View previous topic :: View next topic |
What are the best & worst Indiana Jones movies? |
(best) Raiders // (worst) Skull |
|
44% |
[ 11 ] |
(best) Raiders // (worst) Crusade |
|
8% |
[ 2 ] |
(best) Raiders // (worst) Doom |
|
28% |
[ 7 ] |
(best) Doom // (worst) Skull |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
(best) Doom // (worst) Crusade |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
(best) Doom // (worst) Raiders |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
(best) Crusade // (worst) Skull |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
(best) Crusade // (worst) Doom |
|
16% |
[ 4 ] |
(best) Crusade // (worst) Raiders |
|
4% |
[ 1 ] |
|
Total Votes : 25 |
|
Author |
Message |
Troll_Bait

Joined: 04 Jan 2006 Location: [T]eaching experience doesn't matter much. -Lee Young-chan (pictured)
|
Posted: Wed May 28, 2008 2:04 am Post subject: What are the best & worst Indiana Jones movies? |
|
|
Raiders = Raiders of the Lost Ark
Doom = Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom
Crusade = Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade
Skull = Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull
Edit: I couldn't include all possible permutations. I figured that no one could possibly think of "Skull" as the best of the four. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Gopher

Joined: 04 Jun 2005
|
Posted: Wed May 28, 2008 2:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
Best: Raiders. Worst: all the rest. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Troll_Bait

Joined: 04 Jan 2006 Location: [T]eaching experience doesn't matter much. -Lee Young-chan (pictured)
|
Posted: Wed May 28, 2008 2:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
I disagree. I think "Doom" was almost as good as "Raiders." In fact, Raiders might only have the edge because it came first and thus seemed "fresher," a change of pace, at the time. "Crusade," I think, was too similar to Raiders (Judeo-Christian artifact, similar climaxes) and thus suffered by comparison. Skull was, in my opinion, definitely the worst. I can take falling out of an airplane, inflating a rubber raft, landing on the side of a mountain, sliding down the mountain and into a river, and finally going over a waterfall (Doom). I can't take that three consecutive times in a row (Skull). There's a difference between asking your audience to suspend disbelief (the first three) and treating them like idiots (Skull). |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Gopher

Joined: 04 Jun 2005
|
Posted: Wed May 28, 2008 3:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
But most sequels and spin-offs strike me as pretty bad. Not always Joannie Love Chachi bad, but bad enough.
In fact, look at this problem from that angle and get some perspective: ask yourself: which was worse? Happy Days or Joannie Loves Chachi?
But this logic notwithstanding, I still think that, on its own merits (screenplay, score, originality), Raiders stands superior to all that followed -- just as, for example, Jaws stands superior to This Time Its Personal... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
pkang0202

Joined: 09 Mar 2007
|
Posted: Wed May 28, 2008 4:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
I think Skulls is in the wrong decade. This movie would've been awesome in the 90's. However, throughout the movie, I just couldn't help thinking, "Harrison Ford moves so slow and he has a gut."
Also, I couldn't stand the fact that the Transformers guy is trying to be a badass biker. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Dances With Wolves

Joined: 06 May 2008 Location: A galaxy far, far away!
|
Posted: Wed May 28, 2008 5:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
Ranked in order or my favorite to least favorite:
Raiders of the Lost Ark (Yeah this movie was great)
The Last Crusade / Skulls (I have these 2 tied for second, I really do not think Skulls is as bad as everyone else does, I was entertained)
Temple of Doom (Horrible Movie, but I do like the Short Round character) |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Nowhere Man

Joined: 08 Feb 2004
|
Posted: Wed May 28, 2008 8:53 am Post subject: ... |
|
|
Quote: |
Best: Raiders. Worst: all the rest. |
Yes.
The only reason Crusade appears passable is because ToD was that bad.
Empire Strikes Back and the Evil Dead sequels are the only cases that come to mind where a sequel beats the original.
But don't dis Joanie Loves Chachi. Just consider the implications in Korean. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Dances With Wolves

Joined: 06 May 2008 Location: A galaxy far, far away!
|
Posted: Wed May 28, 2008 9:16 am Post subject: Re: ... |
|
|
Nowhere Man wrote: |
Quote: |
Best: Raiders. Worst: all the rest. |
Yes.
The only reason Crusade appears passable is because ToD was that bad.
Empire Strikes Back and the Evil Dead sequels are the only cases that come to mind where a sequel beats the original.
But don't dis Joanie Loves Chachi. Just consider the implications in Korean. |
Godfather 2 was a great sequel as well, not to get off topic. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Nowhere Man

Joined: 08 Feb 2004
|
Posted: Wed May 28, 2008 9:18 am Post subject: ... |
|
|
True.
So as to not go off-topic, Ima go start a new thread about this. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Czarjorge

Joined: 01 May 2007 Location: I now have the same moustache, and it is glorious.
|
Posted: Wed May 28, 2008 12:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'm sick of people blathering on about how bad 'Temple' was. You guys are wrong. Monkey brains, hearts getting pulled out of chests, and a little kung fu kid. What's not to love. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Gopher

Joined: 04 Jun 2005
|
Posted: Wed May 28, 2008 12:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Well, for one thing, was the Kung Fu Kid not really just on another pathetic Goonie adventure, posing as Dr. Jones's "friend?" |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Kuros
Joined: 27 Apr 2004
|
Posted: Wed May 28, 2008 6:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Crusaders is the best, and Doom and Raiders are both good. I haven't seen Skull, but I'll assume its the worst. But I can't properly vote until I see it. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Troll_Bait

Joined: 04 Jan 2006 Location: [T]eaching experience doesn't matter much. -Lee Young-chan (pictured)
|
Posted: Thu May 29, 2008 1:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
Like Czarjorge, I don't understand why people are so down on Doom. Like Raiders and Crusade, it had a strong opening scene, in a bar owned by a gangster. (Skull is the only one of the series with a weak opening scene.) It has my favorite climatic scene of the series, because Indiana has a much greater role in the outcome, and is much less a pawn of the relic. It also has a strong central villain, as opposed to "too many villains spoil the soup." Short Round could as least drive and hang onto a collapsing bridge, as opposed to Crusade's Jones Senior, who spends much of the movie trying not to get shot, on the back of a motorcycle, getting dragged here and there by Junior, etc. If it's the lack of logic, then you have to point an accusatory finger at Skull. Unlike the other movies, the "miracles" are technological in nature (science mistaken for magic), but how are dismembered alien skeletons supposed to come back to life? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ajgeddes

Joined: 28 Apr 2004 Location: Yongsan
|
Posted: Thu May 29, 2008 4:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
I like all of them, but I haven't seen Skulls yet. Crusade is my favourite, with Raiders pretty much tied, and Doom is my least favourite. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
kimchi story

Joined: 23 Nov 2006
|
Posted: Thu May 29, 2008 9:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
It's definitely Raiders / Skull. The only things that made Skull worth watching weren the references back to Raiders. I laughed out loud when the hangar in Area 51 turned out to be the warehouse from the end of Raiders. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|