View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Toon Army

Joined: 12 Mar 2007
|
Posted: Wed May 21, 2008 11:11 pm Post subject: Working class 'has lower IQ' |
|
|
Press Assoc. - Thursday, May 22 04:10 am
The working classes have lower IQs than those from wealthier backgrounds and should not be expected to win places at top universities, an academic has claimed.
Bruce Charlton, reader in evolutionary psychiatry at Newcastle University, suggested that the low numbers of working-class students at elite universities was the "natural outcome" of IQ differences between classes.
In a paper shown to the Times Higher Education magazine, Dr Charlton questioned the Government's drive to get more students from poor backgrounds into top universities like Oxford and Cambridge.
He said: "The UK Government has spent a great deal of time and effort in asserting that universities, especially Oxford and Cambridge, are unfairly excluding people from low social class backgrounds and privileging those from higher social classes.
"Yet in all this debate a simple and vital fact has been missed: higher social classes have a significantly higher average IQ than lower social classes."
The fact that so few students from poor families get into Oxbridge is not down to "prejudice" but "meritocracy", he said.
The Government criticised Dr Charlton's comments. Higher education minister Bill Rammell said: "These arguments have a definite tone of 'people should know their place'.
"There are young people with talent, ability and the potential to benefit from higher education who do not currently do so. That should concern us all."
Sally Hunt, general secretary of the University and College Union, said: "It should come as little surprise that people who enjoy a more privileged upbringing have a better start in life.
"It is up to all of us to ensure that not having access to the social and educational benefits that money provides is not a barrier to achieving one's full potential."
http://uk.news.yahoo.com/pressass/20080522/tuk-working-class-has-lower-iq-6323e80.html |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Kuros
Joined: 27 Apr 2004
|
Posted: Wed May 21, 2008 11:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
This was just a particularly obtuse and offensive method of expressing a fundamental truth: not everyone is cut out for college. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Ya-ta Boy
Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Location: Established in 1994
|
Posted: Thu May 22, 2008 2:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
"Yet in all this debate a simple and vital fact has been missed: higher social classes have a significantly higher average IQ than lower social classes."
|
It would appear that the doctor has ignored one fundamental fact in particular: It's individuals who go to college, not whole social classes.
Wouldn't it be beneficial to society as a whole to actively recruit the intellectually capable who are financially disadvantaged so as to maximize their contributions to society? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Cheonmunka

Joined: 04 Jun 2004
|
Posted: Thu May 22, 2008 3:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Do you think it is possible that so few 'poor' students attend Oxford and Cambridge because education costs money, and that is something the poor have very little of? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
JustJohn

Joined: 18 Oct 2007 Location: Your computer screen
|
Posted: Thu May 22, 2008 4:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ya-ta Boy wrote: |
Wouldn't it be beneficial to society as a whole to actively recruit the intellectually capable who are financially disadvantaged so as to maximize their contributions to society? |
Agreed. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
some waygug-in
Joined: 25 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Sat May 24, 2008 2:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I guess this is off topic, but I couldn't help but see the relevance.
Was G. W. Bush somehow disadvantaged when he went to Yale?
I wonder what his IQ test would reveal.
This argument is such a load of bat droppings I don't know whether to laugh or cry.  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
moosehead

Joined: 05 May 2007
|
Posted: Sun May 25, 2008 2:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
yea, how true, and rich stupid kids seem to get there a lot easier than smart poor ones.  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
agentX
Joined: 12 Oct 2007 Location: Jeolla province
|
Posted: Sun May 25, 2008 3:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
some waygug-in wrote: |
I guess this is off topic, but I couldn't help but see the relevance.
Was G. W. Bush somehow disadvantaged when he went to Yale?
I wonder what his IQ test would reveal.
This argument is such a load of bat droppings I don't know whether to laugh or cry.  |
He got in on Daddy's little coattails and kiss-assery.
So he got better grades than Kerry. He just bribed the teachers a little more.
That's how the game is played. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
caniff
Joined: 03 Feb 2004 Location: All over the map
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
djsmnc

Joined: 20 Jan 2003 Location: Dave's ESL Cafe
|
Posted: Sun May 25, 2008 5:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The anger directed at the comments in the article is ironic because you're all more or less working class. I doubt that there is one person here who isn't. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
VanIslander

Joined: 18 Aug 2003 Location: Geoje, Hadong, Tongyeong,... now in a small coastal island town outside Gyeongsangnamdo!
|
Posted: Sun May 25, 2008 8:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
children of wealthier families are getting a better grade school education
that I buy
a result shown by the culturally and formal education specific IQ tests
it's not a question of biology or genetics but of socialization and public policy
duh! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|