View previous topic :: View next topic |
Burger King or TRAITOR KING? |
TRAITOR KING |
|
15% |
[ 2 ] |
Of Course TRAITOR KING! |
|
84% |
[ 11 ] |
|
Total Votes : 13 |
|
Author |
Message |
billybrobby

Joined: 09 Dec 2004
|
Posted: Wed Jul 02, 2008 1:22 am Post subject: Burger King or TRAITOR KING? |
|
|
So I'm in Burger King getting a burger and I see the following brochure at the front counter:
http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y24/billybrobby/burger.jpg
Right at the top of the brochure it states that Burger King beef is safe and that it comes only from New Zealand and Australia. The implication? That it would not be safe if it came from somewhere else. Somewhere such as....oh, I know know....AMERICA! BURGER KING'S OWN COUNTRY!
To me, this is like wiping your ass with the declaration of independence and calling Abraham Lincoln a fairy! I would've expected a little more loyalty out of a faceless multinational corporation!
Now when I think back about wearing one of those paper crowns on my 6th birthday party, it will be with no more fondness than thinking back about my uncle molesting me later that day. Thanks, Burger King! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
cangel

Joined: 19 Jun 2003 Location: Jeonju, S. Korea
|
Posted: Wed Jul 02, 2008 1:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
I have always thought the Aussie beef slogan, Clean and Safe, while true, insinuates that other beef is not. Coincidentally, the Aussies didn't start their Clean and Safe campaign until the BSE positive cow was discovered in America. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jkelly80

Joined: 13 Jun 2007 Location: you boys like mexico?
|
Posted: Wed Jul 02, 2008 1:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
Burger King is delicious. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
seoulsucker

Joined: 05 Mar 2006 Location: The Land of the Hesitant Cutoff
|
Posted: Wed Jul 02, 2008 1:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
I say we print up thousands of "100% US Beef" stickers and discretely place them on Burger King and McDonalds cash registers arcoss the land. Of course, we should dress up as the Unabomber first. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Tiberious aka Sparkles

Joined: 23 Jan 2003 Location: I'm one cool cat!
|
Posted: Wed Jul 02, 2008 2:30 am Post subject: Re: Burger King or TRAITOR KING? |
|
|
billybrobby wrote: |
I would've expected a little more loyalty out of a faceless multinational corporation! |
(You still ate the burger, though, right?) |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Return Jones

Joined: 06 Feb 2004 Location: I will see you in far-off places
|
Posted: Wed Jul 02, 2008 2:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
McDonald's in Korea had the same kind of sign during the scare back in 2003.
Costco in Korea also has a similar sign on display in the food court. Saw it yesterday.
Burger King sold out a long time ago. The company was bought and sold several times over by American and foreign companies. Only since 2003 has it again been American-based. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
eamo

Joined: 08 Mar 2003 Location: Shepherd's Bush, 1964.
|
Posted: Wed Jul 02, 2008 2:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
it will be with no more fondness than thinking back about my uncle molesting me later that day. Thanks, Burger King! |
Did he have a big whopper? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
bobranger
Joined: 10 Jun 2008 Location: masan
|
Posted: Wed Jul 02, 2008 2:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
Burger King is a giant conglomerate with loyalty only to money. Nobody on their board or the majority of American shareholders who own FIRST FOOD SERVICES LLC for that matter give a damn about national loyalty. Welcome to the wonders of international business. It�s up to you as an individual to choose to buy or not to buy. I�m not sure but each store is franchised. Though they have to follow corporate rules and standards, I�m sure there is regional influence as to how the product can be marketed. Hey, do what the Koreans did protest. It might violate your visa but I�m sure a letter writing campaign and a crafty boycott might work. Maybe write the American Beef Council. Show them your picture. They may have some pull. If it bother you that much go for it. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Smee

Joined: 24 Dec 2004 Location: Jeollanam-do
|
Posted: Wed Jul 02, 2008 3:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
All the restaurants have done this, and have been doing this since all this Mad Bull Shit started. http://briandeutsch.blogspot.com/2008/05/mcdonalds-beef-lkjafoj328uskdrfjekwlajv.html
I know the OP is just mimicking a troll (though he doesn't do it as well as Qinella). But he does bring up an interesting question . . . you'd think American companies would be leading the way in using American beef. On the one hand American beef has proven incredibly popular among consumers---the ones who actually spend money rather than walk around with candles attacking cops. But on the other hand, of course advertising American beef would be pretty suicidal at a time like this.
That said, Burger King is still awesome. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
aka Dave
Joined: 02 May 2008 Location: Down by the river
|
Posted: Wed Jul 02, 2008 3:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
Corporate America will set out the country at a drop of the hat.
However, Burger King is just awful food. How I miss In and Out. And Tommy's. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Ya-ta Boy
Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Location: Established in 1994
|
Posted: Wed Jul 02, 2008 3:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
I would've expected a little more loyalty out of a faceless multinational corporation!
|
Personally, I see nothing wrong with you burning alive an Aussie or a Kiwi right in front of your favorite BK franchise. I think it would teach BK some much-needed patriotism. (Cow costume optional.) |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
JerBear

Joined: 27 Mar 2008 Location: Seoul, South Korea
|
Posted: Wed Jul 02, 2008 3:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
McDonalds is worse. BK was originally a British company (though it's corporate headquarters are now in Miami, Florida).
McDonalds does the same thing only it's more blatant (it's right on the plastic tray liners) and McDonald's was founded in San Bernardino, California and has ALWAYS been an American company. If you're looking for someone to walk the plank on this one, I say send the clown out first closely followed by the king. Both are guilty as all get out. |
|
|