| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
dmbfan
Joined: 09 Mar 2006
|
 Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2008 1:22 pm Post subject: dmbfan's questions of the day. |
 |
|
The line in the sand has been drawn.
Beattles or Stones?
G.Dead or Phish?
Dylan or Marley?
Out of the Fab 4, who was TRULY the most talented of the four (not a question of popularity, but true talent).
........just curious.
dmbfan |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dmbfan
Joined: 09 Mar 2006
|
| Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2008 2:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| geez.....12 views and not one response......................... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
JMO
Joined: 18 Jul 2006
Location: Daegu
|
| Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2008 3:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Who are G. Dead and Phish?
Marley had better hair.
Stones were cooler.
Ringo Starr as his name was ringo, which is way better than the others.
There you go, questions answered about way old music, that i never listen to. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
dmbfan
Joined: 09 Mar 2006
|
| Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2008 3:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| Who are G. Dead and Phish? |
The Grateful Dead and Phish...................well...do a google search.
| Quote: |
Marley had better hair.
Stones were cooler.
Ringo Starr as his name was ringo, which is way better than the others.
There you go, questions answered about way old music, that i never listen to. |
It's too bad you don't listen to that "way old" music. But, your opinion is your opinion.
Honestly, I was hoping for something a little more then that.
dmbfan
Last edited by dmbfan on Wed Apr 02, 2008 3:25 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
JMO
Joined: 18 Jul 2006
Location: Daegu
|
| Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2008 3:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ok I'll go with Phish because a misspelling of fish is better than greatful, which doesn't really mean anything.
I have a better question.
The Wu Tang or Public Enemy.
I know they are different eras but I'd go with the clan as they produced 2 all world mcs in ghostface and methodman. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
dmbfan
Joined: 09 Mar 2006
|
| Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2008 3:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
Ok I'll go with Phish because a misspelling of fish is better than greatful, which doesn't really mean anything.
I have a better question.
The Wu Tang or Public Enemy.
I know they are different eras but I'd go with the clan as they produced 2 all world mcs in ghostface and methodman. |
Yikes! OK...thank you for pointing that out.
No, I think I want to stick with the questions at hand before any hijacking takes place.
We can get to Wu Tang or Public Enemy, later.
dmbfan |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Kimchi Cowboy
Joined: 17 Sep 2006
|
| Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2008 3:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Beatles.
Phish.
Dylan. Marley was cool too, but Dylan's body of work is immense, and his influence is immeasurable.
And, Lennon. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
uberscheisse
Joined: 02 Dec 2003
Location: japan is better than korea.
|
| Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2008 4:17 pm Post subject: Re: dmbfan's questions of the day. |
|
|
| dmbfan wrote: |
The line in the sand has been drawn.
Beattles or Stones?
G.Dead or Phish?
Dylan or Marley?
Out of the Fab 4, who was TRULY the most talented of the four (not a question of popularity, but true talent).
|
beatles, hands down. they wrote better songs. it's that simple.
g.dead or phish - while both bands are about as interesting as watching old people drive, i'd give it to the dead for pioneering not only something that people try to call a genre but also touring like a MF for many years.
dylan or marley? dylan. apples and oranges though, weird comparison.
fab 4? george. could play, sing, write much better than any of the rest of those jerkies. lennon's output post-beatles, while often being good social commentary, sounded like it was played by some crap high school band doing bad covers. macartney? one word - wings. fail. ringo? fail. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
spliff
Joined: 19 Jan 2004
Location: Khon Kaen, Thailand
|
| Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2008 4:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Dylan, Marley and the Dead. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
runlikegump
Joined: 05 Nov 2007
Location: Seoul
|
| Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2008 5:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Beatles. Stones suck. Always have.
Grateful Dead or Phish? No clue, couldn't name a single song from either.
Dylan. Big time.
True talent - McCartney. The one I like best, Lennon. For a good read, check out Last Interview by David Sheff. It's the full transcript of the last interviews done with Lennon for Rolling Stone in 1980. Sheff asks Lennon who did what in terms of lyrics and music. After reading that, it's tough to argue Paul's brilliance. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
mikeyboy122
Joined: 28 Feb 2008
Location: namyang
|
| Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2008 7:19 pm Post subject: music |
|
|
| Super Sonic Soul Pimps. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
rumdiary
Joined: 05 Jun 2006
|
| Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2008 7:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
What did one Deadhead say to the other Deadhead when they ran out of pot?
This band sucks. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
RACETRAITOR
Joined: 24 Oct 2005
Location: Seoul, South Korea
|
| Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2008 7:36 pm Post subject: Re: dmbfan's questions of the day. |
|
|
Beattles or Stones?
G.Dead or Phish?
Neither. I hate hippie music.
Dylan or Marley?
Although I wish he hadn't grown his hair out.
Out of the Fab 4, who was TRULY the most talented of the four (not a question of popularity, but true talent).
Lennon. Have you ever listened to Wings? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
twg
Joined: 02 Nov 2006
Location: Getting some fresh air...
|
| Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2008 9:04 pm Post subject: Re: dmbfan's questions of the day. |
|
|
| dmbfan wrote: |
| Beattles or Stones? |
The Beatles had the sense to call it a day before they got embarrassing like the Stones did. Beatles.
Battles haven't been around long enough to make the comparison.
Neither.
Dylan is only good when other people do his songs. Marley.
| Quote: |
| Out of the Fab 4, who was TRULY the most talented of the four (not a question of popularity, but true talent). |
Sir George Martin.
| Quote: |
| Wu Tang or Public Enemy |
Public Enemy. Wu were fun, but they had little to say. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
mrgiles
Joined: 09 Jul 2007
Location: Seoul
|
| Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2008 9:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
beatles. tho, god damn paint it black is a fantastic song!!!
i don't like either that much, but phish's association wit neil young earns them brownie points.
dylan i guess, if u have to choose, weird category though.
most talented?? i guess probably lennon. best musician? toss up between george and paul (he can play that bass!! funkee). capable of writing the best songs?? difficult, but i'd pick george. so many of the highlights from the beatles' albums were harrisongs. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
