Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Republicans talk about Iraq, Obama at N. Ky. dinner
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Czarjorge



Joined: 01 May 2007
Location: I now have the same moustache, and it is glorious.

PostPosted: Thu Apr 17, 2008 1:34 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I wonder how much of this is 'good ol' boy'-ism. I moved away from small town Kansas when I was twelve and going back to visit found that the kids I went to school with were rather rednecky. They would say things that would be considered horribly un-PC, but I didn't sense any malice aforethought. They might make crude jokes about Jews or blacks, but I don't think they really felt that Jews and black were lower than themselves.

I'm not apologizing for these guys at all. Maybe they are scummy Republican dousches. But dudes that think alike in a room together might act a little differently than they would in society at large, and how do you truly judge those people? By their words while trying to outdo their dumbass friends and compatriates or their broader actions in their daily lives. Some of those guys probably are racists, and some just like to talk trash with their buddies.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ya-ta Boy



Joined: 16 Jan 2003
Location: Established in 1994

PostPosted: Thu Apr 17, 2008 3:34 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Even I don't think the entire Republican Party is racist.
Quote:
The Southern strategy is very real, but the GOP has strong support everywhere throughout the country.


Racism was never a solely Southern phenomenon. One key faction in the coalition is the group called Reagan Democrats. These are Northern blue collar people, many of whom are/were racists. To add a little history to the thread, William Seward and Salmon P. Chase, radical Republicans in their day, became famous for fighting the Black Laws in the North in the years before the Civil War, abolishing laws preventing blacks from serving on juries and voting).

Overt racism has declined precipitously in my lifetime. It's still around, but in a weaker form, for the most part. We don't hear people defending Plessy vs Ferguson anymore. (Although there is that odd phenomenon of some blacks calling for black-only schools.) I don't think most country club Republicans are racists. As someone has mentioned, racism is no longer acceptable in public. I do think the non-racist Republican leadership is willing to make a pact with the devil in order to win elections. Willie Horton, anyone? But there isn't an agenda to push after the election. It strikes me that 'benign neglect' is an apt title for the Republican approach to race. It seems to me it's much like the 'small government' principle--it sounds good on the campaign stump but no one seems to push it once in office. The only principle I can see that crosses faction lines is lower taxes.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Gopher



Joined: 04 Jun 2005

PostPosted: Thu Apr 17, 2008 4:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Kuros wrote:
But what about individual Southern Republicans? Some of those people are racist.


No doubt.

And Stillnotking: if we are going to discuss political parties that consciously cultivate virulent racism with respect to African-Americans, I really think we must mention the Southern Democratic Party and especially the Dixiecrats. And, at the national level, I can start quoting Harry S. Truman and LBJ if necessary, too.

Stereotypes remain overly simplistic and simply do not hold.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
wannago



Joined: 16 Apr 2004

PostPosted: Fri Apr 18, 2008 2:30 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ya-ta Boy wrote:
Even I don't think the entire Republican Party is racist.
Quote:
The Southern strategy is very real, but the GOP has strong support everywhere throughout the country.


Racism was never a solely Southern phenomenon. One key faction in the coalition is the group called Reagan Democrats. These are Northern blue collar people, many of whom are/were racists. To add a little history to the thread, William Seward and Salmon P. Chase, radical Republicans in their day, became famous for fighting the Black Laws in the North in the years before the Civil War, abolishing laws preventing blacks from serving on juries and voting).


So,you added a little history to the thread. Tell us something we didn't know. Of course Seward and Chase fought the Black Laws. Those were the primary reasons they became a part of Lincoln's cabinet. What is your point?

I would say that today, Democrats are the more prominent racists. Affirmative Action anyone? Let's keep Black people down by making them dependent on government programs for their well-being. THAT, my friends, is racism. Here, read this if you have the cojones:

Leftist Racism

Its a few years old but still very relevant.

Here's a little bit of the forward to the main discussion:

Quote:
One of the wonders of American politics has been the ability of Democrats to portray Republicans as racist, even as they support racial quotas in our colleges and universities, deny black parents the ability to take their children out of horrendous big-city schools through vouchers, and make disgusting TV commercials such as the one by the bigoted and racist NAACP blaming President Bush for the brutal killing of a black man in Texas.

Jesse Jackson, one of the left's most prominent spokesmen, called New York ''Hymietown,'' and San Francisco Mayor Willie Brown once boasted that ''We beat those white boys..'' (Of course, there was no media outcry over these bigoted statements. No liberal media bias here!)

The education policies of the left have decimated our public school system, particularly in big cities such as Washington, D.C., where per-student spending is among the highest in the country and the academic performance of students the lowest.

And is it not interesting that while they deny poor black families access to vouchers to allow their children to receive a decent education, liberal politicians send their own children to private schools? It seems that they do believe in school choice--for those who can afford it.

It was not conservatives but liberals who attempted to limit the number of Asians admitted into the University of California system, because through hard work and parental support they were disproportionately represented in relation to the population in general.

If you would like to be a mail carrier or firefighter or police officer, you should know that conservatives believe your ability to do so should be based on character and merit--while those on the left believe it should be based on the color of your skin.

And when it comes time to vote, remember this: It was Republicans who enabled passage of civil rights legislation--more Democrats than Republicans voted against it. Among the opponents: Sen. Albert Gore, Sr., of Tennessee, father of last election's Democrat presidential candidate Al Gore.

The Democrat Party is jammed top to bottom with bigots, outright racists, and race hustlers like Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton. Do you really want to put more of these guys into power?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ya-ta Boy



Joined: 16 Jan 2003
Location: Established in 1994

PostPosted: Fri Apr 18, 2008 8:25 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
What is your point?

I would say that today, Democrats are the more prominent racists. Affirmative Action anyone?


What is your point indeed? You can say anything you want, but it doesn't make it true.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
stillnotking



Joined: 18 Dec 2007
Location: Oregon, USA

PostPosted: Fri Apr 18, 2008 8:35 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Gopher wrote:
Kuros wrote:
But what about individual Southern Republicans? Some of those people are racist.


No doubt.

And Stillnotking: if we are going to discuss political parties that consciously cultivate virulent racism with respect to African-Americans, I really think we must mention the Southern Democratic Party and especially the Dixiecrats. And, at the national level, I can start quoting Harry S. Truman and LBJ if necessary, too.

Stereotypes remain overly simplistic and simply do not hold.


The Dixiecrats were the entire reason for the Southern Strategy. It always amuses me when Republicans cite "Dixiecrats" as an example of Democratic racism. My entire point is that the Republicans have been actively courting the "Wallace voter" since the late 1950s. Most of the Dixiecrats aren't Dixiecrats any more, they're Republicans; or, like Zell Miller, they are Democrats who vote Republican and haven't bothered to change their registration.

Anyway, people keep trying to accuse me of saying all Republicans are racist, an obvious strawman. Of course most Republicans are not racist. I don't even think George W. Bush is a racist, for what that's worth (not much). But the majority of the Republican leadership is either openly racist, or willing to tolerate open racism from their colleagues.

@ Kuros: your point about moderate Moslems tolerating extremist rhetoric from their leaders is well-taken. I would make a similar argument about Republicans tolerating racism from their elected officials. When Rep. Davis calls Obama "that boy" and Rep. King says the terrorists would be "dancing in the streets" if he were elected (because his middle name is Hussein and his father was Kenyan), I expect outrage from Republicans. Where is it?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
stillnotking



Joined: 18 Dec 2007
Location: Oregon, USA

PostPosted: Fri Apr 18, 2008 8:39 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

wannago wrote:
I would say that today, Democrats are the more prominent racists. Affirmative Action anyone? Let's keep Black people down by making them dependent on government programs for their well-being. THAT, my friends, is racism.


Um, no, it's not. Affirmative action is designed as a counterweight to the very real institutional racism that makes it harder for minority Americans to get into college, get high-paying jobs, etc. I personally think there are better ways to go about it, but the idea that affirmative action represents a hatred of white people is absurd.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Gopher



Joined: 04 Jun 2005

PostPosted: Fri Apr 18, 2008 8:53 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Stillnotking: your position faults "the Republican leadership" for racial politics, for exploiting the Democrat-Dixiecrat split, for example -- mostly to achieve political ends.

By your same logic, I will fault "leftist academics" generally for racial politics, for exploiting, obsessing on, and indeed further reifying racial categorization and racial differentiation in their teaching and scholarship -- mostly to achieve political ends (and, of course, tenure promotions via a long line of new and exciting publications on race, class, and gender; class, gender, and race; and or course, gender, race, and class).
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
stillnotking



Joined: 18 Dec 2007
Location: Oregon, USA

PostPosted: Fri Apr 18, 2008 8:59 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Gopher wrote:
Stillnotking: your position faults "the Republican leadership" for racial politics, for exploiting the Democrat-Dixiecrat split, for example -- mostly to achieve political ends.

By your same logic, I will fault "leftist academics" generally for racial politics, for exploiting, obsessing on, and indeed further reifying racial categorization and racial differentiation in their teaching and scholarship -- mostly to achieve political ends (and, of course, tenure promotions via a long line of new and exciting publications on race, class, and gender; class, gender, and race; and or course, gender, race, and class).


Leftist academics? You may be able to fault them for something, Lord knows they aren't angels, but neither do they set policy. Ward Churchill is not a fitting mirror image of Congressional Republicans. You might as well talk about the despicable racism of Hollywood celebrities -- hey, maybe you were going to go there next. Don't let me stop you.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ya-ta Boy



Joined: 16 Jan 2003
Location: Established in 1994

PostPosted: Fri Apr 18, 2008 9:48 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
Stillnotking: your position faults "the Republican leadership" for racial politics, for exploiting the Democrat-Dixiecrat split, for example -- mostly to achieve political ends.


Rather than introducing leftist academics to the discussion, since this particular topic is about racism and Republicans, how about addressing the possibility of racist tactics of the Republican leadership? Hold leftist academics till another time.

Specifically, what is your view of the Southern Strategy? The Dixiecrat strategy of 1948 is not really the issue. I deplore a policy that happened before I was born. What is your stand on your party's current Southern Strategy?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Gopher



Joined: 04 Jun 2005

PostPosted: Fri Apr 18, 2008 11:14 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Politicians will exploit whatever opportunities present themselves, Ya-ta Boy. I am sorry if this surprises you. But that is one of the many ways politics functions. Whether you and I morally approve or not, politics will continue to function as it does. It has probably been so since the Neolithic, if not earlier, in human history. And, no, I am not alleging that "that makes it OK." I am simply stating that that is the way it is.

If you or anyone else introduces "racism" and its institutionalization in American thought and practice, and make allegations regards exactly that which cultivates, creates, and brings to life such opportunities to exploit in the first place, I am justified in pointing out that leftist academics and even more general leftist politics and especially "identity politics" -- affirmative action and race quotas, for example -- have done more in recent decades to reify and institutionalize racial classification and difference and even racism itself than any other thing or anyone else.

I do not know anyone, including myself, who applauds Republican or Democratic politicians bringing up the race issue, by the way -- and was it not just two years or so ago that Hillary Clinton got into trouble for her palpably manipulative "plantation" analogy, Mr. Democrats have such clean hands? Do you deplore that strategy, too?

In any case, we would certainly have to expand our scope to advertising and market segmentation strategies as well as leftist academics and leftist politics, when fleshing out and apprehending the full dimensions of this problem and its origins and understand exactly what it is that exists today and how at least some Republican strategists systematically exploit it. Also, there is so much more to understanding the Southern Strategy than simple reference to the Dixiecrats, Stillnotking. And there is even room to bring in even more than the usual Republican and Democratic "villains" for the demonization treatment, which appears to be this thread's primary purpose.

This notwithstanding, your desire to limit this discussion to Republican racism is artificial at best, Ya-ta Boy. A weak attempt at strong-arm, clever polemics -- especially a paradoxical and intriguing exploitation of racist politics for political ends, that is, establishing Democrats' alleged moral superiority using Republicans as a foil -- at worst. Racism is an American-wide problem -- actually, a worldwide problem, but that seems to enlarge our scope too far.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
wannago



Joined: 16 Apr 2004

PostPosted: Fri Apr 18, 2008 10:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

stillnotking wrote:
wannago wrote:
I would say that today, Democrats are the more prominent racists. Affirmative Action anyone? Let's keep Black people down by making them dependent on government programs for their well-being. THAT, my friends, is racism.


Um, no, it's not. Affirmative action is designed as a counterweight to the very real institutional racism that makes it harder for minority Americans to get into college, get high-paying jobs, etc. I personally think there are better ways to go about it, but the idea that affirmative action represents a hatred of white people is absurd.


Um, yes, it is. Affirmative Action doesn't represent a hatred of white people, it represents a government institution designed to keep Black folks in their place...and that place is being dependent on the government for anything resembling success in their lives. It basically says, "Black people are not able to be successful on their own by their own actions, you must have the nanny US government giving it to you." Its a great way to get and keep votes, huh? Thanks racist Democrats.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Nowhere Man



Joined: 08 Feb 2004

PostPosted: Sun Apr 20, 2008 7:28 am    Post subject: ... Reply with quote

Is it wrong for them to compare Obama and Clinton to the Nazis?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
stillnotking



Joined: 18 Dec 2007
Location: Oregon, USA

PostPosted: Sun Apr 20, 2008 11:03 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

wannago wrote:
stillnotking wrote:
wannago wrote:
I would say that today, Democrats are the more prominent racists. Affirmative Action anyone? Let's keep Black people down by making them dependent on government programs for their well-being. THAT, my friends, is racism.


Um, no, it's not. Affirmative action is designed as a counterweight to the very real institutional racism that makes it harder for minority Americans to get into college, get high-paying jobs, etc. I personally think there are better ways to go about it, but the idea that affirmative action represents a hatred of white people is absurd.


Um, yes, it is. Affirmative Action doesn't represent a hatred of white people, it represents a government institution designed to keep Black folks in their place...and that place is being dependent on the government for anything resembling success in their lives. It basically says, "Black people are not able to be successful on their own by their own actions, you must have the nanny US government giving it to you." Its a great way to get and keep votes, huh? Thanks racist Democrats.


Even if that were true, which it isn't, it wouldn't be a racist policy, merely a cynical one. Very similar arguments have been made with regard to evangelical Christians (i.e. that they are conned into perpetual support of a party that has no intention of actually winning any major battles for them). You're perverting the term "racism" beyond all recognition. Racism is simply an animus toward a particular race of people. Animus against blacks, Hispanics, and other minorities is either proudly displayed or quietly tolerated by the vast majority of elected Republicans at the national level.

By the way, if you want to know why the "plantation" argument is ridiculous, it's because it posits a conspiracy bigger than igotthisguitar ever dreamed. Same goes for the "Republicans are conning evangelicals" bit. Most of politics is exactly what it looks like: politicians doing their best to deliver political goods to the interest groups they represent.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
stillnotking



Joined: 18 Dec 2007
Location: Oregon, USA

PostPosted: Sun Apr 20, 2008 11:09 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Gopher wrote:
Politicians will exploit whatever opportunities present themselves, Ya-ta Boy. I am sorry if this surprises you. But that is one of the many ways politics functions. Whether you and I morally approve or not, politics will continue to function as it does. It has probably been so since the Neolithic, if not earlier, in human history. And, no, I am not alleging that "that makes it OK." I am simply stating that that is the way it is.


Ah yes, it's just human nature, everyone's hands are equally dirty and no one can criticize anyone else. I believe that is Step Three in the Partisan Defense Handbook, to be used only when Step One (disputes over fact) and Step Two (disputes over intent) have been conclusively defeated.

If it's established that yes, your party leadership says and does racist things; and yes, they say and do those things because they are racists; then rather than leaving the party, or demanding reform, you can simply start in with the tu quoque and "Look Over There! A Democrat Did Something Bad!"

Sad, really. But so predictable.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Page 3 of 5

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International