| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
bacasper
Joined: 26 Mar 2007
|
 Posted: Sun Apr 20, 2008 10:56 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
| doggyji wrote: |
| Scotticus wrote: |
| *beep* size has no bearing on nutrition/societal factors. |
This was what I wasn't very sure about, in fact. Zero relation? Maybe "some" contribution? |
Nutrition can play a part if it is contaminated by chemicals and/or hormones. Pesticides have been linked to decreased *beep* size, while hormones can affect it either way. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
endo
Joined: 14 Mar 2004
Location: Seoul...my home
|
| Posted: Sun Apr 20, 2008 11:09 pm Post subject: Re: Size |
|
|
| chris_J2 wrote: |
| One final point, that almost everyone has overlooked, (one poster sort of hit the right chord, with a "it's not the wand, but the magic in the wand" remark), but most experts are unamimous, that a man's biggest sex organ is his brain. He is only limited by his imagination (or lack thereof.) I suppose the same could be said for most women, too? |
Being too big can be an impediment with certain girls. But being too small is even worse.
Women say size doesn't matter, but I know for a fact that many of them discuss it with their girlfriends.
This can work to your advantage is your big, but it can also hurt you if your small. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
TheUrbanMyth
Joined: 28 Jan 2003
Location: Retired
|
| Posted: Sun Apr 20, 2008 11:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| whatever wrote: |
He makes an excellent point, doggyji.
Your posts are often interesting and insightful, but at the end of the day you appear awfully pathetic to be posting so much here (and you do). |
You have 1213 posts
doggyji has 1217 posts and joined 4 months before you.
Only 4 more to go!!!  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
gangpae
Joined: 03 Sep 2007
Location: Busan
|
| Posted: Mon Apr 21, 2008 6:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Young FRANKenstein wrote: |
| Bibbitybop wrote: |
| The size of South Korean condoms now meets international standards |
I've seen no evidence of this. I still have to import mine from abroad. |
I think it's time someone told Frank that a condom isn't for the head on the shoulders, but rather, the little buddy between the legs. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
doggyji
Joined: 21 Feb 2006
Location: Toronto - Hamilton - Vineland - St. Catherines
|
| Posted: Mon Apr 21, 2008 11:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
| TheUrbanMyth wrote: |
| whatever wrote: |
He makes an excellent point, doggyji.
Your posts are often interesting and insightful, but at the end of the day you appear awfully pathetic to be posting so much here (and you do). |
You have 1213 posts
doggyji has 1217 posts and joined 4 months before you.
Only 4 more to go!!! |
Thanks for the check..lol |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
jou ma se poes
Joined: 13 Apr 2008
|
| Posted: Mon Apr 21, 2008 11:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
| The dick size of Korean men is not an issue; why they are utter dicks in every aspect of real life is the issue to be pondered, non? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
fusionbarnone
Joined: 31 May 2004
|
| Posted: Mon Apr 21, 2008 8:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| KirbyMagnus wrote: |
| Women aren't interested in how big you are, they just want someone to talk to. If you want to to be liked by women, you need to be a cunning linguist. |
Women wanna have fun. Talking is for the male "friend" who gets none. Some women can't stand less than 8"(they'll even pay for the lunch meeting if you ain't up to it) according to askmen.com.
I knew a gal who liked huge tools(12") but that didn't stop her from cheating(lover runs out back door while boyfriend is coming through the front door) so big dongs don't do it all.
Also heard of parlor club owners who ordered gorillas to work over dudes with "big ones" because it ruined their biz through "damaging" the gal.
However, gettin it right keeps em comin back. Hittin the Cl$%, G, goin-ass-grabin-deep "fill up the tank"(quoted by Prince Charles to Parker Bowles) can git ya inta their long term memory.
Don't be a "one-thump-chump"
That's my 2 cents/xxxx worth |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
nicholas_chiasson
Joined: 14 Jun 2007
Location: Samcheok
|
| Posted: Mon Apr 21, 2008 8:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| ^^class has a new name |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Scotticus
Joined: 18 Mar 2007
|
| Posted: Mon Apr 21, 2008 8:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| bacasper wrote: |
| doggyji wrote: |
| Scotticus wrote: |
| *beep* size has no bearing on nutrition/societal factors. |
This was what I wasn't very sure about, in fact. Zero relation? Maybe "some" contribution? |
Nutrition can play a part if it is contaminated by chemicals and/or hormones. Pesticides have been linked to decreased *beep* size, while hormones can affect it either way. |
Last I checked, pesticides/chemicals weren't part of the food pyramid. I stand by my previous comment that nutrition (food, not deadly chemicals) has very little/no affect on how big one's dong is. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
