|
Korean Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Ya-ta Boy
Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Location: Established in 1994
|
Posted: Wed Apr 23, 2008 2:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
| I think one or other of the Poniatowsky brothers would have some interesting things to say about that last choice. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bacasper

Joined: 26 Mar 2007
|
Posted: Wed Apr 23, 2008 8:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Big_Bird wrote: |
| No, she did not die shagging a horse. |
That's true. It's just that people used to mistake me for one.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Khenan

Joined: 25 Dec 2007
|
Posted: Wed Apr 23, 2008 8:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Czarjorge wrote: |
Kurt Vonnegut: If you don't like him you're an a$$hole. Hands down.
FDR: I can see the frenzy coming as we all have before, but you gotta love this guy.
Plato/Socrates: Am I the only one that aspires to philosopher/king status? |
Nice choices. You took some flack for V, but I've got your back on this one.
Aristotle: I'm down with Plato/Soctrates, but Aristotle pretty much invented the scientific method, so he's got my vote (even if he did put forth a lengthy and highly-dubious defense of "natural" slavery). For the record, no: I myself aspire to the be the philosopher/king of my generation - who doesn't? Losers.
Ben Franklin. I mean, come on. "Those who would sacrifice essential liberties for a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." How has he not been listed yet? Ben's my boy! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Czarjorge

Joined: 01 May 2007 Location: I now have the same moustache, and it is glorious.
|
Posted: Wed Apr 23, 2008 11:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
| bucheon bum wrote: |
| Czarjorge wrote: |
| Vonnegut is the most important secular humanist figure in the last century. |
Elaborate. |
How many of you were avid readers as children?
I was, and as a socially awkward pre-teen/teen I read a large amount of science fiction. I am not alone in this. Of the scifi writers many pepper their work with a philosophy/world view that is consistent in their work. In some cases the stories themselves are merely framework for the delivery of allegories and metaphors in varying degrees of complexity.
In Vonnegut's case the view put forth by his work is a secular humanist worldview. See "Rosewater" for an excellent example of this.
Writers/writing have/has a singular ability to affect a person's personal philosophy. More than any other artform the book has the ability to change the reader in lasting ways. Vonnegut does just this, and his work has influenced large numbers of potential malcontents, myself included.
Additionally, Vonnegut spoke publicly about the cause of secular humanism for more than a quarter century, especially in the last decade. He was out there way before Dawkins raising hell in a public setting. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
flip ant

Joined: 01 Jul 2004 Location: He's got high hopes!
|
Posted: Wed Apr 23, 2008 12:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| stillnotking wrote: |
| flip ant wrote: |
| Nathan Bedford Forrest - the reason is obvious |
Founded the KKK? There's a civic-minded bunch. |
You're correct. Nice catch.
Now, for my real choices:
Jesus Christ Think of Him what you will, but he has influenced the world more than any other human being in our history.
also, in another league entirely:
Napoleon Bonaparte He had a profound (and certainly not always positive) affect on Europe and the map we see today.
Peter the Great Anyone that can charge a tax on facial hair has my undying respect. Really put Russia on the map. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Big_Bird

Joined: 31 Jan 2003 Location: Sometimes here sometimes there...
|
Posted: Wed Apr 23, 2008 7:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yesterday I omitted a group of people that I think were very important (with regard to our social and political progress).
Writers like Charles Dickens, Emile Zola, and later perhaps Eric Blair. These guys and plenty of other writers in this ilk used their talents to highlight issues like poverty and social injustice and plant them more firmly into the consciousness of society at large.
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
daskalos
Joined: 19 May 2006 Location: The Road to Ithaca
|
Posted: Thu Apr 24, 2008 1:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Leaders:
I've always been fascinated by England's Elizabeth I, for some of the reasons already noted. Arguably England's greatest monarch.
I admire FDR. I think it's entirely possible his presidency averted violent revolution.
Quite a few others, but just to name a few: Eleanor of Aquitaine, Eleftherios Venizelos, Julius Caesar.
Writers/Artists:
Michelangelo - did it all, acknowledged in his lifetime as the greatest artist who ever lived.
Euripides - anyone who can write Medea as a sympathetic character knew some things worth knowing.
Gore Vidal - I consider him to be the world's greatest living writer, with a far firmer grasp of what's wrong with the world than any living politician. Naturally, he goes unlistened to, except by those of us who love his books and essays. If I could live anyone else's life, it would be his.
Gertrude Stein - not so much as a writer but as an incubator of writer's and artists. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
stillnotking

Joined: 18 Dec 2007 Location: Oregon, USA
|
Posted: Thu Apr 24, 2008 1:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Orwell/Blair deserves to be on anyone's list of great writers.
"Perhaps when the next great war comes we may see that sight unprecedented in all history, a jingo with a bullet hole in him."
Not so far, though, George. Ninety-five percent of our jingos are still serving valiantly in the 101st Fighting Keyboardists. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Nowhere Man

Joined: 08 Feb 2004
|
Posted: Thu Apr 24, 2008 2:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
I'm gonna go along with Kuros here. I always picture Vonnegut sitting at his typewriter, chuckling away at how funny his own sophomoric catch-phrases are. And so it goes. Okay, whatever man.
I will say that I am a pretty big fan of two films that have been made from his novels, Slaughterhouse Five and Mother Night. But those I appreciate as movies. I think Vonnegut probably deserves to be regarded like Ira Levin, as [u]a writer whose novels serve basically as preludes to screenplays.[/u] |
Good god. I think that's the wrongest thing I've ever seen expressed on this board. The only attempt at a Vonnegut movie that I've seen was Breakfast of Champions. And that was just plain wrong.
I can't say I've seen Slaughterhouse 5, but I'm not sure how the movie captured being a POW in a German prison camp gelled with being imprisoned by the Tramalfadoreans with a porn princess (or some such). Was Slaughterhouse 5 just waiting to be screenplayed? How might one make a movie out of Cat's Cradle? Slapstick? Player Piano (OK, kind of done between Minority Report and Gattica)?
I LOVE Vonnegut, and moviewise, I see him as the same as Tom Robbins. Just don't go there. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Big_Bird

Joined: 31 Jan 2003 Location: Sometimes here sometimes there...
|
Posted: Thu Apr 24, 2008 6:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| daskalos wrote: |
Leaders:
I've always been fascinated by England's Elizabeth I, for some of the reasons already noted. Arguably England's greatest monarch.
I admire FDR. I think it's entirely possible his presidency averted violent revolution.
Quite a few others, but just to name a few: Eleanor of Aquitaine, Eleftherios Venizelos, Julius Caesar.
Writers/Artists:
Michelangelo - did it all, acknowledged in his lifetime as the greatest artist who ever lived.
Euripides - anyone who can write Medea as a sympathetic character knew some things worth knowing.
Gore Vidal - I consider him to be the world's greatest living writer, with a far firmer grasp of what's wrong with the world than any living politician. Naturally, he goes unlistened to, except by those of us who love his books and essays. If I could live anyone else's life, it would be his.
Gertrude Stein - not so much as a writer but as an incubator of writer's and artists. |
Interesting choices, Daskolas. I particularly liked Vidal Gore and Eleanor of Aquitaine - and your mention of Eleftherios Venizelos sent me scurrying to google to find out who he was!
Might I ask you to elaborate on why you chose Julius Caesar? Another good choice, imo, but curious why you think so. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
daskalos
Joined: 19 May 2006 Location: The Road to Ithaca
|
Posted: Thu Apr 24, 2008 7:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Big_Bird wrote: |
| Might I ask you to elaborate on why you chose Julius Caesar? Another good choice, imo, but curious why you think so. |
Well, he's a bit of a dicey proposition, because we don't know what he'd have done on March 16th and after. Was he angling to be King? Who knows.
I think, though, that he understood the republican system was flawed, that running an empire on a system designed to run a city state was decidedly not working, and that working to fix it put him athwart a rather hidebound, traditionalist group of men who were benefitting from the status quo, and it was they who forced his hand at the Rubicon. He was a brilliant man who, with time, probably could have reordered and thus saved the Republic, for whatever that was worth. (Really much more of an oligarchy than a republic.) I believe he also probably would have. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
No_hite_pls
Joined: 05 Mar 2007 Location: Don't hate me because I'm right
|
Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2008 6:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
1. Jesus Christ
2. Gandhi
3. FDR and Lincoln; it's a tie for third |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
wannago
Joined: 16 Apr 2004
|
Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2008 10:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Oh, the number of folks who admire FDR makes me shudder....... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
daskalos
Joined: 19 May 2006 Location: The Road to Ithaca
|
Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2008 11:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| wannago wrote: |
| Oh, the number of folks who admire FDR makes me shudder....... |
All right then. How awful was he? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Gopher

Joined: 04 Jun 2005
|
Posted: Sat Apr 26, 2008 12:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
According to the far right, he introduced Socialism into American politics and society and attempted to establish a leftist dictatorship through his efforts to pack the Supreme Court and replace conservative, Southern Democrats with Democrats more supportive of him and his non-emergency New Deal agenda. He is evil.
According to the far left, he collaborated with and sold out to the capitalists, especially on banking reform, when he should have taken advantage of their being down and then broken their backs in order to redistribute the wealth in American society to the left's satisfaction. When the war came, he laid the basis for the dreaded military-industrial complex. He also failed to stop the Holocaust, pass civil rights legislation, establish universal health care, or improve women's lives significantly. He is evil.
There you have it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|