Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

U.S. Economy Grew Faster Than Estimated in Second Quarter
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee



Joined: 25 May 2003

PostPosted: Thu Aug 28, 2008 2:12 pm    Post subject: U.S. Economy Grew Faster Than Estimated in Second Quarter Reply with quote

because of exports.


thanks to a lower dollar.

a lower dollar will do something about the trade deficit and outsourcing.

No protectionism necessary.



Quote:
U.S. Economy: GDP Exceeds Initial Estimate on Exports (Update2)

By Courtney Schlisserman and Timothy R. Homan

Aug. 28 (Bloomberg) -- The U.S. economy expanded faster than previously estimated in the second quarter, helped by a surge in exports that will probably wane as Europe and Japan head toward recessions.

Gross domestic product increased at a 3.3 percent annual pace, compared with the initial estimate of 1.9 percent, the Commerce Department said today in Washington. Trade contributed the most to U.S. growth in almost three decades.



http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aMuMosauQxa4&refer=home
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Kuros



Joined: 27 Apr 2004

PostPosted: Thu Aug 28, 2008 2:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Since mises played skeptic in the other thread, I'll save him the trouble of that role here.

Rising inflation may distort export growth figures

Goldman Sachs' Jan Hatzius wrote:
Durable goods orders beat expectations with a 1.3% month-on-month increase in July. But the apparent strength is due to higher prices, not stronger activity. In fact, deflating orders by the producer price index for durable manufactured goods shows a 9.4% year-on-year drop in real orders, the worst since early 2002.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Ya-ta Boy



Joined: 16 Jan 2003
Location: Established in 1994

PostPosted: Thu Aug 28, 2008 3:08 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

With a sound fiscal policy the dollar wouldn't be a plaything for an irresponsible government to hide it's failures behind. Running up the debt, what is it...$4 TRILLION? in 8 years is irresponsible.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee



Joined: 25 May 2003

PostPosted: Thu Aug 28, 2008 3:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ya-ta Boy wrote:
With a sound fiscal policy the dollar wouldn't be a plaything for an irresponsible government to hide it's failures behind. Running up the debt, what is it...$4 TRILLION? in 8 years is irresponsible.


With all due respect I think it would be good to examine the reasons for US budget deficits.


The stock market meltdown.

The 2000 recession (started before Bush was president)

High oil due to more demand from China and India , and the fact that there is just less easy to get oil.

9-11 attacks (which were being planned before Bush was president. )

Not Bush's fault.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ya-ta Boy



Joined: 16 Jan 2003
Location: Established in 1994

PostPosted: Thu Aug 28, 2008 3:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

How does:

a) Promoting an irrational fear of Commies and Moslems to justify inflated defense spending for unnecessary wars,

b) Refusing to respect the public's desire for social programs while

c) Cutting taxes

help your argument?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee



Joined: 25 May 2003

PostPosted: Thu Aug 28, 2008 4:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ya-ta Boy wrote:
How does:

a) Promoting an irrational fear of Commies and Moslems to justify inflated defense spending for unnecessary wars,

b) Refusing to respect the public's desire for social programs while

c) Cutting taxes

help your argument?



1.
Bush isn't anti muslim.

2.
He doesn't promote an irrational fear of muslims.


3.

The Soviet Union was out to destroy the US.

The additional pressure of Reagans defense spending along with falling oil prices helped break the Soviet Union.

4.
It is not a matter of religion the fact is Al Qaediists , Khomeni supporters and Bathsits are all fascist bigots . Just like the Klan are fascists bigots.
What they demand is illegitimate. They need to be known for what they are.

5.



Bush was wrong they don't fight because they hate our freedoms but it is also true they don't fight cause they hate US policy. The fight to conquer the mideast and in Al Qaeda's case well beyond that.

The anti war movement doesn't know why Al Qaedia fights and the record needs to be set straight.


It is important that everyone knows why the enemies of the US fight.

6.


9-11 happened because the US allowed stuff to go on in the mideast for a long time.

7.

70,000 trained in Al Qaeda camps during the 1990's . Why do you think that was ? and if Al Qaeda is just about Afghanistan then please tell me is Bin Laden from Afghanistan? How about the 9-11 hijackers were any of them from Afghanistan? Or Pakistan for that matter?

8.


I didn't support Bush's tax cuts but tax cuts are good for the economy. I don't think there are many who would say it is not so.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mindmetoo



Joined: 02 Feb 2004

PostPosted: Thu Aug 28, 2008 4:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Outsourcing is a good thing. Don't knock it. It means a company can offer a product for less and/or earn a higher profit. Most people would not be friendly to a car company that adds $1000 of unnecessary nickel because it keeps miners in North America employed. By the same token, we should not pay extra for our toaster because GE wants to keep call room people in Maine employed.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Join Me



Joined: 14 Jan 2008

PostPosted: Thu Aug 28, 2008 4:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee wrote:
Ya-ta Boy wrote:
With a sound fiscal policy the dollar wouldn't be a plaything for an irresponsible government to hide it's failures behind. Running up the debt, what is it...$4 TRILLION? in 8 years is irresponsible.


With all due respect I think it would be good to examine the reasons for US budget deficits.


The stock market meltdown.

The 2000 recession (started before Bush was president)

High oil due to more demand from China and India , and the fact that there is just less easy to get oil.

9-11 attacks (which were being planned before Bush was president. )

Not Bush's fault.



Bush has had EIGHT years to do something...anything... with the economy. Just how much time does the man need? Being the President of the USA has never been an easy job and there will always be difficult obstacles to overcome (that is...the list of excuses you made for Bush above). The difference between a loser and a leader is a leader finds a way to get the job done. I think the score card clearly indicates Bush is not a leader. Laughing
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee



Joined: 25 May 2003

PostPosted: Thu Aug 28, 2008 5:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

mindmetoo wrote:
Outsourcing is a good thing. Don't knock it. It means a company can offer a product for less and/or earn a higher profit. Most people would not be friendly to a car company that adds $1000 of unnecessary nickel because it keeps miners in North America employed. By the same token, we should not pay extra for our toaster because GE wants to keep call room people in Maine employed.


you might be correct.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee



Joined: 25 May 2003

PostPosted: Thu Aug 28, 2008 5:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Join Me wrote:
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee wrote:
Ya-ta Boy wrote:
With a sound fiscal policy the dollar wouldn't be a plaything for an irresponsible government to hide it's failures behind. Running up the debt, what is it...$4 TRILLION? in 8 years is irresponsible.


With all due respect I think it would be good to examine the reasons for US budget deficits.


The stock market meltdown.

The 2000 recession (started before Bush was president)

High oil due to more demand from China and India , and the fact that there is just less easy to get oil.

9-11 attacks (which were being planned before Bush was president. )

Not Bush's fault.



Bush has had EIGHT years to do something...anything... with the economy. Just how much time does the man need? Being the President of the USA has never been an easy job and there will always be difficult obstacles to overcome (that is...the list of excuses you made for Bush above). The difference between a loser and a leader is a leader finds a way to get the job done. I think the score card clearly indicates Bush is not a leader. Laughing



maybe you are right , nevertheless Bush has had more bad luck than Bill Clinton ever did.


9-11 wasn't the average obstacle to overcome.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Join Me



Joined: 14 Jan 2008

PostPosted: Fri Aug 29, 2008 3:49 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee wrote:
Join Me wrote:
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee wrote:
Ya-ta Boy wrote:
With a sound fiscal policy the dollar wouldn't be a plaything for an irresponsible government to hide it's failures behind. Running up the debt, what is it...$4 TRILLION? in 8 years is irresponsible.


With all due respect I think it would be good to examine the reasons for US budget deficits.


The stock market meltdown.

The 2000 recession (started before Bush was president)

High oil due to more demand from China and India , and the fact that there is just less easy to get oil.

9-11 attacks (which were being planned before Bush was president. )

Not Bush's fault.



Bush has had EIGHT years to do something...anything... with the economy. Just how much time does the man need? Being the President of the USA has never been an easy job and there will always be difficult obstacles to overcome (that is...the list of excuses you made for Bush above). The difference between a loser and a leader is a leader finds a way to get the job done. I think the score card clearly indicates Bush is not a leader. Laughing



maybe you are right , nevertheless Bush has had more bad luck than Bill Clinton ever did.


9-11 wasn't the average obstacle to overcome.


Neither were Monica and Hillary. I would say Bush got lucky when he got dealt 9-11...he just forgot that people tend to get real bitter when you neglect the economy and they have to sell their SUVs and homes in order to eat.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee



Joined: 25 May 2003

PostPosted: Fri Aug 29, 2008 4:16 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
Neither were Monica and Hillary. I would say Bush got lucky when he got dealt 9-11...he just forgot that people tend to get real bitter when you neglect the economy and they have to sell their SUVs and homes in order to eat.




Monica and Hillary isn't in any way comparable with 9-11. and for that matter that was Bill Clinton's problem Clinton brought that on himself. Unlike that whole mess Bush didn't bring 9-11 on the US.

and for those who say it happened on his watch ok fair enough but then be sure to acknowledge that 9-11 was being planned while Bill Clinton was in the Whitehouse.

I still think Bill Clinton was a good president but he was also a lucky president.

9-11 was good luck? A trillion dollars of damage or more to the US economy is good luck?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Join Me



Joined: 14 Jan 2008

PostPosted: Fri Aug 29, 2008 5:12 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee wrote:
Quote:
Neither were Monica and Hillary. I would say Bush got lucky when he got dealt 9-11...he just forgot that people tend to get real bitter when you neglect the economy and they have to sell their SUVs and homes in order to eat.




Monica and Hillary isn't in any way comparable with 9-11. and for that matter that was Bill Clinton's problem Clinton brought that on himself. Unlike that whole mess Bush didn't bring 9-11 on the US.

and for those who say it happened on his watch ok fair enough but then be sure to acknowledge that 9-11 was being planned while Bill Clinton was in the Whitehouse.

I still think Bill Clinton was a good president but he was also a lucky president.

9-11 was good luck? A trillion dollars of damage or more to the US economy is good luck?


Without fear and his self created "War on Terrorism" Bush wouldn't have a single thing going for him...and now that the truth is out about Iraq Bush doesn't even have that life preserver to cling to.

Speaking of damage to the economy. The cost of the Iraq war is expected to cost trillions (that is trillion with an S). More importantly it has already cost 4,000 Americans their lives. How many more will pay for George's poor judgment with their lives?

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/03/07/AR2008030702846.html

http://money.cnn.com/2008/01/10/news/economy/costofwar.fortune/index.htm
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee



Joined: 25 May 2003

PostPosted: Fri Aug 29, 2008 5:49 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Join Me wrote:
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee wrote:
Quote:
Neither were Monica and Hillary. I would say Bush got lucky when he got dealt 9-11...he just forgot that people tend to get real bitter when you neglect the economy and they have to sell their SUVs and homes in order to eat.




Monica and Hillary isn't in any way comparable with 9-11. and for that matter that was Bill Clinton's problem Clinton brought that on himself. Unlike that whole mess Bush didn't bring 9-11 on the US.

and for those who say it happened on his watch ok fair enough but then be sure to acknowledge that 9-11 was being planned while Bill Clinton was in the Whitehouse.

I still think Bill Clinton was a good president but he was also a lucky president.

9-11 was good luck? A trillion dollars of damage or more to the US economy is good luck?


Without fear and his self created "War on Terrorism" Bush wouldn't have a single thing going for him...and now that the truth is out about Iraq Bush doesn't even have that life preserver to cling to.

Speaking of damage to the economy. The cost of the Iraq war is expected to cost trillions (that is trillion with an S). More importantly it has already cost 4,000 Americans their lives. How many more will pay for George's poor judgment with their lives?

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/03/07/AR2008030702846.html

http://money.cnn.com/2008/01/10/news/economy/costofwar.fortune/index.htm


nevertheless the 9-11 attacks were a terrible blow to the US economy.


and Iraq war or no Iraq war Bathists , Al Qaedists and the Khomeni followers decided to go after the US along time ago.

Something needed to be done about them.

9-11 happened cause mideast regimes and elites encourage terror.

Doing nothing about it led to 9-11.

9-11 was the price the US paid for doing nothing.


and the US will be hit again like 9-11 unless something is done about Bathists , Al Qaedists and the Khomeni followers.

Doing nothing about the enemy doesn't mean the enemy is going to do nothing.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
blade



Joined: 30 Jun 2007

PostPosted: Fri Aug 29, 2008 7:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee wrote:


nevertheless the 9-11 attacks were a terrible blow to the US economy.

The way I remember it was that the Enron scandal had a greater effect on the stock market than 9-11 did. Am I wrong?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International