|
Korean Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
bucheon bum
Joined: 16 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Wed Sep 03, 2008 9:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| khyber, yes, her speech wasn't anything special. Just standard GOP BS (just like Obama's had a lot of BS about "change" and whatnot). That being said, she came across as articulate, serious, and intelligent. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kotakji
Joined: 23 Oct 2006
|
Posted: Wed Sep 03, 2008 9:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Gopher Im curious to hear your thoughts on the strategy behind the choice of Palin as VP.
Personally, unlike, I'd say the vast majority of posters here, I can say I'm still somewhat on the fence as to which way my vote would run. I actually like, and have liked, McCain for a number of years and he is honestly the first Republican in a long while that I would consider voting for. Being somewhat liberal on domestic social issues, fiscally just a shade to the right of center, and a realist when it comes to international issues, I actually found both candidates being acceptable choices- feeling slightly more comfortable with Obama on most social issues but a bit off put by his populist overtones.
Now, if the GOP's thinking is that the best way to influence the election is to strengthen the voter turnout of the right, then I think Palin is a decent choice. Even with the various scandals, she does do a good job of playing the down to earth small town good old 'boy' that would reinvigorate the conservative segment of the electorate. Additionally, she might bring in votes from people who would have otherwise chosen a third party option
However, if the thinking is that she would help the ticket by converting people on the fence between the two major parties, then I really would have to question the logic. It seems to me that most of the voters that have really strong positions on the major issues in which there is a party divide are already on one side or the other. Rather, its the moderates, who don't have some bugaboo overarching social or economic stance who are still considering their options. IE the gun nuts and the anti gun nuts, the pro life and pro choice crusaders, the taxes are evil crowd and the social justice dudes all have made up their mind by now.
Now if we were to oversimplify the situation and think of it as a continuum, doesn't the choice of Palin actually pull the GOP ticket away from that center in which the undecideds tend to reside and in doing so (somewhat) reduce one of the big draws of McCain?
For me its a choice between the unknown entity that on paper I generally like with a few overtones that worry me paired with a VP I have no problems with, vs. a known entity (and thus IMO less of a risk) that I generally like paired with a VP that I am really turned off by. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Gopher

Joined: 04 Jun 2005
|
Posted: Wed Sep 03, 2008 11:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
One commentator referred to S. Palin not as the ploy to win former H. Clinton supporters to J. McCain's campaign as some suspected earlier but rather a cultural torpedo aimed directly at B. and M. Obama. She certainly did well in her speech tonight. S. Palin does not offer an alternative to H. Clinton but rather an alternative to B. and M. Obama.
Why did the J. McCain campaign choose her? Who knows? I do not. Many here claim to know all about it. But that is just the left's cynicism and fear of a possible Republican victory speaking. She does seem to solidify the GOP's conservative base behind J. McCain. As far as my views go, I like her. I am pleased with her presentation. I support this campaign.
Who should you vote for? Vote for whomever you feel most comfortable with sitting in the Oval Office for four years. I gave up on "rational-choice" voting analysis long ago. We all have this or that issue that remains important to us. But I think feeling your way around, to a degree at least, is the best way to go. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Summer Wine
Joined: 20 Mar 2005 Location: Next to a River
|
Posted: Wed Sep 03, 2008 11:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
The fact remains, Mises: we are at war. I agree that the Iraqi War was an unjust war from the start. But I am not interested in putting people in power who are going to waste their time foaming-at-the-mouth about the past administration and play the usual partisan games. I want to put people in power who are going to live for today and tomorrow, take charge of the situation as it is, and deal with it as adults.
|
Good point.
Sometimes it seems that some people feel that if the US takes its toys back and goes home that the violence will end and every one will be happy.
America didn't start the war, it started in the 1990's and it wasn't handled well then and subsequently its still being fought now. You can go home if you want but those who wish to use violence against you will still target you whether you do or not. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Gatsby
Joined: 09 Feb 2007
|
Posted: Thu Sep 04, 2008 12:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
Apparently Sarah Palin gave a rousing speech. Or as the New York Times put it, "electrifying."
| Quote: |
Ms. Palin�s appearance electrified a convention that has been consumed by questions of whether she was up to the job, as she launched slashing attacks on Mr. Obama�s claims of experience. |
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/04/us/politics/04repubday.html?_r=1&hp&oref=slogin
Is the ability to give an "electrifying" speech a reason to vote for someone?
Call me old fashioned, but I think the content of the speech is more important.
I can think of some people who gave electrifying speeches through history: Hitler, Stalin, Joe McCarthy. Heck, let's throw in Richard Nixon.
I'm not saying Sarah Palin is a Nazi.
But it is easy to give an exciting speech if you do not feel constrained by little details like whether what you are saying is actually true.
And I am saying she has the potential for being a demagogue. She is an extremist who would impose her religious values on everyone else in the United States, whether you like it or not. She is associated with millions of evangelical Christians who have made it quite clear that they would do exactly this.
When she was elected mayor of Wasilla, she was hailed as "the first Christian mayor of Wasilla."
What's next? First Christian President of the United States of Christianity?
This is no joke.
Her idea of reform seems to be getting rid of people who do not agree with her religious values.
Just a couple of weeks ago, her church hosted the founder of Jews for Jesus. Perhaps should would be happier if every Jew in the U.S. converted to fundamentalist Christianity, whether they wanted to or not.
This is not what America stands for. Or at least used to stand for. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
aka Dave
Joined: 02 May 2008 Location: Down by the river
|
Posted: Thu Sep 04, 2008 12:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
If the country is insane enough to elect a Republican ticket after the last 8 years, I sure as heck ain't going back. If you look at the actually content of the convention, it's personal smears and recycled ideology.
This actually could have been Nixon's convention, or Reagan's convention.
It's as if the last 8 years didn't exist. Well, when you've trashed the country, you play what ya got and hope the public is dumb enough to buy it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Gatsby
Joined: 09 Feb 2007
|
Posted: Thu Sep 04, 2008 12:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
If you want to know what evangelical Christians stand for, how they think, whether they are even sane, you have to go to their churches and watch. Better yet, go to a fundamentalist Church in Alaska.
Some of these people are really bizarre.
I watched a "famous" visiting evangelist in Alaska talk for a half hour.
In "tongues." Or, presumably one tongue.
Nothing at all, not one word, made any sense. But the speaker acted like it all made perfect sense, and so did everyone in the congregation.
He then, helpfully, translated his original sermon into English.
Wasn't that inspiring?!!! asked the person who had invited me.
And these evangelicals in Alaska have formed a political network, established by Jerry Prevo, which took over the Republican Party.
You can't understand Sarah Palin without looking at the evangelical conservative Republican movement she is a part of.
These people are dangerous, dishonest, extremist kooks.
Are you an evangelical Christian?
Then no problem.
You're not???
Read this:
| Quote: |
Two years after Representative Newt Gingrich helped draft the Contract With America to advance Republican positions, Ms. Palin and her passion for Republican ideology and religious faith overtook a town known for a wide libertarian streak and for helping start the Iditarod sled dog race.
�Sarah comes in with all this ideological stuff, and I was like, �Whoa,� � said Mr. Stein, who lost the election. �But that got her elected: abortion, gun rights, term limits and the religious born-again thing. I�m not a churchgoing guy, and that was another issue: �We will have our first Christian mayor.� �
�I thought: �Holy cow, what�s happening here? Does that mean she thinks I�m Jewish or Islamic?� � recalled Mr. Stein, who was raised Lutheran, and later went to work as the administrator for the city of Sitka in southeast Alaska. �The point was that she was a born-again Christian.� |
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/03/us/politics/03wasilla.html?sq=john%20stein%20wasilla&st=cse&scp=1&pagewanted=all
She forced most of the city's department heads out of a job, too. She tried to get rid of the city's librarian, who balked at banning books, but that was going too far for city residents.
Not an evangelical Christian? Are you pro-choice? Do you believe in the Constitutional guarantee of freedom of speech and religion? Then you are not a good, Christian person, and those "reformers" will reform you right out of a job if you work in government.
Last edited by Gatsby on Thu Sep 04, 2008 1:12 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ya-ta Boy
Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Location: Established in 1994
|
Posted: Thu Sep 04, 2008 1:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Last week there was criticism, justified, that the Democrats spoke with a lot of partisan rhetoric. I found Palin's speech refreshingly free of partisan rhetoric. Moreover, the general tone of the GOP convention is far more positive than the Democratic convention. I hope this trend of no negative attacks on the Democrats continues. It's uplifting to see the Republicans transcend the politics of fear. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Czarjorge

Joined: 01 May 2007 Location: I now have the same moustache, and it is glorious.
|
Posted: Thu Sep 04, 2008 1:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Ya-ta Boy wrote: |
| Last week there was criticism, justified, that the Democrats spoke with a lot of partisan rhetoric. I found Palin's speech refreshingly free of partisan rhetoric. Moreover, the general tone of the GOP convention is far more positive than the Democratic convention. I hope this trend of no negative attacks on the Democrats continues. It's uplifting to see the Republicans transcend the politics of fear. |
Wow, that comment was almost as WASP-y as Palin's speech.
Though I must admit I've a soft spot for nasty women, so I'm upgrading her from Tina Fey lookalike to MILF. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Gatsby
Joined: 09 Feb 2007
|
Posted: Thu Sep 04, 2008 1:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
Ya-ta Boy wrote:
| Quote: |
| Last week there was criticism, justified, that the Democrats spoke with a lot of partisan rhetoric. I found Palin's speech refreshingly free of partisan rhetoric. Moreover, the general tone of the GOP convention is far more positive than the Democratic convention. I hope this trend of no negative attacks on the Democrats continues. It's uplifting to see the Republicans transcend the politics of fear. |
I think you are absolutely right, Ya-Ta Boy.
I must apologize; I was completely wrong about Sarah Palin. Her speech converted me. I was very impressed by her foreign policy credentials. I like her plan for turning around the situation in Iraq. She made some excellent points on how to deal with Putin and his incursion into Georgia. She had impressive insight into the North Korean nuclear imbroglio. And I think she was right on the money on helping the average American deal with rising gas prices and inflation. Oh, the mortgage crisis -- it's as good as over once she is elected.
Yes, indeed, a very positive, constructive convention from the Republicans! I especially liked her "good Republican cloth coat."
I think John McCain made the right choice in picking Sarah Palin.
Please, please, please, keep her on the ticket!, Ike |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
aka Dave
Joined: 02 May 2008 Location: Down by the river
|
Posted: Thu Sep 04, 2008 2:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Ya-ta Boy wrote: |
| Last week there was criticism, justified, that the Democrats spoke with a lot of partisan rhetoric. I found Palin's speech refreshingly free of partisan rhetoric. Moreover, the general tone of the GOP convention is far more positive than the Democratic convention. I hope this trend of no negative attacks on the Democrats continues. It's uplifting to see the Republicans transcend the politics of fear. |
either troll or joke. Not sure which. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Gatsby
Joined: 09 Feb 2007
|
Posted: Thu Sep 04, 2008 2:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
Sarah Palin: One hot momma from one frigid state!
She's going to have the vote of every red blooded male in America!
One thing puzzles me, though.
Shouldn't John McCain formally accept the convention's nomination, nominate Sarah Palin, and the convention formally select Palin, so that she is officially the Republican nominee for vice president before they let her speak?
Does this mean we will have the honor of a second speech by Palin after she becomes the Republican's official nominee?
And what would have happened had Palin not electrified the base? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ddeubel

Joined: 20 Jul 2005
|
Posted: Thu Sep 04, 2008 2:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
I must apologize; I was completely wrong about Sarah Palin. Her speech converted me. I was very impressed by her foreign policy credentials. I like her plan for turning around the situation in Iraq. She made some excellent points on how to deal with Putin and his incursion into Georgia. She had impressive insight into the North Korean nuclear imbroglio. And I think she was right on the money on helping the average American deal with rising gas prices and inflation. Oh, the mortgage crisis -- it's as good as over once she is elected.
Yes, indeed, a very positive, constructive convention from the Republicans! I especially liked her "good Republican cloth coat."
I think John McCain made the right choice in picking Sarah Palin.
Please, please, please, keep her on the ticket!, Ike |
Please apologize some more....
You forgot to mention her great 5 step plan to revitalize the economy and also her farsighted policy of universal health care. You also missed her very astute analysis of America policy at the WTO and how she would create a more favorable trade balance, all the while bringing America back to a surplus. Her plan for bringing America back into the black is something that even Buffett couldn't have devised - pure genius. She also mentioned repeatedly her new rules for American foreign military intervention. But the highlight for me was her sterling presentation (with slides and examples - god dang she is smart!) on how to get American teenagers from dropping out of school in vast numbers.
Besides these things that you missed, good report.
DD |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
caniff
Joined: 03 Feb 2004 Location: All over the map
|
Posted: Thu Sep 04, 2008 3:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
| To get low-brow for a moment, I'd like to go on record as saying IMO she's not that great-looking. Somewhat low on the sex-appeal scale. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
johnriley007
Joined: 25 Jun 2004
|
Posted: Thu Sep 04, 2008 3:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| She certainly did well in her speech tonight. S. Palin does not offer an alternative to H. Clinton but rather an alternative to B. and M. Obama. |
Good. Let the comparisons begin between B/M Obama and Governor Palin and her husband and their association with the Alaskan Independence Party. It will be interesting to see how she handles this issue once she actually has to answer questions.
Press release with corrections from the AIP Chairman, Lynette Clark.
�
My statement was incorrect regarding the Governor's membership. What was correct was that Todd Palin was a member, that Sarah as a candidate for Governor appeared at the AIP Convention in 2006, and sent a welcoming DVD to the membership at the 2008 AIP statewide convention.
http://www.akip.org/090308.html
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZwvPNXYrIyI
From the Homepage of the AIP:
http://www.akip.org/index.html
The Alaskan Independence Party can be summed up in just two words:
ALASKA FIRST!
Until we as Alaskans receive our Ultimate Goal, the AIP will continue to strive to make Alaska a better place to live with less government interference in our everyday lives.
The Alaskan Independence Party's goal is the vote we were entitled to in 1958, one choice from among the following four alternatives:
1) Remain a Territory.
2) Become a separate and Independent Nation.
3) Accept Commonwealth status.
4) Become a State.
The call for this vote is in furtherance of the dream of the Alaskan Independence Party's founding father, Joe Vogler, which was for Alaskans to achieve independence under a minimal government, fully responsive to the people, promoting a peaceful and lawful means of resolving differences.
From the founder of the AIP, Joe Vogler:
http://www.akip.org/introduction.html
"I'm an Alaskan, not an American. I've got no use for America or her damned institutions."
Joe Vogler
Another Gem:
The AIP founder, Joe Vogler, made the comments in 1991, in an interview that's now housed at the Oral History Program in the Rasmuson Library at the University of Alaska, Fairbanks.
"The fires of hell are frozen glaciers compared to my hatred for the American government," Vogler said in the interview, in which he talked extensively about his desire for Alaskan secession, the key goal of the AIP.
"And I won't be buried under their damn flag," Vogler continued in the interview, which also touched on his disappointment with the American judicial system. "I'll be buried in Dawson. And when Alaska is an independent nation they can bring my bones home."
At another point, Volger advocated renouncing allegiance to the United States. In the course of denouncing Federal regulation over land, he said: "And then you get mad. And you say, the hell with them. And you renounce allegiance, and you pledge your efforts, your effects, your honor, your life to Alaska." |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|