried out 9/11 can repeat their performance.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... , 9, 10, 11  Next
Page 10 of 11

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International