|
Korean Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Underwaterbob

Joined: 08 Jan 2005 Location: In Cognito
|
Posted: Thu Jul 17, 2008 8:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Rteacher wrote: |
You've stated your position well, but I think that the materialistic philosophy that I infer from Darwin's theory contributed to a gradually less sanctified view of life and inspired (even if unintentionally) eugenics, which further inspired Nazis and Communists alike to do atrocious things by supplying some "scientific" rationale. |
FTFY |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Omkara

Joined: 18 Feb 2006 Location: USA
|
Posted: Thu Jul 17, 2008 9:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I still don't get what your gripe about material is, RTeacher.
I can't think of anything--save relationships--which is not matter or energy.
I guess you could say that anything that is immaterial is the meaning of a material or an energy. But, mind you, both matter and energy are not disjunct, but rather mutually dependent.
I guess it is the meaning of evolution that's got the religious folk so worried--so worried, in fact, that they'll deny the material evidence.
What is this other spiritual stuff you go on about? It must be meaning, if it is not chemistry. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
IncognitoHFX

Joined: 06 May 2007 Location: Yeongtong, Suwon
|
Posted: Thu Jul 17, 2008 10:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Rteacher wrote: |
You've stated your position well, but I think that the materialistic philosophy underlying and implied by Darwin's theory contributed to a gradually less sanctified view of life and inspired (even if unintentionally) eugenics, which further inspired Nazis and Communists alike to do atrocious things by supplying some "scientific" rationale. |
This is a fundamental problem with religious arguments towards evolution. There is the underlying, fundamental assumption that morality comes from above and can only be respected if it has some kind of divine significance.
You're saying that materialistic philosophy leads to a less santified, more mechanical view of life, which leads to a lack of respect and love for life, which leads to scientific theories such as eugenics which rank the value of life on an empirical basis.
I understand where you're coming from. Though I am an atheist, I'm also a vegetarian. Many atheists observe a necessity for moralistic behaviour, not only in the evolutionary sense that it is necessary for our survival and procreation, but also in a humanitarian sense. People feel pain; negative emotion is undesirable, and is also a universal amongst people and most animals regardless of intelligence. I don't wish to inflict pain on anyone as I don't want anyone else to inflict pain on me, therefore I will try my best to act in the best favour of all of those around me.
That's human nature, it always has been and it doesn't need to come from above.
Another problem is that didactic systems of morality, or "commandments" inherited from belief systems are uni-faceted and inflexible. Sometimes it is necessary to kill, other times it is necessary to lie. The Bible and other morality books don't allow for such moral development and those who adhere to these commandments stunt their moral development. They, individually and collectively, fail to adjust to circumstances in a rational way. The answer isn't always obvious or black and white.
Courts of law do not need to exist in an open civilization where all members actively persue the most rational and civil answer. Courts of law do need to exist where "the mob" exists, and the mob always has been fueled by religion and superstition.
I also do believe in universals; I'm not a relativist. Some things are just wrong no matter what the circumstances. But that belief and those particular universals is up for the individual to decide. The idea is to develop an individual set of morals alongside a recognized, secular set of morals for society--to develop morals scientifically on the societal level and that of the individual, in a secular way. With love, wisdom and knowledge. That is a wholehearted thing and it has nothing to do with religion.
Eugenics is terrible in principle and a moralistic atheist knows that. There is a rationality behind morals and there is a secular path in employing them. Morals should not be aesthetic, they should be scientific and equated with human nature: we all feel pain, we all get confused, and no decent human being wishes these things upon each other.
Basically, we don't need religion for morals and because scientists have had bad morals in the past as have politicians, doesn't mean we have to write off secular, humanist morality. I think it has a lot more value than you know, spare materialism (which I think you're oversimplifying).
Rteacher wrote: |
I understand that misapplication of scriptural teachings can also provide a "religious" rationale for atrocities - which is why religion should be backed by a philosophy that makes complete sense (at least on some level). |
I agree wholeheartedly. But given how broken and divided belief systems are, would it really help that much?
I know Christians across the whole gamut. From kind, sweet and loving Christians, to Christians who will isolate you and terrify you if you're different than them. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Rteacher

Joined: 23 May 2005 Location: Western MA, USA
|
Posted: Thu Jul 17, 2008 11:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Re "Omkara's" nebulous points, I accept that real knowledge means understanding the difference between matter and spirit.
Here's the way Bhaktivedanta Swami responded when asked about some facet of Hegel's philosophy:
Syamasundara dasa: Hegel attempted to establish the relationship between concrete realities. Isolated facts, or moments, as he calls them, can never constitute the truth because the truth is the whole, an integrated unity that is organic and dynamic.
Srila Prabhupada: Just by analyzing ourselves, we can understand that I, the soul, am existing and that my bodily features are changing. When things change, we call them material. The spirit soul exists in all conditions, and that is the difference between spirit and matter.
Syamasundara dasa: Moments, factors in the organic whole, progress in an evolutionary way according to the course set by reason, which Hegel calls the Welt Geist, the World Spirit.
Srila Prabhupada: That World Spirit is a person. Unless you accept a personal God, there is no question of reason. The reason guiding everything in the universe is explained in Bhagavad-gita: mayadhyaksena prakrtih. "This material nature is working under My direction." (Bg. 9.10) Direction means reason; therefore as soon as you speak of reason, you must accept the Supreme Person who is directing everything according to His supreme reason.
http://www.mcremo.com/philosophy.html
Being vegetarian generally helps one to develop more of a sense of mercy toward other living beings and thus to avoid avoid some negative karma, but it's not enough to save one from serious sinful reactions.
The general principle (coming via disciplic succession) is that animal killing and meat-eating shoud be allowed only when necessary for survival.
Most modern atheists are innocent but misled by those who enviously want to imitate God and lord it over nature and other living beings.
Last edited by Rteacher on Thu Jul 17, 2008 11:31 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Underwaterbob

Joined: 08 Jan 2005 Location: In Cognito
|
Posted: Thu Jul 17, 2008 11:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Rteacher wrote: |
Most modern atheists are innocent but misled by those who enviously want to imitate God. |
Misled how so? Who "enviously want(s) to imitate God."? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Rteacher

Joined: 23 May 2005 Location: Western MA, USA
|
Posted: Fri Jul 18, 2008 12:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
I think that all of us who wanted to enjoy independently and separately from God have tried to imitate God to the extent that we've tried to enjoy and exploit everything..
Our original envy of God was causeless - we probably just wondered what it would be like to be the center of enjoyment (and we got caught by the material energy.
Since God has supplied and arranged for the maintenance (and destruction) of everything He's the ultimate owner and enjoyer of it all.
When we're naturally connected to God by loving devotional service we can also enjoy complete happiness, but when we misuse our free will by desiring to forget and avoid God we foolishly cut ourselves off from the reservoir of real pleasure and suffer what may seem like endless material miseries. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mindmetoo
Joined: 02 Feb 2004
|
Posted: Fri Jul 18, 2008 2:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
Rteacher wrote: |
Charging someone with "quote mining" can also be misleading - quotes apparently taken out of context may be indirectly supported by other evidence (eugenics and Haeckle are key here[) |
Quote mining is always poor scholarship and a huge red flag. Sorry.
Quote: |
Asserting (or insinuating) that anyone associated with the Discovery Institute must be a Christian dominionist is a serious charge that requires more proof than the radical/eccentric views of some big donor (Don't they have some Jews - like Michae Medved - working for them?) |
I'm merely saying the group was formed and financed with a long range plan. That's to deny YOU your basic rights in the nation of your birth.
Quote: |
It's not just Christians and Hare Krishnas who link Darwin - at least indirectly - with Naziism... |
Christians and hare krishnas are also wrong about basic science. Why should I believe they're right about basic history?
Quote: |
And Darwin (and evolution theory) also strongly influenced Communism: |
And all those Krishnas living in a commune. You call that ummm what?
Rteacher, let's approach it this way, granting Hilter read Origin of Species and decided it was a textbook for his career, what of it?
Evolution is clearly used to produce helpful medical breakthroughs. Evolution can also be used to engineer viruses to kill off a race. Nuclear energy can produce important treatments for cancer or can be used to give people cancer (via an atomic blast). The words of your own holy book can be twisted by Krishnas into convincing children playing "naked doctor" with adults is proper. A ruler can be used to determine if a child needs better nutrition or can keep a child safe on rides at amusement parks. A ruler can also be used to measure skulls and nose lengths and decide people have primitive features and should be discriminated against. Do you get pissed off Mr. Centimeter invented the ruler?
If you want to biatch about Darwin and the holocaust (the jews don't, odd the victims don't seem to spend much time laying the blame there), you need to address the above point. Anything else and you're just evading the real point.
It seems to me your argument is Nazis (Nazi leaders, Nazi scientists, Nazi clergy, Nazi party members, Nazi soldiers) didn't have ethics. Stop the presses.
Also, you ever going to answer two basic questions?
1) you got evidence for your dualism?
2) if nothing changes in how the mechanic or scientist investigates the laws of nature, what's your point?
Last edited by mindmetoo on Fri Jul 18, 2008 6:50 am; edited 2 times in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mindmetoo
Joined: 02 Feb 2004
|
Posted: Fri Jul 18, 2008 4:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
Rteacher wrote: |
Our original envy of God was causeless - we probably just wondered what it would be like to be the center of enjoyment (and we got caught by the material energy. |
Were you there to witness that original envy? Where do you get this idea?
Quote: |
Since God has supplied and arranged for the maintenance (and destruction) of everything He's the ultimate owner and enjoyer of it all. |
A statement of faith. Evidence?
Quote: |
When we're naturally connected to God by loving devotional service we can also enjoy complete happiness, but when we misuse our free will by desiring to forget and avoid God we foolishly cut ourselves off from the reservoir of real pleasure and suffer what may seem like endless material miseries. |
Preaching. Aren't you glad I gave you a venue to preach to the never-to-be converted? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Rteacher

Joined: 23 May 2005 Location: Western MA, USA
|
Posted: Fri Jul 18, 2008 6:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
As far as I know, there is a philosophical foundation to every scientific theory. I think that evolutionary science currently assumes a type of monism, while most creationists assume dualism.
The Gaudiya Vaishnava philosophy that I accept and am most familiar with is simultaneously dualistic and monistic.
If there is a paradigm shift to a theistic model that assumes a nonmaterial, unlimited God simultaneously existing both within and beyond each universe as the emanating source of all life and matter, I'd expect that many scientists would naturally shift the focus of investigations that were formerly based on a purely materialistic model.
Although the chart which the following is based on is a few years old, it contrasts some basic tenets (explicit or implicit) of evolution theory [shown in dark red] with those of one devotee scientist's interpretation of Vedic creationist teachings [shown in dark blue]:
Tenets of the Darwinian evolution theory Tenets of Vedic Teachings
1. The universal principle of evolution.
An evolutionary process created all living forms in this universe.
1. The universal principle of creation.
Whatever we see in this universe is the result of creation performed by an intelligent supreme being.
2. A Creator does not exist.
Everything, from the first living cell to the present diversity of plants animals and other species, developed through an evolutionary process. A divine being is not involved.
2. A Creator exists
God, Krishna, is the source of all energies both spiritual and material. He is the cause of all causes, of creation, maintenance and annihilation. The theistic scientific process of development of creation from the most subtle energies to the gross material energies and the creation of different species in all planets of this universe are described in detail in the Puranas such as Srimad Bhagavatam.
3. The material energy has always existed
The total amount of matter and energy is and was always the same even in the shrunken state of the pre-Big Bang mathematical point.
The law of conservation of matter supports this. Matter is neither created nor destroyed in chemical reactions.
3. The material energy is a transformation.
The amount of energy in the unlimited creation of God is always the same. A portion of His spiritual energy, under His supervision, transforms into subtle material energy (pradhana) that further transforms into gross material energy. This is the process of creation of gross material worlds. At annihilation, the whole process is reversed.
4. There is no difference between material processes and life processes.
Life was created by the combination of chemicals; the simple non-living elements under the influence of time, place and circumstances gradually changed into the basic building blocks of life then life itself. This is analogous to the process of nuclear fusion or nuclear fission whereby new atomic nuclei are created. The natural laws for the creation of life were and are the same and as unchanging as the laws governing geology, astronomy, physics the formation of galaxies.
4. There is a clear distinction between living and non-living.
Scientists know of some 120 elements and of their ability to enter different combinations. They do not understand the most important element we call spiriton, or atma in Sanskrit. This element is the main difference between living entities, whether sentient or not, and non-living entities. As long as the spiriton is present in a material body, that material body is pervaded by consciousness, the source of thinking, feeling, willing and activity. These abilities are not characteristic of any combination of the elements known to scientists.
5. Self-organization from the simple to the complex is caused by natural processes.
The processes of mutation and natural selection driven by the availability of energy (food) and ecological niches are the major driving forces in developing new living forms. This can lead over periods of geologic time to more complex and more specialized forms as some life forms adapt to exploit their position.
5. The natural processes of self-organization from the simple to the complex are limited and controlled.
Just as the spiriton pervades the body and keeps it active, similarly the entire universe is pervaded by the supreme spiriton that maintains everything. This Vedic truth is supported by branch of the theory of quantum mechanics that suggests that information is spread throughout the universe quicker then the speed of light. At the time of creation, everything is evolving under the control of the supreme spiriton or consciousness. Therefore, there is no question of independent self-organization. Dull matter could and will never create self-replicating organic life. Creation is the source of all the complexities that are gradually deteriorating - as proved by the second law of thermodynamics and our experience.
6. The mechanisms of evolution are: mutation, extinction and death.
Chance, accident, random mutations, ecological changes, changes in food sources, long periods of time and death are all part of evolutionary processes. Death and extinction eliminate those living entities that have become overspecialized and cannot adapt quickly enough when their ecological niche or food supply disappears.
6. Mutation, extinction, and death exist only in the material world but not in the abode of God.
As the result of falling down from the kingdom of God, the eternal spirit soul, life after life gets a new material body that undergoes six changes, namely birth, growth, duration, reproduction, dwindling and vanishing. The subtle process of elimination of the weaker, that the scientists do not speak about, is karma. In other words, in this material world everything happens according to the law of action and reaction. The concept of accident is excluded. Most often mutations do not change a species into another species, but merely help the living entities to adapt to new and changing times, places and circumstances.
7. There is no plan, goal, or purpose in the universe.
Evolution is a random process. There can therefore be no plan, no purpose and hence no creator for the universe.
7. Causes and results require a planner or goal-giver.
From the level of macrocosm down to the level of the smallest units, all the interrelated, interdependent, and differing complexities certainly lead to an unavoidable conclusion of an intelligent and conscious plan-maker. Thus, because all complex units are interrelated and interdependent they are proof of their purposeful existence. Plan and purpose have their cause in the creator, Krishna, the cause of all causes.
8. Genetic similarities prove common ancestry.
By using DNA, it is possible to construct an evolutionary "Tree of life". The number of mutations between differing life forms determines the position in the "Tree". Presently we do not have all the transitional forms but future discoveries will certainly fill up the gaps.
The common biochemical functions of all species are an obvious proof of common descent.
8. Genetic similarities prove common designer.
The similarities between the species are there because God used similar components when creating different forms of life. Thus, it is observed that certain biochemical functions are similar in all living entities.
9. The present is the key to the past.
The natural laws, in the past, present and future have always remained the same and unchanged
This principle of uniformitarianism states that physical processes as they exist now were the same in the past. Using this it is possible postulate what happened in the remote past. However, it is recognised there are limitations to this principle owing the complexity of and lack of understanding of the universe.
9. The past is the key to the present.
Vedic wisdom states unequivocally that the natural laws remain unchanged, as the Supreme Lord is their maintainer. However, He is free to change them. This especially happens at the time of creation and annihilation. Further, measuring and interpreting the events of past and future in this complex material world is limited because of imperfect senses, imperfect instruments and mistaken interpretations. Data can be interpreted in many different ways and all theories are open revision. Conclusively, our estimations of the past and future can only be vague at best and a mere guess at worst.
10. Evolution is a continuous process
The different life forms we know are all transitional from one form to another. As evolution is an undirected random process, it might result in improvements to or degeneration of the ability of present species to survive.
10. The different types of species were all created and they undergo only minor changes.
The total number of differing species is fixed, at 8.400.000 in the whole universe. Sometimes some species are manifested while others are non-manifested, depending on time, place and circumstance. The variations within species, microevolution, arise due to the exchange of their inherent genetic information. Mutations are mostly non-beneficial and cause damage to or loss of genetic information.
http://krishnascience.com/3_10tenets.html |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
itaewonguy

Joined: 25 Mar 2003
|
Posted: Fri Jul 18, 2008 7:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
mindmetoo wrote: |
Also, you ever going to answer two basic questions?
1) you got evidence for your dualism?
2) if nothing changes in how the mechanic or scientist investigates the laws of nature, what's your point? |
why dont you anwer my questions! ohh thats right you cant! but you still wish to believe in fairytales!
why cant amino acids come together by chance to form proteins?
why cant proteins combine by coincidence to form organelles?, and why cant the organelles gather and somehow get surrounded by a protein membrane to form a cell?
you want to believe in evolution the big bang etc.. but without these MOST IMPORTANT elements unanswered how can you?
and you want to call christians stupid for believing in god.. PLEEEZ KARL!
get it together!
oh and if you want to say it all happend by chance! or a fluke, etc..
then riddle me this batman!
"Is such a harmony that is emerged only out of coincidences possible in reality?" |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mindmetoo
Joined: 02 Feb 2004
|
Posted: Fri Jul 18, 2008 7:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
itaewonguy wrote: |
why dont you anwer my questions! ohh thats right you cant! but you still wish to believe in fairytales! |
You're simply not interesting enough to pay attention to anymore. Sorry. Check the OP. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
itaewonguy

Joined: 25 Mar 2003
|
Posted: Fri Jul 18, 2008 7:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
Rteacher wrote: |
As far as I know, there is a philosophical foundation to every scientific theory. I think that evolutionary science currently assumes a type of monism, while most creationists assume dualism.
|
you are right R teacher, problem is Athiests will never admit it..
here is an example..
" The evolutional miracle"
The fact that the evolutionists attribute "miracles" to evolution shows that they are engaged to the evolution process not only scientifically but with some kind of faith. In other words, they believe in an "evolution religion" and they have to consent to all kinds of impossibilities in order to remain faithful to this religion.
MIND ME TOO and the rest of the Dawkin rejects! are all supporters of this
where as christians, buddists, diets, krishnas will all admit it!
but for athiests they see it has a sign of weakness! sad really!
MIND ME TOO the evolutiional theory is as possible as jesus riding your dinosaur!
you got nothin! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
itaewonguy

Joined: 25 Mar 2003
|
Posted: Fri Jul 18, 2008 7:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
mindmetoo wrote: |
itaewonguy wrote: |
why dont you anwer my questions! ohh thats right you cant! but you still wish to believe in fairytales! |
You're simply not interesting enough to pay attention to anymore. Sorry. Check the OP. |
ohhhhh cat got your tongue!
why dont you go and run along and cry in the corner!!
when you can answer my questions then you can have some cred!
until them Karl you have nothing so be more polite when talking to others who also believe in a theory! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mindmetoo
Joined: 02 Feb 2004
|
Posted: Fri Jul 18, 2008 7:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
Rteacher wrote: |
As far as I know, there is a philosophical foundation to every scientific theory. I think that evolutionary science currently assumes a type of monism, while most creationists assume dualism. |
Yes, the philosophical theory of Occam's Razor. You don't invent entities until you have sufficient evidence for them. Your mechanic that first assumes a fuel line demon. How's the working out for him?
Quote: |
Tenets of the Darwinian evolution theory Tenets of Vedic Teachings |
It's not really "darwinian" anymore. It's the theory of evolution. We need to be clear because darwins ideas, while correct in broad areas, don't necessarily hold in his details.
Quote: |
2. A Creator does not exist.
Everything, from the first living cell to the present diversity of plants animals and other species, developed through an evolutionary process. A divine being is not involved. |
Does saying water obeys certain laws imply a creator doesn't exist? Water flows down hill via a natural process. Oh no. Must mean there's no god? See the OP on this. You're simply repeating a fundamental error. No no no.
Quote: |
3. The material energy has always existed |
We're outside the scope of the theory of evolution now.
Quote: |
They do not understand the most important element we call spiriton |
Bahahahah. This guy should write for star trek. Sorry you simply don't get to make up a particle until you have evidence for it.
Quote: |
This Vedic truth is supported by branch of the theory of quantum mechanics that suggests that information is spread throughout the universe quicker then the speed of light. |
Science-y sounding. If you're going to accept QM then you're going to have to accept a whole lotta implications that run contrary to the natural history of the world contrary to your biblical teaching. Shall we go down that road?
Quote: |
[color=darkred]7. There is no plan, goal, or purpose in the universe. |
Evolution says nothing about this anymore so than to say that water runs downhill implies as much.
Quote: |
[color=darkblue]7. Causes and results require a planner or goal-giver. |
See. If you accept QM above then you can't separate the above from what QM tells us about the fundamental lack of cause. Sorry, you don't get to simply cherry pick what parts of a scientific theory you like and what don't fit.
Quote: |
[color=darkblue] 8. Genetic similarities prove common designer.
The similarities between the species are there because God used similar components when creating different forms of life. Thus, it is observed that certain biochemical functions are similar in all living entities. |
See the OP about genetic errors. Did the designer just happen to design life in such a way as to be perfectly explained by evolution? Odd that.
Quote: |
10. The different types of species were all created and they undergo only minor changes.
The total number of differing species is fixed, at 8.400.000 in the whole universe. Sometimes some species are manifested while others are non-manifested, depending on time, place and circumstance. The variations within species, microevolution, arise due to the exchange of their inherent genetic information. Mutations are mostly non-beneficial and cause damage to or loss of genetic information.
http://krishnascience.com/3_10tenets.html |
Claim. Evidence?
Last edited by mindmetoo on Fri Jul 18, 2008 7:29 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
JMO

Joined: 18 Jul 2006 Location: Daegu
|
Posted: Fri Jul 18, 2008 7:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
itaewonguy wrote: |
mindmetoo wrote: |
itaewonguy wrote: |
why dont you anwer my questions! ohh thats right you cant! but you still wish to believe in fairytales! |
You're simply not interesting enough to pay attention to anymore. Sorry. Check the OP. |
ohhhhh cat got your tongue!
why dont you go and run along and cry in the corner!!
when you can answer my questions then you can have some cred!
until them Karl you have nothing so be more polite when talking to others who also believe in a theory! |
Aren't u the guy who doesn;t believe in the theory of relativity, and all other scientific theories? Hows that working out? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|