Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

A Korean view on the US beef/demonstration issue
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> General Discussion Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
KOREAN_MAN



Joined: 01 Oct 2006

PostPosted: Sat May 31, 2008 4:19 pm    Post subject: Re: A Korean view on the US beef/demonstration issue Reply with quote

Matman wrote:
Where are you getting your information - some teenage chat room? What exactly do you mean "2~3% of risk"? Do you think there's a 2-3% chance of catching vCJD from eating beef older than 24 months? That's nonsense. Americans eat beef older than 24 months and there is no evidence that anyone in the world has ever caught vCJD from eating US beef.


http://209.85.175.104/search?q=cache:8l3bScf6OlQJ:www.bseinfo.org/uDocs/062305bsefactsheet.doc+FDA,+beef,+24+months+old&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=2&lr=lang_en

I heard that a Korean living in the U.S. actually called the FDA to confirm that beef older than 24-month or 30-month are not sold directly in the U.S. But when I hear people say "Americans eat beef that is 24-month old or older" I don't see any proof either. Where are your sources? How do YOU know Americans eat beef older than 24 months? Because it tastes old?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
howie2424



Joined: 09 Jan 2003

PostPosted: Sat May 31, 2008 4:53 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

here's a source, and a Korean one at that. This comes straight from the guys who are bringing the beef in.

Quote:
Those who oppose U.S. beef imports also say beef from cattle 30 months old or over is not fit to eat.

"In the U.S., there is no indication of the animal's age on beef packages sold in the market" said Lee Jong-kyung, CEO of Nerf. "They only indicate the beef's grade. Beef from cattle 30 months old or over is sold and consumed in the U.S., although rumors [in Korea] say Americans do not consume beef from older cattle."


full article here

http://joongangdaily.joins.com/article/view.asp?aid=2890379


Last edited by howie2424 on Sat May 31, 2008 5:07 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Matman



Joined: 02 Jun 2006

PostPosted: Sat May 31, 2008 4:53 pm    Post subject: Re: A Korean view on the US beef/demonstration issue Reply with quote

KOREAN_MAN wrote:
Matman wrote:
Where are you getting your information - some teenage chat room? What exactly do you mean "2~3% of risk"? Do you think there's a 2-3% chance of catching vCJD from eating beef older than 24 months? That's nonsense. Americans eat beef older than 24 months and there is no evidence that anyone in the world has ever caught vCJD from eating US beef.


http://209.85.175.104/search?q=cache:8l3bScf6OlQJ:www.bseinfo.org/uDocs/062305bsefactsheet.doc+FDA,+beef,+24+months+old&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=2&lr=lang_en

I heard that a Korean living in the U.S. actually called the FDA to confirm that beef older than 24-month or 30-month are not sold directly in the U.S. But when I hear people say "Americans eat beef that is 24-month old or older" I don't see any proof either. Where are your sources? How do YOU know Americans eat beef older than 24 months? Because it tastes old?


Because it's a complete non-issue in America. There's no law against it. No one cares how old the cow was so of course the farmers and butchers are happy to sell it. Do you think they're secretly stockpiling beef older than 30 months so they can use it to kill Koreans?

"I heard a Korean living in America..." is the sort of "proof" you'd expect from a childish teenage protest movement. The FDA website is usually a better source of information:

http://www.cfsan.fda.gov/~comm/bsefaq.html

"Similarly, FDA has prohibited the use of the cattle materials that carry the highest risk of BSE in human food, including dietary supplements, and in cosmetics. FDA's rule (and September 2005 amendments) prohibit use of the following cattle material in human food and cosmetics:

* cattle material from non-ambulatory, disabled cattle,
* cattle material from organs from cattle 30 months of age or older in which infectious prions are most likely to occur, and the tonsils and the distal ileum of the small intestine of cattle of all ages,
* cattle material from mechanically separated (MS) (beef), and
* cattle material from cattle that are not inspected and passed for human consumption
...
In September 2005, FDA amended the interim final rule to allow use of the small intestine in human food and cosmetics, provided the distal ileum has been removed."

Note the 30 month rule only applies to certain organ material and not to the rest of the meat.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Jake_Kim



Joined: 27 Aug 2005
Location: Seoul

PostPosted: Sat May 31, 2008 5:13 pm    Post subject: Re: A Korean view on the US beef/demonstration issue Reply with quote

Matman wrote:
I think the two governments are to blame for failing to communicate properly with the Korean people but there are obviously people in Korea who don't want any US beef imports and are prepared to spread fear, lies and half-truths to get their way.

Current mass protestors we have been witnessing for the last few days are of various backgrounds and natually formed, in contrast to previous numerous protests masterminded by student and/or labor unions, etc. Yet, I have stated that there are factions who wish to manipulate the protest into a broad-spectrum anti-everything rally, with Democratic Labor Party/Union or New Progressive Party being one of such candidates. Nevertheless, it is worthy to note that these factions, unlike 2002, have lost their social influence over time by pushing agenda which the majority of Koreans disagree or laugh at.
Therefore, there has been no prominent 'leader' so far in the latest series of protests - relatively sporadic, unorganized, diverse and voluntary - except for those 'middle-school girls' featured in the earlier stages, although it is yet to be witnessed whether the status quo be maintained or the mass protest evolve into a different phase.
flakfizer wrote:
I thought it was just an excuse for 13 and 14 year-olds to stay up late and maybe miss a hagwon class or two seeing as so many of these well-informed portesters are young kids.

The whole ordeal started with those little girls gathering up at the city center a couple of weeks ago, driven by the exaggerated version of 'US beef horror show' which is being spread among the younglings, rather than by motivations to make ESL teachers' and their life easier by skipping Hagwon classes. After the initial stage, Korean government made a series of bad calls instead of convincing the general public. That made people from other age groups and backgrounds join up. Now if you take a snapshot of the protestors, you can't say it's just made up of a bunch of teenagers anymore.
howie2424 wrote:
If you�re looking for a legally binding safeguard that would ensure that Koreans could block any imports of dangerous beef products you needn�t look any farther than Article XX of the General Agreement on Trades and Tariffs which permits any country to suspend the import of any material which threatens the health of its citizens. GATT would supersede any free trade agreement provisions agreed upon between the US and ROK. This has been pointed out umpteen times in the Korean media but fallen on deaf ears.

This is a valid point to be reminded of, and I appreciate your bringing it up.
In my view, however, now it is evolving/degenerating more into a matter of distrust of the government (or the administration, to be precise) despite it all started with the US beef issue. GATT articles are legally binding for sure, but Korean people seem to be losing confidence that the current Lee administration will take necessary measures, even when Korea is entitled to. Of course, there is no hard evidence other than my observation to support such conjecture.

And lastly,

peppermint wrote:
Is there a Korean equivalent to the FDA? Shouldn't they be the ones responsible for ensuring the quality of beef sold in Korea?

There is an equivalent, a Korean version of FDA under the Ministry of Health & Welfare. They do some nice jobs from time to time in busting dishonest food suppliers. But as far as this US beef issue is concerned, the agency has little to say as the negotiations and decisions were conducted at the ministerial level or above, let alone the involvement of diplomats. The agency does all the labs and legworks, but doesn't get to make executive decisions by law, under the current system. It needs to be fixed as well.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Scotticus



Joined: 18 Mar 2007

PostPosted: Sat May 31, 2008 5:19 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

What the OP fails to note is that, whoever they're angry at (LMB or America), it's still "Migook-so" that's on the signs at McDonalds and other establishments saying that they don't use American beef.

I completely agree that if LMB signed some supposed agreement to import rotten, diseased, maggot-ridden US beef (which is basically what I keep hearing from people), then Koreans have every right to be angry. However there seems to be a bit of contention about what beef is getting in. You can say what you want about LMB, but I highly doubt he's going to sign an agreement that is so blatantly dangerous. Why would he sign a deal to accept beef that no one else in the world would accept?

The fact that multiple sources are refuting this claim makes the case even clearer. Considering all the lies going around from the anti-US beef crowd (A Korean has recently died from BSD, etc), I choose to trust common sense and actual sources in the know, rather than rumors and fear-mongering.

As other people have stated, even IF LMB signed some terrible deal that will allow old diseased beef into Korea, it has NOTHING to do with American beef. It has EVERYTHING to do with Korea. It's not America's job to regulate Korean foodstuffs. We're both capitalist societies, and if Korea is stupid enough to buy meat we deem unsafe, then there WILL be people who will sell it to them.

If, as Jake_Kim so matter-of-factly states, Koreans are angry at LMB and not America, then why do the signs talk about American beef as well as LMB? Why do I see banners (literally, huge banners at public crosswalks) declaring that "they" will refuse to accept "American" beef? Why is the protesting not against "dangerous" beef, but specifically "American" beef? To deny that there's an anti-US tinge to all this is gullible, and shows either a glaring lack of knowledge of Korea's recent history or a powerful lack of insight into the real motivations of all parties involved.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bassexpander



Joined: 13 Sep 2007
Location: Someplace you'd rather be.

PostPosted: Sat May 31, 2008 5:20 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The Korean people are being used by other Koreans who are making money, and unfortunately, the Korean people have allowed themselves to be suckered into the argument.

First, you need to ask yourself why Koreans pay 5 to 6 times more for beef than people in other countries like Australia and the USA. The farmers in Korea aren't the ones profiting from that -- THE KOREAN BEEF PRODUCERS ARE! And they have effectively conned the Korean people into believing this is a USA vs. Korea issue in order to protect THEIR profit-rape of the Korean people!


As for Australian beef: The reason why Koreans aren't protesting Australian beef is because Australian beef is priced very, very high in Korea and isn't considered a threat to the huge profits the local Korean beef producers enjoy at the expense of the Korean people. Australian beef prices are very, very low in Australia. The Korean beef producers know Koreans will buy more Korean beef than Australian beef if priced nearly the same, therefore Aussie beef is not considered a threat.

American beef coming in at 1/4 the price of Korean beef IS A THREAT! Especially when Koreans start realizing that it isn't so fatty and tastes better.

The fear of the Korean beef producers is that the Korean people will one day start asking the same questions that nearly every Korean-American asks: Why the hell are the Korean people paying some of the highest beef prices in the world for Korean beef?

They have also suckered the Korean people into thinking that the poor Korean farmers will all lose their livelihood if the American beef is allowed to come in. No -- the Korean beef producers (middlemen) who jack the price up 5x higher than the rest of the world will lose their profits. They'll have to cut back.

My hope is that one day, Koreans will start asking THE RIGHT questions... like who's making the money in Korean beef, and why are they enjoying a profit margin that's unheard-of in the rest of the world -- AT THE EXPENSE OF THE KOREAN PEOPLE?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
blaseblasphemener



Joined: 01 Jun 2006
Location: There's a voice, keeps on calling me, down the road, that's where I'll always be

PostPosted: Sat May 31, 2008 5:24 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

There is a very high likelihood that Korea has had one, possibly several, mad cows. Many asian countries have. Korea has a horrible food regulatory system, even having a whole class of meat unregulated (dog). If a farmer did have a mad cow, what incentive would there be for him to report it? His good conscience? A farmer in korea would be commiting suicide for himself and all family members by reporting it. Koreans don't have a clue when it comes to the 'facts' on this issue.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
GoldMember



Joined: 24 Oct 2006

PostPosted: Sat May 31, 2008 5:30 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Actually if the Korean Government was so very "willing" to allow the importation of Australian beef they wouldn't be putting a (I think it's 50%) tax on it.

Just like Korea "willingly", now allows foreigners to buy property.
Forced to by the IMF bailout.
Just like Korea "willingly", now allows foreigners to buy major stakes in Korean banks.
Forced to by their financial problems.

Korea doesn't willingly do anything, it's only if they are forced to.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
howie2424



Joined: 09 Jan 2003

PostPosted: Sat May 31, 2008 5:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Jake Kim said

Quote:
There is an equivalent, a Korean version of FDA under the Ministry of Health & Welfare. They do some nice jobs from time to time in busting dishonest food suppliers. But as far as this US beef issue is concerned, the agency has little to say as the negotiations and decisions were conducted at the ministerial level or above, let alone the involvement of diplomats. The agency does all the labs and legworks, but doesn't get to make executive decisions by law, under the current system. It needs to be fixed as well.


I�m not sure I understand this statement. Do you mean to suggest that if the Korean equivalent of the FDA found infected US beef and recommended it be quarantined and further imports blocked, someone higher up in the chain of command would overrule that recommendation and allow the product to be sold? That sounds pretty far fetched to me. And if that were true, and your own regulatory agencies were so powerless, then what makes you feel so confident about eating Korean beef? Surely the same impotent or untrustworthy folks are also charged with the duty to protect you against deficiencies in that product as well, aren�t they?


Last edited by howie2424 on Sat May 31, 2008 5:45 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bassexpander



Joined: 13 Sep 2007
Location: Someplace you'd rather be.

PostPosted: Sat May 31, 2008 5:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

When are Koreans going to wake up and realize that other Koreans are the ones raping them out of their paychecks EVERY SINGLE DAY, and that whipping-up the anti-USA beef thing is just the rich using the poor to protect their profit margins?

When are Korean people going to start asking themselves why they're paying 40,000 to 60,000 won just for 2 people to go out and eat Kalbi together, when the same meal in other countries would cost 15,000?

Koreans, will you figure this one out... PLEASE?!!? I'm tired of paying crazy amounts of money for Korean beef, and I'm sure you are, too.

As an American, I can fully understand why Koreans would be proud of their beef. What I don't understand is why they aren't asking for justification as to the prices for that Korean beef, which are 4 to 5 times higher than what others pay in the rest of the world.

And yes, as mentioned above, there is a massive import tax on Australian beef as well. That's why it's not being protested against -- because some rich Koreans are making MONEY off of it. That huge profit is not being made on taxes on USA beef, which is a threat to everyone who is bilking the Korean people out of $$. Korean people -- PLEASE start asking why Korean beef costs so much. It's OK to like your own beef -- what's not OK are the prices you are paying for it.


Last edited by bassexpander on Sat May 31, 2008 5:42 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Jake_Kim



Joined: 27 Aug 2005
Location: Seoul

PostPosted: Sat May 31, 2008 5:40 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

bassexpander pointed out middlemen jacking the price up in the case of Korean beef, and I concur with that point. She or he beats me to it, to tell the truth. Korean beef market, too, needs tougher regulation and major reform - that's what I believe anyway - but it will create another new topic, even though 'everything is connected.'

BTW, I came across with this article:
http://www.reuters.com/article/healthNews/idUSN2344375420080424
Noteworthy, I think, given that one of the criteria being cited or argued is 'being 30-month or older.'[/url]
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Adventurer



Joined: 28 Jan 2006

PostPosted: Sat May 31, 2008 6:05 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Frankly, the OP has done his homework a bit. It is unfair to label him as ignorant as he is not. There is more of a risk if you eat certain parts of the cow. However, is the US exporting whole cows to Korea for slaughter? No. As I understand it, the US simply exporting beef. They are not exporting intestines and the like. Anyway, isn't it the job of your media to discuss this objectively and not discuss it in such a sensationalist way. Seriously, the Korean news seems like tabloid news with the talk of someone being able to spread mad cow. You can't spread mad cow. It also tried to make it seem like Koreans are more susceptible to mad cow disease and many Koreans just accepted that which is not an educated response or scientific. There has been a tint of anti-Americanism no matter what he says, because the media is not discussing it objectively at all, and you have heard of people talking about boycotts and the Korean Left is involved, and the Korean Left has done precious little to help foreigners under President Rho and were overly nationalistic. I don't see Americans looking to export inferior beef to Korea.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ESL Milk "Everyday



Joined: 12 Sep 2007

PostPosted: Sat May 31, 2008 6:14 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Jake Kim:

First of all, you seem to have a good head on your shoulders... it's nice to have someone who can actually explain it to everyone from a Korean perspective. And to tell the truth, you do sound rather well-informed as well.

I'm not sure if Americans are trying to pass off their unusable-in-America crap for a profit... and then using the economical benefits of the FTA to bribe the president into accepting it. On the other hand, nobody knows for sure... though some people sure think they do. Please keep in mind that a lot of the more dangerous beef products ARE being used in America, though not always in meat... they're also used in cheese, pharmaceuticals, etc... you'd be surprised.

Another problem is the huge double-standard between the average Korean's willingness to accept Korean beef versus American beef, despite the fact that even though American beef could be dangerous it seems likely that American beef is still of higher quality and safer than Korean beef. The problem for Koreans is that in this case, American beef providers want to be held to YOUR standards, not theirs.

You admitted your domestic version of the FDA has very little power in executive decisions... which would suggest that accepting poorly-tested American beef when you're already accepting poorly-tested Korean beef, while not exactly ethical, doesn't exactly seem to alter any of the beef standards already in place in your country. The risk is already present, so the main issue here seems to be about the risk now coming from an external source... which would suggest this is a tactic employed by the farmers in an attempt to preserve their livelihoods. Keep in mind that this struggle between the Korean farmers and the Americans has been going on for 10 years now... and while they've used unfair taxes on imports in the past, now they're using mass-hysteria to preserve themselves.

The issue probably should be about demanding higher standards in general... but you would NEVER see anyone protesting Korean beef, because once again, you see the whole 'Korea is perfect and everyone else is out to get us' mentality at work.

When the question of local standards was addressed you seemed to admit that the standards here need improvement and then quickly deflected to American beef. However the fact that American beef standards are quite likely superior to Korean beef standards (please, prove me wrong here) means that it's only fair, business-wise, to accept American beef imports that are of equal or superior quality to Korean beef products.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
movybuf



Joined: 01 Jan 2007
Location: Mokdong

PostPosted: Sat May 31, 2008 6:44 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I read the entire FTA document last night, just so I would know what is going on here. The document is generally filled with legal-lingo that I don't really understand. However, it clearly stated that the meat that will be exported to Korea has to pass the US Federal Meat Inspection Act. Not knowing what the US Federal Meat Inspection Act says, I read that too. From what I can understand, there is no way the meat coming here can be anything different from the meat that is on the tables of the USA. The cows must all pass the same tests.

I didn't read anything in the FTA document stating anything about "dangerous parts" but in the Meat Inspection Act it says that those parts must be removed and destroyed. If I read those two documents wrong- by all means call me on it - but I am pretty sure I understood it.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
justaguy



Joined: 01 Jan 2008
Location: seoul

PostPosted: Sat May 31, 2008 7:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Last time American beef was sold in Korea many butcher shops and restraunt owners were selling American beef labeled "Korean."

Korean beef sales were supposedly high, but the reality was that Korean farmers lost a lot of money because of it.

Many Koreans only want to eat Korean beef. They want to have what they consider to be good quality beef and support local farmers.

Many Koreans expect the relabeling thing to happen again. This is one reason they are upset.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> General Discussion Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Page 3 of 5

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International