Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Now that the war has been won: investing in Iraq
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
fiveeagles



Joined: 19 May 2005
Location: Vancouver

PostPosted: Tue Jun 17, 2008 8:18 pm    Post subject: Now that the war has been won: investing in Iraq Reply with quote

http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/iraq/2008-06-16-iraqinvestment_N.htm?csp=34
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
On the other hand



Joined: 19 Apr 2003
Location: I walk along the avenue

PostPosted: Wed Jun 18, 2008 11:23 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Do the facts presented in that article really back up the claim that the war is over in Iraq?

Quote:
China has also aggressively pursued the Iraqi market, selling machinery to the government and electronic products to consumers.



But those machines and cell phones are still being manufactured in China, right? There could still be a million bombs a day going off in Iraq, and China wouldn't care as long as their companies get paid for delivery.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mises



Joined: 05 Nov 2007
Location: retired

PostPosted: Wed Jun 18, 2008 11:39 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
Foreign companies, including U.S. investors, have committed to deals worth about $500 million so far this year and Brinkley expects at least $1 billion in foreign investment by the end of the year.


$500 million eh? This is peanuts for a nation as energy rich as Iraq. The Americans spend $177million a fucking day "liberating" or whatever that country.

Quote:
So far, Romanian consortium and a Lebanese company have signed revenue-sharing deals with Iraqi state-owned cement factories. Each group will invest about $150 million.


Romanian and Lebanese are hardly known as world-leaders in investment. And cement? There might not be a more pedestrian investment.

Quote:
China has also aggressively pursued the Iraqi market, selling machinery to the government and electronic products to consumers.


"Machinery"? What kind? Electronic products? Cheap phones and mp3's?

Quote:
Iraqi Foreign Minister Hoshiyar Zebari, in Washington on an official visit, said Monday that larger U.S. firms were waiting for more security before entering the market.


Which firms? To do or buy what?

Quote:
China is now Iraq's third-largest trade partner behind the USA and Turkey, according to Global Trade Information Services, a firm that tracks trade statistics.


What the frack? Compare that paragraph with the first.

Quote:
European and Asian companies are beating their American rivals into Iraq now that security has improved the investment climate, Iraq and U.S. officials say.


So the United States is the 2nd largest trade partner but is being beat by Europeans?

Who wrote this piece of shit article?


The war has been won? What are you talking about? The Americans are hiding behind walls eating Pizza Hut, billing out the work with cost-plus contracts to American multinats that hire Indian workers. The war is won? The war isn't meant to be won. The war is meant to raid the American Treasury.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
On the other hand



Joined: 19 Apr 2003
Location: I walk along the avenue

PostPosted: Wed Jun 18, 2008 11:39 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
BAGHDAD � A vehicle packed with explosives detonated in a crowded Baghdad marketplace Tuesday, killing 51 people and wounding another 75 in the deadliest bombing in the capital in months, Iraqi security officials said.

The explosion in the mostly Shiite Muslim district of Hurriyah occurred just before 6 p.m., when the area was bustling with shoppers as well as commuters who'd gathered at a nearby bus station to head home after the workday. Witnesses said several women and children were among the dead.

The bombing disrupted a period of relative calm during which U.S. and Iraqi forces had made significant gains in the twin battles against Sunni insurgents and Shiite militias. Displaced families had begun trickling home, and politicians were gearing up for elections this fall. Then, in an instant, the blast Tuesday restored the ambulance sirens, puddles of blood and smoldering wreckage that had become emblematic of life in the car-bombing capital of the world.



The link
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mises



Joined: 05 Nov 2007
Location: retired

PostPosted: Wed Jun 18, 2008 11:43 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yes, 50-70 Iraqi's dead.

But the war is won because American deaths are at a low. No matter what is happening outside of that one fact. The war is won, though, not won enough to come home.


I fully understand that the war in Iraq is a mess of garbage interests and risks and that leaving right now might cause more harm than staying but I can't fucking stand the pro-war types. The war is won 5eagles?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
fiveeagles



Joined: 19 May 2005
Location: Vancouver

PostPosted: Sat Jun 21, 2008 2:25 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

mises wrote:
Yes, 50-70 Iraqi's dead.

But the war is won because American deaths are at a low. No matter what is happening outside of that one fact. The war is won, though, not won enough to come home.


I fully understand that the war in Iraq is a mess of garbage interests and risks and that leaving right now might cause more harm than staying but I can't fucking stand the pro-war types. The war is won 5eagles?


YUP!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
fiveeagles



Joined: 19 May 2005
Location: Vancouver

PostPosted: Sat Jun 21, 2008 2:58 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

On the other hand wrote:
Do the facts presented in that article really back up the claim that the war is over in Iraq?

Quote:
China has also aggressively pursued the Iraqi market, selling machinery to the government and electronic products to consumers.



But those machines and cell phones are still being manufactured in China, right? There could still be a million bombs a day going off in Iraq, and China wouldn't care as long as their companies get paid for delivery.


The war is won because China is investing in Iraq. It's the same reason why we don't win in Dafour...it's because of the investment that China has in it.

China and Russia have Iran's back. Without their support...Iran is dead. China is beginning to hedge its bet with Iraq now, because inflation is becoming uncontrollable and it has to give in to the surge. The surge has won the war and now China is starting to see it by investing in Iraq. If it invests in Iraq, then Iran will be forced to stop supporting the militias. Sadr has left Basra city and so what remains?

Saudia Arabia is going to start pumping more oil, which will be followed by OPEC. China has raised it's fixed gas prices so this will also affect it's economy. OPEC can no longer afford to keep the price of oil so high.

OPEC has to pump more gas or face huge food shortages and massive inflationary problems throughout the world.

They have no choice but to give in and let the war be won.

The war has been won.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
On the other hand



Joined: 19 Apr 2003
Location: I walk along the avenue

PostPosted: Sat Jun 21, 2008 12:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

FiveEagles:

Well, if that's your argument, I think it's a bit of a departure from what you were originally saying. The article cited Chinese investment as PROOF that the war had already been won. But I think what you're saying now is that Chinese investment is the REASON that the war will be won.

This confusion of is indicated by your switching of tenses in your last two sentences...

Quote:
They have no choice but to give in and let the war be won.

The war has been won.


How can you say that China will LET the war be won, when you've just said that the war has already BEEN won?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mindmetoo



Joined: 02 Feb 2004

PostPosted: Sat Jun 21, 2008 8:39 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

fiveeagles wrote:
The war has been won.


The war has been won because godless communists are getting in there? What was won, exactly, from a Christian POV?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
On the other hand



Joined: 19 Apr 2003
Location: I walk along the avenue

PostPosted: Sun Jun 22, 2008 11:29 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
What was won, exactly, from a Christian POV?


Not much, considering that Christians have been fleeing George W. Bush's Iraqi utopia in droves...

Quote:
Although they make up only about 5% of Iraq's population, Christians make up nearly 40% of the refugees fleeing Iraq, according to the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees.

Other Iraqis who are forced from their homes often relocate to another city or neighborhood, but Iraqi Christians who have to flee often leave the country, said Dana Graber, an Amman-based officer with the International Organization for Migration. "They feel even more vulnerable because they have few, if any, safe communities to where they can escape," she said.




It's kind of ironic, but the people who got duped the worst by the warmongers were the GOP's true-believer evangelical base, who were led to believe that the war would be a boon for the gospel of Jesus in Iraq.

http://tinyurl.com/2a54no
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bucheon bum



Joined: 16 Jan 2003

PostPosted: Sun Jun 22, 2008 12:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

fiveeagles wrote:
mises wrote:
Yes, 50-70 Iraqi's dead.

But the war is won because American deaths are at a low. No matter what is happening outside of that one fact. The war is won, though, not won enough to come home.


I fully understand that the war in Iraq is a mess of garbage interests and risks and that leaving right now might cause more harm than staying but I can't fucking stand the pro-war types. The war is won 5eagles?


YUP!


so, if the united states were to pull out now, Iraq would be no more violent than it is now?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
fiveeagles



Joined: 19 May 2005
Location: Vancouver

PostPosted: Wed Jul 02, 2008 11:50 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21134540/vp/25492096#25462209
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
catman



Joined: 18 Jul 2004

PostPosted: Wed Jul 02, 2008 12:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Any plans on going to Iraq to proselytize?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bucheon bum



Joined: 16 Jan 2003

PostPosted: Wed Jul 02, 2008 7:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

fiveeagles wrote:
Your MSNBC link

Allah akhbar!


Bob Herbert puts the oil "recovery" in perspective

Quote:
In addition to the terrible toll of Americans and Iraqis killed and wounded, the war in Iraq has diverted attention and resources from critical problems here in the U.S., where the housing market has been crippled, the stock market has tanked, gasoline has soared past $4 per gallon, unemployment is increasing and an extraordinary number of debt-ridden working families are staring into a financial abyss.

Even as oil companies are enjoying staggering profits, many Americans � in July! � are already worried sick about the potentially ruinous cost of heating their homes next winter.


And there is this lovely bit of news:

Congressional Commitee Questions State Dept. Role in Iraqi Oil Deal

Yep, looks like all is in the clear now!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee



Joined: 25 May 2003

PostPosted: Thu Jul 03, 2008 2:22 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

A BRIGHTER FUTURE FOR BAGHDAD?
Optimism Grows in Iraq as Daily Life Improves
By Bernhard Zand

There is an unexpected air of normalcy prevailing in Baghdad these days, with consumption flourishing and confidence in the government growing. The progress is astonishing, but can it last?

Pork is available in Baghdad once again. Not just in the Green Zone, where US diplomats can enjoy their spare ribs and Parma ham, but also across the Tigris River, in the real Baghdad, at "Al-Warda" on Karada Street. Bassim Dencha, 32, one of the few Christians remaining in Iraq and the co-owner of Baghdad's finest supermarket, has developed a supply line from Syria. As a result, he now has frozen pork chops and bratwurst arranged in his freezers, next to boxes of frozen French fries and German Black Forest Cakes. And the customers are buying.


REUTERS
Baghdad residents celebrating their national team's victory over China in World Cup 2010 qualifying. The streets of the nation's capital are slowly becoming safer.
For four years, selling pork or alcohol in Baghdad was a security risk. But the acts of terror committed by Islamist fundamentalists, who once punished such violations of their interpretation of the Koran with attacks on businesses and their owners, have gradually subsided. The supply of imported goods is also relatively secure today, now that roads through the Sunni Triangle are significantly safer than they were only a few months ago.

"It's worth it again," says businessman Bassim Dencha. "All we need now is enough electricity to reopen our refrigerated warehouse."

Two kilometers down the street, business is booming late into the night at Ali Lami's roadside snack bar. Before the war the establishment, a Baghdad institution, was a favorite hangout for former dictator Saddam Hussein's henchmen and United Nations weapons inspectors alike. Today professors and students from the university, which is once again open every day, come here to eat shawarma, an Arab fast-food dish consisting of shaved meat and salad served in pita bread.

This fall the manager, Rassak Rashid, 44, plans to open an outdoor seating area in a grove of palm trees behind the snack bar. The lanterns are already hanging in the trees. "Maybe then the police will stop telling our customers to get off the street," says Rashid.

He isn't referring to parking violations, but to the fear of bombs that could be hidden in cars parked along the curb. The police patrolling the streets in front of places like Ali Lami's snack bar aren't entirely convinced that this fragile sense of normalcy will last. While there are certainly signs of improvement, the dangers of life in Baghdad haven't disappeared.

'Fragile and Reversible'

Despite the palpable changes in daily life in the Iraqi capital, people are still being killed, because the Islamic fundamentalists and terrorists are not willing to give in, nor have they been eliminated completely. Eleven people died in attacks last Tuesday, seven on Wednesday and 38 on Thursday.

Is the situation truly improving in Iraq? Is it possible to rely on these changes in everyday life or are they merely an illusion? According to the quarterly report that the Pentagon issued in mid-June, the number of armed incidents has declined by 70 percent since last summer, bringing it down to 2004 levels -- from about 180 daily incidents to 45. More than 320,000 of the 478,000 soldiers in the Iraqi Army, the report claims, are now capable of fighting without American support, and more than �3.8 billion ($5.9 billion) of Iraq's own reconstruction budget totaling �6.4 billion ($9.9 billion) has already been invested in projects. "The security, political and economic trends in Iraq continue to be positive; however they remain fragile, reversible and uneven," the report concluded.

This sounds like realism underscored by cautious optimism. An interim report by the US Government Accountability Office (GAO), which caused a stir in Washington last week, is more pessimistic. The authors are critical of the Iraqi government for still not having passed a law that would regulate the development of oil fields and the distribution of profits among the country's 18 provinces. They also criticize the US war effort in Iraq for consuming $400 million (�258 million) a day and point out that there is no evidence "of a strategic plan" by the US government.

The pessimists have strong arguments and experience on their side. And experience has shown that things usually go downhill in Iraq, with only brief uphill periods. Nevertheless, the number of optimists is growing, and the administration of US President George W. Bush no longer has a monopoly on confidence. After years of resistance, the United Arab Emirates, Bahrain and Saudi Arabia have now announced that they will be sending ambassadors to Baghdad. Thanks to the high oil price, the economy in Iraq, which produces 2.5 million barrels a day, is also improving. The government has now been able to give its civil servants a generous pay increase, and it also expects to cut the price of gasoline, currently at �0.60 a liter ($3.52 a gallon), in half. Fittingly enough, German automotive giant Daimler plans to open an office in Baghdad and build trucks there in the future -- 18 years after Saddam Hussein's invasion of neighboring Kuwait.

Building Confidence with a Fiasco

King Abdullah II of Jordan, who was opposed to the US invasion and then voiced his fears of a "Shiite Crescent" developing in Iraq, recently said something astonishing in an interview with the US magazine Newsweek: "I am actually optimistic for the first time on Iraq. It's the first time that I have felt that Iraqis have, as much as they can, bound themselves together into a unity."

The unexpected change of mood benefits Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki. He was long considered weak and was extremely controversial, viewed as a friend of Iran by the Sunnis and as America's lackey by the militant Shiites. But today even the Arab ultra-nationalist and opinion leader Abd al-Bari Atwan, editor-in-chief of the London-based Arabic daily Al-Quds Al-Arabi, concedes that Maliki has shown an "amazing ability to survive in a turbulent country."


REUTERS
Residents ride in a ferris wheel in al-Numan Square park in northern Baghdad's Adhamiya district.
Paradoxically, this new confidence in Maliki began with a fiasco. In March, he ordered 30,000 men to march into the southern Iraqi port city of Basra to oust the militias, especially the Mahdi Army of Shiite leader Muqtada al-Sadr. The outcome was depressing at first. One thousand Iraqi soldiers deserted, and it was only after the Americans and the British intervened in the fighting and additional Iraqi divisions arrived that calm return to the city.

Nevertheless, these assaults on the Shiite militias in Basra and in eastern Baghdad, dubbed Saulat al-Fursan, or Operation Charge of the Knights, eventually paid off, especially when Maliki followed them with similar offensives against Sunni militias in Mosul and later in the Shiite-dominated province of Meisan. And he recently announced plans to clamp down on Sunni militias in Diyala. These efforts are evidence of the Baghdad central government's new approach of building a monopoly on power in the provinces.

Because of his determination, Shiites accuse Maliki of being as brutal as Saddam. But Iraq's Sunnis see his changed behavior as evidence of his strength as a leader.

It is a deep irony that moderate Sunnis now refer to Maliki, a Shiite, as "batal" -- "a hero." He appears, at least for the time being, to have shed the stigma of religious partisanship.

The prime minister has recognized that the internal war on two fronts provides a strategic opportunity. At first, his activism irritated General David Petraeus, the commander of US forces in Iraq, but now Petraeus supports Maliki's operations. The general is even allowing it to seem as if, in fact, it is the prime minister and not Petraeus who is calling the shots in Iraq.

Maliki has also shown surprising skill on the foreign policy front. Instead of bemoaning the fate of being dependent on both Tehran and Washington, currently two of the world's bitterest enemies, he is using his trumps on both sides. In Washington, he is campaigning for moderation in the nuclear dispute with Tehran, arguing that Iran could otherwise invade southern Iraq. In Tehran, he has promised to do everything in his power to ensure that the upcoming security treaty with the United States will not infringe on Iran's sphere of influence.


REUTERS
Demonstrators display a poster of anti-US cleric Muqtada al-Sadr in Baghdad.
Splitting up the Mahdi Army

Iraq and the United States have been negotiating this security pact for months. It is essentially a military agreement meant to stipulate how many American soldiers will remain in Iraq, and for how long. Time is short, because the United Nations mandate for the presence of the coalition troops, established in June 2004, will expire at the end of this year.

But there is one very significant element of uncertainty in the Iraqi power struggle: Maliki's rival Muqtada al-Sadr. It is difficult to tell whether he withdrew his forces to spare them a defeat against Petraeus' troops or whether he is waiting until after a partial US withdrawal to settle scores with the Sunnis and the government.

Two weeks ago Sadr issued a statement, presumably from his Iranian exile, which revealed much of his worldview but little of his intentions. The statement begins with the following florid introduction: "A message from the humblest servant Muqtada al-Sadr to his loved ones in the army of the Imam al-Mahdi, and to all honorable Iraqis who reject the occupation."

The Mahdi Army has not ended its resistance, Sadr writes, but it will be split in two from now on. Some of the faithful members of his militia, "men of experience, organization, knowledge and the willingness to make sacrifices," are authorized to continue to carry weapons and use them "against the occupation, and no one else," and must do so in "absolute secrecy," writes the militia leader. The others, he continues, "thousands, rather millions," are obligated to fight in "cultural, social and religious" ways against "secular thoughts, against Western hegemony and globalization."

Sadr's sermon ends with a threat: "Those who refuse to abide by this assignment of duties are no longer with me, because they seek only worldly politics and are addicted to hypocrisy. I, however, am a peacemaker, and you are my brothers."

From a sectarian warrior to a foe of globalization -- it would be an astonishing about-face. For the first time since he stepped onto the political stage five years ago, the grim Shiite leader elicited amused response. Perhaps it was premature, perhaps it was a misunderstanding, or perhaps it was simply a good sign of things to come.

Translated from the German by Christopher Sultan



URL:
http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/0,1518,563471,00.html
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Page 1 of 5

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International