Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Is glorifying virginity bad for women?
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  

Is glorifying virginity bad for women?
No, women should generally be encouraged to have a minimum of lovers.
30%
 30%  [ 8 ]
No way! Let's all go to Saudi Arabia (or Bible Belt America)...
7%
 7%  [ 2 ]
Yes, keep your sticky nose out of people's bedrooms..
61%
 61%  [ 16 ]
Total Votes : 26

Author Message
nicholas_chiasson



Joined: 14 Jun 2007
Location: Samcheok

PostPosted: Wed Apr 02, 2008 5:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Justin Hale wrote:

I had sex with a virgin in my early 20s and it wasn't pleasant for me particularly. It can be very difficult if you're, frankly speaking, rather large.

Does your ego know no bounds of propriety?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bucheon bum



Joined: 16 Jan 2003

PostPosted: Wed Apr 02, 2008 5:53 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

After reading that article, it is clear Ms. Fredell is intimidated and fearful of sex. She's using chastity as a way to avoid it. And I think a lot of people who cling to virginity are the same way. Not all by any means, but many. Nothing wrong with that as long as you finally face that fear and overcome it. One person who doesn't have that issue is Mr. Keliher. Given his past, I can understand why he is dedicated to remaining a virgin.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
stevemcgarrett



Joined: 24 Mar 2006

PostPosted: Fri Apr 04, 2008 9:46 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

In a rare moment of actual response, twg said:

Quote:
Turns out this is is all social-conservative hot air.


Turns out that the moral resurgence I referred to occurred irrespective of the viability of abstinence programs in the schools.

If anything, your "evidence" just goes to show how important positive peer pressure is away from school, and of course family concern.

stillnotking:

"It's a concept that men value."

Baloney; do you believe half of what you say? C'mon, get a grip. Lots of girls and women value their virginity and many are self-proclaimed feminists who don't need male approval. Really, stop running rabbit before I call John Updike to straighten you out.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
stillnotking



Joined: 18 Dec 2007
Location: Oregon, USA

PostPosted: Fri Apr 04, 2008 10:35 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

stevemcgarrett wrote:
stillnotking:

"It's a concept that men value."

Baloney; do you believe half of what you say? C'mon, get a grip. Lots of girls and women value their virginity and many are self-proclaimed feminists who don't need male approval. Really, stop running rabbit before I call John Updike to straighten you out.


Lots of women value burqas, too. Lots of women hold their struggling daughters and nieces down on a rock so somebody can mutilate their genitalia with a rusty knife. Lots of women are prostitutes.

Women cater to men's sensibilities. Men cater to women's, too, though generally this involves less genital mutilation, restrictive clothing, and being paid for sex.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
twg



Joined: 02 Nov 2006
Location: Getting some fresh air...

PostPosted: Fri Apr 04, 2008 12:18 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Acting like a windbag* as usual, Steve blew hard:

Quote:
If anything, your "evidence" just goes to show how important positive peer pressure is away from school, and of course family concern.

Stop waving your cane around at that darned permissive society and read it again. The evidence I provided showed ab-only programs were both ineffective, and stupidly dangerous. For example, the Washington Post reported a study back in 2005 that showed just how ineffective and stupidly dangerous they are:

Quote:
Teenagers who take virginity pledges -- public declarations to abstain from sex -- are almost as likely to be infected with a sexually transmitted disease as those who never made the pledge, an eight-year study released yesterday found.

Although young people who sign a virginity pledge delay the initiation of sexual activity, marry at younger ages and have fewer sexual partners, they are also less likely to use condoms and more likely to experiment with oral and anal sex, said the researchers from Yale and Columbia universities.

"The sad story is that kids who are trying to preserve their technical virginity are, in some cases, engaging in much riskier behavior," said lead author Peter S. Bearman, a professor at Columbia's Institute for Social and Economic Research and Policy. "From a public health point of view, an abstinence movement that encourages no vaginal sex may inadvertently encourage other forms of alternative sex that are at higher risk of STDs."

Teens having non vaginal sex to get social conservatives off their backs?!... whoda thunk that would happen, huh?

Here's more from the Guttmacher Institute on the topic of teen pregnancy...

Quote:
In fact, the study found that levels of sexual activity and the age at which teenagers initiate sex do not vary appreciably across the countries and are simply too small to account for the wide variations in teen pregnancy rates. Rather, teen pregnancy and childbearing levels are higher in the United States, they found, largely because of differences in contraceptive use. Sexually active teens in the United States are less likely to use any contraceptive method and especially less likely to use highly effective hormonal methods, primarily the pill, than their peers in other countries (see chart). U.S. teens who become pregnant are also less likely to opt to have an abortion, whether due to lack of abortion access, higher levels of antiabortion sentiment or greater acceptance of teen motherhood.

And yet, funnily enough, abstinence programs actively discourage they get educated about contraception.

You will be happy to see that they do show that some of the reduction of teen pregnancy since the 80s is due to increased abstinence... about 25% of the reason. (And that doesn't show any sort of adoption of social conservative morals on their part. They're just decided to not *beep*) But that leaves us with a majority using contraception properly to prevent pregnancy.

But, for those that have been shying away from safe sex because social conservatives are hounding them, things don't look so good

Quote:
A study by CDC�s Sherry L. Farr and colleagues found that while the majority of sexually active 15- to-24 year-old young women (82 percent) receive contraceptive or STD/HIV services, few receive both (39 percent). In addition, only 38 percent of a subset of young women who reported receiving contraceptive services associated with unprotected sex (e.g., pregnancy testing) also received STD/HIV counseling, testing or treatment, which indicates that many women at high risk are not receiving necessary prevention services.


Ab-only education is ineffective. It forces teens to lie and take bad risks.

It is immoral. Safe sex education isn't

nicholas_chiasson wrote:
Justin Hale wrote:

I had sex with a virgin in my early 20s and it wasn't pleasant for me particularly. It can be very difficult if you're, frankly speaking, rather large.

Does your ego know no bounds of propriety?

I'm just wondering how he discovered he was flexible enough to do that to himself.

* bad word cleaned up as per mod request


Last edited by twg on Fri Apr 04, 2008 8:21 pm; edited 2 times in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Kuros



Joined: 27 Apr 2004

PostPosted: Fri Apr 04, 2008 2:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Big_Bird wrote:
agentX wrote:
Naaahhh...it's not important.

Women on college have more to worry about, things like sexual assault.
http://www.wbko.com/news/headlines/6233526.html
Quote:
"National statistics show that one in three females and one in six males will be the victims of sexual assault in their lifetime," Elizabeth Mohon said.

Mohon is the Sexual Assault Services Coordinator at Western Kentucky University. She helps educate students and faculty members to be aware of the sexual assault problem.

"This is a silent epidemic going on in our community, in our country, in the world," Mohon said.


What do they mean by sexual assault, though? Would that figure include someone coming up and grabbing a girl's breast, for example? Horrible and disgusting, but not on the level of rape. I'd be interested to know, because I find it hard to believe that 1 in 3 girls are raped.

But some might argue that the two issues are sometimes linked - i.e. attitudes to women and what have you, nice girls and cheap girls... you can more easily get away with rape if you choose a girl that society has labelled as 'easy' for example.


Yes, I believe grabbing a girl's breast without consent is sexual assault.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
flakfizer



Joined: 12 Nov 2004
Location: scaling the Cliffs of Insanity with a frayed rope.

PostPosted: Fri Apr 04, 2008 4:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Justin Hale wrote:


I had sex with a virgin in my early 20s and it wasn't pleasant for me particularly. It can be very difficult if you're, frankly speaking, rather large.

Poor virgin. I hope he's ok.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
crescent



Joined: 15 Jan 2003
Location: yes.

PostPosted: Fri Apr 04, 2008 6:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

twg wrote:
Acting like a windbag ass as usual, Steve blew hard:


Hmm. Being hypocritical again are we? Welcome back. Your 1 month hiatus lasted a full 5 days!
Priceless. What's eating ya?...You couldn't stay away from the very users you can't stand?

Yeah, now this is the part where you say I'm chasing you around message boards rehashing old battles. I would have noticed you sooner if you only said something interesting.
Yeah... junkies.... they're sad.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Enrico Palazzo
Mod Team
Mod Team


Joined: 11 Mar 2008

PostPosted: Fri Apr 04, 2008 7:40 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Fellows, what's up with this windbag ass comment directed at Steve, and Crescent and Twg it is a Current Events forum, do some discussing, not dissing. Twg using profanity toward another user is a bit untoward, and I am not saying Steve hasn't used this or that. We can't see everything.
Posters, if you see something report. And please do clean up the place.



Thanks...

We said, play the ball; not the player.... It means you hit the ball, not the player and cause players to come out of the dug out....

Santa Maria!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
peppermint



Joined: 13 May 2003
Location: traversing the minefields of caddishness.

PostPosted: Fri Apr 04, 2008 7:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I read the article in question a few days ago, and couldn't help but feel sorry for Miss Fredell. Putting so much focus on the wedding night generally leads to a whole lot of unrealistic expectations, and a massive letdown during the honeymoon. For guys, it all comes easy, so to speak. For most women it's more a matter of practice makes perfect.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Adventurer



Joined: 28 Jan 2006

PostPosted: Fri Apr 04, 2008 8:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Peppermint, I am not sure that sex is easier for women or for men. That is hard to say. If both the male and female if they haven't experience at all it could be difficult.

Anyway, I wouldn't really look at a woman whether she is a virgin or not a virgin. Her purity comes from her attitude rather than if she engaged in intercourse. Anyway, males are not prized for their virginity in cultures.
It is very often used as a tool to control females. I have respect for a woman who wants to be a virgin, because of her religious principles.
There is nothing wrong with that that at all, but it doesn't make her better than someone who isn't one. I don't think it is backward for someone to prize their virginity. I just don't think it should be used for someone to feel self-righteous, that's all.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
twg



Joined: 02 Nov 2006
Location: Getting some fresh air...

PostPosted: Fri Apr 04, 2008 8:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Enrico Palazzo wrote:
Twg using profanity toward another user is a bit untoward

In the spirit of cooperation with the mods, I've edited the comment.

While it is tempting to dig in my heels and demand that my comments be accepted for the golden glory that they are, I figure that trying to get into a pissing contest with the new mods over them is something only a complete tool would do.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
little mixed girl



Joined: 11 Jun 2003
Location: shin hyesung's bed~

PostPosted: Tue Apr 08, 2008 7:06 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

when it comes to teaching kids about sex, i say teach them about it, and say that the best way to make sure you're not going to get something is to not have sex.

i don't think that there's anything wrong with being a virgin.
some people are too eager to have sex, and they get messed up emotionally.
teach people that if they are going to have sex, it should be safe sex.
but, let's not encourage kids to have sex.

oh, and if you (male or female) make the decision to wait, do it because YOU want to. don't do it because your friends or parents or religion want you to, do it because it's something that YOU want to do.

not every person who is a virgin is a virgin because god said so, why not do it with someone you feel comfortable with. rather than someone who was just there.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
arjuna



Joined: 31 Mar 2007

PostPosted: Tue Apr 08, 2008 9:49 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

A related article you might find interesting:

Prada prostitutes
April 2008 | 145 � Reviews �

http://www.prospect-magazine.co.uk/article_details.php?id=10096

Memoirs by high-class hookers may be cartoonish, but no less so than accounts that cast prostitutes as victims of rapacious male sexuality. There are many types of prostitute, just as there are many reasons for men to visit them. A grown-up debate about sexuality must acknowledge this

Howard Jacobson

"The first thing you should know is that I'm a wh0re."
Belle de Jour: The Intimate Adventures of a London Call Girl (Phoenix)

"A field study in nine countries showed that between 60 and 75 per cent of women in prostitution had been raped, between 70 and 95 per cent had been physically assaulted, and 68 per cent displayed symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder in the same range as combat veterans and victims of torture."
Joan Smith, The Independent, 27th December 2007

"Another thing that distinguishes a ladylike working girl is her groomed and tidy muff. Clients know you make your money with your pvssy, but a freshly waxed, beautifully maintained pvssy sends a message: You spend money on your pvssy."
Tracy Quan, Diary of a Manhattan Call Girl (HarperPerennial)

Georges Bataille's outlined sequel to his erotic novel Story of the Eye is pitilessly direct: "After fifteen years of more and more serious debauchery, Simone ends up in a torture camp� She dies as though making love� fever and agony transfigure her." Pauline R�age, author of Story of O, likewise envisaged death as an alternative ending to O's exalted degradation. But it isn't really an alternative ending. It is the only ending. There is nowhere else for O's eroticism to go.

You can't mess around with sex, in life or in literature. It is never not serious. When a man denies the significance of an adultery with the line, "It didn't matter to me," and the wronged woman replies, "Then why did you do it?", they both miss the point. Everything in sex matters, including the experience of its not mattering. Isn't that what O pursues, the sensation of nothing mattering, least of all herself? And isn't that why some men visit prostitutes, for the intense experience of abnegation associated with payment, for which next to nothing is given and next to nothing is felt?

[...]

The sexual instinct will not stay still for anybody. It would be foolish to deny that the transactional nature of sex with a prostitute will encourage some men to act brutally, but violence is by no means intrinsic to the transaction. Some men visit prostitutes to "use," others to be used. There isn't one of these diarists who doesn't joke about the submissives and quiescents that make up much of her client list. "Do they do this just to get on your nerves?" Tracy Quan wonders, unable to bear for another minute the sight of client Colin on his knees, whimpering, "Yes, Mistress, yes, Mistress." The exchange of money is freighted with meaning; for one man it will confer rights, for another it will take all rights away, make not her but him cheap, signal his desire to abjure his masculinity. Others go because they're desperate, because, like Stephen in A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man, they don't know how else to find initiation into adulthood. Loneliness will make a man pay for sex, as will sorrow, confusion, the longing to enjoy erotic company for a brief hour or less. As well, yes, as plain old pleasure-seeking, because you have money in your pocket and not much else to do, and she is there and happy to take it, and whatever you both think about yourselves the next day, pleasure without a single impulse to cause suffering is what you're after.

If it is inhumane to belittle the miseries of the prostitute, it is no less inhumane to minimise the miseries that make some men their clients. There is at least this to be said about the Prada call girls with their obliging mouths and vaginas�along with the freedoms they insist on for themselves, they grant men the freedom to be creatures of desire. Why, when all is said and done, should a prostitute not be touched by a man's shyness or ineptitude or sadness, or made curious by his turning up in her room looking for he doesn't know what, or excited when on rare occasions what he does want coincides with what she does? Is the battlefield so unforgiving that none of this is conceivable, and that any man who goes out looking for such an eventuality must be treated as a criminal?

And does it not demean a woman, every bit as much as it demeans a man, to position her either as victim of men's appetites or as fantasist of them?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3
Page 3 of 3

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International