View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
posco's trumpet
Joined: 20 Apr 2003 Location: Beneath the Underdog
|
Posted: Fri Dec 05, 2003 8:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
Last edited by posco's trumpet on Sat Dec 06, 2003 5:23 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Paji eh Wong

Joined: 03 Jun 2003
|
Posted: Fri Dec 05, 2003 10:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
bjonothan wrote: |
To me it sounds like a typically Korean way to handle a problem. Blame the foreigners!!! Blame the people who are less likely to come back and bite you on the a$$. Maybe we should have a mass quitting thing....lol Show them how important we really are. After my third year here, I don't think I can handle another year in this racist country. They always have to complain about the wrongdoers. I think that most should look at themselves.....They made this joke of a country........ |
I wasn't hearing any Koreans blaming foriegners. It was the foriegners b!tching. It'd be kind of nice to have some korean government official ask me what I thought AND actually listen to me. My inner cynic says nothing will change, but it's a nice thought.
On a side note, the biggest lesson I've learned in Korea is that the customer always gets what they deserve. Koreans get a bad education and have a bad education system because they have bad ideas about education. As much as my old boss was a ditch pig, as inexperienced as I was, it was the parents who drove the market place. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
posco's trumpet
Joined: 20 Apr 2003 Location: Beneath the Underdog
|
Posted: Fri Dec 05, 2003 3:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Last edited by posco's trumpet on Sun Dec 07, 2003 1:06 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
rapier
Joined: 16 Feb 2003
|
Posted: Fri Dec 05, 2003 8:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
As far as the OP goes, I agree that the seoul traffic is out of control, the city lacks green areas, and air pollution is terrible.
But i think the subway system here is pretty cool.
Sooner or later korea will have to take the opinions of foreigners a whole lot more seriously if they are to become the hub of Asia. Japan got where it is today by closely emulating the west and western ideas, not ignoring foreigners. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Ilsanman

Joined: 15 Aug 2003 Location: Bucheon, Korea
|
Posted: Fri Dec 05, 2003 9:55 pm Post subject: yes |
|
|
I think we should look at the bigger picture here.
Korea was devestated only 50 years ago, they were poverty stricken for many years, and eventually they built it back up to how it is now.
The price of building so fast is evident. The crumbling buildings, the pollution, etc.
They not only want to be the hub of Asia here, but also a great english speaking country, etc. They have big dreams. I don't wrong them for it.
They just need to be more patient I think. I am no visionary, but I think things will get better in Korea, not worse. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
posco's trumpet
Joined: 20 Apr 2003 Location: Beneath the Underdog
|
Posted: Fri Dec 05, 2003 11:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Last edited by posco's trumpet on Sun Dec 07, 2003 1:07 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
On the other hand
Joined: 19 Apr 2003 Location: I walk along the avenue
|
Posted: Fri Dec 05, 2003 11:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Posco:
That quote is completely out-of-context. The writer is calling for an END to the protectionist screen quota system, and is saying that all industries are as much of a threat to Korean culture as the quota's defenders CLAIM Hollywood is. The quote you posted is from an ad absurdum argument that the writer makes.
The writer is actually calling for Korea to be more OPEN to outside cultural influences. I find it hard to believe that you didn't realize this when you read the piece.
Last edited by On the other hand on Sat Dec 06, 2003 12:50 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Holyjoe

Joined: 03 Mar 2003 Location: Away for a cuppa
|
Posted: Fri Dec 05, 2003 11:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
On the other hand, if a person has any significant experience of the subway systems of London, Paris, Berlin, New York or Tokyo, then they'll probably agree that the Seoul subway system sucks ass. |
I think the Seoul system isn't so bad, it's better (in my opinion) than the London and Paris systems anyway. What exactly's wrong with it? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
rapier
Joined: 16 Feb 2003
|
Posted: Sat Dec 06, 2003 12:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
Seoul subway definitely kicks the london underground out the window. No comparison.
I spent over a year in london. Tube strikes, delays, constant fire drills, plus of course the usual host of colorful drunken co- passengers was the norm. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Holyjoe

Joined: 03 Mar 2003 Location: Away for a cuppa
|
Posted: Sat Dec 06, 2003 12:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
The best difference between the Seoul and London subways - air conditioning! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Been Here Years

Joined: 01 Feb 2003 Location: Seoul
|
Posted: Sat Dec 06, 2003 12:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
After reading the article I "saw red". Below is the email I sent but ofcourse I don't hold out much hope that anyone will actually read it or do something about it.
I read your article "Seoul hears some biting foreign advice" with interest but wonder why you don't publish the other side of the coin.
As a teacher of adults for a number of years I would like to give you a few of the reasons that Korean adults do not speak English well.
l. They come late, leave early or are absent from class due to work comittments.
2. They do no homework or study. Reasons given are work and home comittments and being too tired.
3. They do not practice outside of class. Reasons range from no one to practice with (even though our teachers have offered to take phone calls on occasion to help them), embarrassment, lack of time or too tired.
4. When asked why they want to learn English most low level male students cite work related reasons but when asked do they want to study they invariably answer no. Quite a few students resent being "forced" to study English in order to obtain or keep a job and this resentment interferes with their ability to improve their level.
5. The inefficient method of English instruction in the school system produces children who have built in problems of grammar and pronunciation and who are so tired of "studying" English that they literally switch off. As they get older they become embarrassed at their long time as English students while being unable to speak or understand English.
If these problems were aired and adressed things might start to improve. To blame it on teachers who on the whole put their heart into teaching the adults who don't try in return, is most unfair.
As a teacher who really tries hard and puts in a lot of effort and out of hours assistance to my students I resent the broad brush of complaints. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Medic
Joined: 11 Mar 2003
|
Posted: Sat Dec 06, 2003 12:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
I was talking to a Korean friend who owns a hogwon the other day, and he said that the majority of the students enrolled in the evening were only interested in the TOIEC classes. Very few students wanted to do conversation classes. Seems like a lot of jobs are more interested in an employees TOIEC score than their English speaking ability.
It's the B all and end all of everything here. It's no wonder people don't have a good English speaking ability. Why should they? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
rapier
Joined: 16 Feb 2003
|
Posted: Sat Dec 06, 2003 12:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
As a virtual island hermit nation that has relatively recently opened up, it strikes me as strange, that koreans don't want to learn English out of a curiosity, and wanting to connect with,explore the world outside of their own country.
If you were shut in a cupboard all your life, would you not want to explore the outside world as soon as the door was unlocked??? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
schwa
Joined: 18 Jan 2003 Location: Yap
|
Posted: Sat Dec 06, 2003 12:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
Posco wrote: "One example: did something stop Seoul from laying out green areas 50 years ago?"
I think this question shows the bias of someone born into a more prosperous society. Seoul certainly wasnt a 'planned' city. Given the destruction & desperation of the time, I'd think the last thing on anyones mind was preserving a nice place to take a stroll. When putting food on the table is a daily struggle, industry & commerce will always shove aside the luxury of parks.
It seems to me the current efforts to reclaim that paved-over river (forget the name) & to dedicate the soon-to-be relinquished US army base to recreational greenspace are worthy & ambitious undertakings. The big former dumpsite next to the soccer stadium too.
Creating retroactive greenspace is costly & difficult but am I wrong in seeing & applauding positive efforts in that direction? Seoul can afford some foresight now, but its gonna take time. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
kiwiboy_nz_99

Joined: 05 Jul 2003 Location: ...Enlightenment...
|
Posted: Sat Dec 06, 2003 1:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
That quote is completely out-of-context. The writer is calling for an END to the protectionist screen quota system, and is saying that all industries are as much of a threat to Korean culture as the quota's defenders CLAIM Hollywood is. The quote you posted is from an ad absurdum argument that the writer makes.
|
Regardless, seeing industry in terms of culture, and always seeing culture in terms of "us and them", and "if they win we lose" is incredibly immature, and typical of the attitude of the people in power that are holding this country back.
I repreat my of-stated theory that no one ever seems to comment on.
The Hagwon industry is only ten years old. We haven't seen the "Hagwon kids" hit the workforce yet.
How can we judge the effectiveness of the education till that happens.
Next, and more importantly, those kids will be comfortable with foreigners as people, not these wierd "things" that are completely alien, as we are seen at the moment. When the "Hagwon kids" reach positions of power in this country, we will see positive changes here, and perhaps even a bit of sanity. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|