| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
catman
Joined: 18 Jul 2004
|
 Posted: Mon Jun 16, 2008 10:53 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
| Still can't explain the phone call eh? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
loose_ends
Joined: 23 Jul 2007
|
| Posted: Tue Jun 17, 2008 3:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| catman wrote: |
| Still can't explain the phone call eh? |
I will play. What phone call are you referring t exactly? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Zenas
Joined: 17 May 2008
|
| Posted: Tue Jun 17, 2008 3:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| Anyways, it was not a sophisticated operation. |
___________________________________ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
catman
Joined: 18 Jul 2004
|
| Posted: Tue Jun 17, 2008 5:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| loose_ends wrote: |
| catman wrote: |
| Still can't explain the phone call eh? |
I will play. What phone call are you referring t exactly? |
The ones made from the passengers on the planes to family members/friends. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Zenas
Joined: 17 May 2008
|
| Posted: Tue Jun 17, 2008 5:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote:
Back on 9/11, the FBI itself had interviewed Olson. A report of that interview indicates that Olson told the FBI agents that his wife had called him twice from Flight 77.10 And yet the FBI�s report on calls from Flight 77, presented in 2006, indicated that no such calls occurred.
This was an amazing development: The FBI is part of the Department of Justice, and yet its report undermined the well-publicized claim of the DOJ�s former solicitor general that he had received two calls from his wife on 9/11.
10. FBI, �Interview with Theodore Olsen [sic],� �9/11 Commission, FBI Source Documents, Chronological, September 11,� 2001Intelfiles.com, March 14, 2008,
(http://intelfiles.egoplex.com:80/2008/03/911-commission-fbi-source-documents.html)
Ted Olson�s story has also been quietly rejected by the historians who wrote Pentagon 9/11, a treatment of the Pentagon attack put out by the Department of Defense.11
11 Alfred Goldberg et al., Pentagon 9/11 (Washington DC: Office of the Secretary of Defense, 2007).
http://globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=8514 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
catman
Joined: 18 Jul 2004
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
catman
Joined: 18 Jul 2004
|
| Posted: Tue Jun 17, 2008 6:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Also interesting to note that while the government can pull off an amazing conspiracy like 9/11 they can't plant some WMD in the Iraqi dessert. Nor can they fake a Saddam-AQ link. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
yawarakaijin
Joined: 08 Aug 2006
|
| Posted: Wed Jun 18, 2008 1:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
| I am no conspiracy theorist but the commission was a joke. I have no doubt that some serious culpability in regards to inaction has been convered up. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Zenas
Joined: 17 May 2008
|
| Posted: Wed Jun 18, 2008 1:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
What's with all this "I'm not a conspiracy theorist but....?"
If you believe the government's Official Story of "19 Arabs with box cutters" then you are a "conspiracy theorist."
What is it - you think that because the government provided your conspiracy theory that makes it somehow not a conspiracy theory?
The conspiracy theory that isn't a conspiracy theory?
______________________________________ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
