Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

UPDATED! Am I getting fisted on summer intensive OT
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Job-related Discussion Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
maddog



Joined: 08 Dec 2005
Location: Daegu

PostPosted: Sun Aug 24, 2008 11:50 pm    Post subject: UPDATED! Am I getting fisted on summer intensive OT Reply with quote

My contract states that I have to work 20 hours per week, or 90 hours per month.

Summer intensive ran from 21 July til 22 August with three days compulsory vacation in the middle.

I was working 27 hours per week.

My employer is using multiple iterations of the definition of a month (20 days or 31 days) and my working hours (20/week or 90/month) to pay me the lowest ammount of OT he thinks he can get away with.

HIS CALCULATION
Summer intensive was 5 weeks = 1.25 months (WRONG. 5 weeks = 1.15 months)
Therefore, my OT threshold for that period is 90x1.25=112.5

MY CALCULATION
5 weeks is 5 weeks, not 1.25 months. There were three days compulsory vacation. 4 hours per day comes to 12 hours for 3 days.
20x5=100. 100-12=88

During that 5-week period I worked a total of 116.5 hours. 116.5-88=29.5

My boss is claiming that I am owed just 12 hours OT. (He lost an additional two hours somewhere in his black magic math.)

Under Korean law, does his math hold up. One minute he's working in months of 28 days, then 31 days, then 5 weeks, then 1.25 months. He is fisting me, isn't he.

Anyway you cut it, I was doing 7 hours a week OT for 4.4 weeks.

I was looking forward to my OT.

The funny thing is, he wants me to re-sign. In fact, he assumes I will re-sign. Not after this.

Cheers for an advice.

MD


Last edited by maddog on Tue Aug 26, 2008 10:33 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Thunndarr



Joined: 30 Sep 2003

PostPosted: Mon Aug 25, 2008 12:41 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Your summer intensive camp is split up over the course of two different months. The overtime you worked during July would have been added to your hours for July only, same with August.

And unfortunately for you, I can tell you that it's quite common to view vacation days as zero hours for the purposes of calculating your time. (This occasionally works in your favor, but very often, as in your case, does not.)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
moosehead



Joined: 05 May 2007

PostPosted: Mon Aug 25, 2008 1:48 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

guess getting fisted is what you can call it - tho down South where I come from we call it getting screwed and not getting kissed -

sorry OP after all, TIK Shocked
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
maddog



Joined: 08 Dec 2005
Location: Daegu

PostPosted: Mon Aug 25, 2008 2:47 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thunndarr wrote:
Your summer intensive camp is split up over the course of two different months. The overtime you worked during July would have been added to your hours for July only, same with August.

And unfortunately for you, I can tell you that it's quite common to view vacation days as zero hours for the purposes of calculating your time. (This occasionally works in your favor, but very often, as in your case, does not.)


If it's paid vacation, it should count IMO.

They're not adding up OT for July and August. It is one period. But they keep changing between months and weeks, each time working it in their favor. If they calculate it in weeks, I should be getting 29.5 hours OT. If they do it in months, I should be getting 25 hours OT.

The trouble is, they use both according to which gives them them lowest possible number, they count five weeks as 1.25 months, and they've added 12 hours (3 working/vacation days) days to my OT threshold.

What they're effectivley saying is that even with 3 days vacation, one is still supposed to work the full quota of weekly hours. It's PAID vacation.

Do I have a case with the labor board. I really do feel like I'm getting screwed. I was recently appointed head foreign teacher, and one of the deal breakers was less hours. I'm tempted to tell them that I'm steping down as HFT. What's the point? I feel like I'm only HFT when they want me to do something. I guess I should've seen that coming.

In any case, I'm not extending my contract here. I was working 10 hour days for a month, and 12 hour days last Thursday and Friday.

I worked out that I put in extra 48 office hours last month. 48 hours for 240K. That's $5 an hour!! I could get about triple that for pulling pints back home.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Thunndarr



Joined: 30 Sep 2003

PostPosted: Mon Aug 25, 2008 4:40 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
If it's paid vacation, it should count IMO.


But, it doesn't. You can argue til you're blue in the face, but there is no way you're going to convince a Korean to count days you didn't work (even if they are 'paid') towards your contract hours.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Tobias



Joined: 02 Jun 2008

PostPosted: Mon Aug 25, 2008 7:45 am    Post subject: Bring it up in negotiations Reply with quote

Supply and demand forces are on your side. If the guy wants to re-sign you, bring it up in negotiations even if you aren't planning on going another year. If he thinks you're returning, he may pay you for it before the end comes. If you remind him of how tough it may be to replace you, he may pay you on the spot. Give it a shot.

Good luck.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
yingwenlaoshi



Joined: 12 Feb 2007
Location: ... location, location!

PostPosted: Mon Aug 25, 2008 7:48 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I don't see how this hours per month thing can work in any scenario. That should be wiped clean from contracts. Get it in as so many hours per week with so many hours per day.

With the "or" clause in your contract, he could work it out in his favor. So if it is more in his favor to do it the weekly way, he'll do that or vice versa.

But there's no other way for him to work it out. He has to go by the 90 hrs/month or 20 hrs/wk.

I see where you're coming from with the vacation day being included in your total hours so as to get more OT, but I'd forget about that one.

The ticket, or should I say "solution," to avoid this type of situation is to have OT agreed upon as being daily. If you sign a contract for 20 hrs/wk, you should at least both agree that anything over 4 hours/day (teaching hours) should be OT. Or have a set schedule where anything outside your daily schedule is OT with a maximum of 20 hrs during the course of a week within said schedule.

That's it, that's all.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Zyzyfer



Joined: 29 Jan 2003
Location: who, what, where, when, why, how?

PostPosted: Mon Aug 25, 2008 5:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thunndarr wrote:
Quote:
If it's paid vacation, it should count IMO.


But, it doesn't. You can argue til you're blue in the face, but there is no way you're going to convince a Korean to count days you didn't work (even if they are 'paid') towards your contract hours.


See, this is one of those things that's actually important to clarify when negotiating a contract. I was burned once by this as well.

maddog, the logic on your boss' end is that vacation is paid, but you're not teaching, so you don't get any hours added to the month for that time. Paid vacation basically means you're guaranteed to make your minimum salary despite not doing anything. If he were calculating your hours/pay by the week rather than the month or including some base number of hours for paid vacation, it wouldn't be so bad.

It's basically a neat little loophole that keeps overtime pay lower, and only occurs in a job where you're on salary but can also earn overtime wages. The unfairness of it is debatable...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
matthews_world



Joined: 15 Feb 2003

PostPosted: Mon Aug 25, 2008 8:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Maybe he's not paying you for the full hour.

If your school goes by the 22 hour per week max then based on your figure that should be 7.5 extra OT.

How many specific days did you actually work? Start and finish. When did your pay period begin?

There are so many variables here that we need to know.

If there aren't complete weeks that you worked, the OT that you perceived to be working can be absorbed into the 22 hour max.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
maddog



Joined: 08 Dec 2005
Location: Daegu

PostPosted: Mon Aug 25, 2008 10:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

It seems like I haven't got a leg to stand on. In any civilized country paid vacation counts as hours worked.

I've got co-workers who are on 30 hours per week (ie, an average of six hours per day). One of them did 18 hours OT. He's gonna be equally pissed when he finds out that his 3 days paid vacation effectively nullifies any OT that he did.

Oh, I even called the labor board, but even they couldn't give me a straight answer. They said it's between me and my employer. Very vague.

MD
Back to top