View previous topic :: View next topic |
What do you think about US media (MSM & Blogosphere)? |
Too detached and withdrawn |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
Too emotionally involved, unprofessionally so |
|
11% |
[ 1 ] |
Too interested in gutter politics |
|
11% |
[ 1 ] |
Just the right balance of humanity & professionalism |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
Opinionated elitists!! |
|
22% |
[ 2 ] |
As unreflective as they are chatty |
|
33% |
[ 3 ] |
None of the above |
|
22% |
[ 2 ] |
|
Total Votes : 9 |
|
Author |
Message |
Kuros
Joined: 27 Apr 2004
|
Posted: Mon Apr 21, 2008 4:57 pm Post subject: Mediocracy |
|
|
Two media darlings are the front-runners in a national campaign. Should we be embittered? Or is the media in touch with the people?
Considering that my favorite, Bill Richardson, was the only Presidential candidate who got less coverage than Ron Paul, count me among the embittered. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
stillnotking

Joined: 18 Dec 2007 Location: Oregon, USA
|
Posted: Mon Apr 21, 2008 5:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
"Unreflective" is the perfect adjective here. ("Chatty" too, but hey, that's their job.) The media have the most endemic and pernicious case of confirmation bias I've ever seen, when it comes to Presidential candidates. They seize a narrative, play up anything that relates to that narrative, and ignore or downplay any competing information.
In 2004, a man who won three Purple Hearts fighting Communists in Southeast Asia spent the entire campaign battling the media narrative that he was a coward and a traitor. Bush 41, another war hero, somehow became a "wimp" in the eyes of the MSM. I could go on and on and on.
I don't mind them talking about molehills. I mind the echo-chamber effect that turns the molehills into mountains. The media should be a dampener of passions, a provider of perspective, a flattener of simplistic characterizations; these days, they're exactly the opposite. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
bacasper

Joined: 26 Mar 2007
|
Posted: Mon Apr 21, 2008 6:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
They have devolved into mere for-profit corporations which shill for the other interests of capital and no longer bear any resemblance to the guardians that a robust democracy requires.
Can the internet and alternative media fill the gap in time? We can only hope. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Ya-ta Boy
Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Location: Established in 1994
|
Posted: Mon Apr 21, 2008 7:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I voted 'too emotionally involved' to represent my complaint that they all too often are interested in their bottom line. Sensationalism is how they attract viewers, and the way I see it played out in presidential primaries is repeating negative comments another candidate has said. It appears to me that someone in the medial makes a characterization and 'everyone' else grabs onto it and perpetuates that impression--Gore was 'wooden'. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Czarjorge

Joined: 01 May 2007 Location: I now have the same moustache, and it is glorious.
|
Posted: Mon Apr 21, 2008 11:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Just like Kuros they are "Too interested in gutter politics."
Really. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Ya-ta Boy
Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Location: Established in 1994
|
Posted: Tue Apr 22, 2008 2:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
There's a very good example of just how irrelevant and downright silly the media can be on the Daily Show's clip of an MSNBC reporter questioning Obama's scratching his cheek.
When I saw that tonight I started humming:
"Blow up your TV throw away your paper
Go to the country, build you a home
Plant a little garden, eat a lot of peaches
Try an find Jesus on your own" |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Pink Freud
Joined: 27 Jan 2003 Location: Daegu
|
Posted: Tue Apr 22, 2008 3:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
bacasper beat me to it. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
bacasper

Joined: 26 Mar 2007
|
Posted: Tue Apr 22, 2008 3:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
Pink Freud wrote: |
bacasper beat me to it. |
Then you should have voted for None. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Kuros
Joined: 27 Apr 2004
|
Posted: Tue Apr 22, 2008 9:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
Czarjorge wrote: |
Just like Kuros they are "Too interested in gutter politics."
Really. |
True enough. I wouldn't vote for a candidate who couldn't attack. Luckily, that's not a problem this election season.  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|