|
Korean Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
ernie
Joined: 05 Aug 2006 Location: asdfghjk
|
Posted: Thu Mar 13, 2008 4:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| so would you consider dave's a 'union' as well? let's shut it down!!! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
truthfulchat
Joined: 30 Sep 2007
|
Posted: Fri Mar 14, 2008 12:13 am Post subject: Watch out guys |
|
|
| This organization's topic may be taken off. If you are here to advocate for schools to abide by their contracts and laws, it may be taken off. I did a search of my topic on this and the mods took it off. So as a warning maybe we should just keep the organization activities on email because talking about accountability is a no-no in Dave's ESL. Dave's ESL seems to take off posts that talk about accountability by Korea. I did a search of some other posts not done by me and they were taken off too. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
truthfulchat
Joined: 30 Sep 2007
|
Posted: Fri Mar 14, 2008 12:16 am Post subject: Re: What would you like us to do |
|
|
| Mi Yum mi wrote: |
| truthfulchat wrote: |
| Mi Yum mi wrote: |
Yep you are
F-2 is a family visa...child or spouce is Korean. F-5 is a glorified F-2.
I agree with TUM. These guys are biting off way more than they can chew and are going to piss off the gov officials. I bet these guys are gone 6 months after they start their union...er organization. |
Ok now tell me how F-2 and F-5 visas relate to foreign teachers, as ones who are not permanent residents.
As for you comment about TUM. You really think we are not going to organize because people say oh we might piss off the government. How do you think we feel that schools violate contracts and laws that effect the foreign teacher.
If we are really for this cause then it might piss the government off but we have to take our chances to try to hold the schools accountable. Though, there are protection in law they can't fire us for something like urging accountability and enforcement.
Besides do you want us be scared all the time and let schools do this to us. |
I'm on an F and I'm not a permanent residence of Korea. I'm white as a ghost...just as much as a foreigner as most of you. I'm just married to a k-girl. I guess you are pissed about schools, but what is your organization going to do? Really? If the K-government does nothing are the corrupt hogwon bosses going to obey the laws cause they might piss off a bunch of white guys? lol.
No matter how they label your club, call it a knitting circle if you want, it's still a union. Unions are illegal for E holders. Anyone who joins this union can and will be deported. |
Actually by definition of Korean law we aren't union just a community nonprofit organization. The leaders of the organization consulted a labor attorney already. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Poktanju Mod Team


Joined: 15 Jun 2005
|
Posted: Fri Mar 14, 2008 12:58 am Post subject: Re: Watch out guys |
|
|
| truthfulchat wrote: |
| This organization's topic may be taken off. If you are here to advocate for schools to abide by their contracts and laws, it may be taken off. I did a search of my topic on this and the mods took it off. So as a warning maybe we should just keep the organization activities on email because talking about accountability is a no-no in Dave's ESL. Dave's ESL seems to take off posts that talk about accountability by Korea. I did a search of some other posts not done by me and they were taken off too. |
Really, we pull threads that discuss unionizing or making an association?
Like this:
http://forums.eslcafe.com/korea/viewtopic.php?t=86705
or this:
http://forums.eslcafe.com/korea/viewtopic.php?t=82977
or this:
http://forums.eslcafe.com/korea/viewtopic.php?t=88061
or this:
http://forums.eslcafe.com/korea/viewtopic.php?t=74606
or this:
http://forums.eslcafe.com/korea/viewtopic.php?t=114623
or this:
http://forums.eslcafe.com/korea/viewtopic.php?t=111926
Given that we have a verifiable history of not pulling union threads, is it all possible for you to entertain the idea that we just happened to pull only your thread? And that instead of making productive discussion on the issue, you instead chose to take personal attacks against anyone who disagreed with you?
We pulled that thread because everyone one was piling on you for catching you making lies over and over. We pulled it because we felt sorry for you, because you were too humble to say "you're right, I'm a tad paranoid and I make up stories that I later retract".
Now you are continuing to spin more baseless lies that imply that we pull threads like the active ones that I listed and this one here?
Out of respect to the association effort (not yours, but I mean the credible one), can you please not associate your comments with anything that they are saying or doing, otherwise you'll drive people away and kill that initiative, too. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
truthfulchat
Joined: 30 Sep 2007
|
Posted: Fri Mar 14, 2008 1:27 am Post subject: Really I was the one making personal attacks |
|
|
Hmmm. I think the moderator is clearly wrong. I am not the one who started the personal attacks. I believe it was other people who did. I started a topic about violations done by schools related to contracts and laws. I did cite the Bill Kapoun incident, which I clearly used information I was getting from that topic about the ESL student in the fire. I did not make anything up about that, it was all information I read in there. Now if the information was incorrect then that is not my fault but the moderators chose not to point out others who said the same information I did on the Bill Kapoun incident. As for personal attacks, what would you call someone who chooses to only respond to one person who is voicing that contracts and laws should not be violated but when others said the same thing, the people refrain from responding to them. I would call that a personal attack. I was just defending myself against people personal attacking me. How about this? One person chose to bring up problems I had in my past unrelated to the topic but oh no that was not personal attack according to the moderators. I know others felt that I was being personally attacked by some posters (the last poster read what CC said and the link he posted to my hi5 page and saw it as a personal attack). What about a personal attack on the evolution topic. I was vulgarly insulted because I criticized evolution and said I was Christian as others were personally attacked, but hey you guys did not think it was a personal attack.
About my so called lies. The Bill Kapoun incident, I only compiled information I read on other topics. CC being a hagwan or private education leader, based on his response to English teachers being consultants when he hired consultants. Now as for calling him gay, I apologized for that reaction, but it was a defense against a personal attack against me. We aren't perfect and sometimes when we defend ourselves we don't always say appropriate things.
I am not paranoid that schools are breaking contracts and laws. This is the truth and others would agree, you even put posts that echoed my points. The topic became a problem not because of me but others who chose to single me out though others were posting the same concerns.
Really get your story straight.
In addition, neither you nor Dave's ESL has control over the association and I really can be helpful since my fiancee works for the government specifically in a division that handles foreign workers problems. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Captain Corea

Joined: 28 Feb 2005 Location: Seoul
|
Posted: Fri Mar 14, 2008 1:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
The thread is pulled, so no need (nor ability) to really sift through it. But let's be clear here.
-You starting calling people who questioned your points about the Bill Kapoun tragedy 'ass kissers', when in truth they (myself included) were simply questioning the accuracy of your statements (such as when you said the Government did not give him insurance).
-You've stated numerous times that I am a hogwon owner (or something similar). I believe you got this in your head because I said I've employed F2s, F4s, and F5s. Let me break it down for you...
F2 - married to a Korean
F4 - Overseas Korean
F5 - permanent residence
NONE of them are necessarily tied to the ESL industry. You've decided once again to bring this up into this thread (a thread I've never posted in), so once again, I'm telling you - STFU about things you know nothing about.
-You called me gay.
/shrug
What the heck can I really say about that?
-You think everyone is out to get you.
Your school attacks you.
People in America made fun of you.
Koreans mock you on the street.
Posters 'stalk' you.
People accuse you of being a pedophile.
People ask you not to speak for this cause.
There's a common denominator there for anyone watching.
Seriously though. I think everyone agrees on a few points:
-Schools should abide by contracts.
-There should be regulated penalties if they do not.
-There is accountability on both sides (the school and the teacher).
-Truthfulchat should not be representing anyone but himself in any type of meeting. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
truthfulchat
Joined: 30 Sep 2007
|
Posted: Fri Mar 14, 2008 1:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Captain Corea wrote: |
The thread is pulled, so no need (nor ability) to really sift through it. But let's be clear here.
-You starting calling people who questioned your points about the Bill Kapoun tragedy 'ass kissers', when in truth they (myself included) were simply questioning the accuracy of your statements (such as when you said the Government did not give him insurance).
-You've stated numerous times that I am a hogwon owner (or something similar). I believe you got this in your head because I said I've employed F2s, F4s, and F5s. Let me break it down for you...
F2 - married to a Korean
F4 - Overseas Korean
F5 - permanent residence
NONE of them are necessarily tied to the ESL industry. You've decided once again to bring this up into this thread (a thread I've never posted in), so once again, I'm telling you - STFU about things you know nothing about.
-You called me gay.
/shrug
What the heck can I really say about that?
-You think everyone is out to get you.
Your school attacks you.
People in America made fun of you.
Koreans mock you on the street.
Posters 'stalk' you.
People accuse you of being a pedophile.
People ask you not to speak for this cause.
There's a common denominator there for anyone watching.
Seriously though. I think everyone agrees on a few points:
-Schools should abide by contracts.
-There should be regulated penalties if they do not.
-There is accountability on both sides (the school and the teacher).
-Truthfulchat should not be representing anyone but himself in any type of meeting. |
OK maybe @ss kisser is the wrong word. However, the word sympathizer can be a proper term for someone that puts more responsibility on the teacher than the school. Even when I swayed away from the Bill Kapoun incident, which I did, the people who disagreed with me still disagreed that accountability should be focused on the school and laws enforced. You even brought up how teachers should be personally responsible but not once (until now) say the schools should be accountable. Plus when my points were echoed by others you refused to respond to them unless as you say you were asked. You even came up saying the organization probably wont work and even saying if teachers are having problems they should just quit, meaning us teachers should not take action against instead we just quit and go home.
Then you chose to bring up unrelated issues. Now come on that is a personal attack when you bring up issues like my past life.
As for calling you gay. I apologized for it and clearly stated it was a reaction to you only picking on me.
So as it seems you really need to go through the posts. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Poktanju Mod Team


Joined: 15 Jun 2005
|
Posted: Fri Mar 14, 2008 2:03 am Post subject: Re: Really I was the one making personal attacks |
|
|
| truthfulchat wrote: |
Really get your story straight.
|
I did set the story straight. You lied about us in that we take off threads about unionizing and accountability. I provided examples supporting where we have not and that the reason why we pulled your thread was not about what little there was of relevant union discussion, but your digression into personal attacks.
So given that you avoided my response and examples that illustrate that you were lying about us having a mod policy on union threads, I trust that your lack of response on that means that you are in agreeance that you were just feeding more BS and that that matter is now closed.
Having you try to divert focus to instead debate about which user started slinging personal attacks in the pulled thread, is a separate issue that is not relevant to what you said about mod policy in this thread nor my response to it.
In closing, let this be the last time that you associate yourself with this thread concerning the other individual's association effort. It's a valid effort with merit and deserves discussion. If you even remotely begin to tank this thread (or any thread, for that matter) with any more lies, distortion, personal attacks, or overall BS, then in the interests of preserving and furthering constructive discussion of this topic amongst other users here, your account will be banned.
Edit: Any slights not only from, but ABOUT truthfulchat will also be removed, effective immediately. If any of you want to drag this out, do it in PM.
Last edited by Poktanju on Fri Mar 14, 2008 2:06 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
truthfulchat
Joined: 30 Sep 2007
|
Posted: Fri Mar 14, 2008 2:11 am Post subject: Re: Really I was the one making personal attacks |
|
|
| Poktanju wrote: |
| truthfulchat wrote: |
Really get your story straight.
|
I did set the story straight. You lied about us in that we take off threads about unionizing and accountability. I provided examples supporting where we have not and that the reason why we pulled your thread was not about what little there was of relevant union discussion, but your digression into personal attacks.
So given that you avoided my response and examples that illustrate that you were lying about us having a mod policy on union threads, I trust that your lack of response on that means that you are in agreeance that you were just feeding more BS and that that matter is now closed.
Having you try to divert focus to instead debate about which user started slinging personal attacks in the pulled thread, is a separate issue that is not relevant to what you said about mod policy in this thread nor my response to it.
In closing, let this be the last time that you associate yourself with this thread concerning the other individual's association effort. It's a valid effort with merit and deserves discussion. If you even remotely begin to tank this thread with any more lies, distortion, personal attacks, or overall BS, then in the interests of preserving and furthering constructive discussion of this topic amongst other users here, your account will be banned. |
Let's get something straight. There was a guy who talked about protesting against schools. Some moderator said that this topic would not be OK because protesting would be in violation of the Korean laws. That is one I was referencing to.
As for your threat about banning me. In reality, there were personal attacks against me and not one moderator did anything. You don't call CC's comments on my past life a personal attack even providing a link of my hi5 page. Others did see that as a personal attack and told me just don't let that bother you because CC really does not know about your personal life.
However, I will agree to keeping it on topic as long as you can get others to agree to keep it on topic. I will ask that if someone does get off topic and personal attacks me, the moderators will enact the same enforcement on them.
Oh by the way I don't think pms work towards moderators or they don't respond that is why I posted it here. I many times pmed mods about why my threads were taken off and there was no response. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Poktanju Mod Team


Joined: 15 Jun 2005
|
Posted: Fri Mar 14, 2008 2:19 am Post subject: Re: Really I was the one making personal attacks |
|
|
| truthfulchat wrote: |
However, I will agree to keeping it on topic as long as you can get others to agree to keep it on topic. I will ask that if someone does get off topic and personal attacks me, the moderators will enact the same enforcement on them.
|
I've already talked to CC about this in PM. Now fully and completely drop this issue and get back to civilized discussion. If there's any divergence from that, you know where we stand. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Captain Corea

Joined: 28 Feb 2005 Location: Seoul
|
Posted: Fri Mar 14, 2008 2:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
I'll chime in on this thread and my thoughts on a union.
Personally, I don't think it'll fly. Not that it's not needed or deserved, but rather because its got a lot of things going against it.
-The majority of teachers that come here do so for only one year - this limits their commitment.
-The majority of teachers are not connected through anything other than speaking English - getting them all in one 'union hall' would be tough.
-The majority of teachers here do not post online.
-Many teachers would balk at paying union dues.
-Setting up the union and maintaining it as a legal entity would be tough (but not impossible).
-Unions have power because of their workers' ability to mobilize and take action - what action would ESL teachers be able to take in Korea? Can any of you really imagine a massive walk-out?
-Public support would be minimum for a group of foreigners that make (on average) 2.0+ mill a month with free housing).
Basically, I'd much rather see an informed resource portal paid for by donations. Right ow there is Dave's, Galbijim, Expat, EFL law, and a few others, but all too often the net is filled with contradictory answers and half-truths.
If there was one source, heck even a Gov source, that could handle and explain teachers problems, I think there'd be a lot more happy campers here. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
truthfulchat
Joined: 30 Sep 2007
|
Posted: Fri Mar 14, 2008 2:27 am Post subject: Questions about the topic |
|
|
Anway,
Back to topic
How many people have joined the organization?
What are some ways we as teachers will take action? Petitions, Email campaigns, other stuff?
Now I suggested involving government officials? Is this a good option? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mi Yum mi
Joined: 28 Jan 2008
|
Posted: Fri Mar 14, 2008 5:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
Petitions? Email campaigns...what a joke. You really know nothing about Korea. If Koreans want to seriously protest they set themselves on fire, cut of a body part or something else extreme. The government would laugh at a bunch of emails. When have petitions ever worked?
This isn't America Op. You need to get a clue. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mi Yum mi
Joined: 28 Jan 2008
|
Posted: Fri Mar 14, 2008 5:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
| ernie wrote: |
| so would you consider dave's a 'union' as well? let's *beep* it down!!! |
Dave's isn't about fighting the man is it? Tool. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mi Yum mi
Joined: 28 Jan 2008
|
Posted: Fri Mar 14, 2008 5:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Captain Corea wrote: |
-You've stated numerous times that I am a hogwon owner (or something similar). I believe you got this in your head because I said I've employed F2s, F4s, and F5s. Let me break it down for you...
F2 - married to a Korean or with K-kids |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|