|
Korean Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Pluto
Joined: 19 Dec 2006
|
Posted: Thu Aug 21, 2008 10:06 am Post subject: McCain's Questionable Foreign Policy |
|
|
From the libertarian think tank, the Cato Institute:
Quote: |
A major theme of John McCain's campaign is that he has far more experience in foreign affairs than does Barack Obama. McCain has now escalated his attacks by targeting Obama's judgment as well � especially the latter's pessimism about the effectiveness of the surge in Iraq.
There is little doubt about McCain's lengthier foreign policy experience. But it is not at all apparent that his judgment is superior to Obama's. Indeed, the record indicates that McCain's own judgment is alarmingly bad.
Even if one concedes that Obama was excessively negative about the surge's prospects for success (and the jury may be out on that point for months or even years to come), McCain's own prognostications on Iraq have repeatedly been off the mark. He was not prescient about the course of the war: As senior member of the Senate Armed Services Committee prior to the invasion, McCain predicted Iraq would be a quick and easy victory, and even told MSNBC he had "no doubt" U.S. troops "will be welcomed as liberators."
There have been recent episodes in which McCain has missed even the most basic facts about foreign policy. During a recent CNN interview, McCain said the surge of U.S. forces, which began in the spring of 2007, led to the Sunni Awakening � which started in early autumn of 2006, months before the surge was even announced.
Despite McCain's multiple trips to Iraq, he still manages to mangle facts on the ground. As a member of a senatorial delegation visiting Iraq this year, he erroneously accused Iran of aiding al Qaeda and suffered the embarrassment of an on-camera correction by his friend and fellow hawk, Sen. Joe Lieberman, that Tehran was aiding "Shiite extremists," not the Sunni zealots of al Qaeda. Yet, during a Senate hearing a few weeks later, McCain committed a similar gaffe. He asked Gen. David Petraeus to confirm that al Qaeda was far more than "an obscure sect of the Shiites," and then, apparently catching himself, added, "or Sunnis or anybody else."
McCain apparently is not even certain about Iraq's geographic location. He recently referred to a nonexistent "Iraq-Pakistan border." (The two countries are separated by more than 800 miles of Iranian territory.)
Far worse than such embarrassing factual errors, though, have been his shockingly careless � and at times tasteless and insensitive � off-the-cuff comments on various topics. His flip statement about keeping U.S. troops in Iraq for a hundred years is probably the least serious verbal blunder in an ever-mounting total. Leaving aside the key point that fractious Iraq is nothing like stable South Korea (McCain's model for an extended troop presence), his comment was still damaging because it ignored the probable reaction in the Muslim world. Al Qaeda and other radical Islamic groups repeatedly charge that the U.S. is determined to undermine their civilization and act as an imperial hegemon in their region. McCain's "100 years in Iraq" banner gives those allegations credibility and puts moderate Muslims on the defensive.
But that comment was well-thought-out compared to some others. McCain's "joke" at an April 2007 campaign stop, in which he sang "bomb bomb bomb, bomb bomb Iran" to the tune of a Beach Boys song, was beyond tasteless. This month, he again offended basic sensibilities when he joked that despite the imposition of economic sanctions, America's unimpeded sale of cigarettes to Iran might be a good thing because "maybe that's a way of killing 'em."
At best, the senator has a warped sense of humor. But such gaffes also betray a disturbing lack of judgment.
Foreign policy is serious business, and America needs a president who carefully considers his comments rather than shoots from the hip. The world is always watching and listening, and such thoughtless remarks can do tremendous damage to America's already tattered reputation.
McCain's record shows clearly that he is a verbal loose cannon, and would be a clear and present danger in the Oval Office. |
LINK
Stuff like this coming from Cato only drives home how screwed the Republicans are this year. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Ya-ta Boy
Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Location: Established in 1994
|
Posted: Thu Aug 21, 2008 1:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Unfortunately, the race is neck and neck right now, even tilting to McCain. I like how the article questions McCain's experience. Yes, he does have comparatively extensive experience, but does he have judgement? That's the more important question. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
tomato

Joined: 31 Jan 2003 Location: I get so little foreign language experience, I must be in Koreatown, Los Angeles.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
On the other hand
Joined: 19 Apr 2003 Location: I walk along the avenue
|
Posted: Fri Aug 22, 2008 11:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
That was a pretty good video. They did well to emphasize McCain's hallucinatory optimism about how well the war was going at the time he made those infamous remarks. Unfortunately, there is a large segment of the electorate who are attracted to the very same pollyanna jingoism that the video condemns. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Kuros
Joined: 27 Apr 2004
|
Posted: Fri Aug 22, 2008 12:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
On the other hand wrote: |
That was a pretty good video. They did well to emphasize McCain's hallucinatory optimism about how well the war was going at the time he made those infamous remarks. Unfortunately, there is a large segment of the electorate who are attracted to the very same pollyanna jingoism that the video condemns. |
It was good . . . up until the last 90 seconds. It really could have gone without insinuations that McCain is a traitor. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Ya-ta Boy
Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Location: Established in 1994
|
Posted: Sun Aug 24, 2008 12:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
The clip Tomato posted is decent. However, the issue in this election is not foreign policy, as important as that is. The key issue is and always is, the economy. McCain's strength, such as it is, is in a secondary issue.
I hope Obama/Biden seize on the 7 homes thing and use it as a symbol to bash the McCain campaign where it is weak. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Kuros
Joined: 27 Apr 2004
|
Posted: Sun Aug 24, 2008 5:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
Ya-ta Boy wrote: |
The clip Tomato posted is decent. However, the issue in this election is not foreign policy, as important as that is. The key issue is and always is, the economy. McCain's strength, such as it is, is in a secondary issue.
|
This has certainly been true ever since McCain joined Obama on withdrawing from Iraq in under two years (there's a few months difference between their plans, but lets face it, that's just an honorable distance).
As far as the economy goes, as a center-right voter on economics, its time for four years of Democratic tax policy after so long in GOP hands. I also feel that Obama is independent enough to fight with Pelosi to defend good FTAs. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Ya-ta Boy
Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Location: Established in 1994
|
Posted: Mon Aug 25, 2008 1:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
This has certainly been true ever since McCain joined Obama on withdrawing from Iraq |
That helped and the recent improvement in Iraq helped, but basically, the vast majority of voters always vote their pocketbook. Some single issue voters, right to lifers for example don't, but most people define security in terms of economic security for their family. Tip O'Neil said, "All politics is local" and I have always thought this is mainly what he meant.
I'm generally a liberal on social issues and conservative (the old-fashioned kind) on fiscal policy--if you can't pay for it, don't buy it. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|