Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

And, But, So, Because: Prohibited from being the first word
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Job-related Discussion Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Ed Provencher



Joined: 15 Oct 2006

PostPosted: Thu Jun 12, 2008 5:58 pm    Post subject: And, But, So, Because: Prohibited from being the first word Reply with quote

I've informed my classes that they may not use the words 'And, But, So, Because' at the beginning of a sentence when they write their essays for me.

It is grammatically correct to use 'And, But, So, Because' at the beginning of a sentence if the word is followed by a complete sentence, however it doesn't sound natural to me when these words are used at the beginning of 50% or more of the sentences. In Korean, writers may use these kinds of connective words frequently at the beginning of sentences and sound natural, so I understand why they want to do it in English.

I suggested that my students use different connective words such as: However, Although, Furthermore, Additionally, Nevertheless, On the one hand, On the other hand, etc.

I also suggested that they proof read their essay and when they find the words 'And, But, So, Because' at the beginning of a sentence, they should consider combining it with the previous sentence like this: blah blah, but blah blah.

I told them that every instance of using 'And, But, So, Because' will reduce their overall grade by 10%. That got their attention. The result thus far has been incredible.

Have you noticed any particularly common mistakes that Korean students make? Have you developed any useful techniques for correcting them?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Mr. Pink



Joined: 21 Oct 2003
Location: China

PostPosted: Thu Jun 12, 2008 6:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think it depends on the level of student writing the essay.

Teaching them how to use Because properly might be a first step. Yes, a lot of them misuse it, but if you teach them that something like:

I went shopping because we needed food.
Because we needed food, we went shopping.

They should pick up how to do it properly, at least when I taught this to high school students they picked it up.

I always keep the rule of no sentences with And, as it is hard to explain how to use that properly, even for native speakers.

As for So and But, typically I try to teach their use as connectors and encourage students not to start a sentence with it. IMO using something like Therefore or Furthermore or Thus etc. is more effective in good essay writing.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
articulate_ink



Joined: 23 Mar 2004
Location: Left Korea in 2008. Hong Kong now.

PostPosted: Thu Jun 12, 2008 6:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

It's a language transfer error. In Korean (as far as I can tell; people who are more fluent can explain it better), it's grammatically and stylistically correct to begin sentences in this way, so Koreans do it in English too. In classes with more advanced writing students, I explain that in English, we only start sentences with coordinating conjunctions for emphasis. It's not really bad form in English if a writer is judicious, but it quickly becomes overkill. Think of it like salt: a little is often necessary to make a dish more savory but if you pour the whole shaker over your food it's inedible.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
jkelly80



Joined: 13 Jun 2007
Location: you boys like mexico?

PostPosted: Thu Jun 12, 2008 6:18 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I thought beginning with a conjunction was grammatically correct, but stylistically frowned upon? (Like ending with a preposition.)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ed Provencher



Joined: 15 Oct 2006

PostPosted: Thu Jun 12, 2008 6:19 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

By the way, when I need to research a piece of English grammar, I just haphazardly surf the net. Do you all have a favorite website to get answers for difficult English grammar questions?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Zaria32



Joined: 04 Dec 2007

PostPosted: Thu Jun 12, 2008 6:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

This isn't written English but spoken...I think every person in Korea is
taught that the word "an" is pronounced "uhn."

If you speak rapidly, it comes out as "uhn," as in "I'm going to have uhn ice cream."

But when someone says "uhn idea" or "uhn historic..." I want to scream!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ed Provencher



Joined: 15 Oct 2006

PostPosted: Thu Jun 12, 2008 7:01 pm    Post subject: Finisheed vs Finisht Reply with quote

Here's another common mistake that I've encountered. I've heard my Korean co-workers say 'finisheed' instead of 'finisht' many times. It took me a couple months to figure out what was going on.

Koreans tend to pronounce the past tense 'ed' in its full form no matter what word it is attached to.

I use this method to explain proper pronunciation of the past form with 'ed'. This is not including irregular forms.

If the word ends in a 'd' sound or a 't' sound, then the 'ed' is pronounced just like the name Ed.

~t/d = ed

examples:

landed, loaded, handed, intended
rented, resulted, recanted, halted

If the word ends in any other sound, the 'ed' is pronounced as 't' or 'd' sound.

~sh/s

finished [finisht], washed [washt], crashed [crasht], released [releast]

As far as I can tell, '~sh/s' is the only final sound where the 'ed' is changed to a 't' sound. The remaining final sounds change to 'd' sound.

~n/m

loaned [loand], moaned [moand], roamed [roamd], summed [sumd]

~ize

realized [realize-d], resized [resize-d], maximized [maximize-d]

~ole

rolled [rolld], mulled [mulld],


Please let me know if I have missed some exceptions or if you can add some forms that I forgot.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ed Provencher



Joined: 15 Oct 2006

PostPosted: Thu Jun 12, 2008 7:13 pm    Post subject: he vs she Reply with quote

Okay, I'm on a roll. Here is another common mistake I come across.

I often hear my students say 'he' when talking about a 'she' and vice versa.

Why do Korean students often confuse 'he' and 'she'? Do they sound too similar for Korean students to remember the distinction? Even my high level Korean co-teacher makes this mistake.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
rhinocharge64



Joined: 20 Sep 2006

PostPosted: Thu Jun 12, 2008 7:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Although pronons do exist in the Korean language they don't use them. They refer to friends, chingoo, older brother, hyong nim, younger brother, dong seng etc. We on the other hand use he/she/his/hers lots.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
WoBW



Joined: 07 Dec 2007
Location: HBC

PostPosted: Thu Jun 12, 2008 7:43 pm    Post subject: Re: Finisheed vs Finisht Reply with quote

Ed Provencher wrote:
Here's another common mistake that I've encountered. I've heard my Korean co-workers say 'finisheed' instead of 'finisht' many times. It took me a couple months to figure out what was going on.



Man, this is so common. It takes ages to teach them when to use a /t, /d, ot /ed sound at the end of a sentence.

As for starting sentences with And, But, So or Because. I tell lower level students to simply not do it. As they progress I gradually teach them how to do it correctly, starting with Because.

I Tell them that only a good writer can start a sentence with And without making it look clumsy.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
ytuque



Joined: 29 Jan 2008
Location: I drink therefore I am!

PostPosted: Thu Jun 12, 2008 8:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I have read a number of books on writing, and the best explanation for using a conjunction to start a sentence was actually in a movie.

Check out 'Finding Forrester' with Sean Connery where he plays a reclusive writer mentoring an inner-city kid. They have this discussion which covers this topic perfectly, at least in my opinion.

I think putting because in the same category as and, but, or, nor, yet, so, for, is probably a mistake since you can form a perfectly good dependent clause starting with because. It is perfectly acceptable to have a dependent clause start a sentence, neglecting repetitive use of course.

I think your idea of banning sentences starting with conjunctions (other than because) for lower level writers is a good idea. Unfortunately, a couple of textbooks that I use are loaded with examples.

Flame away!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Thiuda



Joined: 14 Mar 2006
Location: Religion ist f�r Sklaven geschaffen, f�r Wesen ohne Geist.

PostPosted: Thu Jun 12, 2008 8:05 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ed Provencher wrote:
By the way, when I need to research a piece of English grammar, I just haphazardly surf the net. Do you all have a favorite website to get answers for difficult English grammar questions?


The OWL at Purdue offers excellent grammar instruction for ESL/EFL students and instructors, as well as plenty of handouts.

Just as good as the OWL at Purdue is the University of Ottawa's Hypergrammar.

The University of Chicago hosts a link page titled Grammar Resources on the Web, which doesn't just link to different grammar sites, but reviews them and provides a summary of each site's strong points.

Finally, one of my favourite ways of learning about grammar is to look up different words on dictionary.com. Definitions of words are supplemented with grammatical information and interesting articles about 'usage'. I also like dictionary.com, because they source all of their information, making it easy for me to back any claims I make about usage and grammar.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
TOMODACHI-KID



Joined: 24 Apr 2007
Location: LAND OF THE RISING SUN: TAKASAGO-KATSUSHIKA

PostPosted: Thu Jun 12, 2008 8:14 pm    Post subject: Re: And, But, So, Because: Prohibited from being the first w Reply with quote

My ego deleted...

Last edited by TOMODACHI-KID on Fri Jun 13, 2008 9:13 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jkelly80



Joined: 13 Jun 2007
Location: you boys like mexico?

PostPosted: Thu Jun 12, 2008 8:20 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

What's better than pedantry? Condescension! ^^ Dave's has it all!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ytuque



Joined: 29 Jan 2008
Location: I drink therefore I am!

PostPosted: Thu Jun 12, 2008 8:42 pm    Post subject: Re: And, But, So, Because: Prohibited from being the first w Reply with quote

TOMODACHI-KID wrote:

I'm not knocking you down, but teaching English goes beyond fault finding in students, and the typical method that you teach...This is why it's important to possess a MATESOL, TESL degree, real-time, two years, graduate school--prepares a person really good to take on all the bullshit of old curriculums and styles...

GALOSHES Shocked


You teach writing? Laughing
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Job-related Discussion Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Page 1 of 4

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International