Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

US: Gas Prices Sending Surge of Riders to Mass Transit
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Tiger Beer



Joined: 07 Feb 2003

PostPosted: Mon May 12, 2008 6:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I didnt realize that was happening in Denver. I've been there and the very small downtown looks cool, but looks like a haven for the homeless and quite dull after dark. It also doesn't take long to walk right from the nice downtown area into real sketchy areas real quickly.

What would be cool to have people realize that it IS better to live in more condensed walkable areas.

Latin American cities are the exact opposite of the United States. If you have any money at all, you are living right in the beautiful well-funded city areas with 1000s of things going on. If you don't have the money, you are living in the far-flung areas where you'll have to spend hours commuting to work.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee



Joined: 25 May 2003

PostPosted: Mon May 12, 2008 6:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

If the US had more mass transportation would the US use more oil or less oil.

What is Ron Paul's opinion on government support for mass transportation?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mises



Joined: 05 Nov 2007
Location: retired

PostPosted: Mon May 12, 2008 7:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee wrote:
If the US had more mass transportation would the US use more oil or less oil.

What is Ron Paul's opinion on government support for mass transportation?


Probably that the federal government has no authority to tax for the purpose of mass transit. The state and municipal governments do.

What the heck does this have to do with Ron Paul?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
blaseblasphemener



Joined: 01 Jun 2006
Location: There's a voice, keeps on calling me, down the road, that's where I'll always be

PostPosted: Mon May 12, 2008 7:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

America's economy is built around the housing market. Get rid of that, and you don't have an economy. Catch-22.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mises



Joined: 05 Nov 2007
Location: retired

PostPosted: Mon May 12, 2008 7:59 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

blaseblasphemener wrote:
America's economy is built around the housing market. Get rid of that, and you don't have an economy. Catch-22.


Much of the GDP growth came from people selling each other houses at increasing prices, and that is gone. However, the United States is still the world's largest manufacturer. Silicon Valley, Boulder Co., NYC, Austin Tx and Boston still lead the whole world in tech innovation. DC and NYC are global powerhouses. Miami is the financial capital of Latin America and has among the highest hotel occupancy rates in the world. Houston and Dallas have been largely untouched in this slowdown and Texas as a whole is still adding jobs. The United States leads the world (by farrrrr) in medical innovation and research and medical related industries are likely to be the next .com and housing booms. The USA is also a breadbasket to the world and so on and on and on.

No need for hyperbole.

How does one "get rid of" a housing market? You mean destroying the homes? Or, do you think that this (very deep) housing recession is permanent?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
wannago



Joined: 16 Apr 2004

PostPosted: Mon May 12, 2008 8:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Tiger Beer wrote:
I didnt realize that was happening in Denver. I've been there and the very small downtown looks cool, but looks like a haven for the homeless and quite dull after dark. It also doesn't take long to walk right from the nice downtown area into real sketchy areas real quickly.


How long has it been since you've been to Denver? When they built Coors Field in Lower Downtown, that whole, old warehouse district got a much-needed facelift. Granted, there are a few spots where some homeless people hang (including near the capitol building itself) but downtown Denver has revitalized and is nowhere near the pit it was 20 years ago. In fact, Lower Downtown is one of "the" places to live...if you can afford it.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
blaseblasphemener



Joined: 01 Jun 2006
Location: There's a voice, keeps on calling me, down the road, that's where I'll always be

PostPosted: Mon May 12, 2008 8:18 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

mises wrote:
blaseblasphemener wrote:
America's economy is built around the housing market. Get rid of that, and you don't have an economy. Catch-22.


Much of the GDP growth came from people selling each other houses at increasing prices, and that is gone. However, the United States is still the world's largest manufacturer. Silicon Valley, Boulder Co., NYC, Austin Tx and Boston still lead the whole world in tech innovation. DC and NYC are global powerhouses. Miami is the financial capital of Latin America and has among the highest hotel occupancy rates in the world. Houston and Dallas have been largely untouched in this slowdown and Texas as a whole is still adding jobs. The United States leads the world (by farrrrr) in medical innovation and research and medical related industries are likely to be the next .com and housing booms. The USA is also a breadbasket to the world and so on and on and on.

No need for hyperbole.

How does one "get rid of" a housing market? You mean destroying the homes? Or, do you think that this (very deep) housing recession is permanent?


Naw, I mean if Americans suddenly started going away from living in houses, and opted instead for apartments. It would do wonders for gas consumption, but it would kill America as the biggest market in the world. Houses are the basis for the American economy, not the Industrial military complex, although that is plenty big enough too.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Pluto



Joined: 19 Dec 2006

PostPosted: Mon May 12, 2008 8:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

blaseblasphemener wrote:
Naw, I mean if Americans suddenly started going away from living in houses, and opted instead for apartments. It would do wonders for gas consumption, but it would kill America as the biggest market in the world. Houses are the basis for the American economy, not the Industrial military complex, although that is plenty big enough too.


I don't think it would be such a bad thing if people started living in apartments as markets would converge. In fact, the high gas prices are already starting to bring people closer to their places of work. As more and more people move closer together, markets will not only converge, but they will also expand. The best thing local governments can do for this trend is to loosen zoning restrictions.

As for government contractors, specifically with regards to the DoD, contracts are becoming more competitive. It may be a small trend but hopefully the DoD will use its powers of monopsony more and more.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bucheon bum



Joined: 16 Jan 2003

PostPosted: Mon May 12, 2008 9:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Here's an interesting website: Walkscore: Finding a great neighborhood

The neighborhood I grew up in: 8 (out of 100)
My last neighborhood in Oakland: 92
Ex-girlfriend's hood in Queens, NYC: 91
My present locale in SD: 69

I wouldn't say it isn't the perfect gauge. I'd take the neighborhood in Queens over mine in Oakland. And while there is plenty w/in a 15 minute walk of my apartment, it isn't very pleasant walking due to 4 lane roads with lots of traffic, large housing complexes, and hills.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bucheon bum



Joined: 16 Jan 2003

PostPosted: Mon May 12, 2008 9:44 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

blaseblasphemener wrote:
mises wrote:
blaseblasphemener wrote:
America's economy is built around the housing market. Get rid of that, and you don't have an economy. Catch-22.


Much of the GDP growth came from people selling each other houses at increasing prices, and that is gone. However, the United States is still the world's largest manufacturer. Silicon Valley, Boulder Co., NYC, Austin Tx and Boston still lead the whole world in tech innovation. DC and NYC are global powerhouses. Miami is the financial capital of Latin America and has among the highest hotel occupancy rates in the world. Houston and Dallas have been largely untouched in this slowdown and Texas as a whole is still adding jobs. The United States leads the world (by farrrrr) in medical innovation and research and medical related industries are likely to be the next .com and housing booms. The USA is also a breadbasket to the world and so on and on and on.

No need for hyperbole.

How does one "get rid of" a housing market? You mean destroying the homes? Or, do you think that this (very deep) housing recession is permanent?


Naw, I mean if Americans suddenly started going away from living in houses,