| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
esetters21
Joined: 30 Apr 2006
Location: Seoul
|
 Posted: Sat Jul 05, 2008 8:51 pm Post subject: UFC 86 |
 |
|
| The main event went the way that it should. I was skeptical about the outcome before it was announced. Rampage Jackson showed no skills other than being able to punch the "f" out of someone (I don't remember one kick that he attempted). Good fight that was ruled correctly IMO. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Hanson
Joined: 20 Oct 2004
|
| Posted: Sat Jul 05, 2008 9:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Just watched it.
Boooooooooooooring!!!
Really, this wasn't a very exciting fight night. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Newbie
Joined: 07 Feb 2003
|
| Posted: Sun Jul 06, 2008 4:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
IMHO, Rampage should have won
I thought he took rounds 1 and 4.
Round 2 to the other dude
3 and 5 split.
(I may be mixing up some of the round numbers there) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
catman
Joined: 18 Jul 2004
|
| Posted: Sun Jul 06, 2008 1:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Didn't think the card was very strong to begin with.
Can't wait for UFC 87!
Welterweight championship bout: Georges St. Pierre vs. Jon Fitch
Lightweight bout: Kenny Florian vs. Roger Huerta
Heavyweight bout: Brock Lesnar vs. Heath Herring
Lightweight bout: Manny Gamburyan vs. Rob Emerson
Middleweight bout: Jason MacDonald vs. Demian Maia |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Young FRANKenstein
Joined: 02 Oct 2006
Location: Castle Frankenstein (that's FRONKensteen)
|
| Posted: Sun Jul 06, 2008 2:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Newbie wrote: |
| IMHO, Rampage should have won |
I went the other way. However, I had JUST finished watching Silva destroy him in their rematch from 2004, so that may have influenced how I saw last night's fight. Either way, it was a weak title win for Forrest. I don't see him holding it for long. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
rumdiary
Joined: 05 Jun 2006
|
| Posted: Sun Jul 06, 2008 6:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Newbie wrote: |
IMHO, Rampage should have won
I thought he took rounds 1 and 4.
Round 2 to the other dude
3 and 5 split.
(I may be mixing up some of the round numbers there) |
You can't have a split in 10 point scoring. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Young FRANKenstein
Joined: 02 Oct 2006
Location: Castle Frankenstein (that's FRONKensteen)
|
| Posted: Sun Jul 06, 2008 7:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| rumdiary wrote: |
| Newbie wrote: |
IMHO, Rampage should have won
I thought he took rounds 1 and 4.
Round 2 to the other dude
3 and 5 split.
(I may be mixing up some of the round numbers there) |
You can't have a split in 10 point scoring. |
Yup. They use the "10-point must" system, meaning one person must get 10 points and the other must get less than 10 points. There are no ties in such a system. and with an odd number of rounds it rarely ends in a draw. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
