|
Korean Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
aboxofchocolates

Joined: 21 Mar 2008 Location: on your mind
|
Posted: Wed Sep 24, 2008 6:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| rubric wrote: |
| Quote: |
I wouldn't bother. Just good w@nking material for cornfed and his ilk.
lol, thanks for the summary. I'll give this one a miss then. |
Good advice. Most of this will go right over your head anyway. Best to give it a miss, miss.
This one may be more manageable http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xf4LO_hlReU&feature=related |
Ooooh, aren�t we just the meanest meanie on the whole wide internet!
Seriously, there is no need to be hostile. If I ever post a link to a diatribe on how misogynistic racist man-boys will be the downfall of the western world and you choose to give it a miss, I will totally understand! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Adventurer

Joined: 28 Jan 2006
|
Posted: Wed Sep 24, 2008 8:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| aboxofchocolates wrote: |
| rubric wrote: |
| Quote: |
I wouldn't bother. Just good w@nking material for cornfed and his ilk.
lol, thanks for the summary. I'll give this one a miss then. |
Good advice. Most of this will go right over your head anyway. Best to give it a miss, miss.
This one may be more manageable http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xf4LO_hlReU&feature=related |
Ooooh, aren�t we just the meanest meanie on the whole wide internet!
Seriously, there is no need to be hostile. If I ever post a link to a diatribe on how misogynistic racist man-boys will be the downfall of the western world and you choose to give it a miss, I will totally understand! |
I will be honest that long ago the word feminist didn't bother me, but generally when I hear it I cringe just as much as I would cringe if you said the name Osama Bin Ladin. The moderate feminists need to come up with a new word. I mean the feminists who don't mind guys who are gentlemen, assertive, open doors, bring flowers, while respecting the women and their rights and worth. No matter how I try, I just don't like the word feminism. I have no problem with the word feminine or masculine or man and woman, but the word feminism has negative connotations or many males and females. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Big_Bird

Joined: 31 Jan 2003 Location: Sometimes here sometimes there...
|
Posted: Wed Sep 24, 2008 8:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Adventurer wrote: |
| aboxofchocolates wrote: |
| rubric wrote: |
| Quote: |
I wouldn't bother. Just good w@nking material for cornfed and his ilk.
lol, thanks for the summary. I'll give this one a miss then. |
Good advice. Most of this will go right over your head anyway. Best to give it a miss, miss.
This one may be more manageable http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xf4LO_hlReU&feature=related |
Ooooh, aren�t we just the meanest meanie on the whole wide internet!
Seriously, there is no need to be hostile. If I ever post a link to a diatribe on how misogynistic racist man-boys will be the downfall of the western world and you choose to give it a miss, I will totally understand! |
I will be honest that long ago the word feminist didn't bother me, but generally when I hear it I cringe just as much as I would cringe if you said the name Osama Bin Ladin. The moderate feminists need to come up with a new word. I mean the feminists who don't mind guys who are gentlemen, assertive, open doors, bring flowers, while respecting the women and their rights and worth. No matter how I try, I just don't like the word feminism. I have no problem with the word feminine or masculine or man and woman, but the word feminism has negative connotations or many males and females. |
Yeah, but any new word that replaces it would immediately be ridiculed and denigrated. You'd be changing the word every 3 years. Myself, I prefer to see it under the umbrella of 'human rights.'
And there are so many branches of feminism. Different 'feminists' have different views - sometimes opposing. It's usually only the most outrageous or extremist that get air time though; thus any word you choose will eventually become synonymous with 'crazy evil hairy-legged man-hating dykes' or what ever silly stereotype your average yob cares to conjure. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jkelly80

Joined: 13 Jun 2007 Location: you boys like mexico?
|
Posted: Wed Sep 24, 2008 11:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Feminism has a problem in that women were second class citizens for way too long in western society, but once they received rights they act just as petulant, spoiled and self-absorbed as any other member of our society.
Therefore even though feminists have legitimate grievances, its usually about past events or conditions in undeveloped regions in their societies. Or even the Third World (I loved talking about the role of American women and then somebody would bring up the Taliban and burqas when losing a debate). Even when they do make good points, they still too often come off as whiny and vindictive. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
aboxofchocolates

Joined: 21 Mar 2008 Location: on your mind
|
Posted: Thu Sep 25, 2008 1:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Big_Bird wrote: |
| Adventurer wrote: |
| aboxofchocolates wrote: |
| rubric wrote: |
| Quote: |
I wouldn't bother. Just good w@nking material for cornfed and his ilk.
lol, thanks for the summary. I'll give this one a miss then. |
Good advice. Most of this will go right over your head anyway. Best to give it a miss, miss.
This one may be more manageable http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xf4LO_hlReU&feature=related |
Ooooh, aren�t we just the meanest meanie on the whole wide internet!
Seriously, there is no need to be hostile. If I ever post a link to a diatribe on how misogynistic racist man-boys will be the downfall of the western world and you choose to give it a miss, I will totally understand! |
I will be honest that long ago the word feminist didn't bother me, but generally when I hear it I cringe just as much as I would cringe if you said the name Osama Bin Ladin. The moderate feminists need to come up with a new word. I mean the feminists who don't mind guys who are gentlemen, assertive, open doors, bring flowers, while respecting the women and their rights and worth. No matter how I try, I just don't like the word feminism. I have no problem with the word feminine or masculine or man and woman, but the word feminism has negative connotations or many males and females. |
Yeah, but any new word that replaces it would immediately be ridiculed and denigrated. You'd be changing the word every 3 years. Myself, I prefer to see it under the umbrella of 'human rights.'
And there are so many branches of feminism. Different 'feminists' have different views - sometimes opposing. It's usually only the most outrageous or extremist that get air time though; thus any word you choose will eventually become synonymous with 'crazy evil hairy-legged man-hating dykes' or what ever silly stereotype your average yob cares to conjure. |
A lot of men and women who are entirely feminist in their beliefs and actions choose not to identify as such because of those negative connotations.
A few years ago one of my professors listed some of the major tenets of feminist theory and asked if we agreed with them. The majority of men and all but one of the women in the room raised their hands. He then asked who called themselves a feminist. No one, myself included, raised their hands. His point was there are all sorts of closet feminists running around that will not identify as feminists because of the stigma attached.
I am not a moderate feminist, I am a radical feminist in the truest sense of the term; I believe major systemic change is necessary for real equality in our society. I also have no problem with men opening doors for me and giving me flowers. I hope they don't mind when I open doors for them or pay for the occasional dinner- reciprocity is important in any relationship and it is up to the individuals involved to find their own balance. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
prideofidaho
Joined: 19 Mar 2008
|
Posted: Thu Sep 25, 2008 1:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
I'm not sure I care enough about online discussions of this topic...no offense, but it's just a topic that I'd rather hash through face-to-face, but I just have to say this.
The point about feminism being utterly absorbed in past grievances is an interesting one that I think about often. However, I'm not sure if I buy that a simple 'wave of the wand' led to a time where women are now just as equal as men. I also think it best to look at certain situations and not simply: North/Central and South American societies, African societies, European societies or Asian societies.
I also think it's wise to consider that in a time now where balances between people are so public and seemingly widespread, a vast majority of those humans in situations where dire and immediate help is needed are women and children.
I can't wave around any statistical evidence...partly cause I'm too lazy, but it's not unheard of for women to be the most affected in wartime situations, primarily cause they're partners, brothers, and fathers have all been killed.
So those are the sorts of things I think about when I call myself a feminist and ponder the movement. That, and my status as a woman here in Korea (and the status of my fellow Korean sisters). We're not related, by the way.
That' all I have to say I think.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Adventurer

Joined: 28 Jan 2006
|
Posted: Thu Sep 25, 2008 10:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
Well, I do prefer the term human rights than feminism. I am somewhat old-fashioned in some areas in that I believe males should some toughness, backbone, assertiveness, but I don't believe that we should we use our energy for violence. I think increasingly there is more violence directed against females in the modern era when compared to the past, and it is troubling. It is not being done by gentlemen, that's for sure.
I am of the believe that a healthy dynamic needs to exist between females and males otherwise the culture becomes dysfunctional.
I also value femininity more than I value feminisim, and I value masculinity more than I value machismo. I think we need masculinity and femininity. What's wrong with that? We love women for their femininity which is a different that should be appreciated and men are loved for their masculinity. We can balance each other out.
I think males and females are being educated in a way where there is no balance of the energies that produce healthy males and females, and there is more and more dysfunctionality. It is normal for men and women to relate each other. It is our nature to do so, but our minds have been so infected with these ideologies of feminism, addiction to the idea of a soulmate, the increased materialism out there and looking for our mates to fit some outer perfection that is not realistic.
Yes, we need to focus on human rights and the fact that we are both part of humanity. I have no problem with a woman paying for my dinner. Plenty of women have done that. I just generally pay for the first date, and I don't mind being a gentleman. I was raised that way, and I also respect women. I just do not respect the idea of women getting too defensive amongst men as if we must prove we are worthy or men who are chauvinistic either. Both kinds of people annoy me.
I support human rights. I just do not support people wanting to view men and women as the same. They are not, and there is nothing wrong with that. They just should be equal in worth, pay, and both should be respect, because one is not better than the other. Men shouldn't feel strange if they lovingly call a female friend babe when he is not hitting on her. He is just being endearing just like a waitress might be if she used the same word with a regular coming into the diner. Why can't we be a little more relaxed and embrace each other? Is it too much to ask? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
peppermint

Joined: 13 May 2003 Location: traversing the minefields of caddishness.
|
Posted: Thu Sep 25, 2008 10:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Adventurer wrote: |
| Well, I do prefer the term human rights than feminism. I am somewhat old-fashioned in some areas in that I believe males should some toughness, backbone, assertiveness, |
Why only males? I was of the impression that a little toughness, backbone and assertiveness were good qualities in general, if not strictly necessary for survival in modern society. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Adventurer

Joined: 28 Jan 2006
|
Posted: Thu Sep 25, 2008 6:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| peppermint wrote: |
| Adventurer wrote: |
| Well, I do prefer the term human rights than feminism. I am somewhat old-fashioned in some areas in that I believe males should some toughness, backbone, assertiveness, |
Why only males? I was of the impression that a little toughness, backbone and assertiveness were good qualities in general, if not strictly necessary for survival in modern society. |
No one said only males. However, whether it is a general thing due to DNA or biology or simply culture, which I doubt, there are general expectations of males from females and other males and vice versa and some behaviors that are tolerated amongst females are less tolerated amongst males, because of the nature.
There are different expectations of what is expected of males from other males and from males no matter what many people tell you in the modern era, the paradigm hasn't really changed much in terms of de facto expectations, only in parlance amongst some people. That's been my experience from what I observed. You can say there are difference amongst the sexes and there are general differences, and the generalities often do not apply, because there are many grey areas, because we are dealing with human beings. The point is men and women are different not simply, because they are anatomically different. There are general psychological and biological differences. We are more similar than different, of course. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
aboxofchocolates

Joined: 21 Mar 2008 Location: on your mind
|
Posted: Thu Sep 25, 2008 8:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Adventurer wrote: |
No one said only males. However, whether it is a general thing due to DNA or biology or simply culture, which I doubt, there are general expectations of males from females and other males and vice versa and some behaviors that are tolerated amongst females are less tolerated amongst males, because of the nature.
|
You clearly lean to the "nature" side of the "nature vs nurture" debate. I'm more of a "nurture" advocate myself. However, rather than hash out that tired old discussion, Lets go to some common ground. Consider the "grey areas" you were mentioning: those people who do not fit the pre-conceived notions of what is feminine (or masculine).
In a free society what is wrong with behavior outside social expectations so long as no one is injured and no laws are broken? For example, I have met women who love looking pretty and wear high heel shoes until their feet bleed and are happy to do so. More power to them. But what if that isn't your cup of tea? Should you be forced to toe the line?
At this point I would like to thank all women before me who fought the good fight and won for me this moment in time where I could walk around in jeans and comfortable shoes without fear of overwhelming reprisal. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Adventurer

Joined: 28 Jan 2006
|
Posted: Thu Sep 25, 2008 8:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| aboxofchocolates wrote: |
| Adventurer wrote: |
No one said only males. However, whether it is a general thing due to DNA or biology or simply culture, which I doubt, there are general expectations of males from females and other males and vice versa and some behaviors that are tolerated amongst females are less tolerated amongst males, because of the nature.
|
You clearly lean to the "nature" side of the "nature vs nurture" debate. I'm more of a "nurture" advocate myself. However, rather than hash out that tired old discussion, Lets go to some common ground. Consider the "grey areas" you were mentioning: those people who do not fit the pre-conceived notions of what is feminine (or masculine).
In a free society what is wrong with behavior outside social expectations so long as no one is injured and no laws are broken? For example, I have met women who love looking pretty and wear high heel shoes until their feet bleed and are happy to do so. More power to them. But what if that isn't your cup of tea? Should you be forced to toe the line?
At this point I would like to thank all women before me who fought the good fight and won for me this moment in time where I could walk around in jeans and comfortable shoes without fear of overwhelming reprisal. |
You seem like a reasonable person. I think nature versus nurture arguments involve, quite often, one over the other. I think both are extremely important. You have to nurture certain kinds of general behavior in society, but it doesn't mean placing females and males in some strict gender box. That is unfair, and it actually goes against nature somewhat, because nature doesn't operate on some neat continuum. It does not.
When women were constrained in the past, men were constrained in many ways as well. We are beholden now to different forces that tie into our genders and our sexuality which includes more violent images on television which renders an abuse of the masculine rather than making the best of the masculine and in some ways the worst is being brought out of many females, but I am no expert on how the media and nouvelle culture is affecting the other gender.
As far as women looking all pretty and elegant, that is not for every female anymore than every male wants to look like Romeo.
Though I said I do think nature plays a huge role, there is some grey, and that grey must be accepted for their to be a more democratic society.
However, the idea of trying to suppress feminity and masculinity in society makes people worse, and I believe that is occuring. It leads to societal dysfunction. We are not of the same gender, so we are different, generally, and what's wrong with that? A society where women are expected to hide the fact that they smoke or only wear dresses would be rather dull and unfair. In the past, when most men were controlled in the West, there was even more control over the women. We need more equality in the world between all people. We need more human rights. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
BreakfastInBed

Joined: 16 Oct 2007 Location: Gyeonggi do
|
Posted: Fri Sep 26, 2008 6:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
I apologize for having nothing meaningful to contribute, but this
| prideofidaho wrote: |
| it's not unheard of for women to be the most affected in wartime situations, primarily cause they're partners, brothers, and fathers have all been killed. |
is priceless.
(no offense prideofidaho, I think I know what you mean)
(ok, a little offense, but it's just too funny) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rubric

Joined: 28 Oct 2006 Location: Pongdongfongyong
|
Posted: Fri Sep 26, 2008 4:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I think I know what she means.
It speaks volumes and is why it can often be difficult talking about the evils of radical feminism with a Western woman who has been exposed to university education.
However, there's a type that quickly swoop and attack any kind of message that challenges the view they have been raised on.
There is a lot of moron-ish and simplistic argument out there that attempts to illustrate the flaws in radical feminism, but this was one of the few articulate and logically presented blogs I stumbled across.
Camille Paglia is another good example, imo, of a writer and thinker who has found that radical feminism has become a vile, destructive, self-protecting, and self-serving philosophy.
http://dir.salon.com/topics/camille_paglia/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
prideofidaho
Joined: 19 Mar 2008
|
Posted: Fri Sep 26, 2008 5:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Sorry, but why is it so priceless? Is it one of those "It's funny 'cause it's true" things? Or is it a "Oh, cute!!! look what SHE said" Or maybe it's something else. I'm just asking.
I just find it odd that so many people are ready and quick to bash feminism now, arguing we've seen the benefits of its labour, and it's now time to bury the hatchet. It's weird because the rest of our planet hasn't seen any result. I'm not being negative or pessimistic, but what the hell is up with that?
Also, what's up with not being able to make the distinction between psycho-radical man-hating feminists and those who are simply questioning our society roles and standards? It's not hard...just use ya brain a little. I only want equality among all people. And I don't believe we're there yet. Plain and simple. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
BreakfastInBed

Joined: 16 Oct 2007 Location: Gyeonggi do
|
Posted: Fri Sep 26, 2008 6:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| prideofidaho wrote: |
| Sorry, but why is it so priceless? Is it one of those "It's funny 'cause it's true" things? Or is it a "Oh, cute!!! look what SHE said" Or maybe it's something else. I'm just asking. |
KILLED!! They've been KILLED!! Women are most affected?! Let me rephrase it. They've been KILLED!! KILLED!! What's more "affected" than that?
Like I said, I think I know what you're driving at, I've read too about the extreme sufferings of women, children, and the elderly in wartime. And I have no particular beef with the basic tenets of feminism as I understand them. I have a mother and sister whom I love dearly and want to see live in a just world. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|