Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Chinese Military
Goto page Previous  1, 2
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Off-Topic Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
samd



Joined: 03 Jan 2007

PostPosted: Sun May 04, 2008 2:50 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

caniff wrote:
Economic expansionism is now in vogue. Why physically take over territory when you can economically control the people who live there instead? It's much more profitable and it comes without the 'moral' baggage.


That was my point. The OP suggested China wanted to expand its physical territory. I suggested otherwise.

Oh, and thanks for calling me a tremendous tool - you're a champion.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
scytale



Joined: 26 Apr 2008

PostPosted: Sun May 04, 2008 2:56 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think that basically, the problem that China has at this point in terms of any kind of domination is how much further behind the rest of the region it is. I understand that they are growing at a very fast rate, but really what we have here is a country that was at a standstill, in terms of scientific and economic progress through most of the 50's, 60's, 70's, and early 80's. Admitting that is an issue of face for the Chinese government, but it's a fact of life.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
pugwall



Joined: 22 Oct 2006

PostPosted: Sun May 04, 2008 3:17 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The thing is we simply do not know where China is going. I was reading an economic article today written by a Chinese-American Washington based academic in 1997 saying that by 2010 there was no way China would be a major economic power. As Deng Xiao Ping said 'China is crossing the river by grasping for stones' and now it seems we are all intrinsically along for the ride.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
lastat06513



Joined: 18 Mar 2003
Location: Sensus amo Caesar , etiamnunc victus amo uni plebian

PostPosted: Sun May 04, 2008 3:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

So would it be safe to say that China is only trying to catch up to the rest of the region in terms of economics, culture, technology and such that it staunchly rejected all the way until Jiang Zemin left office in the late 90's?

That is an interesting notion.... Smile
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
scytale



Joined: 26 Apr 2008

PostPosted: Sun May 04, 2008 3:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Not at all, Deng Xiaoping and Zhang Zemin were serious reformers. It's just that this country is slow to change; and there's a question as to whether or not it's going to change enough.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Kuros



Joined: 27 Apr 2004

PostPosted: Sun May 04, 2008 4:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ya-ta Boy wrote:
Quote:
China is not expansionist and they never have been.


Then how did they get control of Manchuria, Inner Mongolia, Singkiang and Tibet? Wouldn't it be more accurate to say that China was always a land empire that expanded as far as the technology of the day conveniently allowed?


The Yuan and Q'ing dynasties were foreign dynasties, Mongolian and Manchurian respectively. The T'ang dynasty did not conquer Tibet, in fact Tibet attacked the T'ang. The Ming were only briefly interested in the outside world, but Zheng He's missions were peaceful.

The Chinese are not traditionally expansionistic. And I really think most Chinese are more than content with holding Q'ing borders.

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
pugwall



Joined: 22 Oct 2006

PostPosted: Sun May 04, 2008 7:39 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

lastat06513 wrote:
So would it be safe to say that China is only trying to catch up to the rest of the region in terms of economics, culture, technology and such that it staunchly rejected all the way until Jiang Zemin left office in the late 90's?

That is an interesting notion.... Smile


No Deng was the biggest reformer of all. He inherited a seriously retarded country from Mao. Modern China's growth stems from Deng, his bottom-up economic reforms rescued the country.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
djsmnc



Joined: 20 Jan 2003
Location: Dave's ESL Cafe

PostPosted: Sun May 04, 2008 8:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think we're going to all end up red star goose-steppers.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
pugwall



Joined: 22 Oct 2006

PostPosted: Sun May 04, 2008 8:43 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

djsmnc wrote:
I think we're going to all end up red star goose-steppers.


Better dead than red.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Off-Topic Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2
Page 2 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International