|
Korean Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
howie2424

Joined: 09 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Sat May 31, 2008 7:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ESL Milk "Everyday said
Quote: |
When the question of local standards was addressed you seemed to admit that the standards here need improvement and then quickly deflected to American beef. However the fact that American beef standards are quite likely superior to Korean beef standards (please, prove me wrong here) means that it's only fair, business-wise, to accept American beef imports that are of equal or superior quality to Korean beef products. |
Precisely. It's this disingenuous and totally inconsistent approach to the problem that leads many of us to see this not as an anti LMB issue but just more anti-Americanism. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
bassexpander
Joined: 13 Sep 2007 Location: Someplace you'd rather be.
|
Posted: Sat May 31, 2008 9:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
justaguy wrote: |
Last time American beef was sold in Korea many butcher shops and restraunt owners were selling American beef labeled "Korean."
Korean beef sales were supposedly high, but the reality was that Korean farmers lost a lot of money because of it.
Many Koreans only want to eat Korean beef. They want to have what they consider to be good quality beef and support local farmers.
Many Koreans expect the relabeling thing to happen again. This is one reason they are upset. |
Once again, Koreans cheating Koreans, and it's America's fault.
Again, why don't the local beef producers lower the prices on Korean beef to a fair level, so Koreans can afford to enjoy their own beef? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
RJjr

Joined: 17 Aug 2006 Location: Turning on a Lamp
|
Posted: Sat May 31, 2008 10:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
bassexpander wrote: |
Once again, Koreans cheating Koreans, and it's America's fault.
Again, why don't the local beef producers lower the prices on Korean beef to a fair level, so Koreans can afford to enjoy their own beef? |
Considering the costs of transporting beef all the way from the heartland of America, you would think that the Korean beef industry would be able to sell Korean beef below the prices of American beef.
The Korean beef industry could undercut the price of American beef, driving it completely out of the market, but they're apparently more than willing to sell out the health of Korean women, men, and children for a few extra won. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
wylies99

Joined: 13 May 2006 Location: I'm one cool cat!
|
Posted: Sat May 31, 2008 10:09 pm Post subject: Re: A Korean view on the US beef/demonstration issue |
|
|
Jake_Kim wrote: |
Matman wrote: |
I think the two governments are to blame for failing to communicate properly with the Korean people but there are obviously people in Korea who don't want any US beef imports and are prepared to spread fear, lies and half-truths to get their way. |
Current mass protestors we have been witnessing for the last few days are of various backgrounds and natually formed, in contrast to previous numerous protests masterminded by student and/or labor unions, etc. Yet, I have stated that there are factions who wish to manipulate the protest into a broad-spectrum anti-everything rally, with Democratic Labor Party/Union or New Progressive Party being one of such candidates. Nevertheless, it is worthy to note that these factions, unlike 2002, have lost their social influence over time by pushing agenda which the majority of Koreans disagree or laugh at.
Therefore, there has been no prominent 'leader' so far in the latest series of protests - relatively sporadic, unorganized, diverse and voluntary - except for those 'middle-school girls' featured in the earlier stages, although it is yet to be witnessed whether the status quo be maintained or the mass protest evolve into a different phase.
flakfizer wrote: |
I thought it was just an excuse for 13 and 14 year-olds to stay up late and maybe miss a hagwon class or two seeing as so many of these well-informed portesters are young kids. |
The whole ordeal started with those little girls gathering up at the city center a couple of weeks ago, driven by the exaggerated version of 'US beef horror show' which is being spread among the younglings, rather than by motivations to make ESL teachers' and their life easier by skipping Hagwon classes. After the initial stage, Korean government made a series of bad calls instead of convincing the general public. That made people from other age groups and backgrounds join up. Now if you take a snapshot of the protestors, you can't say it's just made up of a bunch of teenagers anymore.
howie2424 wrote: |
If you�re looking for a legally binding safeguard that would ensure that Koreans could block any imports of dangerous beef products you needn�t look any farther than Article XX of the General Agreement on Trades and Tariffs which permits any country to suspend the import of any material which threatens the health of its citizens. GATT would supersede any free trade agreement provisions agreed upon between the US and ROK. This has been pointed out umpteen times in the Korean media but fallen on deaf ears. |
This is a valid point to be reminded of, and I appreciate your bringing it up.
In my view, however, now it is evolving/degenerating more into a matter of distrust of the government (or the administration, to be precise) despite it all started with the US beef issue. GATT articles are legally binding for sure, but Korean people seem to be losing confidence that the current Lee administration will take necessary measures, even when Korea is entitled to. Of course, there is no hard evidence other than my observation to support such conjecture.
And lastly,
peppermint wrote: |
Is there a Korean equivalent to the FDA? Shouldn't they be the ones responsible for ensuring the quality of beef sold in Korea? |
There is an equivalent, a Korean version of FDA under the Ministry of Health & Welfare. They do some nice jobs from time to time in busting dishonest food suppliers. But as far as this US beef issue is concerned, the agency has little to say as the negotiations and decisions were conducted at the ministerial level or above, let alone the involvement of diplomats. The agency does all the labs and legworks, but doesn't get to make executive decisions by law, under the current system. It needs to be fixed as well. |
The protests are "naturally formed"? No leftist politicians and profs trying to score political points at the expense of the current Administration? Whatever.
Planning to join the Starbucks and McDonalds boycott, too, comrade?  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
maximreality
Joined: 24 Jan 2007
|
Posted: Sun Jun 01, 2008 2:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
justaguy wrote: |
Many Koreans only want to eat Korean beef. They want to have what they consider to be good quality beef and support local farmers.
Many Koreans expect the relabeling thing to happen again. This is one reason they are upset. |
I somehow doubt that Korean beef would be superior by any means, though. Small land, pollution, questionable screening procedures, hormones.. you get it. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
aussieb
Joined: 08 Sep 2007 Location: Brisbane,Australia
|
Posted: Sun Jun 01, 2008 2:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
Wow � what a hot topic! Congratulations Jake Kim on a well presented post.
I agree with much of what you say. I believe that these demonstrations are a political backlash against LMB for his perceived weakness in his capitulation to the US on the FTA issue.
The previous Korean Government had strict guidelines in place for the importation of US beef post MCD. Even then, a number of shipments were rejected because of bone detected in the shipments. I am sure I read that a whole vertebra was found in one shipment. (woops � must have slipped through the safety net).
The Korean people have then seen their new President throw all these precautions out the window under pressure from the US
In saying that it is political, I am also sure that the longer these demonstrations persist, the more anti US sentiment will rise.
I am sure that US beef would be 99% safe. However MCD does have an incubation period of up to 4 years in animals and 25 years in humans � so I guess the jury is still out.
I read that, under the FTA, Korea cannot reject US beef even if further cases of MCD are detected until a thorough epidemiological investigation is completed. This investigation took over 12 months to complete after the last incidence of MCD. I would want to know that all imports of beef would be halted immediately there was another confirmed case of MCD, not continue accepting beef for another 12 months while some investigation was carried out.
The US slaughters about 35 million cattle each year. Why would they reduce the animals being tested for MCD from 470,000 to 40,000 in 2007?
Europe produces roughly the same amount of beef as the US. They test approximately 1 million beasts per MONTH.
One processor in the US, Creekstone Farms proposed to conduct their own tests for MCD on all the animals they slaughtered. Why did the USDA block them from doing so?
Maybe the US could be doing more to allay the fears of Koreans and others.
Maybe Koreans should be more concerned about the bird flu which is already within their borders and poses a much greater and immediate threat. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
maximreality
Joined: 24 Jan 2007
|
Posted: Sun Jun 01, 2008 3:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
movybuf wrote: |
I read the entire FTA document last night, just so I would know what is going on here. The document is generally filled with legal-lingo that I don't really understand. However, it clearly stated that the meat that will be exported to Korea has to pass the US Federal Meat Inspection Act. Not knowing what the US Federal Meat Inspection Act says, I read that too. From what I can understand, there is no way the meat coming here can be anything different from the meat that is on the tables of the USA. The cows must all pass the same tests.
I didn't read anything in the FTA document stating anything about "dangerous parts" but in the Meat Inspection Act it says that those parts must be removed and destroyed. If I read those two documents wrong- by all means call me on it - but I am pretty sure I understood it. |
I guess the confusion here stems from the fact that the document explicitly states some of the "dangerous parts", but leaves out some. One would think that when making agreements of this kind all the details would be 120% correct and thoroughly verified. I guess it would be best for all parties if the agreement was renegotiated, so it would be clear and precise.
There are many interest groups who are trying to make the best out of this though:
- Anti-FTA (local farmers, etc.)
- Anti-American groups
- Anti-Japanese groups
- Other political parties
- Human rights organizations
- Environmentalists (the canal thing..)
- Normal workers
Common denominator for all the groups being "Anti-LMB". |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Geckoman
Joined: 07 Jun 2007
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
aka Dave
Joined: 02 May 2008 Location: Down by the river
|
Posted: Sun Jun 01, 2008 3:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
RJjr wrote: |
I think the protesters would get a lot of mileage out of protesting the Bush administration's infringement on the freedoms of meatpackers by trying to prevent them from testing more of their beef. Although I feel like American beef is safe, Bush behaves as if there's something to hide. It would be appropriate if the protesters would call him out on it. Instead of protesting American beef as a whole, I believe the protesters would get near-unanimous support if they protested to allow beef from meatpackers who test all of their beef, but ban imports from those who don't.
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,354710,00.html |
Actually, although I think the whole mad cow thing is utter BS (you're more likely to die of e coli, statistically, or maybe a meteor shower), that episode is so characteristic of Bush criminality that it's pathetic.
http://kr.youtube.com/watch?v=blRCh-EDuDs |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
dogbert

Joined: 29 Jan 2003 Location: Killbox 90210
|
Posted: Sun Jun 01, 2008 3:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Jake_Kim wrote: |
RJjr wrote: |
The part I mainly disagree with pertains to bone marrow.
|
And I stand corrected. The fact that bone marrow is included in American (or Western if applicable) diet is a new information to me. Thank you. |
What I'm about to tell you will shock you and rock the very foundations of your worldview:
Americans eat rice. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Pligganease

Joined: 14 Sep 2004 Location: The deep south...
|
Posted: Sun Jun 01, 2008 3:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Jake_Kim wrote: |
RJjr wrote: |
The part I mainly disagree with pertains to bone marrow.
|
And I stand corrected. The fact that bone marrow is included in American (or Western if applicable) diet is a new information to me. Thank you. |
Why would it be? Are you telling me that Koreans who "love beef bone stew" stop eating it once they move to the States? what about restaurants in Korea towns scattered all across the country that serve the exact same food you would get in Korea? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mj roach
Joined: 16 Mar 2003
|
Posted: Sun Jun 01, 2008 4:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
any and every issue to bask in the warm glow of candles in little cups....
it's an 'uri-nara' thing
without a wold cup type event to allow mass gatherings of 'unity'
the next best thing is 'us vs. them'
no better way to unite (manipulate?) people than an enemy
and japan or the usa draws the biggest 'uri' crowds
australia is and will be a non-stater untill
some perceived 'slight' is spalshed on tv/intenet
and the k/inferiority/superiority complex finds a new target |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
bassexpander
Joined: 13 Sep 2007 Location: Someplace you'd rather be.
|
Posted: Sun Jun 01, 2008 5:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
RJjr wrote: |
bassexpander wrote: |
Once again, Koreans cheating Koreans, and it's America's fault.
Again, why don't the local beef producers lower the prices on Korean beef to a fair level, so Koreans can afford to enjoy their own beef? |
Considering the costs of transporting beef all the way from the heartland of America, you would think that the Korean beef industry would be able to sell Korean beef below the prices of American beef.
|
And it's not even CLOSE in price. The US racks-up all of that shipping cost, tacks it onto the US beef price here, and STILL the US beef is 4 to 5 times LOWER in price than the locally-produced Korean beef.
Are Koreans totally oblivious to the fact that they are being SEVERELY price-gouged by the very people they are rallying to "protect" from this evil American beef?
Again, Koreans are being herded like lemmings to protest the American beef, all so local KOREAN beef producers can continue to RAPE the Korean consumer by charging beef prices 5 times higher than the international norm for a country of this level.
I've said it before: Koreans are welcome to like their own beef more, but they really need to WAKE UP and realize that the rich Korean beef producers are the ones taking advantage of them. WAKE UP KOREA! START ASKING THE RIGHT QUESTIONS, like "Why does Korean beef cost so much when our farmers get so little for their cows?"
Follow the money. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Saxiif

Joined: 15 May 2003 Location: Seongnam
|
Posted: Sun Jun 01, 2008 5:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
What really gets me is that there's so many problems with the US beef industry:
-E. coli.
-Massive use of anti-biotics, which is bad for people with allergies and leads to the evolution of anti-biotic resistant strains of bacteria.
-Massive use of growth horomones. It probably isn't the best idea in the world to eat meat pumped full of horomones.
-Large-scale use of subsidized corn to keep prices low, which hurts American tax payers.
-Massive use of illegal immigrant labor on the part of US slaughterhouses.
-Poor treatment of said workers, for example horrific accident rates.
-Large-scale assembly line style work in slaughterhouses which have been sped up a great deal, with so many cows coming down the assembly line per minute that the rate at which intestines are accidentally cut open to spray shit all over the meat has gotten dangerously high.
-Poor treatment of cows in factory farms.
-High fat content.
-Already fairly lax inspection regime gutted by the Bush administration.
Now if these were the reasons what Koreans were agains the importation of American beef, then more power to them. I usually buy Australian beef myself since it is more likely to be free range.
But nooooooooooooo, thanks to the horrifically irresponsible Korean media we have mad cow hyseria on our hands. This is despite the fact that mad cow disease was never much of a problem in the US in the first place (since US cows usually got their protein more from soybeans than cow brains, since soy beans are cheap in the US). And in addition, there's been regulations in place against cow cannibalism in place for years and years. Dying of mad cow disease by eating American beef is about as likely as getting hit by lightning while getting bitten by a shark, all this hysteria is doing is making Koreans look like idiots. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
justaguy
Joined: 01 Jan 2008 Location: seoul
|
Posted: Sun Jun 01, 2008 6:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
American beef.
Made in America by Mexicans.
Americans need to understand the fact that "Made in America" doesn't necessarily mean made by Americans. And thus shouldn't imply American quality either. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|