|
Korean Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Gopher

Joined: 04 Jun 2005
|
Posted: Sat Sep 27, 2008 11:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
What we are talking about when we predict the imminent collapse of "the American Empire" -- assuming "we" does not refer to the likes of M. Imadinnerjacket and H. Chavez and co. -- is the imminent collapse of the postwar Atlantic system, especially Bretton Woods/Bretton Woods II, the American-led currency-relations system, as well as the American-led and/or created World Bank, IMF, and other financial institutions such as IADB. Also include the American-created and -led military alliance, NATO, and American forces stationed abroad in places such as South Korea and the Gulf. Also include power-projection via nuclear-powered carrier task forces stationed globally.
Nothing lasts forever, true. And none of us knows what the final date in the "Postwar American Hegemony (1945-XXXX)" entry will someday read. But I do know that we are not there yet. Neither do I believe that we are presently facing a sudden decline, unravelling, and collapse.
And let me assure all of those who are celebrating that day, or smugly chiding America for "wanting to dominate the world," etc., if we go down in a sudden collapse, especially in a Great-Depression-like event, we will unfortunately take a lot of others with us, and then regionalism, chaos, and war will follow (Britain has tied itself to the United States since the Truman Doctrine -- who will Britain tie itself to now?; think Russia without NATO pointed at it; think Iran and Israel going aggressive in one form or another; think of what might follow that in the Middle East and Europe; think China and Taiwan; think a rearmed and likely a nuclear-armed Japan and what might follow that in East Asia, not simply militarily, but political-economy-wise, etc., etc.) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ya-ta Boy
Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Location: Established in 1994
|
Posted: Sun Sep 28, 2008 12:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
Officers at the US Pacific Command's headquarters in Honolulu said senior Chinese naval officers have told Admiral Timothy Keating, the Pacific Commander, that they planned to build aircraft carriers in the near future. When those warships are ready for sea duty, the Chinese said, perhaps the US should withdraw to the eastern Pacific while China patrolled the western Pacific.
Keating, the officers said, politely but firmly responded that the US would not retire from the western Pacific.
Beazley did little to conceal an Australian fear, one shared by most American allies in Asia and the Pacific, that the new administration in Washington would turn its back on them in favor of Europe and the Middle East. "It behooves Australia," Beazley said, "to devote particular intellectual effort to ensure that the increasing value of the alliance to its partner is not unnecessarily diminished."
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/09/how_will_the_candidates_deal_w.html |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Kuros
Joined: 27 Apr 2004
|
Posted: Sun Sep 28, 2008 9:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
Chinese aircraft carriers are more than a decade away. And then they'll have one or two to America's half dozen active carrier groups.
India commissions its second carrier this year, and a third in 2012. The Brits have two, France one, hell, Spain and Italy each have one. Thailand has the smallest carrier.
All China has is the never commissioned Varyag from Russia. It sits there, since China promised never to activate it as a condition to purchase. China's naval projection is a joke. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mithridates

Joined: 03 Mar 2003 Location: President's office, Korean Space Agency
|
Posted: Sun Sep 28, 2008 9:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
| I don't get the feeling that any country in the world even wants to take the US' place as a superpower. Headaches galore. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
chris_J2

Joined: 17 Apr 2006 Location: From Brisbane, Au.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Gopher

Joined: 04 Jun 2005
|
Posted: Sun Sep 28, 2008 9:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
| mithridates wrote: |
| I don't get the feeling that any country in the world even wants to take the US' place as a superpower. Headaches galore. |
Then you are projecting your own ignorant impressions onto world affairs. Brazil and Argentina have long shared dreams of regional hegemony, presiding over South American affairs (with F. Castro and a very hysterical, and largely ineffective H. Chavez coming in behind them; but they remain flashes in the pan, no more no less; there is a long continuity to Brazil and Argentina's dreams, dating from the independence era). Iran has such dreams in the Middle East, today. India wants to take a more influential position in world affairs. China aims for space-capable, global superpower status, and at least parity with the United States, backed by a blue-water navy (which I would embrace as a mostly good thing, as I subscribe to C. Layne's offshore-balancing thesis).
Sorry to burst your bubble, but America is not the only nation-state with dreams of influencing world affairs and world history.
And, finally, I do not believe any of these interests are aiming "to dominate the world" as in Lex Luthor and the Legion of Doom, or Darth Vader and "the Empire." Those days ended after the Second World War, when the empires collapsed. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mithridates

Joined: 03 Mar 2003 Location: President's office, Korean Space Agency
|
Posted: Sun Sep 28, 2008 10:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Kuros wrote: |
Chinese aircraft carriers are more than a decade away. And then they'll have one or two to America's half dozen active carrier groups.
India commissions its second carrier this year, and a third in 2012. The Brits have two, France one, hell, Spain and Italy each have one. Thailand has the smallest carrier.
All China has is the never commissioned Varyag from Russia. It sits there, since China promised never to activate it as a condition to purchase. China's naval projection is a joke. |
Plus they also can't even export non-poisonous milk. You can generally tell the emergence of a superpower first by the effect on its neighboring countries, and as yet Korea and Japan are still a long way away from being convinced that China has what it takes to replace the US in any capacity.
Never knew about the Varyag before. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Gopher

Joined: 04 Jun 2005
|
Posted: Sun Sep 28, 2008 12:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| mithridates wrote: |
| You can generally tell the emergence of a superpower first by the effect on its neighboring countries... |
No, this is wrong. You merely describe a regional power. And not all regional powers become superpowers.
One can generally observe the emergence of a superpower by the way regional powers and other superpowers treat it, especially once they begin according it respect in world affairs.
After the American Navy grew, for example, first Britain and then Spain backed out of the Caribbean Basin and the Philippines, expressly following American-dicated terms -- not the kind of conversations Ya-ta Boy references, above. All of the superpowers of the time treated America as a competitor in China as well. America intervened, diplomatically, and negotiated the Russo-Japanese War's conclusion.
Or take post-Napoleonic wars Britain, where both Spain and France, and behind them, Russia, accepted British terms on the Latin American independence movements: no recolonization. I refer to the Polignac Memorandum.
And China, although well-prepositioned as a permanent member of the UN Security Council, is not there yet. In some ways, China is performing very well. Beijing is reaching out into space. In other ways, China is nowhere near where the United States was in the 1880s and 1890s, or where Britain was just before, during, and especially after the Napoleonic wars. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SirFink

Joined: 05 Mar 2006
|
Posted: Sun Sep 28, 2008 3:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| mises wrote: |
| The empire is done, shortly. America will be fine. You don't need to dominate the world to be wealthy and healthy. |
It's probably the opposite. I'm all for America becoming an also-ran. Put us next to Iceland and let us chug along on our merry way. Let the EU step up and try to run things now. Let's see how much they like it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ddeubel

Joined: 20 Jul 2005
|
Posted: Sun Sep 28, 2008 4:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Those thoughtlessly believing that there will be an "end of American history" are very wrong. This is just not looking at the real facts/picture and merely going with the hollow media echo and sound bites that parade as knowledge.
America by every indicator that counts is strong. Not saying the economy is sound but when you measure things that really count -- individual freedoms (movement / business), competitiveness, entrepreneurship, higher education etc.... (there is a long list) America is at or near the top. Add on its incredible size and diversity and you get the BIG picture.
America will be around and influential for a long time. The question is whether she will do the right thing. Meaning, stop a policy of exceptionalism and interventionism - stop killing thousands of the world's people and relying on its military for both economic fuel and foreign policy. It is the military nature of America, along with its now decreasingly defunct journalistic tradition and waning judicial influence that I see as "weaknesses" and even wrongs in its make up.
But this article is like so much else --- sensationalism.
DD
http://eflclassroom.ning.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Safron

Joined: 05 Feb 2007 Location: portland, or
|
Posted: Sun Sep 28, 2008 4:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| When has an empire ever fallen from power peacefully? Just a question... This isn't over yet. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mises
Joined: 05 Nov 2007 Location: retired
|
Posted: Sun Sep 28, 2008 4:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| America won't "Fall". It will decline. Rapidly, perhaps. It will be a financial decline first, as the military is so far ahead of everybody else. But her ability to shape the world will be and has been dramatically decreased. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee

Joined: 25 May 2003
|
Posted: Sun Sep 28, 2008 4:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
Op-Ed Columnist
Green the Bailout
By THOMAS L. FRIEDMAN
Many things make me weep about the current economic crisis, but none more than this brief economic history: In the 19th century, America had a railroad boom, bubble and bust. Some people made money; many lost money. But even when that bubble burst, it left America with an infrastructure of railroads that made transcontinental travel and shipping dramatically easier and cheaper.
The late 20th century saw an Internet boom, bubble and bust. Some people made money; many people lost money, but that dot-com bubble left us with an Internet highway system that helped Microsoft, I.B.M. and Google to spearhead the I.T. revolution.
The early 21st century saw a boom, bubble and now a bust around financial services. But I fear all it will leave behind are a bunch of empty Florida condos that never should have been built, used private jets that the wealthy can no longer afford and dead derivative contracts that no one can understand.
Worse, we borrowed the money for this bubble from China, and now we have to pay it back � with interest and without any lasting benefit.
Yes, this bailout is necessary. This is a credit crisis, and credit crises involve a breakdown in confidence that leads to no one lending to anyone. You don�t fool around with a credit crisis. You have to overwhelm it with capital. Unfortunately, some people who don�t deserve it will be rescued. But, more importantly, those who had nothing to do with it will be spared devastation. You have to save the system.
But that is not the point of this column. The point is, we don�t just need a bailout. We need a buildup. We need to get back to making stuff, based on real engineering not just financial engineering. We need to get back to a world where people are able to realize the American Dream � a house with a yard � because they have built something with their hands, not because they got a �liar loan� from an underregulated bank with no money down and nothing to pay for two years. The American Dream is an aspiration, not an entitlement.
When I need reminding of the real foundations of the American Dream, I talk to my Indian-American immigrant friends who have come here to start new companies � friends like K.R. Sridhar, the founder of Bloom Energy. He e-mailed me a pep talk in the midst of this financial crisis � a note about the difference between surviving and thriving.
�Infants and the elderly who are disabled obsess about survival,� said Sridhar. �As a nation, if we just focus on survival, the demise of our leadership is imminent. We are thrivers. Thrivers are constantly looking for new opportunities to seize and lead and be No. 1.� That is what America is about.
But we have lost focus on that. Our economy is like a car, added Sridhar, and the financial institutions are the transmission system that keeps the wheels turning and the car moving forward. Real production of goods that create absolute value and jobs, though, are the engine.
�I cannot help but ponder about how quickly we are ready to act on fixing the transmission, by pumping in almost one trillion dollars in a fortnight,� said Sridhar. �On the other hand, the engine, which is slowly dying, is not even getting an oil change or a tuneup with the same urgency, let alone a trillion dollars to get ourselves a new engine. Just imagine what a trillion-dollar investment would return to the economy, including the �transmission,� if we committed at that level to green jobs and technologies.�
Indeed, when this bailout is over, we need the next president � this one is wasted � to launch an E.T., energy technology, revolution with the same urgency as this bailout. Otherwise, all we will have done is bought ourselves a respite, but not a future. The exciting thing about the energy technology revolution is that it spans the whole economy � from green-collar construction jobs to high-tech solar panel designing jobs. It could lift so many boats.
In a green economy, we would rely less on credit from foreigners �and more on creativity from Americans,� argued Van Jones, president of Green for All, and author of the forthcoming �The Green Collar Economy.� �It�s time to stop borrowing and start building. America�s No. 1 resource is not oil or mortgages. Our No. 1 resource is our people. Let�s put people back to work � retrofitting and repowering America. ... You can�t base a national economy on credit cards. But you can base it on solar panels, wind turbines, smart biofuels and a massive program to weatherize every building and home in America.�
The Bush team says that if this bailout is done right, it should make the government money. Great. Let�s hope so, and let�s commit right now that any bailout profits will be invested in infrastructure � smart transmission grids or mass transit � for a green revolution. Let�s �green the bailout,� as Jones says, and help ensure that the American Dream doesn�t ever shrink back to just that � a dream. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Bigfeet

Joined: 29 May 2008 Location: Grrrrr.....
|
Posted: Sun Sep 28, 2008 5:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
America has been slowly getting weaker since the 70s. The financial collapse is just a more apparent symptom of it. But while America weakens, I don't see any other nation getting powerful enough to overtake it.
China had the 2nd largest economy in the world at one time before Mao Zedong ruined it. So they're just going back to where they were before. I don't think they will ever overtake the US. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
djsmnc

Joined: 20 Jan 2003 Location: Dave's ESL Cafe
|
Posted: Sun Sep 28, 2008 5:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| America is in trouble on TV, the internet, and in the press. The mass media is telling you it's over. The media tells you that the war is lost. You believe it. You suck every last bit of mangravy that the media secretes down your throat. You choke on it, then dribble that media snowball in the mouths of those around you. America is about to pimp slap your fruity cheeks and kick you to the curb. Your country does what Meegook dictates. Bend over while we plant our drills your country's backside. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|