| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| So, how many do you think is acceptable for a politician to have had? |
| 1 or less |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
| 2 or less |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
| 5 or less |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
| 10 or less |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
| 20 or less |
|
4% |
[ 1 ] |
| 30 or less |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
| 50 or less |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
| Any more than a couple of hundred is a bit deviant |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
| Bloody hell, I don't want my leader to be some virgin! |
|
23% |
[ 5 ] |
| Bloody hell, I don't want my leader to be some virgin! |
|
23% |
[ 5 ] |
| Bloody hell, I don't want my leader to be some virgin! |
|
23% |
[ 5 ] |
| No preference |
|
23% |
[ 5 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 21 |
|
| Author |
Message |
Big_Bird
Joined: 31 Jan 2003
Location: Sometimes here sometimes there...
|
 Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2008 12:11 am Post subject: Between you, me and the bedpost... |
 |
|
| Quote: |
When Nick Clegg admitted to having slept with 'no more than 30' partners he was dubbed the Lib Dem lothario. So how many is too many? Do we tell the truth about our sexual tally? And why do we care, wonders Kira Cochrane
|
Between you, me and the bedpost..
A British party leader admitted to having a bit less than 30 sexual partners and there's been a lot of titter tatter in the media. So, how many partners do you think it is acceptable, for the potential leader of your nation, to have had?
Edit: I don't know how to delete the triplicated option.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mateomiguel
Joined: 16 May 2005
|
| Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2008 12:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
| more power = more booty. These guys at the top of the power chain have a duty, nay, an obligation, to set the upper limit of acceptability in sexual partners. They better be screwing themselves silly, cuz I don't wanna exist in some repressed statistical chart. I want a high upper limit. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Ya-ta Boy
Joined: 16 Jan 2003
Location: Established in 1994
|
| Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2008 1:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
| There is a fine line between "I'm impressed" and "You're promiscuous". The minimum number for 'promiscuous' begins with two partners more than I've had. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ontheway
Joined: 24 Aug 2005
Location: Somewhere under the rainbow...
|
| Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2008 9:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
How about an option for:
Don't ask. Don't tell. "I prefer my political leaders and the media to be mature enough and objective enough to realize that this topic is irrelevant to the selection of a President or Legislator."
This isn't the same as "no preference." It's not that the number matters. It's having the sense not to ask, reveal or discuss the matter that matters. The media shouldn't ask. If asked, the politician should respond that it's a private, personal matter and none of the media's business. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
