| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Was the 1969 moon landing genuine or a conspiracy? |
| Yes, it was a fraud (explain why) |
|
11% |
[ 11 ] |
| Those that think it's a fraud are nutbags (reasons please) |
|
77% |
[ 75 ] |
| Damn, I can't make up my mind. |
|
4% |
[ 4 ] |
| Ha! No-one can land on the moon - it's made of cheese!!! |
|
7% |
[ 7 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 97 |
|
| Author |
Message |
Kwangjuchicken
Joined: 01 Sep 2003
Location: I was abducted by aliens on my way to Korea and forced to be an EFL teacher on this crazy planet.
|
 Posted: Mon Jul 07, 2008 4:13 am Post subject: |
 |
|
| crescent wrote: |
| Kwangjuchicken wrote: |
| none on the moon is correct. try saving his pic to your comp and make it bigger. Very clear. Then use a mag. glass. |
Hilarious.
So you took a 40 year old photo, in all it's imperfection and low quality print papaer and blew it up to magify said imperfections. Then you drew the conclusion that the grainy aspect of 40 year old film equals MUD?
The same thing happens when you take a modern digital photo and magnify it too much. Everyhting looks muddy. |
Are you all nuts. I am talking about the pic. that is on the site that was posted on this thread. That pic is is in great condition. Have any of you looked at the PIC THAT IS IN THE SITE THAT IS POSTED ON THIS THREAD? THAT IS THE ONLY PIC I AM TRALKING ABOUT. AND THE QUALITY OF THAT PIC IS OUTSTANDING. TAKE A LOOK ANS SHUT UP ALREADY. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
knee-highs
Joined: 15 Feb 2007
Location: yes
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 07, 2008 4:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
| mindmetoo wrote: |
| Kwangjuchicken wrote: |
| mindmetoo wrote: |
| Kwangjuchicken wrote: |
| I find it very interesting that Aldrin's feet and lower parts of legs are covered in wet sand and mud. Just like the wet sand and mud that they used to "m/fake" the footprints. Why is there so much wet sand and mud on the moon? And, why did they never tell us about the moon being covered in wet sand and mud? They always called it moon dust. So, is moon dust another way to say WET SAND AND MUD? |
There isn't any wet sand and mud on the moon or on Buzz's boots. |
none on the moon is correct. try saving his pic to your comp and make it bigger. Very clear. Then use a mag. glass. |
Doing odd things with your message board text is a sign you're a nut bag. I turned off your bolding. Get a grip.
Anyway, no. They can engineer a massive massive conspiracy where even the soviets are on board or fooled and yet they make a simple mistake like wet soil on boot? Geez.
If you have a peer reviewed paper from a geologist on this subject, I'd love to see it. Sorry I don't take the authority of an ESL teacher on lunar geology. |
and who is the nut-bag who left Korea but still comes back on this board to gloat and hang out with their "community"? MM2 you are the chump.... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Kwangjuchicken
Joined: 01 Sep 2003
Location: I was abducted by aliens on my way to Korea and forced to be an EFL teacher on this crazy planet.
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 07, 2008 4:23 am Post subject: Re: WAS THE MOON LANDING FAKED? YOU DECIDE |
|
|
[quote="Grab the Chickens Levi"]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moon_landing_conspiracy
quote]
Go to this site.
Click 5.3 Photographs and films
Look at "The original Buzz Aldrin Photograph".
It lookes like it was taken yesterday in mud and sand.
If you all want to disagree with what I saw in THAT pic. them why don't you look at it first. Now that is odd. To tell me what is in or not in a pic. that you have not even looked at.
Last edited by Kwangjuchicken on Mon Jul 07, 2008 4:30 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
knee-highs
Joined: 15 Feb 2007
Location: yes
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 07, 2008 4:26 am Post subject: Re: WAS THE MOON LANDING FAKED? YOU DECIDE |
|
|
[quote="Kwangjuchicken"]
| Choke the Chickens Levi wrote: |
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moon_landing_conspiracy
quote]
Go to this site.
Click 5.3 Photographs and films
Look at "The original Buzz Aldrin Photograph.
It lookes like it was taken yesterday in mud and sand.
If you all want to disagree with what I saw in THAT pic. them why don't you look at it first. Now that is odd. To tell me what is in or not in a pic. that you have not even looked at. |
is everyone named Chicken suffering from some malady? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Kwangjuchicken
Joined: 01 Sep 2003
Location: I was abducted by aliens on my way to Korea and forced to be an EFL teacher on this crazy planet.
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 07, 2008 4:29 am Post subject: Re: WAS THE MOON LANDING FAKED? YOU DECIDE |
|
|
[quote="knee-highs"]
| Kwangjuchicken wrote: |
| Choke the Chickens Levi wrote: |
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moon_landing_conspiracy
quote]
Go to this site.
Click 5.3 Photographs and films
Look at "The original Buzz Aldrin Photograph.
It lookes like it was taken yesterday in mud and sand.
If you all want to disagree with what I saw in THAT pic. them why don't you look at it first. Now that is odd. To tell me what is in or not in a pic. that you have not even looked at. |
is everyone named Chicken suffering from some malady? |
Yes. We get pissed at stupid people. Not you, of course. And don't even get me started on Ducks.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Kwangjuchicken
Joined: 01 Sep 2003
Location: I was abducted by aliens on my way to Korea and forced to be an EFL teacher on this crazy planet.
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 07, 2008 4:34 am Post subject: Re: WAS THE MOON LANDING FAKED? YOU DECIDE |
|
|
[quote="Kwangjuchicken"]
| Grab the Chickens Levi wrote: |
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moon_landing_conspiracy
quote]
Go to this site.
Click 5.3 Photographs and films
Look at "The original Buzz Aldrin Photograph".
It lookes like it was taken yesterday in mud and sand.
If you all want to disagree with what I saw in THAT pic. them why don't you look at it first. Now that is odd. To tell me what is in or not in a pic. that you have not even looked at. |
You do not even need to enlarge that pic or use a maginfying glass. The pic. is already huge. If Full color, and loks like it was made in our mud and sand playground.
you have to click the site address in the OP to get there. If you click my post it does not work. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
OneWayTraffic
Joined: 14 Mar 2005
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 07, 2008 4:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
Well the one I looked at originally was a different one of Buzz but no mind. Same place same man same time same suit. I also just looked at your pic.
Looks like moondust to me. What do you expect it to do, fall off?
Notice how it's evenly covered his pants in a fine layer, no clumps. That's consistent with dust kicked up. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Kwangjuchicken
Joined: 01 Sep 2003
Location: I was abducted by aliens on my way to Korea and forced to be an EFL teacher on this crazy planet.
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 07, 2008 4:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
| OneWayTraffic wrote: |
Well the one I looked at originally was a different one of Buzz but no mind. Same place same man same time same suit. I also just looked at your pic.
Looks like moondust to me. What do you expect it to do, fall off?
Notice how it's evenly covered his pants in a fine layer, no clumps. That's consistent with dust kicked up. |
Scroll to see the bottom of the pic. Very deep boot marks with clumps of mud here and there. And, if they were able to make such deep foot prints of such high quality, why is the famous pic of the foot print look like it was made in dust and not a good quality deep print like in THIS PIC.? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Kwangjuchicken
Joined: 01 Sep 2003
Location: I was abducted by aliens on my way to Korea and forced to be an EFL teacher on this crazy planet.
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 07, 2008 4:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Kwangjuchicken wrote: |
| OneWayTraffic wrote: |
Well the one I looked at originally was a different one of Buzz but no mind. Same place same man same time same suit. I also just looked at your pic.
Looks like moondust to me. What do you expect it to do, fall off?
Notice how it's evenly covered his pants in a fine layer, no clumps. That's consistent with dust kicked up. |
Scroll to see the bottom of the pic. Very deep boot marks with clumps of mud here and there. And, if they were able to make such deep foot prints of such high quality, why is the famous pic of the foot print look like it was made in dust and not a good quality deep print like in THIS PIC.? |
And did you click on the pic to see it full size? The detail is outstanding.
If not, go back and click on it, and also scroll to see the mud clumps in the very deep tred (sp?) marks of the boots. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Kwangjuchicken
Joined: 01 Sep 2003
Location: I was abducted by aliens on my way to Korea and forced to be an EFL teacher on this crazy planet.
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 07, 2008 4:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Kwangjuchicken wrote: |
| Kwangjuchicken wrote: |
| OneWayTraffic wrote: |
Well the one I looked at originally was a different one of Buzz but no mind. Same place same man same time same suit. I also just looked at your pic.
Looks like moondust to me. What do you expect it to do, fall off?
Notice how it's evenly covered his pants in a fine layer, no clumps. That's consistent with dust kicked up. |
Scroll to see the bottom of the pic. Very deep boot marks with clumps of mud here and there. And, if they were able to make such deep foot prints of such high quality, why is the famous pic of the foot print look like it was made in dust and not a good quality deep print like in THIS PIC.? |
And did you click on the pic to see it full size? The detail is outstanding.
If not, go back and click on it, and also scroll to see the mud clumps in the very deep tred (sp?) marks of the boots. |
If you compare the "mock photo" at that site to the one that I have been talking about, the "mock photo" looks like it was made in dust. The "real photo" in full color, large size, 100% perfect detail, looks like a fake one made in mud and sand. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Underwaterbob
Joined: 08 Jan 2005
Location: In Cognito
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 07, 2008 5:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
It looks to me like it could be fine, dry powder.
Better yet try it. Buy some baking powder or talcum powder and make some prints of your own.
I don't see how you can be so vehemently sure that it's mud. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Underwaterbob
Joined: 08 Jan 2005
Location: In Cognito
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 07, 2008 5:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Aah better yet. Look to the right of the photo, next to the gold foil looking stuff. There's a part where the material had been lying on the ground. You can see how it smoothed out the surface and there are even cracks where the powder falls apart. That's definitely not mud. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Underwaterbob
Joined: 08 Jan 2005
Location: In Cognito
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
crescent
Joined: 15 Jan 2003
Location: yes.
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 07, 2008 5:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Kwangjuchicken wrote: |
| Scroll to see the bottom of the pic. Very deep boot marks with clumps of mud here and there. And, if they were able to make such deep foot prints of such high quality, why is the famous pic of the foot print look like it was made in dust and not a good quality deep print like in THIS PIC.? |
My gawd, man. The film is not even close to high quality and depicts the same effects that a modern photo would if magnified beyond it's set resolution.
The same thing happens when you take a photo with a 3megapixel camera and blow it up to a poster size print. You get a grainy image.
Next. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
mindmetoo
Joined: 02 Feb 2004
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 07, 2008 1:52 pm Post subject: Re: WAS THE MOON LANDING FAKED? YOU DECIDE |
|
|
| Kwangjuchicken wrote: |
| It lookes like it was taken yesterday in mud and sand. |
No it doesn't. I've looked at that picture a thousand time. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
