View previous topic :: View next topic |
Is she ugly? |
Yes |
|
61% |
[ 58 ] |
No |
|
38% |
[ 36 ] |
|
Total Votes : 94 |
|
Author |
Message |
Dome Vans Guest
|
Posted: Fri May 30, 2008 4:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
(hit the 'Meet the Girls' tab and scroll down) Incidently, and before you start wandering why I was sniffing around on a tranny site, they were all on Tyra Banks (or whatever her name is) the other night and my GF called me in the room to watch it. |
Yes. Yes. Of course. Sniffing around on a tranny site? I see.
BS.Bro if my bird ever called me in to watch anything with Tyra Banks in, I'd probably have dumped her on the spot and then got back to the immensely important job of whatever I was doing at the moment that she decided to waste my time by calling me in to watch Ms. Banks and her fantastic plastic boobs.
Let's hope I never accidentally end up in Bangkok! "Hey it's a...... wo...man"
Quote: |
Minger, minging, but there isn't a past tense, |
"That guff minged, you smelly prik!" |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Hank the Iconoclast

Joined: 08 Oct 2007 Location: Busan
|
Posted: Fri May 30, 2008 5:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
Sarah Jessica Parker is not attractive in my book. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
saw6436
Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Location: Daejeon, ROK
|
Posted: Fri May 30, 2008 5:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
Big Bird; where is your picture for all of us to judge? In fairness, to answer your question, I wouldn't f*** her with your d***. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Big_Bird

Joined: 31 Jan 2003 Location: Sometimes here sometimes there...
|
Posted: Fri May 30, 2008 5:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
saw6436 wrote: |
Big Bird; where is your picture for all of us to judge? |
 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
anyangoldboy
Joined: 28 Sep 2007
|
Posted: Fri May 30, 2008 5:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
I can see your ti ts there |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
saw6436
Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Location: Daejeon, ROK
|
Posted: Fri May 30, 2008 5:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
About the intellectual reply I would expect given BB's history. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Cheonmunka

Joined: 04 Jun 2004
|
Posted: Fri May 30, 2008 6:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
( to be fair.. her husband Matthew Broderick has really criminally let himself go, he's lucky he still has his hair)
|
Well, he did kill two people with his poor driving and got off with it so I'm not surprised he has let himself go in any wayward sense. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
bogey666

Joined: 17 Mar 2008 Location: Korea, the ass free zone
|
Posted: Fri May 30, 2008 7:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
Cheonmunka wrote: |
Quote: |
( to be fair.. her husband Matthew Broderick has really criminally let himself go, he's lucky he still has his hair)
|
Well, he did kill two people with his poor driving and got off with it so I'm not surprised he has let himself go in any wayward sense. |
he's a perfect example of a guy who's not taking advantage of the blessings genes have given him.
though well into his forties, he retains his hair..and retains what have always been boyish facial features.. but he's allowed himself to get fat. (he's not obese by any stretch , but with his frame, weight gain makes him look "round" and chunky)
and maybe being on Broadway has made him full of himself but when I saw him on Conan O Brien, there was little of that impish boyish charm that made him Ferris Bueller.
he just looked and acted like what he is.. a middle aged man.
what a waste. He has all the tools to escape that prison, but refuses to shed his middle aged man physique. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
KirbyMagnus
Joined: 05 Apr 2008 Location: Korea
|
Posted: Fri May 30, 2008 3:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
bogey666 wrote: |
KirbyMagnus wrote: |
Justin Hale wrote: |
She's not ugly, but she is 43. |
Because of course all older woman are automatically ugly and become bitter spinsters who regret their mispent youth whereas all men as they grow older become ultra virile powerhouses with young women throwing themselves at them because all it takes to entice women is money and power  |
nah.
but it's fair to say "generally speaking", nature is often more kind to men in the aging process.
if they don't get fat.. men don't have to deal with the "gravity" issue, because they don't have fatty tissue that is SUPPOSED to "hang"
and because of classic and historically accepted standards of beauty, facial lines don't detract from the masculine ideal which is more along "rugged" lines (indeed they often help!) whereas the feminine ideal is supposed to be "delicate" , ergo wrinkles and lines detract from it.
Age catches up to everyone but certainly the 40's a lot more men can outrun it for at least a little while longer.
Nota Bene: George Clooney is 47, or 48 these days.. whereas Pitt is around 44 I think.
Best looking woman in that age group I've seen is Cindy Crawford.. who in her mid forties still looks absolutely amazing, but can no longer serve as the sex symbol that Clooney and Pitt can continue on being. |
Fair Enough. I just thought saying 43 was unattrative was a bit ignorant. I think these days if a woman takes care of herself she can still look hot in her 40's. SJP is a moose though.
I think guys are really doing themselves a disservice when they dismiss older women. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
blurgalurgalurga
Joined: 18 Oct 2007
|
Posted: Sat May 31, 2008 3:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
bogey666 wrote: |
a) by the time you're sixty you're going be generally physically decrepit.
b) if one can pick a spot that is going to be more decrepit, it's always best to pick the one most and best covered by layers of clothing and least noticeable - a man's balls fit the bill.
c) seems to me if you're going to get a tightening/tuck anywhere on one's body, then why not around the balls to make them hang less if that's an issue? I don't think plastic surgery around the scrotal sack is going to result in that "lizard" look that one gets on the face
|
I won't be decrepit at sixty! If I'm alive, I will use the magic of Viagra to induce vigour.
And as for the nip and tuck...fine idea! I'm definitely going to enlist the services of a scrotoplasty expert when the time comes. Good-bye, squash balls!
As for the baldness thing...happily not my problem yet, but should that day come, I guess I'll have to weave my way out of it. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
bogey666

Joined: 17 Mar 2008 Location: Korea, the ass free zone
|
Posted: Sat May 31, 2008 4:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
KirbyMagnus wrote: |
bogey666 wrote: |
KirbyMagnus wrote: |
Justin Hale wrote: |
She's not ugly, but she is 43. |
Because of course all older woman are automatically ugly and become bitter spinsters who regret their mispent youth whereas all men as they grow older become ultra virile powerhouses with young women throwing themselves at them because all it takes to entice women is money and power  |
nah.
but it's fair to say "generally speaking", nature is often more kind to men in the aging process.
if they don't get fat.. men don't have to deal with the "gravity" issue, because they don't have fatty tissue that is SUPPOSED to "hang"
and because of classic and historically accepted standards of beauty, facial lines don't detract from the masculine ideal which is more along "rugged" lines (indeed they often help!) whereas the feminine ideal is supposed to be "delicate" , ergo wrinkles and lines detract from it.
Age catches up to everyone but certainly the 40's a lot more men can outrun it for at least a little while longer.
Nota Bene: George Clooney is 47, or 48 these days.. whereas Pitt is around 44 I think.
Best looking woman in that age group I've seen is Cindy Crawford.. who in her mid forties still looks absolutely amazing, but can no longer serve as the sex symbol that Clooney and Pitt can continue on being. |
Fair Enough. I just thought saying 43 was unattrative was a bit ignorant. I think these days if a woman takes care of herself she can still look hot in her 40's. SJP is a moose though.
I think guys are really doing themselves a disservice when they dismiss older women. |
agreed re dismissing older women. I never said 43 was unattractive. It is on many not on everyone.
stupid to discriminate on basis of race or age in either direction. if she's hot.. she's hot. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
friendoken
Joined: 19 Jan 2008
|
Posted: Sat May 31, 2008 10:06 am Post subject: Re: Is she ugly? |
|
|
Big_Bird wrote: |
 |
Wow! I've seen prettier mugs at the starting line of the Kentucky Derby. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
NightSky
Joined: 19 Apr 2005
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
numazawa

Joined: 20 Mar 2005 Location: The Concrete Barnyard
|
Posted: Sun Jun 01, 2008 12:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
Yeah, that's the funny part: the pic offered up for the poll is actually one of the more flattering ones I've seen. Still the tranny-factor is well nigh (neigh?) off the charts.
BTW, that reminds me... Where's Jinju hiding these days? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Tiger Beer

Joined: 07 Feb 2003
|
Posted: Mon Nov 10, 2008 8:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
She's not ugly, she's sexy.
The OP's original photo doesn't necessarily reflect that though. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|