Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Why aren't more people protesting the Wall Street Bailout?
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Leslie Cheswyck



Joined: 31 May 2003
Location: University of Western Chile

PostPosted: Fri Sep 26, 2008 4:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ya-ta Boy wrote:
The Defenestration of Prague. I thought everybody knew that.


I'm more familiar with the one that happened in 1948. Well, we learn something every day.

Anyway, the events of 1637 may be of interest to readers of this thread. The more things change...


Last edited by Leslie Cheswyck on Fri Sep 26, 2008 4:39 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ya-ta Boy



Joined: 16 Jan 2003
Location: Established in 1994

PostPosted: Fri Sep 26, 2008 4:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
Then you shouldn't support this bailout. You should support a different plan.


WHAT different plan?

All I see on the table is a) kick in $700 billion or b) sit back and do nothing.

mises posted something about 150 economists (and 3 Nobelers) objecting to the plan but offered nothing in its place.

A depression is unacceptable as a plan IF there is anything that can be done to prevent it. Hoover tried that...as did previous presidents in previous depressions.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Kuros



Joined: 27 Apr 2004

PostPosted: Fri Sep 26, 2008 4:39 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Gopher wrote:
Kuros: you cannot predict how a great-depression-like event, beginning in the United States and spreading elsewhere, will unfold and where all the ripples will go.

We do, however, have a historical example before us.


Yes, and I just distinguished it by telling you we don't have Hawley-Smoot in our way this time.

Why don't you support the bailout by demonstrating how this is like other moments in history, rather than us trying to argue against vague apparitions of doom?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
mises



Joined: 05 Nov 2007
Location: retired

PostPosted: Fri Sep 26, 2008 4:40 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Dammit you people are listening to the same people who caused this crises or ignored the looming crises. Now they are crying for a huge bailout and you're trusting them.

Not bailing them out WILL NOT cause a depression. Bailing them out MIGHT.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Gopher



Joined: 04 Jun 2005

PostPosted: Fri Sep 26, 2008 4:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Kuros wrote:
...support the bailout.


Easy. Here is, in part, besides H. Paulson's arguments, why I support it: I trust these voices.

Quote:
New York's billionaire mayor says Congress has to approve a bailout of the financial industry. The alternative, he says, would be "inconceivable."

Asked about the issue Friday on his weekly radio show, Mayor Michael Bloomberg envisioned a scenario in which "the world is shutting down. You would literally have the banks closing their doors."

Adds the businessman-turned-politician: "If you work in the automobile business ... nobody's going to buy a car if they can't finance it. Your kid's not going to be able to have a college education. You can't close down society."

On Friday morning, a stalemate continued on a proposed $700 billion bailout package, which Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson insists is urgently needed.


Forbes.com

Quote:
The legendary investor Warren Buffett reckons the US government can make a sizeable profit if it manages its $700bn (�377bn) banking bailout package carefully - and he urged Congress to act quickly to avert an "economic Pearl Harbour".

Having been uncharacteristically quiet through much of the financial crisis, the world's richest man broke cover late on Tuesday by investing $5bn in Goldman Sachs, delivering a powerful shot in the arm to the sickly banking industry.

The Nebraska-based billionaire, whose fortune is estimated at $62bn, threw his weight wholeheartedly behind Henry Paulson's rescue package for Wall Street, arguing that US industry will "grind to a halt" without action.

"Last week, we were at the brink of something that would have made anything that's happened in financial history pale," Buffett told CNBC television. "I'm not saying the Paulson plan will eliminate the problems but it's absolutely necessary, in my view, to avoid going off the precipice..."


The Guardian
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
blaseblasphemener



Joined: 01 Jun 2006
Location: There's a voice, keeps on calling me, down the road, that's where I'll always be

PostPosted: Fri Sep 26, 2008 4:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

There is another choice, the Swedish choice.

The money is given, but the government gets ownership, not just giving out a loan.

No one is talking about it because Wall Street wants its' cake and eat it too.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
sojourner1



Joined: 17 Apr 2007
Location: Where meggi swim and 2 wheeled tractors go sput put chug alugg pug pug

PostPosted: Fri Sep 26, 2008 7:05 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The government is taking possession of banks when they fail, but it's handing them back over to other leaders of the same feather. The government is still solvent enough to prevent disaster by consolidating failures into other banks like we're seeing, but this can't go on. This solvency is based on what seems like a never ending supply of debt to finance this failure caused by incompetent leaders. Companies have not been hiring competent professionals due to the desire to cheat, because competent professionals follow ethics and the rules of the game instead of lobbying the government to bend over backwards for their intentional mistakes out of greed.

I say hold a special vote on whether to bail them out with the $700b or do something else like reinvent an economy that works for the people. We need to have a special vote and if it were a true democracy, they'd let the people decide what to do.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mises



Joined: 05 Nov 2007
Location: retired

PostPosted: Fri Sep 26, 2008 7:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

America is not a financial superpower anymore. This, for the same reason that I am not going to capitalize a large hedge fund tomorrow. I (it) doesn't have enough money.

It is over.

The US needs to accept that it is going to be (in the short/medium run IF the economy is run well) a "bottom" in international finance because it does not have any money.

This whole 700b bailout is the US trying to preserve that which is gone. It is NOT a financial superpower anymore. I still can be an economic one. And that is much more powerful.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ya-ta Boy



Joined: 16 Jan 2003
Location: Established in 1994

PostPosted: Fri Sep 26, 2008 7:20 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
The money is given, but the government gets ownership, not just giving out a loan.


This is more possible in Sweden because they have no difficulty with Democratic Socialism. You can't really say that about the US. I'm afraid if someone seriously suggested the government own large chunks of the economy, there would be heads exploding all over the Right. Even if there were 'Sell by' dates on each deed, it would be pretty much impossible to get people to accept it.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Tiger Beer



Joined: 07 Feb 2003

PostPosted: Fri Sep 26, 2008 9:39 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

mises wrote:
This Salon Radio interview is an absolute must listen for anybody interested in this subject.

http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/radio/2008/09/24/digby/index.html

Yes, this is what I am sadly seeing. McCain rejecting a bailout, and Bush invited Obama and Democrats to help him with it.

This is a very messy situation, and anyone assisting will ultimately be blamed, particularly as this bailout is a pure lose-lose situation.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
gangpae



Joined: 03 Sep 2007
Location: Busan

PostPosted: Fri Sep 26, 2008 10:24 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

What some contributors on this thread don't seem to understand is that the financial system has already collapsed. Perhaps sometime in the future economists will identify the exact mortgage default that set the disaster in motion, but now the when and why are moot. Compared to 1929 the problem is even more pernicious, because now the core source of the problem (mortgage default) has been so well discombobulated into derivatives beyond human comprehension, it may take years, nay decades to figure out.


The laws of economics dictate that market decisions are governed by fear and greed. Fear tends to impinge on liquidity, and the present fear will put a squeeze on liquidity tighter than a bull's butt in fly season. No liquidity and the whole system grinds to a halt. Precipitous decline in demand will create deflation, and deflation is a financial whirlpool almost impossible to escape from, because what tools to do central bankers have for fighting deflation?

Have no doubt September 14, 2007 equals October 28, 1929, and failure to take action would be nothing short of criminal negligence, resulting in severe economic hardship around the world. Of course 700 billion is a low-ball figure, and it may well cost much more to sort the mortgage mess out. It will definitely mean higher taxes and a whole different set of problems, but we need to stay in the game and slog our way through this problem. Laissez-faire may well work, but what if it doesn't? I am not brave enough for the risk and prefer to err on the side of caution.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
khyber



Joined: 16 Jan 2003
Location: Compunction Junction

PostPosted: Fri Sep 26, 2008 10:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Here's a guy not in government (I think) who provides some great ways to avoid this credit hoopy loopy again.
http://businessbytes.blogspot.com/2007/08/market-meltdown-smoke-and-mirrors.html
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
RJjr



Joined: 17 Aug 2006
Location: Turning on a Lamp

PostPosted: Fri Sep 26, 2008 11:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

These banks that are failing have proven themselves to be incompetent losers. If the bankers want money invested in a loser, maybe they should put their personal fortunes on the 1 win, 3 loss Mississippi State Bulldogs to win big today and leave the money of other Americans alone.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
canuckistan
Mod Team
Mod Team


Joined: 17 Jun 2003
Location: Training future GS competitors.....

PostPosted: Sat Sep 27, 2008 5:52 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Of course the bailout is deplorable, but markets are all about psychology.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Privateer



Joined: 31 Aug 2005
Location: Easy Street.

PostPosted: Sat Sep 27, 2008 9:53 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Gopher wrote:
You people oppose the proposed intervention, the bailout plan? I think people who post here, for the large part, remain simple and stubborn "anti" people, no matter the course of action or proposed course of action. If the W. Bush Administration found a cancer vaccination, I imagine you would even oppose that, too.


No matter the course of action? No, I'm quite in favour of the single payer healthcare system which has been proposed over and over again, but which you people seem stubbornly set against.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Page 4 of 6

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International