View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Ethan Allen Hawley

Joined: 04 Jun 2006
|
Posted: Mon Jun 09, 2008 2:15 am Post subject: Linux users eat fair trade chocolate |
|
|
I have recently purchased a large quantity of fair trade chocolate. Fair trade means that the people who produce the products will be paid a fair price for their products which will enable them to send their children to school, pay for adequate health-care, etc. Paying a small price premium on products such as coffee and chocolate usually makes no notable difference to the living expenses of someone in a first-world country such as Australia, but can make a huge difference to the standard of living of the people who produce the products. Also fair-trade products are generally of a very high quality, you are paying for the best quality as well as the best conditions of the workers.
I will share this chocolate at the next LUV meeting, hopefully the people who attend will agree that the chocolate is both of a high quality as well as being good in principle and that they will want to buy it too.
The Fair Trade chocolate I bought cost $6.95 per 100g. I went to Safeway (local bulk food store with low prices) to get prices on other chocolate to compare. Lindt (cheaper Swiss chocolate) costs $3.09 per 100g and has a special of $2.54. The Lindt and the Fair Trade chocolate are both 70%, but the Fair Trade chocolate is significantly smoother, has a slightly better aroma, and a better after-taste. So the Fair Trade chocolate costs slightly more than twice as much as Lindt, but I believe that it has a quality to match the price. Then I compared the price of a cheap chocolate, Cadbury Old Gold chocolate is also 70% cocoa and costs $4.29 for 220g, this makes it between 3.5 and 4.4 times cheaper than the Fair Trade chocolate. But if you like chocolate then Cadbury products probably aren�t on the shopping list anyway. I believe that the Fair Trade chocolate I bought can be justified on the basis of flavor alone without regard to the ethical issues.
All Linux users know what it�s like to have their quality of life restricted by an oppressive monopoly. We are fortunate in that it only affects us in small ways, not in our ability to purchase adequate food and health care. As we oppose software monopolies that hurt us in the computer industry we must also oppose monopolies in the food industry that hurt people in third-world countries. The fair trade programs are the best way I know of doing that. Hopefully after tasting the chocolate many LUV members will want to buy it too.
http://etbe.coker.com.au/2006/08/23/fair-trade-is-the-linux-way/ |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Demophobe

Joined: 17 May 2004
|
Posted: Mon Jun 09, 2008 3:37 pm Post subject: Re: Linux users eat fair trade chocolate |
|
|
Ethan Allen Hawley wrote: |
All Linux users know what it�s like to have their quality of life restricted by an oppressive monopoly. |
Save the world, oppressed Linux users�! Too bad you are drilling in the monetary desert for financial wells.
Let me guess....M$ (in fashionable 'anti' font) is 'the man'� holding you down, right?
Armchair rebellion.
May I suggest a new slogan for the downtrodden, warring Linux crowd?
FIGHT!...tomorrow... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Ethan Allen Hawley

Joined: 04 Jun 2006
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Demophobe

Joined: 17 May 2004
|
Posted: Mon Jun 09, 2008 5:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Equating Linux users to the plight of slave labor in third world countries is insulting to those people.
Also, the "please buy your Louis Vitton handbag, made by fairly-treated Malaysians" whitewash is very 1990's.
Saving the world, bite by privileged bite, eh?
Instead of buying chocolate in the first place, how about asking folks to spend that money on sponsoring a child? Heck, if you eat even one bar a day, you could probably feed a village for a month. I buy fair trade when I can, and am not knocking the cause, but it really is a whitebread approach to the problem. Asking rich people (and yes, we are all comparatively rich) to shop for their superfluous, luxury items with a conscience is an absolute joke. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
JustJohn

Joined: 18 Oct 2007 Location: Your computer screen
|
Posted: Tue Jun 10, 2008 2:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
While you are absolutely right Demo, the problem is that we are all so lazy/selfish that we won't do anything of the sort.
I personally think whoever thought of the idea is brilliant because it allows a ridiculously apathetic (at least in this regard) demographic to do some small amount of good with next to no effort. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
bassexpander
Joined: 13 Sep 2007 Location: Someplace you'd rather be.
|
Posted: Tue Jun 10, 2008 2:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Linux has had years to become a user-friendly product.
It's not. It sucks for the average person. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Demophobe

Joined: 17 May 2004
|
Posted: Tue Jun 10, 2008 3:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
JustJohn wrote: |
I personally think whoever thought of the idea is brilliant because it allows a ridiculously apathetic (at least in this regard) demographic to do some small amount of good with next to no effort. |
 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mrsquirrel
Joined: 13 Dec 2006
|
Posted: Tue Jun 10, 2008 4:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'm a nix user but I certainly don't give a shit about eating more expensive chocolate.
Bad luck for the poor people being born in a poor country. Why would I want them to get rich? If they get rich whose kids would make my Nike trainers and Addidas t-shirts? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|